Skip to main content
Log in

Synergy or Strife? Integrated assessment of economy–resource–environment development in Yangtze River Delta region based on material flow analysis and system dynamics

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Under the background of tighter resource constraints and prominent environmental pollution, regional development is endowed with new connotations and implications. Whether the economy–resources–environment system can achieve coordinated development is a significant indicator in judging high-quality regional development. Taking the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) as an example, this study established a material flow account system, revealed the resource and environmental pressure and operation efficiency of the regional economic system, and clarified the evolutionary trend of regional economy–resource–environment collaborative development. Under the combination of material flow analysis (MFA) and system dynamics (SD), the MFA-SD model was constructed. Four scenarios including business as usual (BAU), economically sustainable degrowth (ESD), economic accelerating development (EAD) and resource and environmental protection (REP) were set up to analyze the optimal path of regional coordinated development. The results indicated that: (1) during the year from 2006 to 2020, Anhui, Jiangsu and Zhejiang showed an overall rising trend in total material requirements (TMR), with average annual growth rates of 5.32, 5.08 and 2.56%, respectively; while the data of Shanghai fluctuated little and showed a stable trend. (2) The YRD region presents a benign and coordinated development trend. Shanghai has a trend of coordinated development of economy–resources–environment, while Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Anhui still need to improve. (3) Between 2021 and 2030, economy lags in REP, resource lags in EAD, and environment lags in BAU and EAD; economy, resource and environment can go hand in hand only in ESD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Major Project of National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 21&ZD166); the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 22VRC200); the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX23_2450).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Author notes

  1. Jiawei Chen and Hong Chen are Co-first author.

    Authors

    Contributions

    Jiawei Chen: Methodology, Writing-Original Draft, Writing-Review & Editing. Hong Chen: Conceptualization, Resources, Funding acquisition, Supervision. Qingqing Sun: Language Editing, Software, Data Curation.

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Hong Chen.

    Ethics declarations

    Conflict of interest

    No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

    Additional information

    Publisher's Note

    Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

    Rights and permissions

    Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Chen, J., Chen, H. & Sun, Q. Synergy or Strife? Integrated assessment of economy–resource–environment development in Yangtze River Delta region based on material flow analysis and system dynamics. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04759-3

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04759-3

    Keywords

    Navigation