Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Methane emissions from dairy farms: case study from a coastal district in South India

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

India has the largest dairy industry in the world and accounts for a significant share of the global emission of livestock methane (\(\hbox {CH}_{{4}}\)), a potent greenhouse gas (GHG). While previous works have examined the large-scale livestock \(\hbox {CH}_{{4}}\) emissions in India, bottom-up studies are essential to account for the diverse farm conditions and practices across the subcontinent. We developed a Methane Calculator for Indian livestock sector using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Tier 2 methodology for estimating methane emissions from enteric fermentation and manure management. Using this calculator, we undertook a study of emissions from four dairy farms in the tropical coastal district of Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, in June 2019. Livestock population and milk production data were collected from the four farms, to compute a mean \(\hbox {CH}_{{4}}\) emission of 0.7183 kg \(\hbox {CO}_{{2}}\) equivalents/kg of fat and protein corrected milk (kg \(\hbox {CO}_{{2}}\)e/kg FPCM), with a notable farm-to-farm variability (63.3%). Having implemented the latest available guidelines outlined by the IPCC, our results are a valuable new addition to the existing body of knowledge in the measurement of dairy farm GHG emissions. We present this as a pilot study, demonstrating a simple method to perform bottom-up investigations of dairy GHG emissions and further formulate policy interventions and mitigation strategies at the farm level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The primary data collected through on-site surveys (personal interviews) are available and shall be provided upon reasonable request.

Code availability

A dairy farm methane emissions calculator for Indian specifications was developed using Microsoft Excel and the same shall be available upon reasonable request.

References

  • ALGAS. (1998). Asia-least cost gas abatement strategy: India (p. 238). Asia Development Bank, Global Environment Facility, United Nations Development Programme, Manila.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, E. K. (1981). Guidelines for the development of continuing education offerings for nurses. Appleton-Century-Crofts and Fleschner Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. D. (1987). Methods of Social Research. 3rd edn. The Free Press. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balhara, A., Nayan, V., Dey, A., Singh, K., Dahiya, S., & Singh, I. (2017). Climate change and buffalo farming in major milk producing states of India-Present status and need for addressing concerns. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 87(4), 403–411.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basset-Mens, C., Ledgard, S., & Carran, A. (2005). First life cycle assessment of milk production from New Zealand dairy farm systems (pp. 258–265). Citeseer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, J. W., & Holden, N. M. (2005). The relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and the intensity of milk production in Ireland. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34(2), 429–436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cederberg, C., & Flysjö, A. (2004). Life cycle inventory of 23 dairy farms in south-western Sweden. SIK Institutet för livsmedel och bioteknik.

  • Chhabra, A., Manjunath, K. R., Panigrahy, S., & Parihar, J. S. (2009). Spatial pattern of methane emissions from Indian livestock. Current Science, 96(5), 683–689.

  • Chhabra, A., Manjunath, K. R., Panigrahy, S., & Parihar, J. S. (2013). Greenhouse gas emissions from Indian livestock. Climatic Change, 117(1–2), 329–344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chianese, D. S., Rotz, C. A., & Richard, T. L. (2009c). Whole-farm greenhouse gas emissions: A review with application to a Pennsylvania dairy farm. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 25(3), 431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, et al. (2012). Whole-farm systems analysis of Australian dairy farm greenhouse gas emissions. Animal Production Science, 52(11), 998–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, et al. (2018). Revised greenhouse-gas emissions from Australian dairy farms following application of updated methodology. Animal Production Science, 58(5), 937–942.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, P. J., Aselmann, I., & Seiler, W. (1986). Methane production by domestic animals, wild ruminants, other herbivorous fauna, and humans. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 38(3–4), 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douphrate, D. I., et al. (2013). The dairy industry: A brief description of production practices, trends, and farm characteristics around the world. Journal of Agromedicine, 18(3), 187–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA. (2013). Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2011 (p. 505). United States Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2003. World agriculture: towards 2015/2030 (ed. Bruinsma, J.), Rome, Italy.

  • FAO. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. In H. Steinfeld, P. Gerber, T. D. Wassenaar, V. Castel, M. Rosales, M. Rosales, & C. de Haan (Eds.),

  • FAO. (2010). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Dairy Sector. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): A Life Cycle Assessment.

  • FAO. 2011. World Livestock 2011 – Livestock in food security. Rome, FAO.

  • FAO (2014). Agriculture, forestry and other land use emissions by sources and removals by sinks: 1990-02011 analyses. FAO Statistics Division Working Paper Series EES/14-2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

  • Fu, W., Gandhi, V. P., Cao, L., Liu, H., & Zhou, Z. (2012). Rising consumption of animal products in China and India: National and global implications. China and World Economy, 20(3), 88–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, A., Bhattacharya, S., Shukla, P. R., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2001). Regional and sectoral assessment of greenhouse gas emissions in India. Atmospheric Environment, 35(15), 2679–2695.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, A., Kankal, B., & Shukla, P. R. (2011). Methane emissions in India: Sub-regional and sectoral trends. Atmospheric Environment, 45(28), 4922–4929.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, M. R., Phondba, B. T., Sherasia, P. L., & Makkar, H. P. (2016). Carbon footprint of milk production under smallholder dairying in Anand district of Western India: A cradle-to-farm gate life cycle assessment. Animal Production Science, 56(3), 423–436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, M. R., Sherasia, P. L., Phondba, B. T., & Makkar, H. P. (2018). Greenhouse gas emission intensity based on lifetime milk production of dairy animals, as affected by ration-balancing program. Animal Production Science, 58(6), 1027–1042.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, T. (2009). Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: Impacts and options for policy makers. Environmental Science and Policy, 12(4), 491–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, P. J. et al. (2013b). Tackling Climate Change through Livestock: A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

  • Gibbs, M. J., & Johnson, D. E. (1994). Methane emissions from the digestive process of livestock. In International anthropogenic methane emissions: Estimates for 1990. Rep. EPA 230-R-93-010. US Environmental Protection Agency.

  • GOI (2007). Government of India, 2007. 18th Livestock Census. (2007). Ministry of Agriculture. Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and fisheries, New Delhi: Govt. of India. http://dahd.nic.in/dahd/statistics/livestock-census.aspx

  • Haas, G., Wetterich, F., & Köpke, U. (2001). Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 83(1–2), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, M., Hemme, T., Ndambi, A., Alqaisi, O., & Sultana, M. N. (2011). Benchmarking of greenhouse gas emissions of bovine milk production systems for 38 countries. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166, 46–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2006). IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories (Vol. 5), Prepared by the National greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Eds: Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T. & Tanabe, K. Hayama, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.

  • IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis, summary for policy makers. Contribution of working group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

  • IPCC (2019). Buendia, E. et al. Refinement To the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC.

  • Jha, A. K., Singh, K., Sharma, C., Singh, S. K., & Gupta, P. K. (2011). Assessment of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Livestock in India. Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change, 2(1), 107.

  • Karunanithi, E. (2004). Climate Change and Indian Dairy Sector: A study on baseline scenario of methane emissions. Doctoral dissertation, NDRI.

  • Key, N., & Tallard, G. (2012). Mitigating methane emissions from livestock: A global analysis of sectoral policies. Climatic Change, 112(2), 387–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, T., Mogensen, L., Knudsen, M. T., & Hermansen, J. E. (2011). Effect of production system and farming strategy on greenhouse gas emissions from commercial dairy farms in a life cycle approach. Livestock Science, 140(1–3), 136–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari, S., et al. (2016). Projection of methane emissions from livestock through enteric fermentation: A case study from India. Environmental Development, 20, 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landes, M., Cessna, J., Kuberka, L., & Jones, K. (2017). India’s dairy sector: Structure, performance, and prospects. United States Department of Agriculture.

  • Lassey, K. R. (2007). Livestock methane emission: From the individual grazing animal through national inventories to the global methane cycle. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 142(2–4), 120–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassey, K. R. (2008). Livestock methane emission and its perspective in the global methane cycle. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 48(2), 114–118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J., Matthews, E., & Fung, I. (1988). Methane emission from animals: A global high-resolution data base. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2(2), 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzetto, A. M., Feigl, B. J., Schils, R. L. M., Cerri, C. E. P., & Cerri, C. C. (2015). Improved pasture and herd management to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from a Brazilian beef production system. Livestock Science, 175, 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J., et al. (2001). Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, A. P. (1992). Greenhouse gas emissions in India: 1992 update. Scientific Report No. 4. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research and Ministry of Environment and Forests New Delhi.

  • Mitra, A. P. (1996). Global Change Greenhouse Gas Emission in India-Methane Budget Estimates from Rice Fields based on Data available upto 1995,No. 10.

  • MOA (2003). 17th Livestock census of India, Dept. of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India. http://www.indiastat.com

  • NATCOM (2004). India’s initial national communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

  • NDDB (2016). Dairying in Kerala—A statistical profile 2016 (p. 135p). National Dairy Development Board.

  • OECD-FAO (2017). OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2017–2026. OECD Publishing and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

  • Ohlan, R. (2014). Growth and instability in dairy production and trade: A global analysis. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 7(2), 145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlan, R. (2016). Dairy economy of India: Structural changes in consumption and production. South Asia Research, 36(2), 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opio, C., et al. (2013). Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supply chains—A global life cycle assessment. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.

  • Patra, A. K. (2012a). Enteric methane mitigation technologies for ruminant livestock: A synthesis of current research and future directions. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184(4), 1929–1952.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patra, A. K. (2012b). Estimation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Indian livestock. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 14(10), 2673–2684.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patra, A. K. (2017). Accounting methane and nitrous oxide emissions, and carbon footprints of livestock food products in different states of India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 678–686.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rakotoarisoa, M., & Gulati, A. (2006). Competitiveness and trade potential of India’s dairy industry. Food Policy, 31(3), 216–227.

  • Ripple, W. J., Smith, P., Haberl, H., Montzka, S. A., McAlpine, C., & Boucher, D. H. (2013). Ruminants, climate change and climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 4(1), 2–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheehle, E. (2002). Emissions and Projections of Non-\(\text{CO}_{{2}}\) Greenhouse gases from developing countries: 1990–2020. Scheehle. elizabet@epa.gov.

  • Scheehle, E. A., & Kruger, D. (2006). Global anthropogenic methane and nitrous oxide emissions. The Energy Journal, (Special Issue No.,3), 33–44.

  • Singh, G. P. (1998). Methanogenesis and production of greenhouse gases under animal husbandry system. Report of AP Cess Fund, National Dairy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, G. P. (2001). Livestock production and environmental protection. In Proceedings of the X Animal Nutrition Conference (pp. 211–221). National Dairy Research Institute.

  • Singhal, K. K., & Mohini, M. (2002). Uncertainty reduction in methane and nitrous oxide gases emission from livestock in India (p. 62). Dairy Cattle Nutrition Division, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India: Project report.

  • Singhal, K. K., Mohini, M., Jha, A. K., & Gupta, P. K. (2005). Methane emission estimates from enteric fermentation in Indian livestock: Dry matter intake approach. Current Science, 88(1), 119–127.

  • Sirohi, S., & Michaelowa, A. (2007). Sufferer and cause: Indian livestock and climate change. Climatic Change, 85(3–4), 285–298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swamy, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2006). Budgeting anthropogenic greenhouse gas emission from Indian livestock using country-specific emission coefficients. Current Science, 91(10), 1340–1353.

  • Yamaji, K., Ohara, T., & Akimoto, H. (2003). A country-specific, high-resolution emission inventory for methane from livestock in Asia in 2000. Atmospheric Environment, 37(31), 4393–4406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, R. O., Noor, Z. Z., Abba, A. H., Hassan, M. A. A., & Din, M. F. M. (2012). Methane emission by sectors: A comprehensive review of emission sources and mitigation methods. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(7), 5059–5070.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding sources were available for this research.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Govind Pradeep

    Present address: School of Development, Azim Premji University, Sarjapura, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 562125, India

  2. R. Rajkumar

    Present address: Department of Economics, Malabar Christian College, Calicut, Kerala, 673001, India

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Symbiosis College of Arts and Commerce, Pune, Maharashtra, 411004, India

    Govind Pradeep

  2. Department of Humanities, Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695547, India

    C. S. Shaijumon & R. Rajkumar

  3. Space Physics Laboratory, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (ISRO), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695022, India

    Jayadev Pradeep

Authors
  1. Govind Pradeep
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. S. Shaijumon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Rajkumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jayadev Pradeep
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Govind Pradeep.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests or competing interests pertaining to the research presented in this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pradeep, G., Shaijumon, C.S., Rajkumar, R. et al. Methane emissions from dairy farms: case study from a coastal district in South India. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 9929–9962 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01851-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01851-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation