Abstract
Wildland fires are increasingly becoming a major concern for many European countries, affecting ecosystems and societies, and they are expected to become more prevalent in future due to climate change. Forests provide various ecosystem services not valued by traditional markets, such as carbon sequestration. Recently, Portugal has created new environmental policies that address climate change, fire management, and biodiversity conservation through payment for ecosystem services schemes. In this context, this study’s objective is to evaluate the newly established carbon taxation in Portugal to incentivize forest restoration and fire management measures. Using publicly available data, this is done by comparing the carbon emissions savings by avoided fires and the income of the carbon taxation with the costs of the payment for ecosystem services scheme and prescribed burning. The results indicate that investing in forest management to avoid fires repays itself regarding carbon storage and economically. The ecosystem services payment scheme’s incentives are in the order of 5–20 euros per hectare, while the carbon sequestration benefits can vary between 75 and 671 euros per hectare. The National Prescribed Burning Program policy is able to reduce overall wildfire emissions, which can correspond to a benefit in the order of 134–2476 euros per hectare, while its costs are in the order 120 euros per hectare. Finally, the results have shown that these policies can work synergistically, both economically and environmentally, as development agendas, such as the Sustainable Development Goals, recommend. This analysis framework might be useful for other countries, especially in the Mediterranean Basin.







Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbier, E. B., Lozano, R., Rodríguez, C. M., & Troëng, S. (2020). Adopt a carbon tax to protect tropical forests. Nature, 578(7794), 213–216. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00324-w
Cairns, R. D., & Lasserre, P. (2004). Reinforcing economic incentives for carbon credits for forests. Forest Policy and Economics, 6(3–4), 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2004.03.007
Carvalho, A., Schmidt, L., Santos, F. D., & Delicado, A. (2014). Climate change research and policy in Portugal. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.258
Chestney, N. (2020). EU carbon price rises to all-time high after EU climate deal | Reuters. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-carbon/eu-carbon-price-rises-to-all-time-high-after-eu-climate-deal-idUSKBN28L0SO
Convention on Biological Diversity. (2016). Biodiversity and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Biodiversity Is Essential for Sustainable Development.
Doelle, M., Henschel, C., Smith, J., Tollefson, C., & Wellstead, A. (2012). New governance arrangements at the intersection of climate change and forest policy: Institutional, political and regulatory dimensions. Public Administration, 90(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02006.x
European Commision. (2020). EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing nature back into our lives. In European Commission (Vol. 53).
Evison, D. (2017). The New Zealand forestry sector’s experience in providing carbon sequestration services under the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme, 2008 to 2012. Forest Policy and Economics, 75, 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.10.003
Fan, Y., Jia, J. J., Wang, X., & Xu, J. H. (2017). What policy adjustments in the EU ETS truly affected the carbon prices? Energy Policy, 103(January), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.008
Fernandes, P. M. (2015). Empirical support for the use of prescribed burning as a fuel treatment. Current Forestry Reports, 1(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-015-0010-z
Gren, I. M., & Zeleke, A. A. (2016). Policy design for forest carbon sequestration: A review of the literature. Forest Policy and Economics, 70, 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.008
Guo, M., Li, J., Wen, L., & Huang, S. (2019). Estimation of CO2 emissions from Wildfires using OCO-2 data. Atmosphere, 10(10), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10100581
Hoberg, G., Peterson St-Laurent, G., Schittecatte, G., & Dymond, C. C. (2016). Forest carbon mitigation policy: A policy gap analysis for British Columbia. Forest Policy and Economics, 69, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.005
ICNF. (2015). 6.o Inventário Florestal Nacional (IFN6)—2015 Relatório Final. Retrieved from http://www2.icnf.pt/portal/florestas/ifn/ifn6
ICNF. PLANO NACIONAL DE FOGO CONTROLADO. (2017).
IPCC. (2006). 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Volume 4. Agriculture, forestry and other land use. In 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Volume 4. Agriculture, forestry and other land use.
Kelman, I. (2017). Linking disaster risk reduction, climate change, and the sustainable development goals. Disaster Prevention and Management, 26(3), 254–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-02-2017-0043
Kliestik, T., Misankova, M., Valaskova, K., & Svabova, L. (2018). Bankruptcy prevention: New effort to reflect on legal and social changes. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9912-4
Kubálek, J., Čámská, D., & Strouhal, J. (2018). Personal bankruptcies from macroeconomic perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 5(2), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijek-2017-0013
Lintunen, J., Laturi, J., & Uusivuori, J. (2016). How should a forest carbon rent policy be implemented? Forest Policy and Economics, 69, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.04.005
Liu, J., & Wu, F. (2017). Forest carbon sequestration subsidy and carbon tax as part of China’s forestry policies. Forests, 8(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8030058
Maroušek, J., Strunecký, O., & Stehel, V. (2019). Biochar farming: Defining economically perspective applications. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21(7), 1389–1395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01728-7
Maroušek, J., Vochozka, M., Plachý, J., & Žák, J. (2017). Glory and misery of biochar. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19(2), 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1284-y
Matzek, V., Puleston, C., & Gunn, J. (2015). Can carbon credits fund riparian forest restoration? Restoration Ecology, 23(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12153
Narayan, C., Fernandes, P. M., van Brusselen, J., & Schuck, A. (2007). Potential for CO2 emissions mitigation in Europe through prescribed burning in the context of the Kyoto Protocol. Forest Ecology and Management, 251(3), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.042
Nilsson, M., Griggs, D., & Visbeck, M. (2016). Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature, 534(7607), 320–322. https://doi.org/10.1038/534320a
Oliveira, T. M., Guiomar, N., Baptista, F. O., Pereira, J. M. C., & Claro, J. (2017). Is Portugal’s forest transition going up in smoke? Land Use Policy, 66, 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.046
PEA. (2020). Portuguese National Inventory Report on Greenhouse Gases, 1990–2018. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/documents/215705
Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., & Kropp, J. P. (2017). A systematic study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) interactions. Earth’s Future, 5(11), 1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000632
Rosa, I. M. D., Pereira, J. M. C., & Tarantola, S. (2011). Atmospheric emissions from vegetation fires in Portugal (1990–2008): Estimates, uncertainty analysis, and sensitivity analysis. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11(6), 2625–2640. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2625-2011
Stavins, R. N., & Richards, K. R. (2005). The cost of U.S. forest-based carbon sequestration. Pew Center on Global Climate Change., 52, 52.
UTAO. (2019). Tributação de combustíveis: estudo aprofundado e atualizado até final de. Retrieved from https://www.parlamento.pt/sites/COM/XIIILEG/5COFMA/Paginas/utao.aspx
Vilén, T., & Fernandes, P. M. (2011). Forest fires in Mediterranean countries: CO2 emissions and mitigation possibilities through prescribed burning. Environmental Management, 48(3), 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9681-9
Wu, T., Kim, Y. S., & Hurteau, M. D. (2011). Investing in natural capital: Using economic incentives to overcome barriers to forest restoration. Restoration Ecology, 19(4), 441–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00788.x
Yang, S., Zhao, W., Liu, Y., Cherubini, F., Fu, B., & Pereira, P. (2020). Prioritizing sustainable development goals and linking them to ecosystem services: A global expert’s knowledge evaluation. Geography and Sustainability, 1(4), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.09.004
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by Operation NORTE-08-5369-FSE-000045 co-funded by the European Social Fund (FSE) through NORTE 2020—Programa Operacional Regional do NORTE. This work was also financed by National Funds through the Portuguese funding agency, FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, within project UIDB/50014/2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pacheco, R.M. Carbon taxation as a means to incentivize forest and fire management. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 12387–12403 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01953-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01953-5

