Skip to main content
Log in

Rural landscape comprehensive evaluation system and case study based on environmental value-added

  • Case study
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increased urban pollution and urban life pressure have increased the importance of rural areas, especially suburban villages. To better carry out the rural landscape design work, and clarify the relationship between the various impact factors of rural landscape, carried out the study of this article. Based on the environment value-added theory, this paper established a comprehensive evaluation system of suburban rural landscapes with landscape productivity, landscape ecology, landscape life, and landscape effect as the standard layer (including 24 sub-indicators), and calculated the weight of each index. At the same time, a quantitative evaluation of Liutian village’s 2016 integrated landscape was carried out. The results showed that the weight values of the four indicators in the standard layer are: landscape productivity (0.3862) > landscape ecology (0.3140) > landscape life (0.1696) > landscape effect (0.1302). The scoring percentage (the actual score divided by the weight value) of the four indicators is ranked as follows: landscape productivity (0.7258) > landscape life (0.6410) > landscape effect (0.5629) > landscape ecology (0.4456). Liutian village’s final score is 0.6005, and the comprehensive landscape evaluation result is average, which can meet the basic needs of landscape users. Through the analysis of the four factors at the standard layer, the problems in the landscape of Liutian village were analyzed, and development suggestions were proposed from the aspects of industry, government, planning, and culture. This research builds a quantitative analysis system for the comprehensive evaluation of rural landscape, which has certain theoretical and practical value for the guidance and evaluation of rural planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The database analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Adelaide, U. O. (2019). Rural transformation: Cherry growing on the Guanzhong Plain, China and the Adelaide Hills, South Australia. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29(5), 675–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksu, G. A., & Küçük, N. (2020). Evaluation of urban topography–biotope–population density relations for Istanbul-Beşiktaş urban landscape using AHP. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(2), 733–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0217-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa-Brandao, V. B. V., Perez-Rodriguez, F., Rojo-Alboreca, A., & Ferreira-Neto, J. (2018). Selection of social and environmental criteria for the delimitation of rural settlements in Galicia, Spain. Revista De La Facultad De Agronomia, 35(1), 108–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Z., Li, J., & Wang, J. (2020). The protection and landscape characteristics of traditional villages in coastal areas of SW China. Journal of Coastal Research. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCR-SI111-062.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervinka, R., Röderer, K., & Hämmerle, I. (2014). Evaluation of hospital gardens and implications for design. Benefits from environmental psychology for architecture and landscape planning. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 31(1), 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng-Ying, H. (2022). Driving factors and innovation paths of rural tourism transformation and upgrading under the background of industrial integration: From the perspective of ecological integration of culture and tourism. Ecological Economy, 18(3), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • China, S. B. O. T. (2017). China statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., Arge, A. R., Groot, R. D., Farberk, S., & Belt, M. V. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics, 25, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Čurović, Ž, Čurović, M., Spalević, V., Janic, M., Sestras, P., & Popović, S. (2019). Identification and evaluation of landscape as a precondition for planning revitalization and development of Mediterranean rural settlements—case study: Mrkovi village, Bay of Kotor, Montenegro. Sustainability-Basel, 11(7), 2039. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, X., & Lu, K. (2020). Protection and construction strategy of rural landscape based on regional perspective: A case study of Wuling Town, Hunan Province. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 780(7), 72005–72008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, T., Xue, Y., & Dong, X. U. (2001). Study on the method applied in garden plant landscape evaluation. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 18(4), 394–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duzgunes, E., & Demirel, O. (2015). Evaluation of rural areas in terms of landscape quality: Salacik Village (Trabzon/Turkey) example. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(6), 310–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, C., Cheng, L., Iqbal, J., & Cheng, D. (2019). An integrated rural development mode based on a tourism-oriented approach: Exploring the beautiful village project in China. Sustainability-Basel, 11(14), 3890. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaodi, X., Caixia, Z., Changsun, Z., Yu, X., & Chunxia, L. (2015). The value of ecosystem services in China. Resources Science, 37(9), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, T., Hai-Qing, Z., Xiao-Dong, G., & Ji-Zhong, D. U. (2012). Evaluation of Ecological Environment in Jingxin Wetland Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Meteorological and Environmental Research, 12, 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J. (2017). Planning implementation evaluation of beautiful countryside planning—based on the cases of Fuzhou beautiful villages. Fujian Architecture and, Construction, 231, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hualin, X., & Liming, L. (2003). Research advance and index system of rural landscape evaluation. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 6(22), 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iiyama, N., Kamada, M., & Nakagoshi, N. (2005). Ecological and social evaluation of landscape in a rural area with terraced paddies in southwestern Japan. Landscape Urban Plan, 70(3–4), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, H., Zhu, L., & Du, J. (2022). Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of the farmers’ sense of gain in the provision of rural infrastructures: The case of tourism-oriented rural areas of China. Sustainability-Basel. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiannan, Q., Shutao, H., Yonghui, F., & Xiaolei, Y. (2015). Analysis of land use landscape patterns in Fujin basedo on remote sensing image. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 40(2), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laterra, P., Orúe, M. E., & Booman, G. C. (2012). Spatial complexity and ecosystem services in rural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 154(3), 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Qi, T., & Zhang, G. (2015). Review and prospect of landscape impact assessment at home and abroad (pp. Annual Meeting of Tourism Geology and Geopark Research Branch of Chinese Geological Society and Symposium on Construction of Mangdang Mountain Geopark and Development of Geotourism.

  • Li, P. (2016). Analysis on financial discrepancies of Henan urban-rural based on the dual structure—The statistical data is collected from1980 to 2013. Economic Survey, 33(2), 144–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, H. (2017). Comprehensive evaluation of rural landscape in Hetuala village of Liaoning Province. Shenyang Agricultural University.

  • Liang, T., & Peng, S. (2017). Using analytic hierarchy process to examine the success factors of autonomous landscape development in rural communities. Sustainability-Basel. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, I. H., Ming, L. L., & Wei, Z. Y. (2003). Studies on the indicator system of rural landscape evaluation and evaluating method. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 24(2), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. (2019). Development model and spatial reconstruction of rural tourism in Hainan from the perspective of agricultural sustainable development. Rev Fac Agron Luz, 36(2), 262–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, H., Zou, J., Pykett, J., & Li, Y. (2011). Analysis of rural transformation development in China since the turn of the new millennium. Applied Geography, 31(3), 1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X., Wang, G., Zhu, C., & Chi, X. (2021). Mapping the challenges to the sustainable operation of suburban villages in a metropolis: A comparative case study from the lens of three stakeholder-led approaches. Land, 10(8), 864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao, Y., Zuo, X., & Fan, H. (2019). Environmental study on harmonious development of rural urbanization construction under the horizon. Ekoloji, 28(107), 4615–4623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannan, S. (2019). Study on landscape evaluation of waterfront public space in villages in Hangzhou city. Zhejiang A and F University.

  • Peng, Y. (2022). Study on the path of building a sports and leisure town with 10,000 mu ecological tea garden in Western Hunan under the background of rural revitalization. Modern Economics and Management Forum, 3(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, T., Zhang, G., Wang, Y., Liu, C., & Li, X. (2017). Research on landscape quality of country parks in Beijing as based on visual and audible senses. Urban for Urban Gree. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rongtao, S. (2022). Accessibility of rural tourism projects in Wan’an county based on highway network data. Landscape Studies, 14(2), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiting, L. (2021). Ecological risk assessment and landscape pattern optimization based on ecosystem services. Shaanxi Normal University.

  • Tan, B., Wang, H., Ma, C., Wang, X., & Zhou, J. (2021). Spatial and temporal measurement of the interaction between the county economy and rural transformation in Xinjiang, China. Sustainability-Basel, 13, 5318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Y., Qian, J., & Wang, L. (2021). Village classification in metropolitan suburbs from the perspective of urban-rural integration and improvement strategies: A case study of Wuhan, central China. Land Use Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, A., Tu, R., Yue, W., Liu, Y., & Wu, Y. (2020). Construction and case study of rural environmental value-added evaluation system based on emergy theory. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1.

  • Wan, A., Chen, H., Xie, X., & Liu, Y. (2022a). Rural landscape comprehensive evaluation system and case study based on environmental value-added. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 7349–7360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, A., Qi, X., Yue, W., & Tu, R. (2022b). Construction and case verification of rural environmental value-added evaluation system. Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 24, 1781–1797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Zhang, X., Yang, M., Gou, X., Liu, B., Hao, Y., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2021). Multi-site evaluation of accumulated temperature and rainfall for maize yield and disease in loess plateau. Agriculture, 11.

  • Wang, X. (2021). The practice teaching of regional cultural expression in rural landscape planning and design under the background of urban-rural integration. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 1917861758.

  • Wang, B., Yue, M. A., & Peng, X. (2018). Research on the evaluation system of woody landscape plants maintenance. Agricultural Biotechnology, 7(02), 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Li, Y., Yang, X., Zhang, Z., Gao, S., Zhou, Q., & Guo, Z. (2021a). Evaluating urban ecological civilization and its obstacle factors based on integrated model of PSR-EVW-TOPSIS: A case study of 13 cities in Jiangsu Province. China. Ecol Indic, 133, 108431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., & Huang, H. (2018). Study on the method of town landscape evaluation in urban fringe—a case study in Hefei. Architecture and Culture, 6, 71–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W. (2019). Analysis of three relations in rural tourism development of china Guizhou under the strategic background of rural vitalization. Fresen Environ Bull, 28(4), 2733–2738.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Q., Zhang, X., Xu, Y., & Li, T. (2016). Dualities of semi-urbanization villages in social-spatial transition: A case study of Zhoucun village in suburban Nanjing, China. Journal of Rural Studies, S258994824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Z. (2023). Research on urban domestic sewage treatment technology and development trends under the background of rural tourism development. International Journal of Science and Engineering Applications, 12(4), 92–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, H., Liu Li, M., & Zhao, Y. (2003). Studies on the indicator system of rural landscape evaluation and evaluating method. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2, 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, H., Zhu, Z., He, Y., Zeng, X., & Wen, Y. (2022). Integrated framework of rural landscape research: Based on the global perspective. Landscape Ecology, 37(4), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, W. (2021). Exploring the traditional farming culture and improving the local cultural confidence: Solving the problem of rural tourism homogenization (pp. E3S Web of Conferences).

  • Yang, C. (2017). Research on rural tourism development model under the background of precision poverty alleviation. Agro Food Industry Hi-Tech, 28(1), 1191–1195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yangting, J., Yanni, L., Wei, C., Chenyang, L., & Yanyun, L. (2016). Evaluation on waterfront plantscape of urban-park in Chengdu. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 31(3), 291–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, X. H. (2019). The landscape evaluation system of ecotourism villages in qinling mountains. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1704_89558968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelenakova, M., Petrilakova, A., & Galas, S. (2011). Evaluation of the development potential of the village Spisske Bystre, Slovakia. [Conference Paper] Conference on Public Recreation and Landscape Protection—Hand in Hand, Mendel Univ, Fac Forestry and Wood Technol, Dept Landscape Management, Brno, CZECH REPUBLIC.

  • Zhang, Q., Liu, W., & Yu, Z. (2015). Landscape character assessment framework in rural area: A case study in Qiaokou, Changsha, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 5, 252–262

  • Zhang, R., & Zhang, X. (2022). Spatial-temporal differentiation and the driving mechanism of rural transformation development in the Yangtze River economic belt. Sustainability-Basel, 14.

  • Zhang, L., Zhu, K., & Li, X. (2018). CSA mode and its planning strategy of suburban rural development in the context of rural revitalization—A case study of Taoxi area Sanshigang Town Hefei City. Journal of Chizhou University, 32(03), 6–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Ge, X. (2021). Construction and application of beautiful rural landscape evaluation model using computer eye tracking technology. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1915(3), 32092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, T., Zhao, Y., & Li, M. (2019). Landscape performance for coordinated development of rural communities and small-towns based on “ecological priority and all-area integrated development”: Six case studies in east China’s Zhejiang Province. Sustainability-Basel, 11(15), 4096. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Dai, R., Yang, Y., Li, F., Zhang, Y., & Wang, X. (2022). Integrated evaluation of resource and environmental carrying capacity during the transformation of resource-exhausted cities based on Euclidean distance and a Gray-TOPSIS model: A case study of Jiaozuo City, China. Ecological Indicators, 142, 109282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Z. G., Yu, D., Han, C. Y., & Wang, K. R. (2017). Ecosystem services value prediction and driving forces in the Poyang Lake Eco-economic Zone. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(24), 11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by the Weinan County Government of Shaanxi Province.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajun Wan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests.

Consent for publication

The authors declare that they agree with the publication of this paper in this journal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tu, R., Wan, A., Chen, H. et al. Rural landscape comprehensive evaluation system and case study based on environmental value-added. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04993-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04993-9

Keywords

Navigation