Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Farmers’ behaviors and attitudes toward climate change adaptation: evidence from Vietnamese smallholder farmers

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines how a wide range of social-psychological factors, including perceived risks, beliefs in climate change occurrences and consequences, belief in human ingenuity and trust in institutions, could influence farmers’ decisions in taking different climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies. We found that farmers who believe in climate change occurrences and consequences tend to adopt mitigation strategies than others, while those who believe in perceived risk associated with climate threats are more likely to have positive attitudes toward adaptation. Moreover, belief in human ingenuity to tackle climate change lessens farmers’ decisions to adopt adaptation and mitigation measures. Therefore, policymakers should improve farmers’ belief in human ingenuity, the occurrences of climate change and climate change consequences to effectively motivate them toward climate change adaptation and mitigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

The data and statistical codes (in Stata software) used in this study are available from the authors upon request.

References

  • Abid, M., Schneider, U. A., & Scheffran, J. (2016). Adaptation to climate change and its impacts on food productivity and crop income: Perspectives of farmers in rural Pakistan. Journal of Rural Studies, 47, 254–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. M., Hurd, B. H., Lenhart, S., & Leary, N. (1998). Effects of global climate change on agriculture: An interpretative review. Climate Research, 11(1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D. R., Naess, L. O., Wolf, J., & Wreford, A. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, 93(3–4), 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almazroui, M., Nazrul Islam, M., Athar, H., Jones, P., & Rahman, M. A. (2012). Recent climate change in the Arabian Peninsula: annual rainfall and temperature analysis of Saudi Arabia for 1978–2009. International Journal of Climatology, 32(6), 953–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antwi− Agyei, P., Dougill, A. J., & Stringer, L. C. (2015). Barriers to climate change adaptation: evidence from northeast ghana in the context of a systematic literature review. Climate and Development, 7(4), 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. G., Morton, L. W., & Hobbs, J. (2013). Farmer beliefs and concerns about climate change and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation: Evidence from Iowa. Climatic Change, 118(3–4), 551–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. G., Jr., Morton, L. W., & Hobbs, J. (2015). Understanding farmer perspectives on climate change adaptation and mitigation: The roles of trust in sources of climate information, climate change beliefs, and perceived risk. Environment and Behavior, 47(2), 205–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azadi, Y., Yazdanpanah, M., & Mahmoudi, H. (2019). Understanding smallholder farmers’ adaptation behaviors through climate change beliefs, risk perception, trust, and psychological distance: Evidence from wheat growers in Iran. Journal of Environmental Management, 250, 109456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannstrom, C., Jepson, W., Filippi, A. M., Redo, D., Xu, Z., & Ganesh, S. (2008). Land change in the brazilian savanna (cerrado), 1986–2002: Comparative analysis and implications for land-use policy. Land Use Policy, 25(4), 579–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, M., & Ma, Z. (2016). Linking smallholder farmer climate change adaptation decisions to development. Climate and Development, 8(4), 289–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, I., & Lim, B. (2005). Achieving adequate adaptation in agriculture. Climatic change, 70(1), 191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, T. H., & Kay, A. C. (2014). Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 809–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-F. (2015). An examination of the value-belief-norm theory model in predicting pro-environmental behaviour in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(2), 145–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, M. G., Kang, H., Dietz, T., Jaimes, P., & Liu, J. (2019). Activating values for encouraging pro-environmental behavior: the role of religious fundamentalism and willingness to sacrifice. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 9(4), 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codjoe, S. N. A., Owusu, G., & Burkett, V. (2014). Perception, experience, and indigenous knowledge of climate change and variability: The case of Accra, a sub-Saharan African city. Regional Environmental Change, 14(1), 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creutzig, F., Jochem, P., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Mattauch, L., van Vuuren, D. P., McCollum, D., & Minx, J. (2015). Transport: A roadblock to climate change mitigation? Science, 350(6263), 911–912.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, T. J., & Clayton, S. (2011). The psychological impacts of global climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freibauer, A. (2003). Regionalised inventory of biogenic greenhouse gas emissions from European agriculture. European Journal of Agronomy, 19(2), 135–160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frijters, P., & Beatton, T. (2012). The mystery of the u-shaped relationship between happiness and age. Journal of Economic Behavior& Organization, 82(2–3), 525–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardezi, M., & Arbuckle, J. G. (2020). Techno-optimism and farmers’ attitudes toward climate change adaptation. Environment and Behavior, 52(1), 82–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giaccaria, S., Frontuto, V., & Dalmazzone, S. (2016). Valuing externalities from energy infrastructures through stated preferences: A geographically stratified sampling approach. Applied Economics, 48(56), 5497–5512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimberg, B. I., Ahmed, S., Ellis, C., Miller, Z., & Menalled, F. (2018). Climate change perceptions and observations of agricultural stakeholders in the Northern Great Plains. Sustainability, 10(5), 1687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grothmann, T., & Patt, A. (2005). Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(3), 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, C., Dai, H., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Liu, X., & Liu, Y. (2020). Impacts of climate change mitigation on agriculture water use: A provincial analysis in china. Geography and Sustainability, 1(3), 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, K., & Niemeyer, S. (2011). Public responses to climate change: The role of deliberation in building capacity for adaptive action. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 957–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 622–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, J. K., & Hofmockel, K. S. (2020). Soil microbiomes and climate change. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 18(1), 35–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., & Shin, W. (2017). Understanding american and korean students’ support for pro-environmental tax policy: The application of the value-belief-norm theory of environmentalism. Environmental Communication, 11(3), 311–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. (2012). Climate change and soil degradation mitigation by sustainable management of soils and other natural resources. Agricultural Research, 1(3), 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Dang, H., Li, E., Nuberg, I., & Bruwer, J. (2014). Farmers’ perceived risks of climate change and influencing factors: A study in the Mekong Delta. Vietnam. Environmental Management, 54(2), 331–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Dang, H., Li, E., Nuberg, I., & Bruwer, J. (2014). Understanding farmers’ adaptation intention to climate change: A structural equation modelling study in the Mekong Delta. Vietnam. Environmental Science& Policy, 41, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, K., Grigg, A., O’Connor, B., Brown, C., Vause, J., Gheyssens, J., Weatherdon, L., Halle, M., Burgess, N. D., Fletcher, R., et al. (2019). A common framework of natural capital assets for use in public and private sector decision making. Ecosystem Services, 36, 100899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locatelli, B., Pavageau, C., Pramova, E., & Di Gregorio, M. (2015). Integrating climate change mitigation and adaptation in agriculture and forestry: Opportunities and trade-offs. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(6), 585–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change, 77(1), 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mase, A. S., Gramig, B. M., & Prokopy, L. S. (2017). Climate change beliefs, risk perceptions, and adaptation behavior among Midwestern US crop farmers. Climate Risk Management, 15, 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masud, M. M., Azam, M. N., Mohiuddin, M., Banna, H., Akhtar, R., Alam, A. F., & Begum, H. (2017). Adaptation barriers and strategies towards climate change: Challenges in the agricultural sector. Journal of cleaner production, 156, 698–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P. and J. A. Nelder (1989). Generalized Linear Models. 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall.

  • McFadden, D., & Train, K. (2000). Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15(5), 447–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mersha, A. A., & van Laerhoven, F. (2018). The interplay between planned and autonomous adaptation in response to climate change: Insights from rural Ethiopia. World Development, 107, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M., Duncan, R., & Parton, K. (2015). Religion does matter for climate change attitudes and behavior. PloS one, 10(8), e0134868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nauges, C., & Wheeler, S. A. (2017). The complex relationship between households’ climate change concerns and their water and energy mitigation behaviour. Ecological Economics, 141, 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, A. T., & Hens, L. (2019). Climate change-associated hazards, impacts, and vulnerability at regional level. In human ecology of climate change hazards in Vietnam. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen-Anh, T., Nong, D., Leu, S., et al. (2021). Changes in the environment from perspectives of small-scale farmers in remote vietnam. Regional Environmental Change, 21(4), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, R. E., Bard, R. J., & Fisher, A. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 19(3), 461–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojo, T., & Baiyegunhi, L. (2020). Determinants of climate change adaptation strategies and its impact on the net farm income of rice farmers in South-West Nigeria. Land Use Policy, 95, 103946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. (2020). What makes climate change adaptation effective? a systematic review of the literature. Global Environmental Change, 62, 102071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, P., Irulappan, V., Bagavathiannan, M. V., & Senthil-Kumar, M. (2017). Impact of combined abiotic and biotic stresses on plant growth and avenues for crop improvement by exploiting physio-morphological traits. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham, N. T. T., Nong, D., & Garschagen, M. (2019). Farmers’ decisions to adapt to flash floods and landslides in the northern mountainous regions of vietnam. Journal of environmental management, 252, 109672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revelt, D., & Train, K. (1998). Mixed logit with repeated choices: Households’ choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 647–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickson, R., Deeks, L., Graves, A., Harris, J., Kibblewhite, M., & Sakrabani, R. (2015). Input constraints to food production: The impact of soil degradation. Food Security, 7(2), 351–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2012). Human drivers of national greenhouse-gas emissions. Nature Climate Change, 2(8), 581–586.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. J. (1992). Adaptation of agriculture to climate change. Climatic change, 21(4), 385–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samer, F., Osman, A. I., Doran, J., & Rooney, D. W. (2020). Strategies for mitigation of climate change: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 18(6), 2069–2094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. (2011). Focussing in on focus groups: effective participative tools or cheap fixes for land use policy? Land Use Policy, 28(4), 684–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J., & Street, R. (1999). The science of adaptation: a framework for assessment. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 4(3), 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J., & Wandel, J. (2000). An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. In Societal adaptation to climate variability and change. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B., & Skinner, M. W. (2002). Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: A typology. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 7(1), 85–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. B., & Lenhart, S. S. (1996). Climate change adaptation policy options. Climate Research, 6(2), 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stakhiv, E. Z. (1996). Managing water resources for climate change adaptation. In: Adapting to Climate Change, pp. 243–264. Springer.

  • Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25(5), 322–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talanow, K., Topp, E. N., Loos, J., & Martín-López, B. (2021). Farmers’ perceptions of climate change and adaptation strategies in South Africa’s Western Cape. Journal of Rural Studies, 81, 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, J., & McDaniels, T. L. (2013). Understanding individual risk perceptions and preferences for climate change adaptations in biological conservation. Environmental Science& Policy, 27, 114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thampapillai, D. J., & Anderson, J. R. (1994). A review of the socio-economic analysis of soil degradation problems for developed and developing countries. Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, 62, 291–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinh, T. Q., Rañola, R. F., Jr., Camacho, L. D., & Simelton, E. (2018). Determinants of farmers’ adaptation to climate change in agricultural production in the central region of Vietnam. Land Use Policy, 70, 224–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, K. L., & Fielding, K. S. (2014). It’s political: How the salience of one’s political identity changes climate change beliefs and policy support. Global Environmental Change, 27, 131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Valkengoed, A. M., & Steg, L. (2019). Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour. Nature Climate Change, 9(2), 158–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vetter, S. H., Sapkota, T. B., Hillier, J., Stirling, C. M., Macdiarmid, J. I., Aleksandrowicz, L., Green, R., Joy, E. J., Dangour, A. D., & Smith, P. (2017). Greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural food production to supply Indian diets: Implications for climate change mitigation. Agriculture, Ecosystems& Environment, 237, 234–241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, E., & Smit, B. (2005). Climate change adaptation in light of sustainable agriculture. Journal of sustainable agriculture, 27(1), 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, T., & Von Braun, J. (2013). Climate change impacts on global food security. Science, 341(6145), 508–513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (2016). Understanding and interpreting generalized ordered logit models. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 40(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L., & Fulton, L. (2005). Climate change mitigation and transport in developing nations. Transport Reviews, 25(6), 691–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynveen, C. J., & Sutton, S. G. (2015). Engaging the public in climate change-related pro-environmental behaviors to protect coral reefs: The role of public trust in the management agency. Marine Policy, 53, 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by the Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number 502.01-2018.309.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tuan Nguyen-Anh.

Ethics declarations

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 7 Full estimation results of the mixed-effects ordered logit model
Table 8 Full estimation results of the ordered logit model

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tiet, T., To-The, N. & Nguyen-Anh, T. Farmers’ behaviors and attitudes toward climate change adaptation: evidence from Vietnamese smallholder farmers. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 14235–14260 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02030-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02030-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation