Abstract
Daily individual activities and behaviours as well as collective actions of society have the potential to address environmental challenges or worsen them. Promoting behavioural solutions to environmental problems requires an understanding of the underpinning factors that determine engagement in environmentally friendly behaviour. This study examined the determinants of pro-environmental behaviour(PEB) of youth in urban areas in Ghana inundated with diverse values, beliefs, norms and unique situational factors. The study adopted a cross-sectional survey research design with data collected from 233 urban youth in Ghana through an online survey. Covariance-base structural equation modelling technique was employed in the analysis with the aid of AMOS graphics to test hypothesised effects of values, norms, beliefs and situational factors on engagement in PEB. The findings revealed a causal positive link from biospheric values (β = 0.176, p < 0.05) and egoistic values (β = 0.185, p < 0.01) to individuals’ new environmental paradigm (NEP) and from NEP to awareness of consequences (β = 0.517, p < 0.01) to ascription of responsibilities (β = 0.298, p < 0.01) and to norms (β = 0.242, p < 0.01) which significantly influence PEB (β = 0.242, p < 0.01). Personal constraints indicated by lifestyle and livelihood objectives were found to negatively affect the VBN theory explanation of PEB. The findings of this study reveal the need for educational programmes and awareness creation to instil environmentally friendly values, beliefs and norms in youth to incentivise the adoption of PEB as behavioural solutions to environmental problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M. M. (2017). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 890, No. 1, p. 012163). IOP Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163.
Adom, D. (2022). Catch them young: Children as bearers of indigenous ecological knowledge for biodiversity conservation in Ghana. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity, 6(3), 12–25.
Aguilar-Luzón, M. C., Carmona, B., Calvo-Salguero, A., & Castillo Valdivieso, P. A. (2020). Values, environmental beliefs, and connection with nature as predictive factors of the pro-environmental vote in Spain. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1043. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01043
Anderson, D. J., & Krettenauer, T. (2021). Connectedness to nature and pro-environmental behaviour from early adolescence to adulthood: A comparison of urban and rural Canada. Sustainability, 13(7), 3655. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073655
Atmi, R. T., Satibi, I. F., & Cahyani, I. R. (2018). Media literacy skills and social media: A portray of teenagers in urban area. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.7), 236–239, https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.7.16359.
Balundė, A., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L. (2019). The relationship between people’s environmental considerations and pro-environmental behavior in Lithuania. Frontiers in Psychology, 2319, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02319.
Balundė, A., Perlaviciute, G., & Truskauskaitė-Kunevičienė, I. (2020). Sustainability in youth: Environmental considerations in adolescence and their relationship to pro-environmental behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 2985, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582920.
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
Besley, T., & Peters, M. A. (2020). Life and death in the Anthropocene: Educating for survival amid climate and ecosystem changes and potential civilisation collapse. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(13), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1684804
Boulianne, S., Lalancette, M., & Ilkiw, D. (2020). “School strike 4 climate”: Social media and the international youth protest on climate change. Media and Communication, 8(2), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2768
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Buttigieg, K., & Pace, P. (2013). Positive youth action towards climate change. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 15(1), 15–47. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2013-0002
Chileshe, B., & Moonga, M. S. (2019). Disparities in pro-environmental behaviour between rural and Urban areas in Zambia. Multidisciplinary Journal of Language and Social Sciences Education (2664-083X, Online ISSN: Print ISSN: 2616-4736), 2(1), 196–215.
Chwialkowska, A., Bhatti, W. A., & Glowik, M. (2020). The influence of cultural values on pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122305
Coelho, F., Pereira, M. C., Cruz, L., Simões, P., & Barata, E. (2017). Affect and the adoption of pro-environmental behaviour: A structural model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.10.008
Derdowski, L. A., Grahn, Å. H., Hansen, H., & Skeiseid, H. (2020). The new ecological paradigm, pro-environmental behaviour, and the moderating effects of locus of control and self-construal. Sustainability, 12(18), 7728. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187728
Duflo, E., Dupas, P. and Kremer, M. (2021). The impact of free secondary education: Experimental evidence from Ghana (No. w28937). National Bureau of Economic Research. [Online] Available at: https://web.stanford.edu/~pdupas/DDK_GhanaScholarships.pdf. Access 28 Aug 2021.
Farrow, K., Grolleau, G., & Ibanez, L. (2017). Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: A review of the evidence. Ecological Economics, 140, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017
Gatignon, H. (2003). Statistical analysis of management data. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/b101868.
Georgescu, M. A., & Herman, E. (2020). Are young people ready to have a pro-environmental sustainable behaviour as tourists? An investigation of towel reuse intention. Sustainability, 12(22), 9469.
Ghana Statistical Service, (2020). Children, Adolescents & Young People In Ghana. [Online] Available at: https://www2.statsghana.gov.gh/docfiles/publications/2010phc_children_adolescents_&young_people_in_Gh.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2021.
Ghazali, E. M., Nguyen, B., Mutum, D. S., & Yap, S. F. (2019). Pro-environmental behaviours and value-belief-norm theory: Assessing unobserved heterogeneity of two ethnic groups. Sustainability, 11(12), 3237. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123237
Goldman, D., Pe'er, S., & Yavetz, B. (2017). Environmental literacy of youth movement members-is environmentalism a component of their social activism? Environmental Education Research, 23(4), 486–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1108390.
Han, H., Yu, J., Kim, H. C., & Kim, W. (2018). Impact of social/personal norms and willingness to sacrifice on young vacationers’ pro-environmental intentions for waste reduction and recycling. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(12), 2117–2133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1538229
Han, R., & Cheng, Y. (2020). The influence of norm perception on pro-environmental behavior: A comparison between the moderating roles of traditional media and social media. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 7164. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197164
Hiratsuka, J., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L. (2018). Testing VBN theory in Japan: Relationships between values, beliefs, norms, and acceptability and expected effects of a car pricing policy. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 53, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.12.015
Huckelba, A. L., & Van Lange, P. A. (2020). The silent killer: Consequences of climate change and how to survive past the year 2050. Sustainability, 12(9), 3757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093757
Ile, I., & Boadu, E. S. (2018). The paradox of youth empowerment: Exploring youth intervention programme in Ghana. Cogent Social Sciences, 4(1), 1528709. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1528709
Ing, J., & Nicolaï, J. P. (2020). Perspectives on the economics of the environment in the shadow of coronavirus. Environmental and Resource Economics, 20(2020), 447–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00493-2
Kaaronen, R. O., & Strelkovskii, N. (2020). Cultural evolution of sustainable behaviors: Pro-environmental tipping points in an agent-based model. One Earth, 2(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.01.003
Klaniecki, K., Wuropulos, K., & Hager, C. P. (2016). In W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Behaviour change for sustainable development. Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education (pp. 1–10). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_161-1.
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4.th ed.). Guilford Press.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
Kwon, H. A., & Kim, S. (2017). Variation in the characteristics of everyday life and meaning of urban housing due to the transition of social structure: Focusing on articles published in lifestyle magazines. Sustainability, 9(8), 1298.
Lakew, Y., & Olausson, U. (2019). Young, sceptical, and environmentally (dis) engaged: Do news habits make a difference? Journal of Science Communication, 18(4), A06. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18040206
Landry, N., Gifford, R., Milfont, T. L., Weeks, A., & Arnocky, S. (2018). Learned helplessness moderates the relationship between environmental concern and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.12.003
Li, D., Zhao, L., Ma, S., Shao, S., & Zhang, L. (2019). What influences an individual’s pro-environmental behavior? A literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.024
Liu, X., Zou, Y., & Wu, J. (2018). Factors influencing public-sphere pro-environmental behavior among Mongolian college students: A test of value–belief–norm theory. Sustainability, 10(5), 1384. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051384
Liu, Y., Sheng, H., Mundorf, N., Redding, C., & Ye, Y. (2017). Integrating norm activation model and theory of planned behavior to understand sustainable transport behavior: Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(12), 1593. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121593
MacKay, M., Parlee, B., & Karsgaard, C. (2020). Youth engagement in climate change action: Case study on indigenous youth at COP24. Sustainability, 12(16), 6299. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166299
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
Morgado, F. F. R., Meireles, J. F. F., Neves, C. M., Amaral, A. C. S., Ferreira, M. E. C. (2018). Scale development: Ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices. Psychology: Research and Review, 30(1), 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1.
Noblet, C. L., Anderson, M., & Teisl, M. F. (2013). An empirical test of anchoring the NEP scale in environmental ethics. Environmental Education Research, 19(4), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.704899
O'brien, K., Selboe, E., & Hayward, B. M. (2018). Exploring youth activism on climate change. Ecology and Society, 23(3), 42. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10287-230342.
Okumah, M., Martin-Ortega, J., Novo, P., & Chapman, P. J. (2020). Revisiting the determinants of pro-environmental behaviour to inform land management policy: A meta-analytic structural equation model application. Land, 9(5), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9050135
Palupi, T., & Sawitri, D. R. (2018). The importance of pro-environmental behavior in adolescent. In E3S Web of Conferences, 31, 09031; EDP Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183109031.
Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Goldman, D., Hadjichambis, A.C., Parra, G., Lapin, K., Knippels, M.C. and Van Dam, F. (2020). Educating for environmental citizenship in non-formal frameworks for secondary level youth. Conceptualizing environmental citizenship for 21st century education, environmental discourses in science education 4, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20249-1_14.
Patel, J., Modi, A., & Paul, J. (2017). Pro-environmental behavior and socio-demographic factors in an emerging market. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 6(2), 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-016-0071-5
Porter, G., Hampshire, K., Abane, A., Munthali, A., Robson, E., De Lannoy, A., & Owusu, S. (2020). Mobile phones, gender, and female empowerment in sub-Saharan Africa: Studies with African youth. Information Technology for Development, 26(1), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2019.1622500
Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability science, 14, 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5.
Prudon, P. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis: a brief introduction and critique. Qualtrics, P. UT, USA. 10.1.1.476.6207&rep.
Ramstetter, L., & Habersack, F. (2019). Do women make a difference? Analysing environmental attitudes and actions of Members of the European Parliament. Environmental Politics, 29(6), 1063–1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1609156
Samuels, P. (2017). Advice on exploratory factor analysis. [Online] Available at: https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/6076/1/__staff_shares_storage%20500mb_Library_ID112668_Stats%20Advisory_New%20Statistics%20Workshops_18ExploratoryFactorAnalysis_ExploratoryFactorAnalysis4.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2023.
Schwartz, S. H., (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online readings in Psychology and Culture, Unit 2. [Online] Available at: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol2/iss1/11. Accessed 15 Aug 2021.
Sedgwick, P. (2014). Cross sectional studies: advantages and disadvantages. BMJ-British Medical Journal, 348. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2276.
Sharma, R., & Gupta, A. (2020). Pro-environmental behaviour among tourists visiting national parks: Application of value-belief-norm theory in an emerging economy context. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 25(8), 829–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2020.1774784
Smith, M. A., & Kingston, S. (2021). Demographic, attitudinal, and social factors that predict pro-environmental behavior. Sustainability and Climate Change, 14(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1089/scc.2020.0063
Soper, D. S. (2021). A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models [Software]. Available from https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc. Accessed 21 June 2021.
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004.
Stern, P. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Thondhlana, G., & Hlatshwayo, T. N. (2018). Pro-environmental behaviour in student residences at Rhodes University. South Africa. Sustainability, 10(8), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082746
Twerefou, D. K., Tutu, K., Owusu-Afriyie, J., & Adjei-Mantey, K. (2015). Attitudes of local people to mining policies and interventions. International Growth Centre, Ref: E-33107-GHA-1.
Vicente-Molina, M. A., Fernández-Sainz, A., & Izagirre-Olaizola, J. (2018). Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.079
Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
Weiskopf, S. R., Rubenstein, M. A., Crozier, L. G., Gaichas, S., Griffis, R., Halofsky, J. E., & Whyte, K. P. (2020). Climate change effects on biodiversity, ecosystems, ecosystem services, and natural resource management in the United States. Science of the Total Environment, 733, 137782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137782.
White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919825649.
Wut, T. M., Ng, P., Hing-Ki, M. K., & Chiu, S. F. (2020). Does gender matter? Attitude towards waste charging policy and pro-environmental behaviours. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(8), 1100–1115. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-03-2020-0102
Xiao, C., & Hong, D. (2018). Gender differences in environmental behaviors among the Chinese public: Model of mediation and moderation. Environment and Behavior, 50(9), 975–996. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517723126
Yusliza, M. Y., Amirudin, A., Rahadi, R. A., Nik Sarah Athirah, N. A., Ramayah, T., Muhammad, Z., & Mokhlis, S. (2020). An investigation of pro-environmental behaviour and sustainable development in Malaysia. Sustainability, 12(17), 7083, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177083.
Zhang, M. F., Dawson, J. F., & Kline, R. B. (2021). Evaluating the use of covariance-based structural equation modelling with reflective measurement in organizational and management research: A review and recommendations for best practice. British Journal of Management, 32(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12415
Acknowledgements
The author acknowledges the support of Dr. Nicholas Spedding, the University of Aberdeen and the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the UK in the conduct of the research leading to this publication.
Funding
This work was not funded by any grant from a public or private institution or agency.However a partial research support grant was given by the Commonwealth Scholarship Commision to aid the author's research activities leading to this publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that they have no financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Banunle, A. Determinants of pro-environmental behaviour of urban youth in Ghana. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04480-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04480-1