Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender disparities in defining factors of pedestrian level of service of sidewalks

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study delves into the potential impact of gender on critical factors that define Pedestrian Level of Service (PLOS) of sidewalks. Through an in-depth personal interview survey among 502 respondents, consisting of 240 males and 262 females, the variations in perception of male and female pedestrians concerning a spectrum of built environment factors influencing sidewalk quality were assessed. Two structural equation models have been separately developed for male respondents and female respondents. The study found that there is a substantial gender-based disparities in the effect of diverse factors that define PLOS of sidewalks. Especially, the factor ‘Security’ found to be an important factor shaping pedestrians’ satisfaction with the sidewalk quality for both genders. The results found that women pedestrians’ have notably higher satisfaction across all PLOS factors compared to their male counterparts, offering a promising avenue for improving sidewalk environment. Also, it would help planners in identifying the factors that impact the pedestrians’ satisfaction on PLOS of sidewalks based on gender. This study helps urban planners in identifying factors with gender specific impacts on pedestrians’ satisfaction with PLOS for sidewalks. It will thus help in giving emphasis on improvement of those factors for women pedestrians which will ensure their active participation in social activities. By prioritising improvements tailored to women pedestrians’ needs, the present study holds potential to promote their engagement in social activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not available as some articles are under review on the similar ideas using the same data sets.

References

  • Alfonzo, M. A. (2005). To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. Environment and Behavior, 37(6), 808–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asadi-Shekari, Z., Moeinaddini, M., & Shah, M. Z. (2014). A pedestrian level of service method for evaluating and promoting walking facilities on campus streets. Land Use Policy, 38, 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asadi-Shekari, Z., Moeinaddini, M., & Zaly Shah, M. (2013). Non-motorised level of service: Addressing challenges in pedestrian and bicycle level of service. Transport reviews, 33(2), 166–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, M. and Lawson, C., 1996, October. Trip chaining, childcare and personal safety: critical issues in women’s travel behavior. In Proceedings from the second national conference on women’s travel issues. Washington DC: US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.

  • Bivina, G. R., Parida, P., Advani, M., & Parida, M. 2018. Pedestrian level of service model for evaluating and improving sidewalks from various land uses. European Transport-Trasporti Europei.

  • Bivina, G. R., Gupta, A., & Parida, M. (2019). Influence of microscale environmental factors on perceived walk accessibility to metro stations. Transportation Research Part d: Transport and Environment, 67, 142–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bivina, G. R., Gupta, A., & Parida, M. (2020). Walk accessibility to metro stations: An analysis based on meso-or micro-scale built environment factors. Sustainable Cities and Society, 55, 102047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumen, O. (1994). Gender differences in the journey to work. Urban Geography, 15(3), 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson-Kanyama, A., Lindén, A. L., & Thelander, A. (1999). Insights and applications gender differences in environmental impacts from patterns of transportation-a case study from Sweden. Society & Natural Resources., 12(4), 355–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Census of India 2011: provisional population totals-India data sheet. Office of the Registrar General Census Commissioner, India. Indian Census Bureau.

  • Chumanov, E. S., Wall-Scheffler, C., & Heiderscheit, B. C. (2008). Gender differences in walking and running on level and inclined surfaces. Clinical Biomechanics, 23(10), 1260–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, K. J., & Livi, A. D. (2005). Gender differences in walking behavior, attitudes about walking, and perceptions of the environment in three Maryland communities. Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation, 2, 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, K. J., Smith, A. D. L., & Rodriguez, D. (2007). The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment. Landscape and urban planning, 80(1–2), 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornet, Y., & Gudmundsson, H. (2015). Building a metaframework for sustainable transport indicators: Review of selected contributions. Transportation Research Record, 2531(1), 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, B. D., Nor, S. N. M., Rohani, M. M., Prasetijo, J., Aman, M. Y., & Ambak, K. (2016). Pedestrian footpath level of service (FOOT-LOS) model for Johor Bahru. MATEC Web Conf., 47, 03006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IRC:103–2012. (2012). Guidelines for pedestrian facilities. New Delhi: The Indian Roads Congress.

  • Dixon, L. (1996). Bicycle and pedestrian level-of-service performance measures and standards for congestion management systems. Transportation research record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1538, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, R., Flannery, A., Landis, B., Petritsch, T., Rouphail, N., & Ryus, P. (2008). Multimodal level of service for urban streets. Transportation Research Record, 2071(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elvik, R. (2000). How much do road accidents cost the national economy? Accident Analysis & Prevention, 32(6), 849–851.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fyhri, A., Hof, T., Simonova, Z. and de Jong, M., 2010. The influence of perceived safety and security on walking. Final Report of the COST project 358.

  • Gallin, N. (2001). Quantifying pedestrian friendliness–guidelines for assessing pedestrian level of service. Road & Transport Research, 10(1), 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliem, J., & Gliem, R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for likert-type. scales midwest research to practice conference in adult. Co Continuing and Community Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., Bivina, G. R., & Parida, M. (2022). Does neighborhood design matter for walk access to metro stations? An integrated SEM-Hybrid discrete mode choice approach. Transport Policy, 121, 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S. (2006). Community design and travel behavior. Research on Womens Issues in Transportation, 29.

  • Hidayati, I., Tan, W., & Yamu, C. (2020). How gender differences and perceptions of safety shape urban mobility in Southeast Asia. Transportation Research Part f: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 73, 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahan, M. I., Mazumdar, A. A. B., Hadiuzzaman, M., Mashrur, S. M., & Murshed, M. N. (2020). Analyzing service quality of pedestrian sidewalks under mixed traffic condition considering latent variables. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 146(2), 04020011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, S. (2007). Pedestrian and bicyclist level of service on roadway segments. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2031, 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson-Latham, G. (2007). A study on gender equality as a prerequisite for sustainable development. Report to the Environment Advisory Council, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H. (2013). A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 43(5), 587–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khisty, C.J., (1994). Evaluation of pedestrian facilities: beyond the level-of-service concept. In Transportation Research Record 1438, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994,pp. 45–50 .

  • Kline, R. (2013). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Applied quantitative analysis in education and the social sciences (pp. 171–207). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, B., Vattikuti, V., Ottenberg, R., McLeod, D., & Guttenplan, M. (2001). Modeling the roadside walking environment: Pedestrian level of service. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1773, 82–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. S. (2005). Gender differences in physical activity and walking among older adults. Journal of Women & Aging, 17(1–2), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewen, L. J., Steel, G. D., & Suedfeld, P. (1993). Perceived safety from crime in the urban environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lois, D., Monzón, A., & Hernández, S. (2018). Analysis of satisfaction factors at urban transport interchanges: Measuring travellers’ attitudes to information, security and waiting. Transport Policy, 67, 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, L.M. and Barros, A.P., (2014). Understanding the factors that influence pedestrian environment quality. In Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting (pp. 1–15).

  • Matthies, E., Kuhn, S., & Klöckner, C. A. (2002). Travel mode choice of women: The result of limitation, ecological norm, or weak habit? Environment and Behavior, 34(2), 163–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra-Sarkar, S.S., 1994. A Method for Evaluation of Urban Pedestrian Spaces. PhD thesis, Department of City and Regional Planning. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 194.

  • Morton, C., Caulfield, B., & Anable, J. (2016). Customer perceptions of quality of service in public transport: Evidence for bus transit in Scotland. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 4(3), 199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muraleetharan, T., Adachi, T., Hagiwara, T., & Kagaya, S. (2005). Method to determine pedestrian level-of-service for crosswalks at urban intersections. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraleetharan, T., Adachi, T., Uchida, K. E., Hagiwara, T., & Kagaya, S. (2004). A study on evaluation of pedestrian level of service along sidewalks and at crosswalks using conjoint analysis. Infrastructure Planning Review, 21, 727–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NATPAC 2014. Annual Report 2013–14. National Transportation Planning and Research Centre (NATPAC), India. 141 p.

  • Ouali, L. A. B., Graham, D. J., Barron, A., & Trompet, M. (2020). Gender differences in the perception of safety in public transport. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (statistics in Society), 183(3), 737–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pain, R. H. (1993). Women’s fear of sexual violence: explaining the spatial paradox, in: H. Jones (Ed.) Crime and the Urban Environment, Aldershot, pp. 46–55

  • Parida, P. and Parida, M., 2011. Appreciation of Gender Differences in Development of Qualitative Level of Service for Sidewalks. Women’s Issues in Transportation, p.246.

  • Parida, P.M., Najamuddin, Parida, M., 2007. Planning, design & operation of sidewalk facilities in Delhi. Highway research bulletin, Indian Roads Congress, Delhi, No. 77m 81–95

  • Pikora, T. J., Bull, F. C., Jamrozik, K., Knuiman, M., Giles-Corti, B., & Donovan, R. J. (2002). Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. American journal of preventive medicine, 23(3), 187–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pojani, D., & Stead, D. (2015). Sustainable urban transport in the developing world: Beyond megacities. Sustainability, 7(6), 7784–7805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rani, K., Boora, A., Bivina, R. G., & Parida, M. 2018. Which factors affect “walkability” of pedestrians on sidewalk in Indian cities? Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studie, 11.

  • Transit Cooperative Research Program. 2001. Research results digest 41: guidelines for collecting, analyzing, and reporting transit crime data (http://gulliver.trb.org/publications/tcrp/ tcrp_rrd_41.pdf; accessed 5 May 2008).

  • Root, A., Schintler, L., & Button, K. (2000). Women, travel and the idea of ‘sustainable transport.’ Transport Reviews, 20(3), 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, S., 2004, November. Understanding women’s and men’s travel patterns. In Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation: Proceedings from the Second National Conference, Report FHWA-PL-97–024, FHWA,U.S. Department of Transportation.

  • Sahani, R., Ojha, A., & Bhuyan, P. K. (2017). Service levels of sidewalks for pedestrians under mixed traffic environment using genetic programming clustering. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(7), 2879–2887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, G., Behrendt, H., & Teytelboym, A. (2010). Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 28(1), 46–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 625–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silveira, T. C., Krainer, C. W., Krainer, J. A., Romano, C. A., Matoski, A., Santo, A. L., & Moreira, A. R. (2019). Does gender influence travel satisfaction with public transport. Revista ESPACIOS, 40(25), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. G., & Maxfield, M. G. (1981). Coping with crime: Individual and neighborhood reactions (p. 272). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. K., Lelas, J. L., & Kerrigan, D. C. (2002). Gender differences in pelvic motions and center of mass displacement during walking: Stereotypes quantified. Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine, 11(5), 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streiner, D. L. (1994). Figuring out factors: The use and misuse of factor analysis. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39(3), 135–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UTTIPEC. (2010). Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure (Planning and Engineering) Centre Regulations. Annual Report.

  • Vallejo-Borda, J. A., Cantillo, V., & Rodriguez-Valencia, A. (2020). A perception-based cognitive map of the pedestrian perceived quality of service on urban sidewalks. Transportation Research Part f: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 73, 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warsén, L. (2002). Riding without fear, Public Transport. International, 2, 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winslott Hiselius, L., Kronsell, A., Dymén, C., & Smidfelt Rosqvist, L. (2019). Investigating the link between transport sustainability and the representation of women in Swedish local committees. Sustainability, 11(17), 4728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Zhou, D., Wang, Y., Ma, D., Chen, W., Xu, D., & Zhu, Z. (2019). Economical and outdoor thermal comfort analysis of greening in multistory residential areas in Xi’an. Sustainable Cities and Society, 51, 101730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology Bhopal, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, 462003, India

    G. R. Bivina

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, 247667, India

    Manoranjan Parida

Authors
  1. G. R. Bivina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manoranjan Parida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

GRB Conceptualization, Data collection, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. MP Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. R. Bivina.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bivina, G.R., Parida, M. Gender disparities in defining factors of pedestrian level of service of sidewalks. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04796-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04796-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation