Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Investigate the energy–environmental indices for pomegranate molasses production: evidence from Isfahan, Iran

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today, the study and analysis of energy and environmental pollutants in agricultural lands, greenhouses and gardens alone cannot be effective in relation to the efficiency of agricultural products. Therefore, in the post-harvest stages, two issues of energy and environment are addressed. Based on this, the current research was conducted with the aim of investigating the energy–environmental indicators of pomegranate paste production in Iran. The results showed that the total energy input, energy ratio (ER) and energy productivity (EP) were calculated as 35,027 MJ/ton, 0.103 and 0.0002 tons of paste/total cycle energy, respectively. Energy required to produce paste bottles and pomegranate energy (chemical fertilizers and diesel fuel) for processing were the most consumed inputs in the study areas with 13,500 (38%) and 13,131 (37%) MJ.t−1, respectively. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and the IMPACT 2002+ method were used to calculate the environmental effects, and 1 ton of pomegranate paste produced was determined as a functional unit (FU). Based on the findings obtained from the environmental section, the polyethylene bottles production had the highest emissions on the ecosystem quality (EQ), human health (HT), climate change (CC) and resources reduction (RR) damage categories as 94%, 72%, 71% and 92%, respectively. Based on the normalization results, HH, CC, RR and EQ have the highest values with 126.63, 78.23, 54.94 and 3.71, respectively. Also, the final impact was calculated as 263.53 pPt t−1, and HH had the highest contributions to it. Results taken from the post-harvest section (specially packaging) confirmed the requisiteness of agricultural crops whole cycle investigation (cradle-to-grave analysis). The findings show that by reducing fossil and non-renewable inputs (chemical fertilizers, electricity and diesel fuel) and replacing them with clean energy, it is possible to achieve sustainability in product production. By managing the consumption of inputs, organic products with high-energy efficiency can be produced and the world can use its economic and social benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Author elects to not share data.

Abbreviations

EP:

Energy productivity

ER:

Energy ratio

CC:

Climate change

EQ:

Ecosystem quality

FU:

Functional unit

HT:

Human health

LCA:

Life cycle assessment

LCI:

Life cycle inventory

LCIA:

Life cycle impact assessment

NEG:

Net energy gain

RR:

Resource reduction

SE:

Specific energy

References

  • Aganovic, K., Smetana, S., Grauwet, T., Toepfl, S., Mathys, A., Van Loey, A., & Heinz, V. (2017). Pilot scale thermal and alternative pasteurization of tomato and watermelon juice: An energy comparison and life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 514–525.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akcaoz, H., Ozcatalbas, O., & Kizilay, H. (2009). Analysis of energy use for pomegranate production in Turkey. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 7, 475–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amadeo, K., (2022). Oil Price Forecast 2023–2050. Current and Future Crude Oil Prices

  • Anonymous, (2002). Pomegranate growing. AGFACTS. Available at: http: //www.agric.nsw.gov.au

  • Anonymous, (2010). Database EcoInvent version 2, Available from: www.ecoinvent.org.

  • Anonymous, (2013). Ministry of Culture and Tourism Republic of Azerbaijan.

  • Anonymous, (2019). Annual agricultural statistics of Isfahan province in Iran [In Persian]. <agri-es.ir/Iran>

  • Caldeira-Pires, A., Benoist, A., Da Luz, S. M., Silverio, V. C., Silveira, C. M., & Machado, F. S. (2018). Implications of removing straw from soil for bioenergy: An LCA of ethanol production using total sugarcane biomass. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 249–259.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canakci, M. (2010). Energy use pattern and economic analyses of pomegranate cultivation in Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(7), 491–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Habert, G., Bouzidi, Y., Jullien, A., & Ventura, A. (2010). LCA allocation procedure used as an incitative method for waste recycling: An application to mineral additions in concrete. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(12), 1231–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WG. (1999). Sampling techniques, Third Edn. Wiley.

  • De Menna, F., Vittuari, M., & Molari, G. (2015). Impact evaluation of integrated food-bioenergy systems: A comparative LCA of peach nectar. Biomass and bioenergy, 73, 48–61.

  • Dwivedi, P., Spreen, T., & Goodrich-Schneider, R. (2012). Global warming impact of Florida’s Not-From-Concentrate (NFC) orange juice. Agricultural Systems, 108, 104–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhami, B., Raini, M. G. N., & Soheili-Fard, F. (2019). Energy and environmental indices through life cycle assessment of raisin production: A case study (Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province, Iran). Renewable Energy, 141, 507–515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elhami, B., Raini, M. G. N., Taki, M., Marzban, A., & Heidarisoltanabadi, M. (2021). Analysis and comparison of energy-economic-environmental cycle in two cultivation methods (seeding and transplanting) for onion production (case study: Central parts of Iran). Renewable Energy, 178, 875–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallahpour, F., Aminghafouri, A., Ghalegolab Behbahani, A., & Bannayan, M. (2012). The environmental impact assessment of wheat and barley production by using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14(6), 979–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2020). https://www.fao.org.

  • Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Kaab, A., & Rafiee, S. (2020). Application of life cycle analysis to assess environmental sustainability of wheat cultivation in the west of Iran. Energy, 193, 116768.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghatrehsamani, S., Ebrahimi, R., Kazi, S. N., Badry, A. B., & Sadeghinezhad, E. (2016). Optimization model of peach production relevant to input energies–Yield function in Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari province. Iran. Energy, 99, 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbani, R., Mondani, F., Amirmoradi, S., Feizi, H., Khorramdel, S., Teimouri, M., & Aghel, H. (2011). A case study of energy use and economical analysis of irrigated and dryland wheat production systems. Applied Energy, 88(1), 283–288.

  • Glozer, K., & Ferguson, L. (2008). Pomegranate Production in Afghanistan. UC Davis College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, Department of Plant Sciences, 32 p.

  • Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M.A.J., De Schryver, A., Struijs, J., Van Zelm, R., (2009). ReCiPe 2008: A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level, first ed. (Report I: characterisation).

  • Guinee, J. (2010). Sulphuric acid plant fundamentals. Sulphuric acid short course, Vancouver, Canada. pp. 7.

  • Hayek, J., El Bachawati, M., & Manneh, R. (2021). Life cycle assessment and water footprint scarcity of yogurt. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(12), 18362–18393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesampour, R., Taki, M., Fathi, R., Hassani, M., & Halog, A. (2022). Energy-economic-environmental cycle evaluation comparing two polyethylene and polycarbonate plastic greenhouses in cucumber production (from production to packaging and distribution). Science of the Total Environment, 828, 154232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini-Fashami, F., Motevali, A., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Hashemi, S. J., & Chau, K. W. (2019). Energy-Life cycle assessment on applying solar technologies for greenhouse strawberry production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 116, 109411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houshyar, E., Mahmoodi-Eshkaftaki, M., & Azadi, H. (2017). Impacts of technological change on energy use efficiency and GHG mitigation of pomegranate: Application of dynamic data envelopment analysis models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1180–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2006). Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. In: Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K. (Eds.), Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. IGES, Japan (www.ipccnggip.iges.or).

  • ISO 14040 (2006). Environmental management life cycle assessment principles and framework. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11(2):36.

  • ISO 14044 (2006). Environmental management–life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. Eur Comm Stand Int Organ Stand

  • Jolliet, O., Margni, M., Charles, R., Humbert, S., Payet, J., Rebitzer, G., & Rosenbaum, R. (2003). IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8(6), 324–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi, M., & Moghaddam, H. (2018). On-farm energy flow in grape orchards. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 17(2), 191–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanali, M., Akram, A., Behzadi, J., Mostashari-Rad, F., Saber, Z., Chau, K. W., & Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. (2021). Multi-objective optimization of energy use and environmental emissions for walnut production using imperialist competitive algorithm. Applied Energy, 284, 116342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanali, M., Kokei, D., Aghbashlo, M., Nasab, F. K., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., & Tabatabaei, M. (2020). Energy flow modeling and life cycle assessment of apple juice production: Recommendations for renewable energies implementation and climate change mitigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 118997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshnevisan, B., Rafiee, S., Omid, M., Mousazadeh, H., & Sefeedpari, P. (2013). Prognostication of environmental indices in potato production using artificial neural networks. Journal of Cleaner Production., 52, 402–409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshnevisan, B., Shariati, H. M., Rafiee, S., & Mousazadeh, H. (2014). Comparison of energy consumption and GHG emissions of open field and greenhouse strawberry production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 316–324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kitani, O. (1999). Energy and biomass engineering, CIGR handbook of agricultural engineering. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.

  • Kizilaslan, H. (2009). Input–output energy analysis of cherries production in Tokat Province of Turkey. Applied Energy, 86(7–8), 1354–1358.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kouchaki-Penchah, H., Sharifi, M., Mousazadeh, H., Zarea-Hosseinabadi, H., & Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. (2016). Gate to gate life cycle assessment of flat pressed particleboard production in Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 343–350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredi, M., & Vignali, G. (2014). Life cycle assessment of a packaged tomato puree: A comparison of environmental impacts produced by different life cycle phases. Journal of Cleaner Production, 73, 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardani, A., & Taghavifar, H. (2016). An overview on energy inputs and environmental emissions of grape production in West Azerbayjan of Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 918–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J., & Gavurová, B. (2022). Recovering phosphorous from biogas fermentation residues indicates promising economic results. Chemosphere, 291, 133008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J., & Maroušková, A. (2021). Economic considerations on nutrient utilization in wastewater management. Energies, 14(12), 3468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohseni, P., Borghei, A. M., & Khanali, M. (2018). Coupled life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for mitigation of environmental impacts and enhancement of energy efficiency in grape production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 937–947.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mostashari-Rad, F., Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Taki, M., Ghahderijani, M., Kaab, A., Chau, K. W., & Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. (2021). Exergoenvironmental damages assessment of horticultural crops using ReCiPe2016 and cumulative exergy demand frameworks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi, S. M., & Falahatkar, S. (2020). Spatiotemporal distribution patterns of atmospheric methane using GOSAT data in Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(5), 4191–4207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi-Avval, S. H., Rafiee, S., Sharifi, M., Hosseinpour, S., & Shah, A. (2017). Combined application of life cycle assessment and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for modeling energy and environmental emissions of oilseed production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 807–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek, T., Kägi, T., Blaser, S. (2007). Life cycle inventories of agricultural production systems. Final report ecoinvent V2. 0 No. 15.

  • Pishgar-Komleh, S. H., Akram, A., Keyhani, A., Sefeedpari, P., Shine, P., & Brandao, M. (2020). Integration of life cycle assessment, artificial neural networks, and metaheuristic optimization algorithms for optimization of tomato-based cropping systems in Iran. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25(3), 620–632.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajabi Hamedani, S., Keyhani, A., & Alimardani, R. (2011). Energy use patterns and econometric models of grape production in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy, 36(11), 6345–6351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saber, Z., Esmaeili, M., Pirdashti, H., Motevali, A., & Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. (2020). Exergoenvironmental-Life cycle cost analysis for conventional, low external input and organic systems of rice paddy production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taghavifar, H., & Mardani, A. (2015). Prognostication of energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions analysis of apple production in West Azarbayjan of Iran using Artificial Neural Network. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troujeni, M. E., Khojastehpour, M., Vahedi, A., & Emadi, B. (2018). Sensitivity analysis of energy inputs and economic evaluation of pomegranate production in Iran. Information Processing in Agriculture, 5(1), 114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waismoradi, A., Yousefinejad-Ostadkelayeh, M., & Rahmati, H. (2015). Environmental impact assessment of tangerine production using LCA methodology, case study: Guilan province of Iran.

Download references

Funding

No funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering of Biosystems, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, PO Box 115, 88186-34141, Shahrekord, Iran

    Amin Lotfalian Dehkordi

  2. Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

    Somaye Shadmanfar

Authors
  1. Amin Lotfalian Dehkordi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Somaye Shadmanfar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Lotfalian Dehkordi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Consent to participate

Authors of paper, consent to participate in the paper.

Consent to Publication

Authors of paper, consent to publish.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lotfalian Dehkordi, A., Shadmanfar, S. Investigate the energy–environmental indices for pomegranate molasses production: evidence from Isfahan, Iran. Environ Dev Sustain 26, 6109–6129 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02952-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02952-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation