Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A multi-scale approach to mapping conservation priorities for rural China based on landscape context

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integration of agricultural, cultural and natural conservation to address land-use change risk has become a crucial issue for rural sustainability, especially for China with dense population and undergoing hyper-urbanization. There is not yet a specific study going with conservation of the whole rural landscape at national level. In this paper, a multi-scale approach is presented as a first proxy to meet this challenge through synthetically combining agricultural, cultural and natural conservation concerns of rural landscape within a spatially analytical framework of landscape vulnerability assessment. This framework consists of three main indicators (exposure, sensitivity and resilience), aiming to identify vulnerable rural areas under land-use changes based on the assumption that more vulnerable areas should receive higher priorities in conservation. Conservation actions were also derived and mapped with conservation priorities. The results show this approach can well-address integrated conservation issue within rural areas. The top conservation priorities in rural China were identified in areas with diverse bio-culture and those significantly suffered from urbanization and rapid agriculture-nature transition. Protection actions were assigned to areas with high exposure risk, while restoration actions were set for areas with low sensitivity. Besides, management actions aimed at areas with low resilience, and maintenance actions covered areas with low exposure, high sensitivity and high resilience. Though this approach was detailed in rural China, it is applicable to any large-scale rural regions under land-use change risk. We conclude that this approach promotes integrated conservation within rural landscape and facilitate real-world implementation of its conservation actions, and suggest that further detailed examinations at refined scale will also be needed to efficiently guild local conservation practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 268–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnoletti, M. (2014). Rural landscape, nature conservation and culture: Some notes on research trends and management approaches from a (southern) European perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 126, 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam, P., Fedoriak, M., Cruz, F., Munoz-Rojas, J., Yamelynets, T., Manton, M., Washbourne, C.-L., Dobrynin, D., Izakovicova, Z., & Jansson, N. (2021). Meeting places and social capital supporting rural landscape stewardship: A pan-European horizon scanning. Ecology and Society, 26, 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam, P., Manton, M., Yamelynets, T., Sørensen, O. J., & Kondrateva, S. V. (2020). Landscape approach towards integrated conservation and use of primeval forests: The Transboundary Kovda River Catchment in Russia and Finland. Land, 9, 144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70, 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, Y., Jiang, B., Wang, M., Li, H., Alatalo, J. M., & Huang, S. (2015). New ecological redline policy (ERP) to secure ecosystem services in China. Land Use Policy, 55, 348–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, Y., Wong, C. P., Jiang, B., Hughes, A. C., Wang, M., & Wang, Q. (2018). Developing China’s ecological redline policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning. Nature Communications, 9, 3034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balvanera, P., Siddique, I., Dee, L., Paquette, A., Isbell, F., Gonzalez, A., Byrnes, J., O’Connor, M. I., Hungate, B. A., & Griffin, J. N. (2014). Linking biodiversity and ecosystem services: Current uncertainties and the necessary next steps. BioScience, 64, 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belote, R. T., Aplet, G. H., Carlson, A. A., Dietz, M. S., May, A., McKinley, P. S., Schnure, M., & Garncarz, J. (2021). Beyond priority pixels: Delineating and evaluating landscapes for conservation in the contiguous United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 209, 104059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, E. M., Cramer, W., Begossi, A., Cundill, G., Díaz, S., Egoh, B. N., Geijzendorffer, I. R., Krug, C. B., Lavorel, S., Lazos, E., Lebel, L., Martín-López, B., Meyfroidt, P., Mooney, H. A., Nel, J. L., Pascual, U., Payet, K., Harguindeguy, N. P., Peterson, G. D., … Woodward, G. (2015). Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: Three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, E. M., Peterson, G. D., & Gordon, L. J. (2009). Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12, 1394–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobiec, A., Paderewski, J., & Gajdek, A. (2021). Urbanisation and globalised environmental discourse do not help to protect the bio-cultural legacy of rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 208, 104038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter, G. F. (2014). Geographic information systems for geoscientists: Modelling with GIS. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, T. M., Mittermeier, R. A., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Gerlach, J., Hoffmann, M., Lamoreux, J. F., Mittermeier, C. G., Pilgrim, J. D., & Rodrigues, A. S. L. (2006). Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science, 313, 58–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. R. (1995). Who will feed China. World Watch Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. T., & Vivas, M. B. (2005). Landscape development intensity index. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 101, 289–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, S., Chen, L., Shankman, D., Wang, C., Wang, X., & Zhang, H. (2011). Excessive reliance on afforestation in China’s arid and semi-arid regions: Lessons in ecological restoration. Earth-Science Reviews, 104, 240–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, S., Lv, Y., Zheng, H., & Wang, X. (2014). Challenges facing China’s unbalanced urbanization strategy. Land Use Policy, 39, 412–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., Liu, W., & Lu, D. (2015). Challenges and the way forward in China’s new-type urbanization. Land Use Policy, 55, 334–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, J., Dong, W., Wang, S., & Fu, Y. (2015). Quantitative analysis of agricultural land use change in China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts a/b/c, 87–88, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craven, D., Filotas, E., Angers, V. A., & Messier, C. (2016). Evaluating resilience of tree communities in fragmented landscapes: linking functional response diversity with landscape connectivity. Diversity and Distributions, 22(2), 505–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csurgó, B., & Smith, M. K. (2021). The value of cultural ecosystem services in a rural landscape context. Journal of Rural Studies, 86, 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallimer, M., Davies, Z. G., Diaz-Porras, D. F., Irvine, K. N., Maltby, L., Warren, P. H., Armsworth, P. R., & Gaston, K. J. (2015). Historical influences on the current provision of multiple ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 31, 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S., Heywood, V., & Hamilton, A. (1994). Centres of plant diversity. Natural History, 111, 01–01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, X., Huang, J., Rozelle, S., Zhang, J., & Li, Z. (2015). Impact of urbanization on cultivated land changes in China. Land Use Policy, 45, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, C., Thompson, J. R., & Pettorelli, N. (2015). The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity-ecosystem services relationships. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 282, 20151348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egoh, B., Rouget, M., Reyers, B., Knight, A. T., Cowling, R. M., van Jaarsveld, A. S., & Welz, A. (2007). Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: A review. Ecological Economics, 63, 714–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada-Carmona, N., Hart, A. K., DeClerck, F. A. J., Harvey, C. A., & Milder, J. C. (2014). Integrated landscape management for agriculture, rural livelihoods, and ecosystem conservation: An assessment of experience from Latin America and the Caribbean. Landscape and Urban Planning, 129, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Y., & Liu, J. (2014). The modification of North China quadrangles in response to rural social and economic changes in agricultural villages: 1970–2010s. Land Use Policy, 39, 266–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO, U.N.F.a.A.O.,. (2009). Harvesting agriculture’s multiple benefits: Mitigation, adaptation, development and food security: Policy brief. FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina, A. (2000). The cultural landscape as a model for the integration of ecology and economics. BioScience, 50, 313–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., Nachtergaele, F., Prieler, S., Teixeira, E., Toth, G., van Velthuizen, H., Verelst, L., Wiberg, D. (2012) Global agro-ecological zones, Model documantation. IIASA and FAO.

  • Game, E. T., Kareiva, P., & Possingham, H. P. (2013). Six common mistakes in conservation priority setting. Conservation Biology, 27, 480–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, J., Wang, Y., Zou, C., Xu, D., Lin, N., Wang, L., & Zhang, K. (2020). China’s ecological conservation redline: A solution for future nature conservation. Ambio, 49(9), 1519–1529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girardello, M., Santangeli, A., Mori, E., Chapman, A., Fattorini, S., Naidoo, R., Bertolino, S., & Svenning, J. C. (2019). Global synergies and trade-offs between multiple dimensions of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, S. (2007). Protecting China’s cultural heritage sites in times of rapid change: Current developments, practice and law. Stefan Gruber, ‘protecting China’s cultural heritage sites in times of rapid change: Current developments. Practice and Law, 10, 253–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulickx, M. M. C., Verburg, P. H., Stoorvogel, J. J., Kok, K., & Veldkamp, A. (2013). Mapping landscape services: A case study in a multifunctional rural landscape in The Netherlands. Ecological Indicators, 24, 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidir, I. A., Kaszta, Ż, Sousa, L. L., Lubis, M. I., Macdonald, D. W., & Linkie, M. (2021). Felids, forest and farmland: Identifying high priority conservation areas in Sumatra. Landscape Ecology, 36, 475–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. W., Lempert, R. J., Keller, K., Hackbarth, A., Mijere, C., & McInerney, D. J. (2012). Robust climate policies under uncertainty: A comparison of robust decision making and info-gap methods. Risk Analysis, 32, 1657–1672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartel, T., Schweiger, O., Öllerer, K., Cogălniceanu, D., & Arntzen, J. W. (2010). Amphibian distribution in a traditionally managed rural landscape of Eastern Europe: Probing the effect of landscape composition. Biological Conservation, 143, 1118–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, G., Zhao, Y., Wang, L., Jiang, S., & Zhu, Y. (2019). China’s food security challenge: Effects of food habit changes on requirements for arable land and water. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 739–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R., Dyer, G. A., Lozada-Ellison, L. M., Gimona, A., Martin-Ortega, J., Munoz-Rojas, J., & Gordon, I. J. (2015). A social–ecological systems analysis of impediments to delivery of the Aichi 2020 Targets and potentially more effective pathways to the conservation of biodiversity. Global Environmental Change, 34, 22–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, C., Suich, H., Vira, B., & Mace, G. M. (2014). Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world. Global Environmental Change, 28, 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, J. A. G. (2000). Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: New measures of landscape fragmentation. Landscape Ecology, 15, 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, P., Chen, D., & Li, M. (2021). Farmland landscape fragmentation evolution and its driving mechanism from rural to urban: A case study of Changzhou City. Journal of Rural Studies, 82, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P., & Marvier, M. (2003). Conserving biodiversity coldspots. American Scientist, 91, 344–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P., & Marvier, M. (2012). What Is conservation science? BioScience, 62, 962–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J. J., Schellnhuber, H. J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N. M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G. C., Grübler, A., Huntley, B., Jäger, J., Jodha, N. S., Kasperson, R. E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., … Svedin, U. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292, 641–642.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keys, P. W., Galaz, V., Dyer, M., Matthews, N., Folke, C., Nyström, M., & Cornell, S. E. (2019). Anthropocene risk. Nature Sustainability, 2, 667–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klausmeyer, K. R., Shaw, M. R., MacKenzie, J. B., & Cameron, D. R. (2011). Landscape-scale indicators of biodiversity’s vulnerability to climate change. Ecosphere, 2(8), art88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, E. F., & Meyfroidt, P. (2011). Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 3465–3472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtomäki, J., & Moilanen, A. (2013). Methods and workflow for spatial conservation prioritization using Zonation. Environmental Modelling and Software, 47, 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leinwand, I. I. F., Theobald, D. M., Mitchell, J., & Knight, R. L. (2010). Landscape dynamics at the public–private interface: A case study in Colorado. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 182–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Feng, T., & Hao, J. (2009). The evolving concepts of land administration in China: Cultivated land protection perspective. Land Use Policy, 26, 262–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Zhang, L., Yan, J., Wang, P., Hu, N., Cheng, W., & Fu, B. (2017). Mapping the hotspots and coldspots of ecosystem services in conservation priority setting. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 27, 681–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, E., & Ding, C. G. (2008). Assessing farmland protection policy in China. Land Use Policy, 25, 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Wu, B. (2010) Grain for green programme'in China: Policy making and implementation. Policy Briefing Series.

  • Liu, D., Chen, Y., Cai, W., Dong, W., Xiao, J., Chen, J., Zhang, H., Xia, J., & Yuan, W. (2014a). The contribution of China’s Grain to green program to carbon sequestration. Landscape Ecology, 29, 1675–1688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., Pell, A. N., Deadman, P., Kratz, T., & Lubchenco, J. (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317, 1513–1516.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Li, S., Ouyang, Z., Tam, C., & Chen, X. (2008). Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 9477–9482.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Zhang, Z., Xu, X., Kuang, W., Zhou, W., Zhang, S., Li, R., Yan, C., Yu, D., & Wu, S. (2010). Spatial patterns and driving forces of land use change in China during the early 21st century. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20, 483–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., Xu, X., & Chen, X. (2015). Assessing the impact of urban expansion on potential crop yield in China during 1990–2010. Food Security, 7, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Duan, M., & Yu, Z. (2013). Agricultural landscapes and biodiversity in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 166, 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Fang, F., & Li, Y. (2014b). Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making. Land Use Policy, 40, 6–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell, D. B., Burke, M. B., Tebaldi, C., Mastrandrea, M. D., Falcon, W. P., & Naylor, R. L. (2008). Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science, 319, 607–610.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lü, Y., Fu, B., Feng, X., Zeng, Y., Liu, Y., Chang, R., Sun, G., & Wu, B. (2012). A Policy-Driven Large Scale Ecological Restoration: Quantifying Ecosystem Services Changes in the Loess Plateau of China. PLoS ONE, 7, e31782.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., Jenkins, A., Ferrier, R. C., Bailey, M., Gordon, I. J., Song, S., Huang, J., Jia, S., Zhang, F., Liu, X., Feng, Z., & Zhang, Z. (2015). Addressing China’s grand challenge of achieving food security while ensuring environmental sustainability. Science Advances, 1, e1400039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luers, A. L. (2005). The surface of vulnerability: An analytical framework for examining environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 15, 214–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, G. M. (2014). Whose conservation? Science, 345, 1558–1560.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, G. M., Norris, K., & Fitter, A. H. (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27, 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C. R., & Pressey, R. L. (2000). Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 405, 243–253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McShane, T. O., Hirsch, P. D., Trung, T. C., Songorwa, A. N., Kinzig, A., Monteferri, B., Mutekanga, D., Thang, H. V., Dammert, J. L., Pulgar-Vidal, M., Welch-Devine, M., Peter Brosius, J., Coppolillo, P., & O’Connor, S. (2011). Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biological Conservation, 144, 966–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen, A., Anderson, B. J., Eigenbrod, F., Heinemeyer, A., Roy, D. B., Gillings, S., Armsworth, P. R., Gaston, K. J., & Thomas, C. D. (2011). Balancing alternative land uses in conservation prioritization. Ecological Applications, 21, 1419–1426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen, A., Wilson, K. A., & Possingham, H. P. (2009). Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, W. (2015). Conceptualising multifunctional agriculture from a global perspective: Implications for governing agricultural trade in the post-Doha Round era. Land Use Policy, 49, 252–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouchet, M. A., Lamarque, P., Martín-López, B., Crouzat, E., Gos, P., Byczek, C., & Lavorel, S. (2014). An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 28, 298–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853–858.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra, H., Reyers, B., & Lavorel, S. (2013). Impacts of land change on biodiversity: Making the link to ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 503–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Green, R. E., Lehner, B., Malcolm, T. R., & Ricketts, T. H. (2008). Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 9495–9500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold, T., Hudson, L. N., Hill, S. L. L., Contu, S., Lysenko, I., Senior, R. A., Borger, L., Bennett, D. J., Choimes, A., Collen, B., Day, J., De Palma, A., Diaz, S., Echeverria-Londono, S., Edgar, M. J., Feldman, A., Garon, M., Harrison, M. L. K., Alhusseini, T., … Purvis, A. (2015). Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature, 520, 45–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, E., Mace, G. M., Armsworth, P. R., Atkinson, G., Buckle, S., Clements, T., Ewers, R. M., Fa, J. E., Gardner, T. A., Gibbons, J., Grenyer, R., Metcalfe, R., Mourato, S., Muûls, M., Osborn, D., Reuman, D. C., Watson, C., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2009). Priority research areas for ecosystem services in a changing world. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 1139–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning, J., Liu, J., Kuang, W., Xu, X., Zhang, S., Yan, C., Li, R., Wu, S., Hu, Y., Du, G., Chi, W., Pan, T., & Ning, J. (2018). Spatiotemporal patterns and characteristics of land-use change in China during 2010–2015. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28, 547–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, L. M. J., Pollock, L. J., Renaud, J., Verhagen, W., Verburg, P. H., Lavorel, S., Maiorano, L., & Thuiller, W. (2021). Balancing conservation priorities for nature and for people in Europe. Science, 372, 856.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell, P. J., & Anderson, P. M. L. (2010). Sustainable multifunctional landscapes: A review to implementation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R.J., Scurlock, J.M.O., Prince, S.D., Zheng, D.L., Johnson, K.R., (2013) NPP multi-biome: NPP and driver data for ecosystem model-data intercomparison, R2. ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center.

  • Piao, S., Fang, J., He, J. S., & Xiao, Y. (2004). Spatial distribution of grassland biomass in China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 28, 491–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plieninger, T., Bieling, C., (2012) Connecting cultural landscapes to resilience, Understanding and managing change in human-shaped environments. Cambridge University Press (CUP), pp. 3–26.

  • Plieninger, T., Höchtl, F., & Spek, T. (2006). Traditional land-use and nature conservation in European rural landscapes. Environmental Science and Policy, 9, 317–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plieninger, T., van der Horst, D., Schleyer, C., & Bieling, C. (2014). Sustaining ecosystem services in cultural landscapes. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06159-190259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullin, A. S., Sutherland, W., Gardner, T., Kapos, V., & Fa, J. E. (2013). Conservation priorities, Key Topics in Conservation Biology 2 (pp. 1–22). John Wiley and Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, J., He, S., & Liu, L. (2013). Aestheticisation, rent-seeking, and rural gentrification amidst China’s rapid urbanisation: The case of Xiaozhou village, Guangzhou. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, B., Li, H., Zhou, M., & Zhang, L. (2015). Vulnerability of ecosystem services provisioning to urbanization: A case of China. Ecological Indicators, 57, 505–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, D. I., Tambosi, L. R., & Metzger, J. P. (2015). A landscape triage approach: Combining spatial and temporal dynamics to prioritize restoration and conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 590–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G. D., & Bennett, E. M. (2010). Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 5242–5247.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruckelshaus, M., McKenzie, E., Tallis, H., Guerry, A., Daily, G., Kareiva, P., Polasky, S., Ricketts, T., Bhagabati, N., Wood, S. A., & Bernhardt, J. (2015). Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecological Economics, 115, 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudnick, D.A., Ryan, S.J., Beier, P., Cushman, S.A., Dieffenbach, F., Epps, C.W., Gerber, L.R., Hartter, J., Jenness, J.S., Kintsch, J. (2012) The role of landscape connectivity in planning and implementing conservation and restoration priorities. Issues in Ecology, 1–20.

  • Salafsky, N., Salzer, D., Stattersfield, A. J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Neugarten, R., Butchart, S. H. M., Collen, B., Cox, N., Master, L. L., O’Connor, S., & Wilkie, D. (2008). A standard lexicon for biodiversity conservation: Unified classifications of threats and actions. Conservation Biology, 22, 897–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J.-L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., Venter, M., Boedhihartono, A. K., Day, M., Garcia, C., van Oosten, C., & Buck, L. E. (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 8349–8356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seto, K. C., Reenberg, A., Boone, C. G., Fragkias, M., Haase, D., Langanke, T., Marcotullio, P., Munroe, D. K., Olah, B., & Simon, D. (2012). Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 7687–7692.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siciliano, G. (2012). Urbanization strategies, rural development and land use changes in China: A multiple-level integrated assessment. Land Use Policy, 29, 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simelton, E. (2011). Food self-sufficiency and natural hazards in China. Food Security, 3, 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, G., Li, Z., Yang, Y., Semakula, H. M., & Zhang, S. (2015). Assessment of ecological vulnerability and decision-making application for prioritizing roadside ecological restoration: A method combining geographic information system, Delphi survey and Monte Carlo simulation. Ecological Indicators, 52, 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, W., & Deng, X. (2015). Effects of urbanization-induced cultivated land loss on ecosystem services in the North China Plain. Energies, 8, 5678–5693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, V., Seto, K. C., Emerson, R., & Gorelick, S. M. (2013). The impact of urbanization on water vulnerability: A coupled human–environment system approach for Chennai, India. Global Environmental Change, 23, 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Termorshuizen, J. W., & Opdam, P. (2009). Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology, 24, 1037–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, D. M. (2010). Estimating natural landscape changes from 1992 to 2030 in the conterminous US. Landscape Ecology, 25, 999–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, D. M. (2013). A general model to quantify ecological integrity for landscape assessments and US application. Landscape Ecology, 28, 1859–1874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, D. M., Reed, S. E., Fields, K., & Soulé, M. (2012). Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States. Conservation Letters, 5, 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L., II. (2010). Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science? Global Environmental Change, 20, 570–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L., II., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, J. X., Luers, A., Martello, M. L., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A., & Schiller, A. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 8074–8079.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., O’Neill, R. V., Gardner, R. H., & Milne, B. T. (1989). Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 3, 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, W. R., Brandon, K., Brooks, T. M., Costanza, R., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Portela, R. (2007). Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. BioScience, 57, 868–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, U., (2015) World population prospects: The 2015 Revision.

  • Villa, F., Bagstad, K. J., Voigt, B., Johnson, G. W., Portela, R., Honzák, M., & Batker, D. (2014). A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment. PLoS ONE, 9, e91001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. J., & Ryan, R. L. (2008). Place attachment and landscape preservation in rural New England: A Maine case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86, 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Chen, Y., Shao, X., Zhang, Y., & Cao, Y. (2012). Land-use changes and policy dimension driving forces in China: Present, trend and future. Land Use Policy, 29, 737–749.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., Guo, H., Chuai, X., Dai, C., Lai, L., & Zhang, M. (2014). The impact of land use change on the temporospatial variations of ecosystems services value in China and an optimized land use solution. Environmental Science and Policy, 44, 62–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. (2012). Spatio-temporal changes in agrochemical inputs and the risk assessment before and after the grain-for-green policy in China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185, 1927–1937.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z.-J., Jiao, J.-Y., Rayburg, S., Wang, Q.-L., & Su, Y. (2016). Soil erosion resistance of “Grain for Green” vegetation types under extreme rainfall conditions on the Loess Plateau, China. CATENA, 141, 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbanks, T. J., & Kates, R. W. (1999). Global change in local places: How scale matters. Climatic Change, 43, 601–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. A., Carwardine, J., & Possingham, H. P. (2009). Setting conservation priorities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1162, 237–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C., Chen, M., Zhou, L., Liang, X., & Wang, W. (2020). Identifying the spatiotemporal patterns of traditional villages in China: A multiscale perspective. Land, 9, 449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi, J., Zhao, M., Ge, Q., & Kong, Q. (2014). Changes in land use of a village driven by over 25 years of tourism: The case of Gougezhuang village, China. Land Use Policy, 40, 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Lebel, L., & Sturgeon, J. (2009). Functional links between biodiversity, livelihoods, and culture in a Hani Swidden landscape in Southwest China. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02916-140220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Ma, E. T., Tashi, D., Fu, Y., Lu, Z., & Melick, D. (2005). Integrating sacred knowledge for conservation: Cultures and landscapes in southwest China. Ecology and Society, 10, 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, W., Khoshroo, N., Bjornlund, H., & Yin, Y. (2012). Effects of “Grain for Green” reforestation program on rural sustainability in China: An AHP approach to peasant consensus of public land use policies. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 28, 867–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, W., Xiao, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, W., Zhang, L., Hull, V., Wang, Z., Zheng, H., Liu, J., Polasky, S., Jiang, L., Xiao, Y., Shi, X., Rao, E., Lu, F., Wang, X., Daily, G. C., & Ouyang, Z. (2017). Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 1601–1606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X. J. (2013). China’s rapid urbanization. Science, 342, 310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, H., Verburg, P. H., Liu, L., & Eitelberg, D. A. (2016). Spatial analysis of cultural heritage landscapes in rural China: Land use change and its risks for conservation. Environmental Management, 57, 1304–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Zhang, L., Liu, W., Qi, Y., & Wo, X. (2014a). Livestock-carrying capacity and overgrazing status of alpine grassland in the Three-River Headwaters region, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24, 303–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Fu, B., Lü, Y., & Zeng, Y. (2015). Balancing multiple ecosystem services in conservation priority setting. Landscape Ecology, 30, 535–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, R., Li, Z., Yuan, Y., Li, Z., & Yin, F. (2013). Analyses on the changes of grazing capacity in the three-river headwaters region of china under various climate change scenarios. Advances in Meteorology, 2013, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Song, W. (2014b). Determinants of cropland abandonment at the parcel, household and village levels in mountain areas of China: A multi-level analysis. Land Use Policy, 41, 186–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Zhang, K., Fu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2012). Examining land-use/land-cover change in the Lake Dianchi Watershed of the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of Southwest China with remote sensing and GIS techniques: 1974–2008. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9, 3843–3865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y., Zhang, H., Niu, Z., & Gong, P. (2012). Protection efficacy of national wetland reserves in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57, 1116–1134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Zhao, C., & Gong, C. (2014). Reserve rural beauty: The values of rural areas. Peking University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurlini, G., Riitters, K. H., Zaccarelli, N., & Petrosillo, I. (2007). Patterns of disturbance at multiple scales in real and simulated landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 22, 705–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFE0103100) for financial support and professor Peter Verburg for precious comments on the first draft of this manuscript. Thanks also go to professor Liming Liu, Dr. Luo Liu, Dr. Binwu Wang and Dr. Jin Sun for their helps in early preparation and data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing, 100084, China

    Huirong Yu

Authors
  1. Huirong Yu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huirong Yu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 3905 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, H. A multi-scale approach to mapping conservation priorities for rural China based on landscape context. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 10803–10828 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01884-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01884-1

Keywords