Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unleashing the role of greenwashing in the relationship of environmental sustainability thoughts and environmental performance: exploring the importance of generative leadership

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the existing relationships among greenwashing, thoughts on environmental sustainability, environmental performance, and generative leadership. Data from 575 small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from Saudi Arabia were used to test research hypotheses. By using a questionnaire, the results were derived through random sampling, indicating that the findings could be helpful for future research in this field. This study demonstrates how firms can become more efficient and improve their environmental performance through environment sustainable thoughts. However, greenwashing is expected to negatively influence the relationship of environment sustainable thoughts and environmental performance. Furthermore, the study examines the mediating roles of greenwashing and generative leadership in the relationship between environmental sustainability thoughts and environmental performance. The findings may be helpful for managers who want to run their companies sustainably since they need to understand the role of greenwashing and creative leadership. In fact, generative leadership within an organization increase the likelihood of promoting environmental performance, whereas greenwashing negatively contributes to improving environmental performance. The perspective adopted in this paper is consistent with previous theoretical studies and emphasizes attractive trends in environmental-friendly businesses. Similarly, the research offers insights into the sustainability realm, bridging various factors to provide a broader understanding and in-depth analysis of how greenwashing and generative leadership affect each dimension of sustainability and environmental performance of companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data collected during the survey can be made available upon request from the corresponding author.

References

  • Abbas, J., & Khan, S. M. (2022). Green knowledge management and organizational green culture: An interaction for organizational green innovation and green performance. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2022-0156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, P., Braunberger, D., Hamilton, S., & Caldwell, B. (2021). Leaders in limbo: The role of collaborative inquiry influencing school leaders’ levels of efficacy. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 22(1), 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, Z., Ahmad, M., Rjoub, H., Kalugina, O. A., & Hussain, N. (2022). Economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 30(4), 595–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alma Çallı, B., Özşahin, M., Coşkun, E., & Rıfat Arık, A. (2022). Do generative leadership and digital literacy of executive management help flourishing micro and small business digital maturity? International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 11(3), 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alraja, M. N., Imran, R., Khashab, B. M., & Shah, M. (2022). Technological innovation, sustainable green practices and SMEs sustainable performance in times of crisis (COVID-19 pandemic). Information Systems Frontiers, 24(4), 1081–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10250-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsayegh, M. F., Abdul Rahman, R., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), 3910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Swidi, A. K., Gelaidan, H. M., & Saleh, R. M. (2021). The joint impact of green human resource management, leadership and organizational culture on employees’ green behaviour and organisational environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316, 128112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alzoubi, H., Ahmed, G., Al-Gasaymeh, A., & Kurdi, B. (2020). Empirical study on sustainable supply chain strategies and its impact on competitive priorities: The mediating role of supply chain collaboration. Management Science Letters, 10(3), 703–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arouri, M., El Ghoul, S., & Gomes, M. (2021). Greenwashing and product market competition. Finance Research Letters, 42, 101927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asiaei, K., Jusoh, R., Barani, O., & Asiaei, A. (2022). How does green intellectual capital boost performance? The mediating role of environmental performance measurement systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1587–1606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bager, S. L., & Lambin, E. F. (2020). Sustainability strategies by companies in the global coffee sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3555–3570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumüller, J., & Sopp, K. (2022). Double materiality and the shift from non-financial to European sustainability reporting: Review, outlook and implications. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(1), 8–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begum, S., Ashfaq, M., Xia, E., & Awan, U. (2022a). Does green transformational leadership lead to green innovation? The role of green thinking and creative process engagement. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 580–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begum, S., Xia, E., Ali, F., Awan, U., & Ashfaq, M. (2022b). Achieving green product and process innovation through green leadership and creative engagement in manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33(4), 656–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, X., Zhu, B., Zhang, H., Li, L., & Xie, M. (2020). Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Science of the Total Environment, 746, 140810.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, E. A., & Trinh, M. P. (2019). Catalyzing capacity: Absorptive, adaptive, and generative leadership. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 32(3), 356–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, M., Rangarajan, K., & Dutta, G. (2020). Corporate sustainability in small and medium-sized enterprises: A literature analysis and road ahead. Journal of Indian Business Research, 12(2), 271–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M., & Blass, V. D. (2010). Measuring corporate environmental performance: The trade-offs of sustainability ratings. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez-Escrig, E., Mallén-Broch, F. F., Lapiedra-Alcamí, R., & Chiva-Gómez, R. (2019). The influence of leaders’ stewardship behavior on innovation success: The mediating effect of radical innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 159, 849–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragomir, V. D., & Dragomir, V. D. (2020). Ethical aspects of environmental strategy. Corporate Environmental Strategy: Theoretical, Practical, and Ethical Aspects, pp. 75–113.

  • Du, X. (2015). How the market values greenwashing? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 547–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupraz, P., & Guyomard, H. (2019). Environment and climate in the common agricultural policy. EuroChoices, 18(1), 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzikriansyah, M. A., Masudin, I., Zulfikarijah, F., Jihadi, M., & Jatmiko, R. D. (2023). The role of green supply chain management practices on environmental performance: A case of Indonesian small and medium enterprises. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 6, 100100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellitan, L. (2020). Competing in the era of industrial revolution 4.0 and society 5.0. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, dan Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, A. (1995). The survey handbook. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatti, L., Seele, P., & Rademacher, L. (2019). Grey zone in–greenwash out. A review of greenwashing research and implications for the voluntary-mandatory transition of CSR. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilal, F. G., Ashraf, Z., Gilal, N. G., Gilal, R. G., & Channa, N. A. (2019). Promoting environmental performance through green human resource management practices in higher education institutions: A moderated mediation model. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1579–1590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hang, Y., Sarfraz, M., Khalid, R., Ozturk, I., & Tariq, J. (2022). Does corporate social responsibility and green product innovation boost organizational performance? A moderated mediation model of competitive advantage and green trust. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 5379–5399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Boiral, O., & Díaz de Junguitu, A. (2020). Environmental management certification and environmental performance: Greening or greenwashing? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2829–2841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, C. O., Schmidheiny, S., & Watts, P. (2002). Walking the talk: The business case for sustainable development. Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilinitch, A. Y., Soderstrom, N. S., & Thomas, T. E. (1998). Measuring corporate environmental performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 17(4–5), 383–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, I., Kassinis, G., & Papagiannakis, G. (2022). The impact of perceived greenwashing on customer satisfaction and the contingent role of capability reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 1–15.

  • Jhamb, S., & Fiegl, R. (2022). Perceived greenwashing and sustainable business strategies: Understanding organizational roles in addressing environmental issues. IUP Journal of Business Strategy19(2).

  • Kassinis, G. I., Kay, A. A., Papagiannakis, G., & Vlachos, P. A. (2022). Stigma as moral insurance: How stigma buffers firms from the market consequences of greenwashing. Journal of Management Studies, 59(8), 2154–2190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassinis, G. I., & Soteriou, A. C. (2015). Environmental and quality practices: Using a video method to explore their relationship with customer satisfaction in the hotel industry. Operations Management Research, 8(3), 142–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, J., Bhudhiraja, K., & Gupta, N. (2023). Impact of green washing on consumers and businesses. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Application of AI and Statistical Decision Making for the Business World, ICASDMBW 2022, 16–17 December 2022, Delhi, India.

  • Konar, S., & Cohen, M. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance? Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kularatne, T., Wilson, C., Månsson, J., Hoang, V., & Lee, B. (2019). Do environmentally sustainable practices make hotels more efficient? A study of major hotels in Sri Lanka. Tourism Management, 71, 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lashitew, A. A. (2021). Corporate uptake of the sustainable development goals: Mere greenwashing or an advent of institutional change? Journal of International Business Policy, 4, 184–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, T. T., & Ikram, M. (2022). Do sustainability innovation and firm competitiveness help improve firm performance? Evidence from the SME sector in Vietnam. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 588–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Li, W., Seppänen, V., & Koivumäki, T. (2022). How and when does perceived greenwashing affect employees’ job performance? Evidence from China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1722–1735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Li, W., Seppänen, V., & Koivumäki, T. (2023). Effects of greenwashing on financial performance: Moderation through local environmental regulation and media coverage. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 820–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K., Peng, M. Y. P., Anser, M. K., Yousaf, Z., & Sharif, A. (2021). Bright harmony of environmental management initiatives for achieving corporate social responsibility authenticity and legitimacy: Glimpse of hotel and tourism industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 640–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, R. J., Tan, K. H., & Geng, Y. (2013). Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macaux, W. P. (2012). Generative leadership: Responding to the call for responsibility. Journal of Management Development, 31(5), 449–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltais, A., & Nykvist, B. (2020). Understanding the role of green bonds in advancing sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1724864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangini, E. R., Amaral, L. M., Conejero, M. A., & Pires, C. S. (2020). Greenwashing study and consumers’ behavioral intentions. Consumer Behavior Review, 4(3), 229–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankoff, J. C., Blevis, E., Borning, A., Friedman, B., Fussell, S. R., Hasbrouck, J., & Sengers, P. (2007). Environmental sustainability and interaction. In CHI’07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 2121–2124).

  • Mel’Nichuk Marina, V. (2019). Leadership ideas shaped by digital insights in higher education. Personnel Management, 4, 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Azorín, J. F., Claver-Cortés, E., Pereira-Moliner, J., & Tarí, J. J. (2009). Environmental practices and firm performance: An empirical analysis in the Spanish hotel industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(5), 516–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • More, P. V. (2019). The impact of greenwashing on green brand trust from an Indian perspective. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 8(1), 162–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. T. H., Yang, Z., Nguyen, N., Johnson, L. W., & Cao, T. K. (2019). Greenwash and green purchase intention: The mediating role of green skepticism. Sustainability, 11(9), 2653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurunnabi, M. (2020). Recovery planning and resilience of SMEs during the COVID-19: Experience from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 16(4), 643–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ögmundarson, Ó., Herrgård, M. J., Forster, J., Hauschild, M. Z., & Fantke, P. (2020). Addressing environmental sustainability of biochemicals. Nature Sustainability, 3(3), 167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onah, D. F., Pang, E. L., & Sinclair, J. E. (2022). Investigating self-regulation in the context of a blended learning computing course. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 39(1), 50–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perifanis, N. A., & Kitsios, F. (2023). Investigating the influence of artificial intelligence on business value in the digital era of strategy: A literature review. Information, 14(2), 85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullman, M. E., Maloni, M. J., & Carter, C. R. (2009). Food for thought: Social versus environmental sustainability practices and performance outcomes. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(4), 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qayyum, A., Jamil, R. A., & Sehar, A. (2022). Impact of green marketing, greenwashing and green confusion on green brand equity. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, (ahead-of-print).

  • Raab, C., Baloglu, S., & Chen, Y. S. (2018). Restaurant managers’ adoption of sustainable practices: An application of institutional theory and theory of planned behavior. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 21(2), 154–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, C. A., & Montiel, I. (2005). When are corporate environmental policies a form of greenwashing? Business and Society, 44(4), 377–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasheed, T. (2022). Supply Chain sustainability through green practices in manufacturing: A case study from Pakistan: Supply chain sustainability. South Asian Journal of Operations and Logistics (ISSN: 2958–2504)1(1), 57–71.

  • Rasool, S. F., Wang, M., Tang, M., Saeed, A., & Iqbal, J. (2021). How toxic workplace environment effects the employee engagement: The mediating role of organizational support and employee wellbeing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman, S. U., Elrehail, H., Alshwayat, D., Ibrahim, B., & Alami, R. (2023). Linking hotel environmental management initiatives and sustainable hotel performance through employees’ eco-friendly behaviour and environmental strategies: a moderated-mediated model. European Business Review, (ahead-of-print).

  • Repar, N., Jan, P., Dux, D., Nemecek, T., & Doluschitz, R. (2017). Implementing farm-level environmental sustainability in environmental performance indicators: A combined global-local approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 692–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K., Roux, D., & Biggs, H. (2000). Challenges for catchment management agencies: lessons from bureaucracies, business and resource management. Water Sa, 26(4), 505–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, S., Subramanian, N., Jabbour, C. J., & Chong, T. (2019). Green human resource management and the enablers of green organisational culture: Enhancing a firm’s environmental performance for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 737–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şahin, H., & Erkal, S. (2017). An investigation of university students’ attitudes toward environmental sustainability. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(4), 147–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salkind, N. J. (1997). Exploring research (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, C., Coelho, A., & Marques, A. (2023). The greenwashing effects on corporate reputation and brand hate, through environmental performance and green perceived risk. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-05-2022-0216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharmer, O., & Kaufer, K. (2013). Leading from the emerging future: from ego-system to eco-system economies. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shokri, A., Antony, J., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2021). A readiness self-assessment model for implementing green lean six sigma initiatives in manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silsbee, D. (2008). Presence-based coaching: Cultivating self-generative leaders through mind, body, and heart. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Latan, H., & Sohal, A. S. (2022). Stakeholder pressure, green innovation, and performance in small and medium-sized enterprises: The role of green dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 500–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chierici, R., & Graziano, D. (2020). Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotarauta, M. (2015). Leadership and the City: Power, strategy and networks in the making of knowledge cities. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. K., Brewster, C. J., Collings, D. G., & Hajro, A. (2020). Enhancing the role of human resource management in corporate sustainability and social responsibility: A multi-stakeholder, multidimensional approach to HRM. Human Resource Management Review, 30(3), 100708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, F., de Arruda, M. P., de Mascena, K. M., & Boaventura, J. M. (2020). Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: A classification model. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2071–2080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumrin, S., Gupta, S., Asaad, Y., Wang, Y., Bhattacharya, S., & Foroudi, P. (2021). Eco-innovation for environment and waste prevention. Journal of Business Research, 122, 627–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surie, G., & Hazy, J. K. (2006). Generative leadership: Nurturing innovation in complex systems. Emergence-Mahwah-Lawrence Erlbaum, 8(4), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo, S., & Webster, J. (2021). Perceived greenwashing: The effects of green marketing on environmental and product perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics, 171, 719–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahir, R., Athar, M. R., & Afzal, A. (2020). The impact of greenwashing practices on green employee behaviour: Mediating role of employee value orientation and green psychological climate. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1781996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, M., Walsh, G., Lerner, D., Fitza, M. A., & Li, Q. (2018). Green innovation, managerial concern and firm performance: An empirical study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(1), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarabieh, S. M. Z. A. (2021). The impact of greenwash practices over green purchase intention: The mediating effects of green confusion, Green perceived risk, and green trust. Management Science Letters, 11(2), 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vezzoli, C., & Manzini, E. (2008). Design for environmental sustainability (p. 4). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Ma, B., & Bai, R. (2020). The spillover effect of greenwashing behaviours: An experimental approach. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 38(3), 283–295.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, D. J. (2006). Mode four: Generative leadership. The ambiguity advantage: What great leaders are great at (pp. 99–118). Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Winn, M. I., & Angell, L. C. (2000). Towards a process model of corporate greening. Organization Studies, 21, 1119–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yahya, S., Jamil, S., & Farooq, M. (2021). The impact of green organizational and human resource factors on developing countries’ small business firms tendency toward green innovation: A natural resource-based view approach. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(4), 726–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong, J. Y., Yusliza, M. Y., Ramayah, T., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Sehnem, S., & Mani, V. (2020). Pathways towards sustainability in manufacturing organizations: Empirical evidence on the role of green human resource management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 212–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahoor, N., & Gerged, A. M. (2021). Relational capital, environmental knowledge integration, and environmental performance of small and medium enterprises in emerging markets. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3789–3803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zameer, H., Wang, Y., & Yasmeen, H. (2020). Reinforcing green competitive advantage through green production, creativity and green brand image: Implications for cleaner production in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., Bi, J., Yuan, Z., Ge, J., Liu, B., & Bu, M. (2008). Why do firms engage in environmental management? An empirical study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(10), 1036–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. (2022). Environmental regulation, green innovation, and export product quality: What is the role of greenwashing? International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G. (2023). Regulatory-driven corporate greenwashing: Evidence from “low-carbon city” pilot policy in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 78, 101951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Ul-Durar, S., Akhtar, M. N., Zhang, Y., & Lu, L. (2021). How does responsible leadership affect employees’ voluntary workplace green behaviors? A multilevel dual process model of voluntary workplace green behaviors. Journal of Environmental Management, 296, 113205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Li, D., Cao, C., & Huang, S. (2018). The influence of greenwashing perception on green purchasing intentions: The mediating role of green word-of-mouth and moderating role of green concern. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 740–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Wang, Z., Zhong, X., Yang, S., & Siddik, A. B. (2022). Do green banking activities improve the banks’ environmental performance? The mediating effect of green financing. Sustainability, 14(2), 989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to all the respondents who participated in the survey.

Funding

This research received no external funding from any national or international agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magdalena Radulescu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Questionnaire

Appendix: Questionnaire

Environmental Sustainability Thoughts

  1. 1.

    In my perspective, environmental conservation is crucial.

  2. 2.

    For things that are healthy for the environment, I'm willing to spend more.

  3. 3.

    I try to reduce the amount of water and electricity I use.

  4. 4.

    I'm worried about how global warming will affect the environment.

  5. 5.

    Recycling and material repurposing, in my opinion, are crucial.

  6. 6.

    I think that there is a connection between climate change and human activity.

  7. 7.

    In order to reduce my environmental impact, I'm willing to change my way of life.

Greenwashing

  1. 1.

    Our SME exaggerates the environmental advantages in its ads.

  2. 2.

    The environmental promises made by our SME in its ads are hazy or vague.

  3. 3.

    Our SME’s environmental claims are not adequately disclosed in its ads.

  4. 4.

    Our SME puts an excessive amount of attention on unimportant environmental benefits.

  5. 5.

    Our SME misleads customers by giving the idea that it is environmentally friendly despite the fact that this is not supported by its advertisements.

Environmental performance

  1. 1.

    Our SME complies with environmental laws and norms or goes above and beyond them.

  2. 2.

    Our SME has taken measures to reduce its environmental impact.

  3. 3.

    Our SME keeps a close eye on its environmental performance and reports it.

  4. 4.

    Our SME has a solid reputation for being environmentally responsible.

Generative leadership

  1. 1.

    Our SME encourages team members to contribute to the accomplishment of shared objectives through their original ideas.

  2. 2.

    Our SME gives team members time to reflect and recognize their experiences and insights.

  3. 3.

    Our SME tries to create a supportive workplace where employees can feel supported and empowered.

  4. 4.

    In Our SME, people work in partnership with others to develop original concepts and solutions.

  5. 5.

    Our SME gives team members opportunities to progress professionally.

  6. 6.

    Our SME emphasizes on respect and trust when forming bonds with teammates.

  7. 7.

    In our SME, we encourages critical thought and assumption-checking among team members.

  8. 8.

    Our employees are prepared to take calculated risks in order to achieve important goals.

  9. 9.

    Our employees has a good outlook and a pleasant attitude.

  10. 10.

    Our management and leadership invite feedback and accept useful criticism.

  11. 11.

    We uphold moral standards and social duty.

  12. 12.

    We encourage team members to assume responsibility for their duties and obligations.

  13. 13.

    Our expectations are precisely stated and well communicated.

  14. 14.

    We are willing to make tough choices when necessary.

  15. 15.

    We are flexibility and adaptation to changing situations are displayed.

  16. 16.

    We respect the contributions of every member while celebrating team accomplishments.

  17. 17.

    We enable team members to benefit from their setbacks and mistakes.

  18. 18.

    We develop a clear vision for the team.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yousaf, Z., Palazzo, M., Radulescu, M. et al. Unleashing the role of greenwashing in the relationship of environmental sustainability thoughts and environmental performance: exploring the importance of generative leadership. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03473-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03473-w

Keywords

Navigation