Abstract
The agglomeration of technological talents is important for achieving carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. This paper analyzes the logical relationship between technological talent agglomeration and carbon emission efficiency. Following this, an empirical test with Chinese provincial panel data is conducted. The study concludes that: (1) The agglomeration of technological talents can improve carbon emission efficiency. This is shown by the fact that for every 1 unit increase in the level of scientific and technological talent agglomeration, China’s carbon emission efficiency will increase by 0.0391 units. This conclusion is still valid after alleviating endogenous problems. (2) At present, development research in China is not yet able to improve carbon emission efficiency, and only basic and applied research can significantly improve carbon emission efficiency. Educational heterogeneity shows that undergraduate agglomeration has no significant effect on improving carbon efficiency. The agglomeration of people with master’s and doctoral degrees can significantly improve carbon emission efficiency. Indeed, the higher the education level, the stronger this promotion effect is. (3) In addition to the direct effect, the mechanism test also concluded that the technological talent agglomeration mainly improves carbon emission efficiency by promoting green technology innovation and optimizing industrial structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The dataset used for this study will be made available upon request.
References
Adams, S., Adedoyin, F., Olaniran, E., & Bekun, F. V. (2020). Energy consumption, economic policy uncertainty and carbon emissions; causality evidence from resource rich economies. Economic Analysis and Policy, 68, 179–190.
Apaydın, A., & Ocakoğlu, F. (2020). Response of the Mogan and Eymir lakes (Ankara, Central Anatolia) to global warming: Extreme events in the last 100 years. Journal of Arid Environments, 183, 104299.
Asheim, B., Coenen, L., & Vang, J. (2007). Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: Sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25, 655–670.
Bano, S., Zhao, Y., Ahmad, A., Wang, S., & Liu, Y. (2018). Identifying the impacts of human capital on carbon emissions in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 1082–1092.
Cecchini, L., Venanzi, S., Pierri, A., & Chiorri, M. (2018). Environmental efficiency analysis and estimation of CO2 abatement costs in dairy cattle farms in Umbria (Italy): A SBM-DEA model with undesirable output. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 895–907.
Chen, Y., Fan, Z., Gu, X., & Zhou, L. (2020). Arrival of young talent: The send-down movement and rural education in China. American Economic Review, 110(11), 3393–3430.
Chen, Y., Wong, C. W. Y., Yang, R., & Miao, X. (2021). Optimal structure adjustment strategy, emission reduction potential and utilization efficiency of fossil energies in China. Energy, 237, 121623.
Cubas, G., Ravikumar, B., & Ventura, G. (2016). Talent, labor quality, and economic development. Review of Economic Dynamics, 21, 160–181.
Della Peruta, M. R., Del Giudice, M., Lombardi, R., & Soto-Acosta, P. (2018). Open innovation, product development, and inter-company relationships within regional knowledge clusters. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9, 680–693.
Dinan, T. (2017). Projected increases in hurricane damage in the united states: the role of climate change and coastal development. Ecological Economics, 138, 186–198.
Dong, B., Xu, Y., & Fan, X. (2020a). How to achieve a win-win situation between economic growth and carbon emission reduction: Empirical evidence from the perspective of industrial structure upgrading. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(35), 43829–43844.
Dong, B., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Confucianism and science. Explorations in Economic History, 91, 101517.
Dong, F., Li, Y., Gao, Y., Zhu, J., Qin, C., & Zhang, X. (2022a). Energy transition and carbon neutrality: Exploring the non-linear impact of renewable energy development on carbon emission efficiency in developed countries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 177, 106002.
Dong, F., Zhu, J., Li, Y., Chen, Y., Gao, Y., Hu, M., Qin, C., & Sun, J. (2022b). How green technology innovation affects carbon emission efficiency: Evidence from developed countries proposing carbon neutrality targets. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 35780–35799.
Dong, Y., Jin, G., & Deng, X. (2020b). Dynamic interactive effects of urban land-use efficiency, industrial transformation, and carbon emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270, 122547.
DoS. 2021. The Long-Term Strategy of the United States: Pathways to Net-Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050
Du, K., & Li, J. (2019). Towards a green world: How do green technology innovations affect total-factor carbon productivity. Energy Policy, 131, 240–250.
Fang, G., Gao, Z., Tian, L., & Fu, M. (2022). What drives urban carbon emission efficiency? Spatial analysis based on nighttime light data. Applied Energy, 312, 118772.
Gu, G., Zheng, H., Tong, L., & Dai, Y. (2022). Does carbon financial market as an environmental regulation policy tool promote regional energy conservation and emission reduction? Empirical Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 163, 112826.
Guo, X., Deng, M., Wang, X., & Yang, X. (2024). Population agglomeration in Chinese cities: is it benefit or damage for the quality of economic development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31 (7), 10106–10118.
Gulbrandsen, M., & Kyvik, S. (2010). Are the concepts basic research, applied research and experimental development still useful? An empirical investigation among Norwegian academics. Science and Public Policy, 37(5), 343–353.
Han, J.-S., & Lee, J.-W. (2020). Demographic change, human capital, and economic growth in Korea. Japan and the World Economy, 53, 100984.
He, A., Xue, Q., Zhao, R., & Wang, D. (2021a). Renewable energy technological innovation, market forces, and carbon emission efficiency. Science of the Total Environment, 796, 148908.
He, F., Du, H., & Yu, B. (2022). Corporate ESG performance and manager misconduct: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 82, 102201.
He, K., Chen, W., & Zhang, L. (2021b). Senior management’s academic experience and corporate green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120664.
Hu, C., Mao, J., Tian, M., Wei, Y., Guo, L., & Wang, Z. (2021). Distance matters: Investigating how geographic proximity to ENGOs triggers green innovation of heavy-polluting firms in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 279, 111542.
Hu, G.-G. (2021). Is knowledge spillover from human capital investment a catalyst for technological innovation? The curious case of fourth industrial revolution in BRICS economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120327.
Hu, T.-S. (2008). Interaction among high-tech talent and its impact on innovation performance: A comparison of Taiwanese science parks at different stages of development. European Planning Studies, 16, 163–187.
Hu, T.-s, Lin, C.-y, & Chang, S.-L. (2005). Role of interaction between technological communities and industrial clustering in innovative activity: The case of Hsinchu district. Taiwan. Urban Studies, 42, 1139–1160.
Huang, C., Zhang, X., & Liu, K. (2021a). Effects of human capital structural evolution on carbon emissions intensity in China: A dual perspective of spatial heterogeneity and nonlinear linkages. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135, 110258.
Huang, H., Patricola, C. M., Winter, J. M., Osterberg, E. C., & Mankin, J. S. (2021b). Rise in Northeast US extreme precipitation caused by Atlantic variability and climate change. Weather and Climate Extremes, 33, 100351.
IPCC. (2022). Climate change 2022: mitigation of climate change
Jiang, M., An, H., & Gao, X. (2022). Adjusting the global industrial structure for minimizing global carbon emissions: A network-based multi-objective optimization approach. Science of the Total Environment, 829, 154653.
Jiang, X., Fu, W., & Li, G. (2020). Can the improvement of living environment stimulate urban Innovation?—Analysis of high-quality innovative talents and foreign direct investment spillover effect mechanism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 120212.
Jin, P., Peng, C., & Song, M. (2019). Macroeconomic uncertainty, high-level innovation, and urban green development performance in China. China Economic Review, 55, 1–18.
Khattak, S. I., & Ahmad, M. (2022). The cyclical impact of green and sustainable technology research on carbon dioxide emissions in BRICS economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 22687–22707.
Kuang, H., Akmal, Z., & Li, F. (2022). Measuring the effects of green technology innovations and renewable energy investment for reducing carbon emissions in China. Renewable Energy. 197: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.091
Li, D., & Yao, Q. (2024). A pathway towards high-quality development of the manufacturing industry: Does scientific and technological talent matter? PLoS ONE, 19(3), e294873.
Li, H., & Liu, B. (2022). The effect of industrial agglomeration on China’s carbon intensity: Evidence from a dynamic panel model and a mediation effect model. Energy Reports, 8, 96–103.
Lian, G., Xu, A., & Zhu, Y. (2022). Substantive green innovation or symbolic green innovation? The impact of ER on enterprise green innovation based on the dual moderating effects. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(3), 100203.
Lin, B., & Ma, R. (2022). Green technology innovations, urban innovation environment and CO2 emission reduction in China: Fresh evidence from a partially linear functional-coefficient panel model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121434.
Lin, B., & Zhang, A. (2023). Can government environmental regulation promote low-carbon development in heavy polluting industries? Evidence from China’s new environmental protection law. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 99, 106991.
Liu, C., Ma, C., & Xie, R. (2020). Structural, innovation and efficiency effects of environmental regulation: evidence from china’s carbon emissions trading pilot. Environmental and Resource Economics, 75, 741–768.
Liu, J., Li, M., & Ding, Y. (2021). Econometric analysis of the impact of the urban population size on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 18186–18203.
Liu, X., Zhang, X., & Sun, W. (2022). Does the agglomeration of urban producer services promote carbon efficiency of manufacturing industry? Land Use Policy, 120, 106264.
Luo, Y., Lu, Z., Salman, M., & Song, S. (2022). Impacts of heterogenous technological innovations on green productivity: An empirical study from 261 cities in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 334, 130241.
Mayer-Haug, K., Read, S., Brinckmann, J., Dew, N., & Grichnik, D. (2013). Entrepreneurial talent and venture performance: A meta-analytic investigation of SMEs. Research Policy, 42, 1251–1273.
Oh, D.-h. (2010). A metafrontier approach for measuring an environmentally sensitive productivity growth index. Energy Economics, 32, 146–157.
Pantouvakis, A., & Vlachos, I. (2020). Talent and leadership effects on sustainable performance in the maritime industry. Transportation Research Part d: Transport and Environment, 86, 102440.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71–S102.
Shao, Y., & Chen, Z. (2022). Can government subsidies promote the green technology innovation transformation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Economic Analysis and Policy, 74, 716–727.
Shi, X., & Xu, Y. (2022). Evaluation of China’s pilot low-carbon program: A perspective of industrial carbon emission efficiency. Atmospheric Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2022.101446
Song, W., Mao, H., & Han, X. (2021). The two-sided effects of foreign direct investment on carbon emissions performance in China. Science of the Total Environment, 791, 148331.
Tarazkar, M. H., Dehbidi, N. K., Ozturk, I., & Al-Mulali, U. (2021). The impact of age structure on carbon emission in the Middle East: The panel autoregressive distributed lag approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 33722–33734.
TCFM. (2020). Statement by Xi Jinping President of the People’s Republic of China at the general debate of the 75th session of the United Nations General Assembly
Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010). An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA–a third pole of technical efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 1554–1563.
UNEP. (2020). Emissions Gap Report 2020
Van Soest, H. L., et al. (2021). Global roll-out of comprehensive policy measures may aid in bridging emissions gap. Nature Communications, 12, 6419.
Wang, Z., & Shao, H. (2024). Spatiotemporal interactions and influencing factors for carbon emission efficiency of cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. China. Sustain Cities Soc, 103, 105248.
Wang, J., & Deng, K. (2022). Impact and mechanism analysis of smart city policy on urban innovation: Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 73, 574–587.
Wang, L., Wang, H., Cao, Z., He, Y., Dong, Z., & Wang, S. (2022). Can industrial intellectualization reduce carbon emissions?—Empirical evidence from the perspective of carbon total factor productivity in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 121969.
Wang, M., & Feng, C. (2021). Revealing the pattern and evolution of global green development between different income groups: A global meta-frontier by-production technology approach. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 106600.
Wang, M., Xu, M., & Ma, S. (2021). The effect of the spatial heterogeneity of human capital structure on regional green total factor productivity. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 59, 427–441.
Wei, F., Zhang, X., Chu, J., Yang, F., & Yuan, Z. (2021). Energy and environmental efficiency of China’s transportation sectors considering CO2 emission uncertainty. Transportation Research Part d: Transport and Environment, 97, 102955.
Wei, L., & Liu, Z. (2022). Spatial heterogeneity of demographic structure effects on urban carbon emissions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 95, 106790.
Wu, Y., & Gao, X. (2022). Can the establishment of eco-industrial parks promote urban green innovation? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 341, 130855.
Xu, L., Fan, M., Yang, L., & Shao, S. (2021). Heterogeneous green innovations and carbon emission performance: Evidence at China’s city level. Energy Economics, 99, 105269.
Xu, Q., Zhong, M., & Cao, M. (2022). Does digital investment affect carbon efficiency? Spatial effect and mechanism discussion. Science of the Total Environment, 827, 154321.
Yan, Y., Xu, X., & Lai, J. (2021). Does Confucian culture influence corporate R&D investment? Evidence from Chinese private firms. Finance Research Letters, 40, 101719.
Yang, S., Wang, W., Feng, D., & Lu, J. (2022). Impact of pilot environmental policy on urban eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 341, 130858.
Yao, Y., Ivanovski, K., Inekwe, J., & Smyth, R. (2020). Human capital and CO2 emissions in the long run. Energy Economics, 91, 104907.
Ye, J., Wan, Q., Li, R., Yao, Z., & Huang, D. (2022). How do R&D agglomeration and economic policy uncertainty affect the innovative performance of Chinese high-tech industry? Technology in Society, 69, 101957.
You, J., & Zhang, W. (2022). How heterogeneous technological progress promotes industrial structure upgrading and industrial carbon efficiency? Evidence from China’s Industries. Energy, 247, 123386.
Yu, Y., Huang, J., & Zhang, N. (2019). Modeling the eco-efficiency of Chinese prefecture-level cities with regional heterogeneities: A comparative perspective. Ecological Modelling, 402, 1–17.
Yu, Y., & Zhang, N. (2021). Low-carbon city pilot and carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China. Energy Economics, 96, 105125.
Zameer, H., Wang, Y., Vasbieva, D. G., & Abbas, Q. (2021). Exploring a pathway to carbon neutrality via reinforcing environmental performance through green process innovation, environmental orientation and green competitive advantage. Journal of Environmental Management, 296, 113383.
Zhang, W., Liu, X., Zhao, S., & Tang, T. (2024). Does green finance agglomeration improve carbon emission performance in China? A perspective of spatial spillover. Applied Energy, 358, 122561.
Zhao, J., Jiang, Q., Dong, X., Dong, K., & Jiang, H. (2022). How does industrial structure adjustment reduce CO2 emissions? Spatial and mediation effects analysis for China. Energy Economics, 105, 105704.
Zheng, S., & Du, R. (2020). How does urban agglomeration integration promote entrepreneurship in China? Evidence from regional human capital spillovers and market integration. Cities, 97, 102529.
Zhou, Y. (2018). Human capital, institutional quality and industrial upgrading: Global insights from industrial data. Economic Change and Restructuring, 51(1), 1–27.
Zhu, B., Zhang, M., Zhou, Y., Wang, P., Sheng, J., He, K., Wei, Y., & Xie, R. (2019). Exploring the effect of industrial structure adjustment on interprovincial green development efficiency in China: A novel integrated approach. Energy Policy, 134, 110946.
Zhu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2014). An Optimal Balanced Economic Growth and Abatement Pathway for China Under the Carbon Emissions Budget. Computational Economics, 44, 253–268.
Zhu, Y., Du, W., & Zhang, J. (2022). Does industrial collaborative agglomeration improve environmental efficiency? Insights from China’s population structure. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(4), 5072–5091.
Acknowledgements
This study was collectively funded by the General Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province [No. 2020SJA0199].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PZ: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. YQ: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition. XW: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing. FY: conceptualization, methodology.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, P., Qian, Y., Wang, X. et al. Can technological talent agglomeration improve carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from China. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04909-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04909-7