Abstract
Developing countries introduced environmental impact assessment (EIA) systems in the 1970s and 1980s, but their weak implementation has been a major problem. This study suggests solutions for the enhancement of EIA systems in developing countries using a quantitative literature review. It clarifies the time-series changes of constraints and develops recommendations on EIA systems by applying quantitative text analysis to 128 documents published between 1983 and 2020. Before and after 2003, the ratio of the constraints embodied in law and administration significantly decreased, and that of environmental impact statements (EISs) significantly increased, while the ratio of recommendations for monitoring significantly increased. Based on these findings, the study proposes that countries should strive for better quality EIS and develop an EIS database to enhance EIA systems, because EIS quality determines the effectiveness of an EIA system and the database supports improvement of that quality. It is suggested that improving EIS quality will lead to the enhancement of EIA systems in developing countries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Abad-Segura, E., Batlles-delaFuente, A., González-Zamar, M. D., & Belmonte-Ureña, L. J. (2021). Implications for sustainability of the joint application of bioeconomy and circular economy: A worldwide trend study. Sustainability, 13, 7182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137182
Abracosa, R., & Ortolano, L. (1987). Environmental impact assessment in the Philippines: 1977–1985. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 7, 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(87)90003-5
Ahmed, T., & Ferdausi, S. A. (2016). Evaluation of the EIA system in Bangladesh. In 36th annual conference of the international association for impact assessment, Nagoya, 11–14 May. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304526684.
Anifowose, B., Lawler, D. M., van der Horst, D., & Chapman, L. (2016). A systematic quality assessment of environmental impact statements in the oil and gas industry. Science of the Total Environment, 572, 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.083
Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2020). Effectiveness of the 2009 safeguard policy statement. https://www.adb.org/documents/effectiveness-2009-safeguard-policy-statement.
Aung, T. S. (2017). Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system and implementation in Myanmar: Its significance in oil and gas industry. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 66, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.05.005
Aw, O. (1996). Integration of EIA in development projects: The ADB experience. Impact Assessment, 14, 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1996.9725894
Badr, E. A. (2009). Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system in Egypt. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27, 193–203. https://doi.org/10.3152/146155109X465959
Badr, E. A., Zahran, A. A., & Cashmore, M. (2011). Benchmarking performance: Environmental impact statements in Egypt. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31, 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.10.004
Barker, A., & Jones, C. (2013). A critique of the performance of EIA within the offshore oil and gas sector. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 43, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.05.001
Bilgin, A. (2015). Analysis of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) Directive and the EIA decision in Turkey. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 53, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.04.001
Boyle, J. (1998). Cultural influences on implementing environmental impact assessment: Insights from Thailand, Indonesia, and Malaysia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18, 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(97)00082-6
Briffett, C. (1999). Environmental impact assessment in Southeast Asia: Fact and fiction? GeoJournal, 49, 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007142422219
Briffett, C., Obbard, J. P., & Mackee, J. (2003). Towards SEA for the developing nations of Asia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00100-2
Brown, A. L., Hindmarsh, R. A., & McDonald, G. T. (1991). Environmental assessment procedures and issues in the Pacific Basin-Southeast Asia region. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 11, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(91)90029-J
Burdge, R. J. (1991). A brief history and major trends in the field of impact assessment. Impact Assessment, 9, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1991.9726070
Byambaa, B., & de Vries, W. T. (2020). Evaluating the effectiveness of the environmental impact assessment process in Mongolia for nomadic-pastoral land users. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1643629
Chanthy, S., & Grünbühel, C. M. (2015). Critical challenges to consultants in pursuing quality of environmental and social impact assessments (ESIA) in Cambodia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 33, 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2015.1049488
Cherp, A. (2001). EA legislation and practice in Central and Eastern Europe and the former USSR: A comparative analysis. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21, 335–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00078-6
Chi, C. S. F., Xu, J., & Xue, L. (2014). Public participation in environmental impact assessment for public projects: A case of non-participation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57, 1422–1440. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.810550
Coşkun, A. A., & Turker, O. (2011). Analysis of environmental impact assessment (EIA) system in Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 175, 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1507-3
De Jong, A. A., Runhaar, H. A. C., Runhaar, P. R., Kolhoff, A. J., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2012). Promoting system-level learning from project-level lessons: An analysis of donor-driven ‘indirect’ learning about EIA systems in Ghana and the Maldives. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 33, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.10.001
De la Maza, C. L. (2001). NEPA’s influence in developing countries: The Chilean case. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00073-1
Duarte, C. G., Dibo, A. P. A., Siqueira-Gay, J., & Sánchez, L. E. (2017). Practitioners’ perceptions of the Brazilian environmental impact assessment system: Results from a survey. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35, 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2017.1322813
Ebisemiju, F. S. (1993). Environmental impact assessment: Making it work in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 38, 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1993.1044
Elvan, O. D. (2018). Analysis of environmental impact assessment practices and legislation in Turkey. Environmental Science & Policy, 84, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.008
Fonseca, A., Sánchez, L. E., & Ribeiro, J. C. J. (2017). Reforming EIA systems: A critical review of proposals in Brazil. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 62, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.10.002
Gałaś, S., Gałaś, A., Zeleňáková, M., Zvijáková, L., Fialová, J., & Kubíčková, H. (2015). Environmental impact assessment in the Visegrad group countries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 55, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.06.006
Geghamyan, S., & Pavlickova, K. (2019). Does the current state of environmental impact assessment in Armenia pose a challenge for the future? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 21(2), 1950004. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333219500042
Glasson, J., & Salvador, N. N. B. (2000). EIA in Brazil: A procedures-practice gap. A comparative study with reference to the European Union, and especially the UK. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 191–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(99)00043-8
Gutierrez, M., Bekessy, S. A., & Gordon, A. (2021). Biodiversity and ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment: An evaluation of six Australian cases. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 87, 106552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106552
Gwimbi, P., & Nhamo, G. (2016a). Benchmarking the effectiveness of mitigation measures to the quality of environmental impact statements: Lessons and insights from mines along the Great Dyke of Zimbabwe. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18, 527–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9663-9
Gwimbi, P., & Nhamo, G. (2016b). Translating mitigation measures proposed in environmental impact statements into planning conditions: Promises and practices by multinational platinum mining forms along the Great Dyke of Zimbabwe. Environmental Science and Policy, 57, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.005
Hasan, M. A., Nahiduzzaman, K. M., & Aldosary, A. S. (2018). Public participation in EIA: A comparative study of the projects run by government and non-governmental organizations. Environment Impact Assessment Review, 72, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.05.001
Higuchi, K. (2014). Quantitative text analysis for social researchers: A contribution to content analysis. Nakanishiya. (in Japanese).
Jay, S., Jones, C., Slinn, P., & Wood, C. (2007). Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.12.001
Kabir, S. M. Z., & Momtaz, S. (2012). The quality of environmental impact statements and environmental impact assessment practice in Bangladesh. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30, 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.672671
Kakonge, J. O. (1996). Problems with public participation in EIA process: Examples from Sub-Saharan Africa. Impact Assessment, 14, 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1996.9725906
Kamijo, T., & Huang, G. (2016). Improving the quality of environmental impacts assessment reports: Effectiveness of alternatives analysis and public involvement in JICA supported projects. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 34, 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2016.1176402
Kamijo, T., & Huang, G. (2017). Enhancing the discussion of alternatives in EIA using principle component analysis leads to improved public involvement. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 65, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.04.009
Kamijo, T., & Huang, G. (2021). Decision factors and benchmarks of EIA report quality for Japan’s cooperation projects. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 2552–2569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00686-1
Kengne, C. V. N., Evouna, S. E. M., & Bitondo, D. (2013). Public hearing in environmental and social impact assessment for energy sector projects in Cameroon. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 31, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.759454
Kennedy, W. V. (1985). Environmental impact assessment: The work of the OECD. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 5, 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(85)90011-3
Kennedy, W. V. (1999). Environmental impact assessment and multilateral financial institutions. In J. Petts (Ed.), Handbook of environmental impact assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 98–120). Blackwell.
Khan, M., Chaudhry, M. N., Ahmad, S. R., Saif, S., & Mehmood, A. (2020). Performance of EIA authority and effectiveness of EIA system in Pakistan. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 81, 106357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106357
Khosravi, F., Jha-Thakur, U., & Fischer, T. B. (2019). Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system in Iran. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 74, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.10.005
Kolhoff, A. J., Runhaar, H. A. C., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2009). The contribution of capacities and context to EIA system performance and effectiveness in developing countries: Toward a better understanding. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27, 271–282. https://doi.org/10.3152/146155109X479459
Kolhoff, A. J., Runhaar, H. A. C., Gugushvili, T., Sonderegger, G., Van der Leest, B., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2016). The influence of actor capacities on EIA system performance in low and middle income countries—Cases from Georgia and Ghana. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 57, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.011
Kurniawan, A. R., Murayama, T., & Nishikizawa, S. (2020). A qualitative content analysis of environmental impact assessment in Indonesia: A case study of nickel smelter processing. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38, 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1672452
Landim, S. N. T., & Sanchez, L. E. (2012). The contents and scope of environmental impact statements: How do they evolve over time? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30, 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.746828
Lim, G. (1985). Theory and practice of EIA implementation: A comparative study of three developing countries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 5, 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(85)90039-3
Lohani, B., Evans, J. W., Ludwig, H., Everitt, R. R., Carpenter, R. A., & Tu., S. L. (1997). Environmental impact assessment for developing countries in Asia. Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/publications/environmental-impact-assessment-developing-countries-asia.
Makmor, M., & Ismail, Z. (2016). Improving environmental impact assessment (EIA) process in Malaysia. Journal Teknologi, 78, 93–107. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.4489
McCullough, A. (2017). Environmental impact assessments in developing countries: We need to talk about politics. The Extractive Industries and Society, 4, 448–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.07.002
Memon, P. A. (2000). Devolution of environmental regulation: Environmental impact assessment in Malaysia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18, 283–293. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154600781767295
Momtaz, S. (2006). Public participation and community involvement in environmental and social impact assessment in developing countries: An application of the Vroom-Yetton model using Bangladesh as a case study. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 2, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-2077/CGP/v02i04/54233
Momtaz, S., & Kabir, S. M. Z. (2013). Evaluating environmental and social impact assessment in developing countries. Elsevier.
Morgan, R. K. (2012). Environmental impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.661557
Mubanga, R. O., & Kwarteng, K. (2020). A comparative evaluation of the environmental impact assessment legislation of South Africa and Zambia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106401
Mwenda, A. N., Bregt, A. K., Ligtenberg, A., & Kibutu, T. N. (2012). Trends in consultation and public participation within environmental impact assessment in Kenya. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30, 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.668075
Nizami, A., Molander, S., Asam, Z., Rafique, R., Korres, N. E., Kiely, G., & Murphy, J. D. (2011). Comparative analysis using EIA for developed and developing countries: Case studies of hydroelectric power plants in Pakistan, Norway and Sweden. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 18, 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2011.559399
Nor, Y. M. (1991). Problems and perspectives in Malaysia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 11, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(91)90028-I
Okello, N., Beevers, L., Douven, W., & Leentvaar, J. (2009). The doing and un-doing of public participation during environmental impact assessment in Kenya. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.3152/146155109X465940
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1992). Good practices for environmental impact assessment of development projects. https://www.oecd.org/dac/environment-development/1887592.pdf.
Otwong, A., & Phenrat, T. (2017). Comparative analysis of public participation in the EIA process for Thai overseas investment projects: Krabi coal terminal, Hongsa coal power plant, and Dawei special economic zone. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35, 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2017.1354641
Pact. (2017). Guidelines on public participation in environmental impact assessment in the Mekong Region. https://www.pactworld.org/library/guidelines-public-participation-eia-mekong-region.
Pham, M. T., Bui, N. K., & Puzirevsky, R. (2020). Legal framework for environmental impact assessment in Vietnam: The challenges between the regulations and practice. E3S Web of Conferences, 164, 11008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016411008
Purnama, D. (2003). Reform of the EIA process in Indonesia: Improving the role of public involvement. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 415–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00046-5
Rathi, A. K. A. (2017). Evaluation of project-level environmental impact assessment and SWOT analysis of EIA process in India. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 67, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.08.004
Rathi, A. K. A. (2021). Is “consideration of alternatives” in project level environmental impact assessment studies in developing countries an eyewash: An Indian case-study. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1886058
Ruffeis, D., Loiskandl, W., Awulachew, S. B., & Boelee, E. (2010). Evaluation of the environmental policy and impact assessment process in Ethiopia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 28, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.3152/146155110X488844
Sadler, B. (1996). International study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment: Final report. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency//International Association for Impact Assessment.
Sainath, N. V., & Rajan, K. S. (2015). Meta-analysis of EIA public hearing in the state of Gujarat, India: Its role versus the goal of environmental management. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 33(2), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.964085
Sandham, L. A., van Heerden, A. J., Jones, C. E., Retief, F. P., & Morrison-Saunders, A. N. (2013). Does enhanced regulation improve EIA report quality? Lessons from South Africa. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.08.001
Scholten, J. J., & Post, R. A. M. (1999). Strengthening the integrated approach to impact assessments in development cooperation. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 19, 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(99)00011-6
Smith, E. T., & Schin, A. (2004). An evolution of public consultation requirements within the environmental impact assessment process at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 22, 153–157. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154604781766021
Staronova, K. (2016). Regulatory impact assessment in Slovakia: Performance and procedural reform. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 34, 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2016.1176410
Suwanteep, K., Murayama, T., & Nishikizawa, S. (2016). Environmental impact assessment system in Thailand and its comparison with those in China and Japan. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 58, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.001
Swangjang, K. (2018). Comparative review of EIA in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 72, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.04.011
Tiwari, V., & Thakur, S. (2021). Environment sustainability through sustainability innovations. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 6941–6965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00899-4
Tongcumpou, C., & Harvey, N. (1994). Implications of recent EIA changes in Thailand. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 14, 271–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(94)90023-X
Toro, J., Requena, I., & Zamorano, M. (2010). Environmental impact assessment in Colombia: Critical analysis and proposals for improvement. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30, 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.09.001
Ulibarri, N., Scott, T. A., & Perez-Figueroa, O. (2019). How does stakeholder involvement affect environmental impact assessment? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 79, 106309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106309
Valappil, M., Devuyst, D., & Hens, L. (1994). Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment procedure in India. Impact Assessment, 12, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/07349165.1994.97258
Walker, H., Sinclair, A. J., & Spaling, H. (2014). Public participation in and learning through SEA in Kenya. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 45, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.10.003
Wiklund, H. (2011). Why high participatory ideals fail in practice: A bottom-up approach to public nonparticipation in EIA. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 13(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333211003833
Wood, C. (2003). Environmental impacts assessment in developing countries. International Development Plan Review, 25, 301–321. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.25.3.5
World Bank (WB). (2006). Environmental impact assessment regulations and strategic environmental assessment requirements: Practices and lessons learned in East and Southeast Asia. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/949001468167952773/pdf/408730PAPER0EI1onal1review01PUBLIC1.pdf.
Zuhair, M. H., & Kurian, P. A. (2016). Socioeconomic and political barriers to public participation in EIA: Implications for sustainable development in the Maldives. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 34(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2016.1176404
Acknowledgements
This study was conducted as a part of the “Improving the Planning Stage of JICA Environmental and Social Considerations” research Project on the JICA Ogata Sadako Research Institute for Peace and Development.
Funding
This study was funded by the JICA Ogata Sadako Research Institute for Peace and Development.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author has no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamijo, T. How to enhance EIA systems in developing countries: a quantitative literature review. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 13476–13492 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02029-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02029-0