Abstract
The Kabartal wetland situated in the upper Indo-Gangetic flood plains in northern India is significant because of its hydrological and ecological services, and the socio-economic and cultural values that it represents. Despite being designated as a wildlife sanctuary, this wetland is under threat from anthropogenic pressures. As in the case of most wetlands, the reason is incomplete information on its ecological services and functions, breakdown of traditional management structures and the lack of appropriate and recognized property rights. Our study assesses the economic linkages between the Kabartal wetland and the local people living around it, through socio-economic surveys and Contingent Valuation Method (CVM). The major objective of the study was to determine the importance of this wetland to the local people and to give an indication of the distribution of the benefits among various stakeholders. The people in the region are poor, have low literacy levels and high dependence on Kabartal and more than 50% want that the wetland should be drained and the land used for agriculture. However, they are willing to participate in collaborative management initiatives with the state. The willingness of people to accept compensation, as an alternative to access to Kabartal wetland, regressed on various socio-economic and attitudinal parameters, gave an estimated mean value of US $27,500 per household over a period of 60 years. This value is a pointer of the total value of access to Kabartal wetland to the surrounding villagers and would be useful when decisions to compensate people for lost access to Kabartal are made.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anon: 2004, Management Action Plan for Kanwar Lake 2004–2005 to 2008–2009. Department of Environment & Forests, Government of Bihar.
Adger, W.N. and Luttrell, C.: 2000, ‘The Values of Wetlands: Landscape and Institutional Perspectives,’ Ecological Economics 35, 75–89.
Badola, R. and Hussain, S.A.: 1999, ‘Collaborative Management of Protected Areas: Approach, Evolution and Success,’ in Background paper presented at the International Technical Consultation on Protected Area Management and Sustainable Rural Development-How can they be Reconciled, Oct 26–29, 1999. Harare, Zimbabwe.
Badola, R. and Hussain, S.A.: 2003, ‘Valuation of Bhitarkanika Mangrove Ecosystem for Ecological Security and Sustainable Resource Use,’ Study Report. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun, India.
Badola, R.: 2000, ‘Local People Amidst the Changing Conservation Ethos: Relationships Between People and Protected Areas in India,’ in T. Enters, P.B. Drust and M. Victor (eds.), Decentralization and Devolution of Forest Management in Asia and the Pacific. RECOFTC Report No. 18 and RAP Publication 2000/1, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 187–204.
Bathla, S. and Parwaiz, A.: 1999, User’s Analysis of Protected Areas—a Case Study of Binsar Wildlife Sanctuary in Kumaon, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore.
Berkes, F.: 1994, ‘Co-Management: Bridging the Two Solitudes,’ Northern Perspectives 22, 18–20.
Bromley, D.W.: 1991, Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. Basil Blackwell Inc., Cambridge, UK, p. 247.
Cummings, R.G., Brookshire, D.S. and Schulze, W.D.: 1986, Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation, Rowman and Allanheld. Totowa, New Jersey.
Filion, F.L.: 1995, ‘Towards an IWRB Specialist Group on the Economic Value of Wetlands,’ Keynote paper Presented at the International Conference on Wetlands and Development, Selangor, Malaysia.
Grimble, R. and Chan, M.K.: 1995, ‘Stakeholders Participation for Natural Resources Management in Developing Countries: Some Practical Guidelines for Making Management More Participatory and Effective,’ Natural Resources Forum 19(2), 113–124.
Hearth, G.: 2004, ‘Incorporating Community Objectives in Improved Wetland Management: The Use of Analytic Hierarchy Process,’ Journal of Environmental Management 70, 263–273.
IUCN: 2003, ‘Valuing Wetlands in Decision Making: Where are we Now? Integrating Wetland Economic Values into River Basin Management,’ Wetland valuation issues paper# 1, IUCN-The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.
Kothari, A. Singh, S. and Suri, S.: 1996, People and Protected Areas –Towards Participatory Conservation in India. Sage Publications Pvt. Ltd, London, 276 pp.
Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T.: 1989, Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future. Washington D.C.
Mitsch, W.J. and Gosselink, J.G.: 2000, Wetlands. 3rd edn. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
Ravenga, C., Brunner, J., Henninger, N., Kassem, K. and Payne, R.: 2000, Pilot Analysis of Global Ecosystems. Freshwater Systems. World Resources Institute, Washington DC.
Rodgers, W.A. and Panwar, H.S.: 1988, ‘Planning Wildlife Protected Area Network in India,’ Report Prepared for the Department of Environment, Forests and Wildlife, GOI, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun, India.
Schlager, E. and Ostrom, E.: 1992, ‘Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis,’ Land Economics 68, 249–262.
Scott, D.A.: 1989, A Directory of Asian Wetland. IUCN. Cambridge, U.K.
Randall, A.K., Sharma, N. and Munasinghe, M.: 1995, ‘Valuing Tropical Forests: Methodology and Case Study of Madagascar,’ World Bank Environment Paper Number 13, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
Streever, W.J., Callaghan-Perry, M., Searles, A., Stevens, T. and Svoboda, P.: 1998, ‘Public Attitudes and Values for Wetland Conservation in New South Wales, Australia,’ Journal of Environmental Management 54, 1–14.
Struhsaker, T.T., Struhsaker, P.J. and Siex, K.S.: 2005, ‘Conserving Africa’s Rain Forests: Problems in Protected Areas and Possible Solutions,’ Biological Conservation 123, 45–54.
Tockner, K. and Stanford, J.A.: 2002, ‘Riverine Flood Plains: Present State and Future Trends,’ Environmental Conservation 29(3), 308–330.
Turner, R.K., van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., Soderqvist, T., Barendregt, A., van der Straaten, J., Maltby, E. and van Ireland, E.C.: 2000, ‘The Values of Wetlands: Landscape and Institutional Perspectives,’ Ecological Economics 35, 7–23.
Udaya Sekhar, N.: 2004, ‘Fisheries in Chilika Lake: How Community Access and Control Impacts their Management,’ Journal of Environmental Management 73, 257–266.
Vitouesk, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Lubchenco, J. and Melillo, J.M.: 1997, ‘Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystem,’ Science 227, 494–499.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ambastha, K., Hussain, S.A. & Badola, R. Social and economic considerations in conserving wetlands of indo-gangetic plains: A case study of Kabartal wetland, India. Environmentalist 27, 261–273 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9003-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9003-1