Abstract
Relevant research has indicated that China’s transfer payment in National Key Ecological Function zones (hereafter TPNKEFZ) is expected to protect the environment and improve people's livelihoods. The effectiveness of the TPNKEFZ on environmental protection has been confirmed, but the quantitative impact and mechanism of the TPNKEFZ on green poverty reduction have not been emphasized. In this study, we examine the impact of the capital scale of TPNKEFZ on green poverty reduction in the Yanshan-Taihang Mountainous area, and we further investigate the green poverty reduction mechanism and the spillover effect of the TPNKEFZ. The results show that: (1) The capital scale of TPNKEFZ can significantly promote green poverty reduction, and the conclusion remains valid after the robustness test. The results of heterogeneity tests show that the green poverty reduction effect of the TPNKEFZ is more prominent in resource-based eco-cities and impoverished areas; (2) The results of mediating effect tests show that the TPNKEFZ enhances green poverty reduction through promoting the upgrading of industrial structure. As the level of the upgrading of industrial structure rises, the role of the capital scale of TPNKEFZ in promoting green poverty reduction has increased significantly. Specifically, when the level of industrial structure’s upgrading crosses the threshold value of 0.6294, the green poverty reduction index increases from 0.80 to 1.42% for every 1% increase in the TPNKEFZ, with the environmental protection index increasing from 0.02 to 0.39%; (3) The results of spatial effect tests indicate that the TPNKEFZ has a positive spatial spillover effect on green poverty reduction. In summary, the findings highlight the significant promoting role of the capital scale of TPNKEFZ on green poverty reduction in both local and neighboring areas. It also underscores the importance of appropriately exceeding the transfer payment scale, implementing differentiated strategies based on resource endowments and poverty levels, adjusting the balance between the tertiary and secondary industries to promote the industrial structure’s upgrading, and establishing a regional synergy mechanism for TPNKEFZ.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
A portion of the datasets covering economic, social and environmental aspects generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. However, the datasets covering the transfer payments involving National Key Ecological Function Zones are not publicly available because of the financial implications of the datasets and the request for confidentiality in the government's letter.
References
Adams, W. M., Aveling, R., Brockington, D., et al. (2004). Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science, 306(5699), 1146–1149.
Bao, B., Zeng, H., Xiao, W., et al. (2022). The spatial effect of transfer payments for key ecological function zones on the development of ecological industry: A case study of 80 counties in Jiangxi province. Journal of Natural Resources, 37(10), 2720–2735.
Benra, F., Nahuelhual, L., Felipe-Lucia, M., et al. (2022). Balancing ecological and social goals in PES design – Single objective strategies are not sufficient. Ecosystem Services, 53, 101385.
Busch, J., Ring, I., Akullo, M., et al. (2021). A global review of ecological fiscal transfers. Nature Sustainability, 4(9), 756–765.
Chen, S., Hou, M., Wang, X., et al. (2023). Transfer payment in national key ecological functional areas and economic development: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(2), 4075–4095.
China Institute For Poverty Reductioni B N U. (2016) China Green Poverty Reduction Index Report 2016. Beijing: THE ECONOMIC DAILY PRESS.
Dong, X., Zhang, X., & Zhou, Q. (2023). Underload and overload communities: Revealing the conflicts between population distribution and carrying capacity at an inner-city community scale. Sustainable Cities and Society, 98, 104793.
Droste, N., Lima, G. R., May, P. H., et al. (2017). Municipal responses to ecological fiscal transfers in Brazil: A microeconometric panel data approach. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(4), 378–393.
DROSTE, N., RING, I., et al. (2018). Ecological fiscal transfers in Europe - Evidence-based design options for a transnational scheme. Ecological Economics, 147, 373–382.
Du, J., Fang, S., Sheng, Z., et al. (2020). Variations in vegetation dynamics and its cause in national key ecological function zones in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(24), 30145–30161.
Du, W., Yan, H., Feng, Z., et al. (2021). The supply-consumption relationship of ecological resources under ecological civilization construction in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 172, 105679.
Gan, C., Zheng, R., & Yu, D. (2011). An empirical study on the effects of industrial structure on economic growth and fluctuations in China. Economic Research Journal, 5, 14.
Gao, X., Huang, B., Hou, Y., et al. (2020). Using ecosystem service flows to inform ecological compensation: Theory & application. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093340
Gong, J. (2021). Do industrial pollution activities in China respond to ecological fiscal transfers? Evidence from payments to national key ecological function zones. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1813695
Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93(2), 345–368.
Hu, S., Yang, Y., Zheng, H., et al. (2022). A framework for assessing sustainable agriculture and rural development: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 97, 106861.
Imai, K. S. (2011). Poverty, undernutrition and vulnerability in rural India: Role of rural public works and food for work programmes. International Review of Applied Economics, 25(6), 669–691.
Jiang, W., & Jiahua, P. (2018). Can environmental protection in ecological functional zones break free from the constraints of focusing just on economic benefits?— A case study of the plateau ecological zone’s Tiamitcheen. Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies, 6(03), 65–78.
Jin, S. (2021) Impact of transfer payment in key ecological function areas on green poverty reduction——Take Jiangxi province as an example. Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics
Jin, S., Jiang, A., & Bao, B. (2023). Can China’s transfer payment in key ecological function areas reduce the carbon intensity?—Quasi—natural experimental evidence from Jiangxi, China. Ecological Indicators, 154, 110537.
Ju, F., Zhou, J., & Jiang, K. (2022). Evolution of stakeholders’ behavioral strategies in the ecological compensation mechanism for poverty alleviation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 176, 105915.
Koutroumpis, P. (2009). The economic impact of broadband on growth: A simultaneous approach. Telecommunications Pol, 33(9), 471–485.
Le-Rong, Y. U., & Xion-Yun, L. I. (2021). The effects of social security expenditure on reducing income inequality and rural poverty in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(4), 1060–1067.
Lesage, J P., Fischer, M. M. (2009) The impact of knowledge capital on regional total factor productivity. Available at SSRN 1088301
Lichtenberg, E., & SMITH-RAMíREZ, R. (2011). Slippage in conservation cost sharing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93(1), 113–129.
Liu, G., Wen, Y., Xie, J., et al. (2020). Evolution of transfer payment policy for national key ecological function areas and suggestions for improvement. Environmental Protection, 48(17), 9–14.
Luo, H., Zhao, S., Peng, W. (2016) Study on ecological compensation for Shaying river provincial water function zone. In: Proceedings of the international conference on sustainable energy & environmental engineering
Ma, B., Qin, L., & Liu, H. (2021). Effect evaluation of transfer payment on improving county ecological environment quality in national key ecological function areas. ACTA ECOLOGICA SINICA, 41(22), 8833–8844.
Ma, B., Sun, Y., & Qin, L. (2022). Counties’ economic effect of ecological protection policies in China: Evidence from national key ecological function zones. China Environmental Science, 42(12), 13.
Muradian, R., Arsel, M., Pellegrini, L., et al. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions. Conservation Letters, 6(4), 274–279.
Normile, D. (2016). China Rethinks Cities. Science, 352(6288), 916–918.
Ola, O., Menapace, L., Benjamin, E., et al. (2019). Determinants of the environmental conservation and poverty alleviation objectives of payments for ecosystem services (PES) programs. Ecosystem Services, 35, 52–66.
Pan, D., & Tang, J. (2020). The effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on water pollution control: Quasi-natural experimental evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment, 751(5), 141550.
Pan, X., Xu, L., Yang, Z., et al. (2017). Payments for ecosystem services in China: Policy, practice, and progress. Journal of Cleaner Production, 158, 200–208.
Qin, B., Yu, Y., Ge, L., et al. (2022). Does eco-compensation alleviate rural poverty? New evidence from national key ecological function areas in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10899.
Ran, R., Xie, M., & Hua, L. (2023). How to break the environment-economic trap in rocky desertification contiguous poverty-stricken areas: The mediating effect of industrial structure upgrading. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 30(5), 576–590.
Santos, R., Ring, I., Antunes, P., et al. (2012). Fiscal transfers for biodiversity conservation: The portuguese local finances law. Land Use Policy, 29(2), 261–273.
Song, M., Huang, D., & Paudel, B. (2023). A supply-demand framework for eco-compensation calculation and allocation in China’s national key ecological function areas—A case study in the Yangtze river economic belt. Land, 12(1), 7.
Townsend, P. (1979) Poverty in The United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living. Nursing Research
van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Brauer, M., et al. (2016). Global estimates of fine particulate matter using a combined geophysical-statistical method with information from satellites, models, and monitors. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(7), 3762–3772.
Wu, L., & Jin, L. (2020). How eco-compensation contribute to poverty reduction: A perspective from different income group of rural households in Guizhou, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122962.
Wu, F., Wang, W., Hong, J., et al. (2023). Environmental decentralization and green development: The mediating role of industrial upgrading. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30(44), 99965–99978.
Wunder, S. (2008). Payments for environmental services and the poor: Concepts and preliminary evidence. Environment and Development Economics, 13(3), 279–297.
Yamineva, Y., & Liu, Z. (2019). Cleaning the air, protecting the climate: Policy, legal and institutional nexus to reduce black carbon emissions in China. Environmental Science & Policy, 95, 1–10.
Yue, L., Xue, D., Draz, M. U., et al. (2020). The double-edged sword of urbanization and its nexus with eco-efficiency in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020446
Zhai, J., Liu, Y., Hou, P., et al. (2016). Water conservation service assessment and its spatiotemporal features in national key ecological function zones. Advances in Meteorology, 2016, 5194091.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the project of Science and Technology Planning Project of Hebei Provincial Department of Science and Technology (decision number: 225576117D) awarded to GZ, the Key Program of Humanities and Social Sciences of Hebei Provincial Department of Education (decision number: ZD202311) awarded to JN, the Graduate Student Innovation Ability Training Funding Project of Hebei Province (decision number: CXZZSS2023137) awarded to QY, and the National Pre-research Project of Hebei GEO University (decision number: KY2024YB21) awarded to GZ.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yuan, Q., Zhang, G., Ma, X. et al. Can China’s transfer payment in national key ecological function zones promote green poverty reduction? Quasi-natural experiment evidence from China. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04922-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04922-w