Abstract
In 2014, Taoyuan County and Taoyuan City were consolidated and promoted as a special municipality. However, with numerous migrants entering the existing industrial area, the resultant pollution and carbon footprint have urged competent authorities to take certain actions and respond to the city’s demand to maintain a sustainable environment. Therefore, the study explores the factors influencing energy efficiency and carbon reduction (EECR) actions during urbanization, with Taoyuan City, Taiwan as the research subject. Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted to compile the factors influencing the EECR actions of Taoyuan City. Subsequently, a quantitative questionnaire was distributed to identify influential factors. The results revealed that contextual factors of EECR policies, especially the support from local residents in Taoyuan, exerted a major effect on the implementation of EECR actions. Besides, the supporting regulations and professional training (pertaining to the human resources aspect) all exerted the effect as well. Accordingly, suggestions with the respect for the supportively contextual factors were provided to facilitate the pursuit of a low-carbon society.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (1998). Multinetwork management: Collaboration and the hollow state in local economic policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024374. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1181756
Betsill, M. M. (2001). Mitigating climate change in US cities: Opportunities and obstacles. Local Environment, 6(4), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830120091699
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
Campbell, E., Uppalapati, S. S., Kotcher, J., & Maibach, E. (2023). Communication research to improve engagement with climate change and human health: A review. Front Public Health, 10, 1086858. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1086858
Chen, S. H., & Kao, W. C. (2022). County-city consolidation and sustainability: Empirical evidence from Taiwan’s local experience in the 2010s. Journal of Urban Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2022.2050919
Commercon, F. A., Goldberg, M. H., Lacroix, K., Carman, J. P., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2023). Evaluating the terms americans use to refer to carbon emissions. Environmental Communication, 17(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2156907
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (2008). The new environmental paradigm. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.1.19-28
Hanf, K., & O’Toole, L. Jr. (1992). Revisiting old friends: Networks, implementation structures and the management of interorganizational relations. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00293.x
Johns-Putra, A. (2016). Climate change in literature and literary studies: From cli-fi, climate change theater and ecopoetry to ecocriticism and climate change criticism. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(2), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.385
Kreslake, J. M., Price, K. M., & Sarfaty, M. (2016). Developing effective communication materials on the health effects of climate change for vulnerable groups: A mixed methods study. Bmc Public Health. http://doi.org/16:946.
Liu, J. (2017). Integration across a metacoupled world. Ecology and Society, 22(4), 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09830-220429
Ma, C. C. (2012). A study on the policy argument and cognition of values of local sustainable development: The case of anti-idling policy in Tainan. Journal of Public Affairs Review, 13(1), 75–113. https://doi.org/10.29622/JPAR.201206.0005
Marvin, S., & Guy, S. (1998). Creating myths rather than sustainability: The transition fallacies of the new localism. Local Environment, 2, 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839708725536
McEvoy, D., Gibbs, D. C., & Longhurst, J. W. S. (2001). Reducing residential carbon intensity: The new role for English local authorities. Urban Studies, 38(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980123554
National Council for Sustainable Development, NCSD (2009). Executive Yuan Taiwan sustainable development goalshttps://nsdn.iweb6.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E8%83%BD%E6%BA%90%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E7%B6%B1%E9%A0%98.pdf
Nielsen, K. S., Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Gilligan, J. M., van Vuuren, D. P., Figueroa, M. J., & Wood, R. (2020). Improving climate change mitigation analysis: A framework for examining feasibility. One Earth, 3(3), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.007
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1981). Control and power in central-local government relationships. Gower.
Ripple, W., Wolf, C., Newsome, T., Barnard, P., Moomaw, W., & Grandcolas, P. (2020). World scientists’ warning of a climate emergency. BioScience, 70(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz088/5610806
Rucker, J. M., Murphy, M. C., & Quintanilla, V. D. (2019). The immigrant labeling effect: The role of immigrant group labels in prejudice against noncitizens. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(8), 1139–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218818744
Rutland, T., & Aylett, A. (2008). The work of policy: Actor networks, governmentality, and local action on climate change Portland, Oregon. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(4), 627–646. https://doi.org/10.1068/d6907
Schneider-Mayerson, M. (2017). Climate change fiction. In R. G. Smith (Ed.), American literature in transition: 2000–2010 (pp. 309–321). Cambridge University Press.
Schneider-Mayerson, M., Gustafson, A., Leiserowitz, A., Goldberg, M. H., Rosenthal, S. A., & Ballew, M. (2023). Environmental literature as persuasion: An experimental test of the effects of reading climate fiction. Environmental Communication, 17(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1814377
Scholz, J. T., Berardo, R., & Kile, B. (2008). Do networks solve collective action problems? Credibility, search, and collaboration. The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080389
Schuldt, J. P., Enns, P. K., Konrath, S., & Schwarz, N. (2020). Shifting views on global warming and climate change in the United States. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101414
Souza, G. M., Ballester, M. V. R., de Brito Cruz, C. H., Chum, H., Dale, B., Dale, V. H., Fernandes, E. C. M., Foust, T., Karp, A., & Lynd, L. (2017). The role of Bioenergy in a climate-changing World. Environmental Development, 23, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2017.02.008
Stern, P. C. (2000). Towards a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
Sun, J., Mooney, H., Wu, W., Tang, H., Tong, Y., Xu, Z., Huang, B., Cheng, Y., Yang, X., Wei, D., Zhang, F., & Liu, J. (2018). Importing food damages domestic environment: Evidence from global soybean trade. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(21), 5415–5419. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718153115
Taoyuan City Government (2015). Future Taoyuan—Policy planning of low carbon green city. Taoyuan City Government. https://greencity.tydep.gov.tw/views/home/index.php
Tromboni, F., Liu, J., Ziaco, E., Breshears, D. D., Thompson, K. L., Dodds, W. K., Dahlin, K. M., LaRue, E. A., Thorp, J. H., Viña, A., Laguë, M. M., Maasri, A., Yang, H., Chandra, S., & Fei, S. (2021). Macrosystems as metacoupled human and natural systems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 19(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2289
Wondolleck, J. M., & Yaffee, S. L. (2000). Making collaboration work. Island.
Worthington, I., Patton, D., & Lindley, I. (2003). Local authorities, business and LA21: A study of east midlands sustainable development partnerships. Local Government Studies, 29(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/714004179
Yang, H., Dietz, T., Li, Y., Dou, Y., Wang, Y., Huang, Q., Zhang, J., Songer, M., & Liu, J. (2022). Unraveling human drivers behind complex interrelationships among sustainable development goals: A demonstration in a flagship protected area. Ecology and Society, 27(3), 15. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13275-270315
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
No.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1: background information of the Taoyuan metropolitan area
Prior to the promotion of Taoyuan City as a special municipality, the Taoyuan metropolitan area promoted the Laojie River improvement project, the low-carbon transportation promotion project (which encouraged the use of electric buses and scooters), community energy-efficient light replacement subsidies, low-carbon model community incentives, energy-efficient on-site medical consultations, training of seed personnel for low-carbon promotion, and low-carbon vegetarian diets. Private businesses have also been assisted in obtaining environmental protection labels and certificates. In terms of resource allocation, the energy efficiency and carbon reduction (EECR) actions of the Taoyuan metropolitan area are based on the Low-Carbon City Promotion Project. Before the merging of Taoyuan City and County was promoted, the low-carbon city promotion committees of the competent authorities at different governmental departments and units had begun operations to integrate their operational resources and construct a model community in response to the developmental strategies of the Low-Carbon Home Project promoted by the Environmental Protection Administration. Six of the subordinate working groups and the Low-Carbon City Joint Report Platform were responsible for cross-department and cross-unit business contacts. Through meticulous coordination, the competent authorities allocated resources and achieved the objectives of the EECR policies before Taoyuan City was promoted. For example, by 2013, carbon production was reduced to 21,360 tons/year, energy-efficient product sales and individual green consumption had reached NT$5 billion/year, and the market share of electric scooters had reached 0.3%.
Appendix 2: interviewees
Appendix 3: operational measurements of the sub-concepts of the dependent variables
The operational measurement indicators of the dependent variables were compiled on the basis of the interview analysis results. According to the interviewees, the inspection of EECR actions could be conducted by establishing carbon reduction goals and by evaluating the extent and public awareness of policy implementation. That is, the local governments could establish a regional, quantized carbon reduction index in response to the policy goals promoted by the central government. They could develop a local EECR management index in combination with local regulations, supervising the policy implementation results through a quantized approach (interviewee A3). In addition to the quantized index, public awareness of policy implementation would reflect the extent of policy implementation. For regions with less effective implementation, the respective local governments could provide suggestions, assist relevant organizations in cooperating with the policies, or provide implementation instructions to improve the extent of policy implementation and public awareness of implementation, possibly encouraging more people to cooperate with EECR actions and practice EECR measures (interviewee A4).
Appendix 4: the questionnaire, the coding and summary statistics of the data
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hsi, DL., Chen, SH. & Wang, SW. Urban actions toward energy efficiency and carbon reduction—an empirical study under the urbanization dynamics. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04908-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04908-8