Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Building a demand-oriented optimal model for the recycling of used electronic products

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recycling and remanufacturing of used electronic products are the great significance to environmental governance and resource management. From the demand perspective of remanufactured products, this paper proposes a demand-oriented recycling model of used electronic products based on the reverse supply chain and cooperative game theory. Taking cost–benefit analysis as the basis of the benefits model of the participants in the electronic waste product recycling system, a static multi-stage game model and a dynamic cooperative game model are established, there is an optimal strategy at each stage which may not be unique, depending on the decision model constructed. In the static multi-stage recycling mode, the strategic decisions at all stages are all based on the same demand for remanufactured products, the strategy decision at each stage of the recycling mode of waste electronic products is based on the multi-stage demand prediction of remanufactured products. The cost optimization of each link in the static multi-stage is to realize the optimal strategy combination of participants in each link. The study concluded that by setting demand as the main goal, both recycling and remanufacturing companies can improve their own benefits by realizing an optimal cost combination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Althaf, S., Babbitt, C. W., & Chen, R. (2019). Forecasting electronic waste flows for effective circular economy planning. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 151, 104362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boldoczki, S., Thorenz, A., & Tuma, A. (2020). The environmental impacts of preparation for reuse: A case study of WEEE reuse in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calmon, A. P., & Graves, S. C. (2017). Inventory management in a consumer electronics closed-loop supply Chain. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 19(4), 568–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, D., Debsarkar, A., Hazra, T., Bala, B. K., Gangopadhyay, A., & Chatterjee, D. (2017). Scenario of future e-waste generation and recycle-reuse-landfill-based disposal pattern in India: A system dynamics approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19, 1473–1487.

  • Feng, L., Govindan, K., & Li, C. (2017). Strategic planning: Design and coordination for dual-recycling channel reverse supply chain considering consumer behavior. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(2), 601–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, J., Zhong, J., Chen, D., & Liu, Q. (2020). Urban environmental governance, government intervention, and optimal strategies: A perspective on electronic waste management in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 154, 104547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haleem, F., Farooq, S., & Wæhrens, B. V. (2017). Supplier corporate social responsibility practices and sourcing geography. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 92–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S., Dai, Y., Ma, Z.-J., & Ye, Y.-S. (2016). Designing contracts for a reverse supply chain with strategic recycling behavior of consumers. International Journal of Production Economics, 180, 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, W., & Boons, F. (2017). Policy durability of Circular Economy in China: A process analysis of policy translation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 117, 12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Parra, B., Rubio, S., & Vicente-Molina, M.-A. (2014). Key drivers in the behavior of potential consumers of remanufactured products: A study on laptops in Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 488–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadambala, D. K., Subramanian, N., Tiwari, M. K., Abdulrahman, M., & Liu, C. (2017). Closed loop supply chain networks: Designs for energy and time value efficiency. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 382–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiddee, P., Naidu, R., & Wong, M. H. (2013). Electronic waste management approaches: An overview. Waste Management, 33(5), 1237–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., & Dixit, G. (2019). A novel hybrid MCDM framework for WEEE recycling partner evaluation on the basis of green competencies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Lei, M., Deng, H., Keong Leong, G., & Huang, T. (2016). A dual channel, quality-based price competition model for the WEEE recycling market with government subsidy. Omega, 59, 290–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Xia, Z., Shi, Q., & Xu, Q. (2021). Pricing and coordination of waste electrical and electronic equipment under third-party recycling in a closed-loop supply chain. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 12077–12094.

  • Maiti, T., & Giri, B. C. (2017). Two-way product recovery in a closed-loop supply chain with variable markup under price and quality dependent demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messmann, L., Helbig, C., Thorenz, A., & Tuma, A. (2019). Economic and environmental benefits of recovery networks for WEEE in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 655–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, S., & Webster, S. (2008). Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu, Y., Liu, Y., Nayak, R. R., & Li, M. (2015). Sustainable development of eco-industrial parks in China: Effects of managers’ environmental awareness on the relationships between practice and performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu, Y., Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Geng, Y., & Zhong, Y. (2013). A review of developing an e-wastes collection system in Dalian, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 176–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabbaghi, M., Esmaeilian, B., RaihanianMashhadi, A., Behdad, S., & Cade, W. (2015). An investigation of used electronics return flows: A data-driven approach to capture and predict consumers storage and utilization behavior. Waste Management, 36, 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, F., Sošić, G., & Debo, L. (2019). Manufacturers’ competition and cooperation in sustainability: Stable recycling alliances. Management Science, 65(10), 4733–4753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C.-Y. (2017). The impact of cost structure on supply chain cash flow risk. International Journal of Production Research, 55(22), 6624–6637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B., Ren, C., Dong, X., Zhang, B., & Wang, Z. (2019). Determinants shaping willingness towards on-line recycling behaviour: An empirical study of household e-waste recycling in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 143, 218–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., Han, X., & Hu, G. (2016). Optimal production for manufacturers considering consumer environmental awareness and green subsidies. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 397–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Wang, J., & You, J. (2015). Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products. European Journal of Operational Research, 241(1), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Tse, Y. K., Doherty, B., Li, S., & Akhtar, P. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management: Confirmation of a higher-order model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 206–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T., He, G., & Han, Y. (2020). How to optimize retailers’ recovery strategies for electronic waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, W., Zheng, Y., & Huang, W. (2017). Competitive advantage of qualified WEEE recyclers through EPR legislation. European Journal of Operational Research, 257(2), 641–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X. (2017). Recycling pricing and coordination of WEEE dual-channel closed-loop supply chain considering consumers’ Bargaining. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health., 14, 1578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zlamparet, G. I., Ijomah, W., Miao, Y., Awasthi, A. K., Zeng, X., & Li, J. (2017). Remanufacturing strategies: A solution for WEEE problem. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Xiaodong Lv is in charge of the Introduction and Theory and Hypotheses Section. Angfei Li and Tao Zhang provide the empirical results of the article, and Shuhong Wang makes the conclusions and submits the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuhong Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Consent to participate

All authors of the article consent to participate.

Consent to publish

All authors of the article consent to publish.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Parameters setup.

Appendix: Parameters setup.

Notation

Definitions

\(C\left[ {{\text{Sale}}} \right]\)

Total cost of sales of the remanufactured products

\(C\left[ {{\text{Rem}}} \right]\)

Total production cost of the remanufactured product

\(C\left[ {{\text{Rec}}} \right]\)

Total cost for recycling the waste electronics

\(E\left[ {{\text{Rem}}\& {\text{Rec}}} \right]\)

Cost of the recovery enterprise and remanufacturing enterprise in the dynamic situation

\(E\left[ {{\text{Sale}}} \right]\)

Expected sales benefits of the remanufactured products

\(E\left[ {Cons} \right]\)

Expected benefits for the consumer groups of the remanufactured products

\(E\left[ {hol} \right]\)

Expected benefits for the waste electronic product holders

\(E\left[ {Rem\& Rec} \right]\)

Expected benefits for the recycling and remanufacturing companies

\(E\left[ {Sale\& Hol} \right]\)

Expected benefits for the consumer groups of the remanufactured products and holders of waste electronic products

\({\upalpha }_{i} \left( {i = 1,2,3} \right)\)

Proportion of products sold through the direct sales channel during the remanufacturing sales process in constant market demand

\(\beta_{i} \left( {i = 1,2} \right)\)

Cost for a remanufactured product of different quality levels produced by remanufacturer when the remanufactured product demand is constant

\({\upgamma }\)

Proportion of the direct recycling channels adopted by the recycling companies when the demand for the waste electronic products is constant

\(1 - {\upgamma }\)

Proportion of the commissioned recycling channels adopted by the recycling companies

\(C_{0} \left( {\sum Q_{i} } \right)\)

Fixed costs for selling all the remanufactured products, including advertising and leasing

\(C_{1} \left( {\sum Q_{i} } \right)\)

Variable costs for selling all the remanufactured products, including discounts, cash and compensation, to promote sales

\(C_{2} \left( {\alpha_{i} } \right)\)

Cost to be paid to the retailer when taking commission sales; this cost is related to the proportion of commission

\(P_{i} \left( {i = 1,2,3} \right)\)

Sale price of the remanufactured product

\(\mu_{i}\)

Conversion rate of waste electronic products to remanufactured products

\(\beta_{j} \in \left[ {0,1} \right]\)

The quality level of different waste electronic products

\(C_{0}^{^{\prime}} \left( {\sum Q_{i}^{^{\prime}} } \right)\)

Fixed cost of remanufacturing; this cost is related to the scale of the waste products

\(C_{1}^{^{\prime}} \left( {\sum Q_{i}^{^{\prime}} } \right)\)

Variable costs in the remanufacturing process; this cost consists of the production costs of all the different processes \(\mathrm{k}\) of the remanufacturing process

\(Q_{i}^{^{\prime}}\)

The quantity of waste electronic products required by remanufacturing enterprises \(Q_{i}^{^{\prime}} \left( {i = 1,2,3} \right)\) \({Q}_{i}^{^{\prime}}\left(i=\mathrm{1,2},3\right)\) \({Q}_{i}^{^{\prime}}\left(i=\mathrm{1,2},3\right)\)

\(Q_{i}\)

The demand forecast for different remanufactured products in the market \({\mathrm{Q}}_{\mathrm{i}}\left(\mathrm{i}=\mathrm{1,2},3\right)\) \({\mathrm{Q}}_{\mathrm{i}}\left(\mathrm{i}=\mathrm{1,2},3\right)\)

\(C_{0}^{^{\prime\prime}} \left( {\sum Q_{i}^{^{\prime}} } \right)\)

Fixed cost of recycling

\(\mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{1} c^{\prime\prime}\left( {\beta_{j} } \right)q^{\prime}\left( {\beta_{j} } \right)\)

Direct cost of recycling the product

\(c^{\prime\prime}\left( {\beta_{j} } \right)\)

Product recycling prices at different quality levels

\(C_{1}^{^{\prime\prime}} \left( \gamma \right)\)

Cost of adopting a commissioned recycling channel

\(d_{n} \left[ {Q_{{i - }} \left( {t - n} \right)} \right]^{{r_{n} }} e^{{\theta _{n} }}\)

Changes in the product demand in the current period caused by the product sales in the period \(\left( {t - n} \right)\), where \(d_{n}\), \(r_{n}\) and \(\theta_{n}\) denote the model parameters

\(Q_{{i - }} \left( {t - n} \right)\)

Number of products sold in \(\left( {t - n} \right)\), \(n \le t\)

\(n\)

Number of data periods considered to generate the predictions

\(F\left( {P_{i} ,Q_{i} } \right)\)

Benefits such as satisfaction from the remanufactured consumer groups buying remanufactured products

\(G\left( {\sum Q_{i}^{^{\prime}} ,P_{i}^{^{\prime\prime}} } \right)\)

Cost effectiveness of the electronics products discarded by the product owners

\(\alpha_{i}^{*} \left( {i = 1,2,3} \right)\)

Strategies for the remanufacturing product sales phase

\(\alpha_{i}^{*} Q_{i}\)

Number of products sold through direct channels for different products

\(\beta_{1}^{*} ,\beta_{2}^{*}\)

Strategies in the remanufacturing phase

\(\gamma^{*}\)

Strategies for product recycling

\(E\left[ {Rpv} \right]\)

Cost constraints in the resale process

\(a_{m} x_{m}^{{b_{m} }} e^{{\varepsilon_{m} }}\)

Changes in the product demand caused by the factor \(\left( {t - n} \right)\) affecting the demand for remanufactured products,where \(a_{m}\), \(b_{m}\) and \(\varepsilon_{m}\) denote the model parameters

\(x_{m}\)

Value converted by qualitative or quantitative elements according to certain rules

\(\varepsilon_{m}\)

Number of variables that affect the demand forecast for the remanufactured products

\(P_{i}\)

Remanufactured product prices in the market

\(q^{\prime}\left( {\beta_{j} } \right)\)

Number of used electronic products at different quality levels

\(Q_{{i - }} \left( {t + 2} \right)\)

Forecast of the remanufacturing product demand in the period (t + 2)

\(Q_{{i - }}^{'} \left( t \right)\)

Number of waste electronic products to be recycled in the period t

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lv, X., Li, A., Wang, S. et al. Building a demand-oriented optimal model for the recycling of used electronic products. Environ Dev Sustain 25, 5949–5971 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02287-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02287-6

Keywords

Navigation