Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Bayesian game of resource exploitation in hinterland regions: modelling scenarios for sustainable development

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate climate change, decision-makers around the world look for alternatives to fossil resources. Among these alternatives is biomass, such as wood pulp, macroalgae, and grasses. Although refined biomass can replace oil, plastics, and petrochemicals within many industries, increased use of biomass may cause land-use changes, biodiversity loss, and disruption of ecosystems. On our path towards a fossil-free society, we must therefore combine intensified biomass production with conservation of critical natural resources. As these resources are often abundant in rural and coastal regions, the resource strategies of these regions are important for the environmental sustainability of this transition. Constructing a game of resource exploitation and conservation in rural regions, this paper models various scenarios for sustainable development and identifies the conditions under which these scenarios are most likely to occur. Based on a game theoretic analysis, three hypotheses are formulated on the costs and benefits that motivate rural regions to manage their biomass resources sustainably. These hypotheses shed light on dynamics that much of the existing literature seems to overlook. Thus, this paper holds novel insights that may contribute to theory development on environmentally sustainable resource exploitation at the regional level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

See online appendix.

References

  • Alcott, B., Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., Polimeni, J., Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., & Polimeni, J. (2012). The Jevons paradox and the myth of resource efficiency improvements. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849773102.

  • Andersen, M. S., & Massa, I. (2000). Ecological modernization—origins, dilemmas and future directions. Journal of Environmental Policy& Planning, 2(4), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/714852820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antikainen, R., Dalhammar, C., Hildén, M., Judl, J., Jääskeläinen, T., Kautto, P., & Thidell, Å. (2017). Renewal of forest based manufacturing towards a sustainable circular bioeconomy. Finnish Environment Institute.

  • Arler, F., Mosgaard, M. A., & Riisgaard, H. (2015). Bæredygtighed: Værdier, regler og metoder. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, S., Murphy-Bokern, D., Kalinina, O., Taylor, G., & Jones, M. (Eds.). (2016). Perennial biomass crops for a resource-constrained world. Cham: Springer.

  • Christensen, L. D. (2020). Seaweed cultivation in the Faroe Islands: Analyzing the potential for forward and fiscal linkages. Marine Policy, 119, 104015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damsø, T., Kjær, T., & Christensen, T. B. (2016). Local climate action plans in climate change mitigation—examining the case of Denmark. Energy Policy, 89, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieckhoff, P., El-Chichakli, B., & Patermann, C. (2015). Bioeconomy policy. Synopsis and Analysis of Strategies in the G7 (A Report from the German Bioeconomy Council).

  • Ebner, A. (2016). Editorial: Exploring regional varieties of capitalism. Regional Studies, 50(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1039227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figge, F., Young, W., & Barkemeyer, R. (2014). Sufficiency or efficiency to achieve lower resource consumption and emissions? The role of the rebound effect. Journal of Cleaner Production, 69, 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fund, C., El-Chichakli, B., Patermann, C., & Dieckhoff, P. (2015). Bioeconomy policy (Part II). Synopsis and Analysis of Strategies in the G7 (A Report from the German Bioeconomy Council).

  • Garnett, T., Appleby, M. C., Balmford, A., Bateman, I. J., Benton, T. G., Bloomer, P., & God617 fray, H. C. J. (2013). Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Premises and policies. Science, 341(6141), 33–34. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grunfelder, J., Norlén, G., Randall, L., & Gassen, N. S. (2020). State of the nordic region 2020. Nordic Council of Ministers. https://doi.org/10.6027/NO2020-001.

  • Gunton, T. (2003). Natural resources and regional development: An assessment of dependency and comparative advantage paradigms. Economic Geography, 79(1), 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunton, T. (2013). The Staple Theory at 50: Staple theory and the new staple boom \(|\) rab624 ble.ca. http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/progressive-economics-forum/2013/11/staple-theory-50-staple-theory-and-new-staple-boo.

  • Hall, P. A., & Gingerich, D. W. (2009). Varieties of capitalism and institutional complemen627 tarities in the political economy: An empirical analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 39(03), 449. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409000672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., Soskice, D. W., & (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press.

  • Halseth, G. (Ed.). (2016). Transformation of resource towns and peripheries: Political economy perspectives. Routledge.

  • Halseth, G., & Ryser, L. (2018). Towards a political economy of resource dependent regions. Abing634 don. Routledge.

  • Hecken, G. V., & Bastiaensen, J. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services in Nicaragua: Do market-based approaches work? Development and Change, 41(3), 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01644.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermansen, J. E. (2017). Danmark, Miljø-og, Fødevareministeriet & DCA - Nationalt Center for Fødevarerog Jordbrug. Green biomass—protein production through bio-refining. Tjele: DCA—Nationalt Center for Fødevarer og Jordbrug.

  • Hintz, J. (2007). Some political problems for rewilding nature. Ethics, Place& Environment, 10(2), 177–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668790701344774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hueting, R. (2010). Why environmental sustainability can most probably not be attained with growing production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 525–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innis, H. A. (1999). The fur trade in Canada: An introduction to Canadian economic history. University of Toronto Press.

  • IPCC. (2018). Global warming of \(1.5^{\circ }\text{C}\).

  • Jänicke, M. (2020). Ecological modernization—a paradise of feasibility but no general solution. In L. Mez, L. Okamura, & H. Weidner (Eds.), The ecological modernization capacity of Japan and Germany: Comparing nuclear energy, renewables, automobility and rare earth policy (pp. 13–23). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27405-4_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. W. (2015). Perceived barriers and policy solutions in clean energy infrastructure investment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 104, 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, D. (2015). Rethinking rewilding. Geoforum, 65, 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminker, C., & Stewart, F. (2012). The role of institutional investors in financing clean energy tech. Paris, France: Rep.

  • Keith, H., Lindenmayer, D., Mackey, B., Blair, D., Carter, L., McBurney, L., Konishi-Nagano, T. (2014). Managing temperate forests for carbon storage: Impacts of logging versus forest protection on carbon stocks. Ecosphere, 5(6), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00051.1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerschner, C., Wächter, P., Nierling, L., & Ehlers, M.-H. (2018). Degrowth and Tech664 nology: Towards feasible, viable, appropriate and convivial imaginaries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1619–1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, L., Bjornsdottir, B., Brandt, A., Hilden, K., Hreggvidsson, G., Jacobsen, B., & Wentzel, A. (2016). Development of the Nordic bioeconomy. Nordic Council of Ministers. https://doi.org/10.6027/TN2015-582

  • Leoussis, J., & Brzezicka, P. (2017). Access-to-finance conditions for investments in bio-based industries and the blue economy (Tech. Rep.). Luxembourg: European Investment Bank and Innovation Finance Advisory.

  • Næss-Schmidt, S., & Hansen, M. B. (2012). Bioøkonomiens potentiale og værdien for landdistrikterne (Tech. Rep.). Copenhagen Economics.

  • OECD. (2011). Towards green growth. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264111318-en.

  • O’Riordan, T., Lenton, T. (Eds.) (2013). Addressing tipping points for a precarious future. Published for The British Academy, by Oxford University Press.

  • Osborne, M. J. (2009). An introduction to game theory. Oxford University Press.

  • Ostrom, E. (2015). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge Univ Press.

  • Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A., & Platais, G. (2005). Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development, 33(2), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A. K., & Solberg, B. (2005). Environmental and economic impacts of substitution between wood products and alternative materials: A review of micro-level analyses from Norway and Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 7(3), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00063-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polzin, F. (2017). Mobilizing private finance for low-carbon innovation—A systematic review of barriers and solutions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77, 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Research & Degrowth. (2010). Degrowth declaration of the Paris 2008 conference. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 523–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (1980). Entropy: A new world view. The Viking Press.

  • Scarlat, N., Dallemand, J.-F., Monforti-Ferrario, F., & Nita, V. (2015). The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and facts. Environmental Development, 15, 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1984). Choice and consequence. Harvard University Press.

  • Schneider, F., Kallis, G., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2010). Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, K. Z. S. (2006). Nature and national identity after communism: Globalizing the ethnoscape. University of Pittsburgh Press.

  • Skjærseth, J. B., & Wettestad, J. (2008). Implementing EU emissions trading: Success or failure? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-008-9068-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, J. (Ed.). (2014). The staple theory @ 50: Reflections on the lasting significance of Mel Watkins’ "a staple theory of economic growth”. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

  • Stidsen, M. (2019). Den kommunale klimaindsats 1990–2018: En komparativ analyse af fem danske kommuners klimaindsats i et historisk perspektiv. Politik. https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v22i3.117729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, B. K., & Troy, D. J. (Eds.). (2015). Seaweed sustainability: Food and non-food applications. Elsevier/AP, Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier.

  • Torre, A., & Wallet, F. (2016). Regional development in rural areas. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02372-4.

  • Vahabi, M. (2017). A critical survey of the resource curse literature through the appropriability lens.

  • Vatn, A. (2016). Environmental governance: Institutions, policies and actions (Paperback (Edn). Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Venkataraman, S. (2004). Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M. (1963). A staple theory of economic growth. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 29(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.2307/139461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M. (1977). The staple theory revisited. Journal of Canadian Studies, 12(5), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcs.12.5.83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R., Olsen, L. S., Baltzopoulos, A., Dip, A. T., Fredericsson, C., Perjo, L., Rasmussen, R. O. (2012). Scoping green growth and innovation in Nordic regions. Stockholm.

  • Wunder, S. (2005). Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts (CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 42). Jakarta: Center for International Forestry Research.

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by Nordforsk, Nordic Energy and Nordic Innovation (Grant No. 82841) to the project NOWAGG (New Nordic Ways to Green Growth: https://projects.au.dk/nowagg/)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark

    Lotte Dalgaard Christensen

Authors
  1. Lotte Dalgaard Christensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lotte Dalgaard Christensen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 221 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Christensen, L.D. A Bayesian game of resource exploitation in hinterland regions: modelling scenarios for sustainable development. Environ Dev Sustain 25, 277–296 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02052-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02052-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation