Developing a multi-criteria sustainable credit score system using fuzzy BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS

Roy, Pranith Kumar; Shaw, Krishnendu

doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01662-z

Published: 25 July 2021

Developing a multi-criteria sustainable credit score system using fuzzy BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS

Pranith Kumar Roy¹ &
Krishnendu Shaw¹

Environment, Development and Sustainability volume 24, pages 5368–5399 (2022)Cite this article

474 Accesses
4 Citations
Metrics details

Abstract

Sustainability has emerged as a dominating paradigm across global institutions as a critical component for their prospects. Organisations all across the globe must commit to strengthen the values as a participant in sustainable development. Financial institutions are no exception; they are also being pushed to undertake many sustainable initiatives, such as increasing socially meaningful, relevant, and sustainable projects. In addition, they may contribute to sustainable growth by enacting a green banking policy. To promote the green financing strategy, this study proposes a multi-criteria sustainable credit scoring model considering triple bottom line attributes (economic, environmental, and social) besides managerial attributes. The model is built on a novel hybrid approach that combines the fuzzy best–worst method (BWM) with the fuzzy technique for order preferences by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS). The fuzzy BWM was used to weigh factors, while the fuzzy TOPSIS was utilised to evaluate borrowers. The integration of fuzzy set theory assisted in overcoming decision-making ambiguity. An empirical analysis was performed to demonstrate the utility of the proposed model. According to the study’s findings, the most important attribute for sustainable credit scoring is environmental and social sustainability and financial sustainability. On policy implications, regulators could also use the framework as a benchmark to counsel financial institutions on how to include different sustainable criteria into their credit lending process. Furthermore, financial institutions could use the proposed technique as a part of a sustainable lending policy to identify potential borrowers engaged in sustainable business.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

Abdul Razak, L., Ibrahim, M. H., & Ng, A. (2020). Which sustainability dimensions affect credit risk? Evidence from corporate and country-level measures. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(12), 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13120316
Article Google Scholar
Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of FINANCE, XXIII(4), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.2307/2978933
Article Google Scholar
Altman, E. I., Esentato, M., & Sabato, G. (2018). Assessing the credit worthiness of Italian SMEs and mini-bond issuers. Global Finance Journal, December 2017, 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2018.09.003
Altman, E. I., Sabato, G., & Wilson, N. (2010). The value of non-financial information in SME risk management. The Journal of Credit Risk, 6(2), 95–127. https://doi.org/10.21314/jcr.2010.110
Angilella, S., & Mazzù, S. (2015). The financing of innovative SMEs: A multicriteria credit rating model. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(2), 540–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.01.033
Article Google Scholar
Atanda, J. O., & Öztürk, A. (2020). Social criteria of sustainable development in relation to green building assessment tools. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0184-1
Article Google Scholar
Bai, C., Shi, B., Liu, F., & Sarkis, J. (2019). Banking credit worthiness: Evaluating the complex relationships. Omega (united Kingdom), 83, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.02.001
Article Google Scholar
Belas, J., Smrcka, L., Gavurova, B., & Dvorsky, J. (2018). The impact of social and economic factors in the credit risk management of SME. The Impact of Social and Economic Change, 24(3), 1215–1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.1967.tb01896.x
Article Google Scholar
Boffo, R., & Patalano, R. (2020). ESG investing: Practices, progress and challenges. http://www.oecd.org/finance/ESG-Investing-Practices-Progress-and-Challenges.pdf.
Boggia, A., Massei, G., Paolotti, L., Rocchi, L., & Schiavi, F. (2018). A model for measuring the environmental sustainability of events. Journal of Environmental Management, 206, 836–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.057
Article Google Scholar
Chen, D., Faibil, D., & Agyemang, M. (2020). Evaluating critical barriers and pathways to implementation of e-waste formalization management systems in Ghana: A hybrid BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(35), 44561–44584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10360-8
Article Google Scholar
Chi, G., & Zhang, Z. (2017). Multi criteria credit rating model for small enterprise using a nonparametric method. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101834
Dong, J., Wan, S., & Chen, S. M. (2021). Fuzzy best-worst method based on triangular fuzzy numbers for multi-criteria decision-making. Information Sciences, 547, 1080–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.09.014
Article Google Scholar
Doumpos, M., & Figueira, J. R. (2019). A multicriteria outranking approach for modeling corporate credit ratings: An application of the ELECTRE TRI-NC method. Omega (united Kingdom), 82, 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.01.003
Article Google Scholar
Erdogan, A. I. (2018). Factors affecting SME access to bank financing: An interview study with Turkish bankers. Small Enterprise Research, 25(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2018.1428911
Article Google Scholar
European Commission. (2019). Financing sustainable growth. SUSTAINABLE FINANCE.
G20 Green Finance Study Group. (2016). G20 Green Finance Synthesis Report 2016. G20 Green Finance Synthesis Report, August, 1–11.
García, F., Giménez, V., & Guijarro, F. (2013). Credit risk management: A multicriteria approach to assess creditworthiness. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 57(7–8), 2009–2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2012.03.005
Article Google Scholar
Gastelum Chavira, D. A., Leyva Lopez, J. C., Solano Noriega, J. J., Ahumada Valenzuela, O., & Alvarez Carrillo, P. A. (2017). A credit ranking model for a parafinancial company based on the ELECTRE-III method and a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 60, 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.021
Article Google Scholar
Georgios, K. (2019). Credit risk evaluation and rating for SMES using statistical approaches: The case of European SMES manufacturing sector. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 9(5), 59–83.
Google Scholar
Ghosh, P., Westhoff, P., & Debnath, D. (2019). Biofuels, food security, and sustainability. In Biofuels, bioenergy and food security (pp. 211–229). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2015-0-00851-6
Guo, S., & Zhao, H. (2017). Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowledge-Based Systems, 121, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.01.010
Article Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., & Camón-Cala, J. (2016). A credit score system for socially responsible lending. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 691–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2448-5
Article Google Scholar
Haeussler, C., & Sauermann, H. (2013). Credit where credit is due? The impact of project contributions and social factors on authorship and inventorship. Research Policy, 42(3), 688–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.009
Article Google Scholar
Höck, A., Klein, C., Landau, A., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The effect of environmental sustainability on credit risk. Journal of Asset Management, 21(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-020-00155-4
Article Google Scholar
Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey. In Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (Vol. 186). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
Ignatius, J., Hatami-Marbini, A., Rahman, A., Dhamotharan, L., & Khoshnevis, P. (2018). A fuzzy decision support system for credit scoring. Neural Computing and Applications, 29(10), 921–937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2592-1
Article Google Scholar
Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, United Kingdom, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118644898.
Kumar, K., & Prakash, A. (2020). Managing sustainability in banking: Extent of sustainable banking adaptations of banking sector in India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(6), 5199–5217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00421-5
Article Google Scholar
Lozano, R. (2018). Sustainable business models: Providing a more holistic perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1159–1166. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2059
Article Google Scholar
Hirschey, M. (1979). Fundamentals of managerial economics S. H. Julian Gough (Ed.), 1st ed. The Macmillan Press Ltd, South-Western. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16225-3
Martí-Ballester, C. P. (2020). Examining the financial performance of pension funds focused on sectors related to sustainable development goals. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 27(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1678532
Article Google Scholar
Martini, A. (2021). Socially responsible investing: From the ethical origins to the sustainable development framework of the European Union. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01375-3
Article Google Scholar
Merikas, A., Merika, A., Penikas, H. I., & Surkov, M. A. (2020). The Journal of Economic Asymmetries The Basel II internal ratings based ( IRB ) model and the transition impact on the listed Greek banks. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 22(November 2019), e00183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2020.e00183
Miah, M. D., Rahman, S. M., & Mamoon, M. (2020). Green banking: The case of commercial banking sector in Oman. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00695-0
Article Google Scholar
Mohd Nor, S., Abdul Rahim, R., & Che Senik, Z. (2016). The potentials of internalising social banking among the Malaysian Islamic banks. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18(2), 347–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9651-0
Article Google Scholar
Morelli, J. (2011). Environmental sustainability: A definition for environmental professionals. Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14448/jes.01.0002
Mou, Q., Xu, Z., & Liao, H. (2016). An intuitionistic fuzzy multiplicative best-worst method for multi-criteria group decision making. Information Sciences, 374, 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.08.074
Article Google Scholar
Mousavi, M. M., & Lin, J. (2020). The application of PROMETHEE multi-criteria decision aid in financial decision making: Case of distress prediction models evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113438
Article Google Scholar
NǍdǍban, S., Dzitac, S., & Dzitac, I. (2016). Fuzzy TOPSIS: A general view. Procedia Computer Science, 91(Itqm), 823–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.088
Poveda, C. A., & Lipsett, M. (2011). A review of sustainability assessment and sustainability/environmental rating systems and credit weighting tools. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(6), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v4n6p36
Article Google Scholar
Ramadan, Z. (2018). The gamification of trust: The case of China’s “social credit.” Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 36(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-06-2017-0100
Article Google Scholar
Rehman, A., Ullah, I., Afridi, F. E. A., Ullah, Z., Zeeshan, M., Hussain, A., & Rahman, H. U. (2021). Adoption of green banking practices and environmental performance in Pakistan: a demonstration of structural equation modelling. Environment, Development and Sustainability, January, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01206-x
Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
Article Google Scholar
Roy, P. K., & Shaw, K. (2021). A credit scoring model for SMEs using AHP and TOPSIS. International Journal of Finanance and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2425
Article Google Scholar
Salih, M. M., Zaidan, B. B., Zaidan, A. A., & Ahmed, M. A. (2019). Survey on fuzzy TOPSIS state-of-the-art between 2007 and 2017. Computers and Operations Research, 104, 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2018.12.019
Article Google Scholar
Şengül, Ü., Eren, M., Eslamian Shiraz, S., Gezder, V., & Sengül, A. B. (2015). Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 75, 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.045
Article Google Scholar
Shi, B., Wang, J., Qi, J., & Cheng, Y. (2015). A novel imbalanced data classification approach based on logistic regression and fisher discriminant. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/945359
Article Google Scholar
Singh, M. P., Chakraborty, A., Roy, M., & Tripathi, A. (2021). Developing SME sustainability disclosure index for Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) listed manufacturing SMEs in India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(1), 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00586-z
Article Google Scholar
Sofuoğlu, M. A. (2020). Fuzzy applications of Best-Worst method in manufacturing environment. Soft Computing, 24(1), 647–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04491-5
Article Google Scholar
Staszkiewicz, P., & Staszkiewicz, L. (2015). Chapter 5—financial information. In L. S. Piotr Staszkiewicz (Ed.), Finance volume 1: A quantitative introduction (Vol. 1, pp. 72–100). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801584-1.00005-6
Sun, H., Mohsin, M., Alharthi, M., & Abbas, Q. (2020). Measuring environmental sustainability performance of South Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119519
Article Google Scholar
Uddin, M. S., Chi, G., Al Janabi, M. A. M., & Habib, T. (2020). Leveraging random forest in micro-enterprises credit risk modelling for accuracy and interpretability. International Journal of Finance and Economics, April, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2346
Vallance, S., Perkins, H. C., & Dixon, J. E. (2011). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum, 42(3), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002
Article Google Scholar
Visser, W., & Elkington, J. (2013). Cannibals with Forks. The Top 50 Sustainability Books, April, 108–112. https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.978-1-907643-44-6_24
Wang, M., & Ku, H. (2021). Utilizing historical data for corporate credit rating assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 165(August 2020), 113925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113925
WCED. (1987). Our common future. In World commission on environment and development (Vol. 4, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/07488008808408783
Weber, O. (2017). Corporate sustainability and financial performance of Chinese banks. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(3), 358–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2016-0066
Article Google Scholar
Weber, O., Hoque, A., & Ayub Islam, M. (2015). Incorporating environmental criteria into credit risk management in Bangladeshi banks. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 5(1–2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1008736
CAS Article Google Scholar
Woodcraft, S., Bacon, N., Caistor-Arendar, L., Hackett, T., & Hall, P. (2011). Design for social sustainability: A framework for creating thriving new communities. Social Life, 54.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Chapter 2: Towards sustainable development I. The concept of sustainable development. Our Common Future, 1–19.
Yurdakul, M., & Iç, Y. T. (2005). Development of a performance measurement model for manufacturing companies using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches. International Journal of Production Research, 43(21), 4609–4641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500161746
Article Google Scholar
Zeidan, R., Boechat, C., & Fleury, A. (2015). Developing a sustainability credit score system. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2034-2
Article Google Scholar
Zhakanova Isiksal, A. (2020). The financial sector expansion effect on renewable electricity production: Case of the BRICS countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01010-7
Article Google Scholar
Zhang, W., He, H., & Zhang, S. (2019). A novel multi-stage hybrid model with enhanced multi-population niche genetic algorithm: An application in credit scoring. Expert Systems with Applications, 121, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.020
Article Google Scholar
Zimmer, K., Fröhling, M., & Schultmann, F. (2016). Sustainable supplier management—a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. International Journal of Production Research, 54(5), 1412–1442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340
Article Google Scholar
Ziout, A., Azab, A., Altarazi, S., & ElMaraghy, W. H. (2013). Multi-criteria decision support for sustainability assessment of manufacturing system reuse. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 6(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2012.10.006
Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author express his sincere thanks to Mrs. Kamalika Roy, Aishi Roy, and Ariya Roy for their continuous support and encouragements during the research.

Funding

NA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad, Jharkhand, 826004, India
Pranith Kumar Roy & Krishnendu Shaw

Authors

Pranith Kumar Roy
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Krishnendu Shaw
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pranith Kumar Roy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Availability of data, code and material

Available as supplementary documents, anonymized data available on requests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 222 kb)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 939 kb)

Supplementary file3 (PDF 431 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roy, P.K., Shaw, K. Developing a multi-criteria sustainable credit score system using fuzzy BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 5368–5399 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01662-z

Download citation

Received: 30 March 2021
Accepted: 13 July 2021
Published: 25 July 2021
Issue Date: April 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01662-z

Keywords

Sustainable credit scoring
Sustainability
Fuzzy best–worst method
Fuzzy TOPSIS
Fuzzy set theory