Abstract
Communities next to national parks, known as gateway communities, can benefit from national park development. Gateway communities are unique and limited in the degree to which, and direction in which, they can be developed. In this research, Banff National Park was used as a case study to explore residents' perceptions of the impact of national park tourism via a survey questionnaire distributed in communities at three different spatial levels (core, intermediate, and remote portal). The data analyses were based on a sample of 231 respondents and were processed using factor analysis and linear regression models for different communities. The results identified six impact factors, and the differences in each community were analyzed. The findings indicated that residents' perceptions of the impacts of tourism in the town of Canmore rank first, followed by those of Banff and Golden. The regression analysis revealed that Banff was found to have the most supportive residents, and their support for tourism was found to be significantly affected by community natural environmental factors and cultural development factors. Canmore residents were mainly affected by cultural factors. Golden residents were least supportive due to through natural environmental factors and quality of life factors. An adaptive analysis revealed that Banff has the closest economic relationship with national park tourism, and Golden the weakest. Balancing the positive and negative impacts of tourism, exploring more cultural service functions of the communities, seeking a more diverse industrial structure, planning year-round tourism, and cooperating with other communities to ensure local benefits are recommended. The findings may provide an additional understanding of the local perceptions of tourism impacts and local support from a spatial perspective and can help sustainable tourism management by assisting communities to optimize the tourism industry structure and local management strategies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
The data and material of this original research belong to one integrated project on national park research. It will be kept for further related research and submitted to the University of British Columbia Research Commons for open access until all the research in this project is published.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Albuquerque, C. A., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2005). Local perceptions towards biological conservation in the community of Vila Velha, Pernambuco, Brazil. Interciencia, 30, 460.
Almeida García, F., Balbuena Vázquez, A., & Cortés Macías, R. (2015). Resident’s attitudes towards the impacts of tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives, 13, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2014.11.002
Andereck, K. L. (1995). Environmental consequences of tourism: A review of recent research. General Technical Report-Intermountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, No.INT-323, 77–81.
Andereck, K. L., Valentine, K. M., Knopf, R. C., & Vogt, C. A. (2005). Residents’ perceptions of community tourism impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(4), 1056–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2005.03.001
Benson, A., & Clifton, J. (2004). Assessing tourism’s impacts using local communities’ attitudes towards the environment. In F. D. Pineda & C. A. Brebbia (Eds.), Sustainable tourism (pp. 3–12). WIT Press.
Brunt, P., & Courtney, P. (1999). Host perceptions of sociocultural impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(3), 493–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00003-1
Bruyere, B. L., Rodriguez, D. A., & Vaske, J. J. (2002). Enhancing importance-performance analysis through segmentation. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 12(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J073v12n01_05
Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150876
Dearden, P. (2010). Parks and protected areas. In B. Mitchell (Ed.), Resource and environmental management in Canada: Addressing conflict and uncertainty (4th ed., pp. 328–355). Oxford University Press.
Deery, M., Jago, L., & Fredline, L. (2012). Rethinking social impacts of tourism research: A new research agenda. Tourism Management, 33(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.01.026
Draper, D. (2000). Toward sustainable mountain communities: Balancing tourism development and environmental protection in Banff and Banff National Park, Canada. Ambio, 29(7), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-29.7.408
Ezebilo, E. E., & Mattsson, L. (2010). Socio-economic benefits of protected areas as perceived by local people around Cross River National Park, Nigeria. Forest Policy and Economics, 12(3), 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.09.019
Frauman, E., & Banks, S. (2011). Gateway community resident perceptions of tourism development: Incorporating importance-performance analysis into a limits of acceptable change framework. Tourism Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.01.013
Fredman, P., & Yuan, M. (2011). Primary economic impacts at three spatial levels: The case of Fulufjället National Park, Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 11(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2011.629910
Gomez, V. L. (2005). Tourism and preservation in gateway communities: A case study of the towns surrounding Mesa Verde national park. (Master's thesis), University of Pennsylvania Scholarly Commons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/27/?utm_source=repository.upenn.edu%2Fhp_theses%2F27&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages.
Gursoy, D., Jurowski, C., & Uysal, M. (2002). Resident attitudes: A structural modelling approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00028-7
Guthiga, P. (2008). Understanding local communities perceptions of existing forest management regimes of a Kenyan rainforest. International Journal of Social Forestry, 1, 145–166.
International Union for Conversation of Nature. (n.d.). Category II: National Park. https://www.iucn.org/theme/protected-areas/about/protected-areas-categories/category-ii-national-park
Joyner, L., Lackey, N. Q., & Bricker, K. S. (2019). Community engagement: An appreciative inquiry case study with Theodore Roosevelt national park gateway communities. Sustainability, 11(24), 7147. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247147
Karanth, K. K., & Nepal, S. K. (2012). Local resident’s perception of benefits and losses from protected areas in India and Nepal. Environmental Management, 49(2), 372–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9778-1
Ko, D. W., & Stewart, W. P. (2002). A structural equation model of residents’ attitudes for tourism development. Tourism Management, 23(5), 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00006-7
Kousis, M. (1989). Tourism and the family in a rural Cretan community. Annals of Tourism Research, 16(3), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(89)90047-9
Kyungmi, K. (2002). The effects of tourism impacts upon quality of life of residents in the community. (Doctoral dissertation). https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/29954.
Lankford, S. V., & Howard, D. R. (1994). Developing a tourism impact attitude scale. Annals of Tourism Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(94)90008-6
Liu, J. C., & Var, T. (1986). Resident attitudes toward tourism impacts in Hawaii. Annals of Tourism Research, 13, 193–214.
Machlis, G. E., & Field, D. R. (Eds.). (2000). National parks and rural development. Island Press.
Maddox, R. N. (1985). Measuring satisfaction with tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 23(3), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728758502300301
Makindi, S. (2016). Local communities, biodiversity conservation and ecotourism: A case study of the Kimana Community Wildlife Sanctuary, Kenya. African Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Leisure, 5.
Marino, M., Collins, J., & Brawn, G. (1980). Human perception of the natural environment. (May), 137. https://doi.org/10.7939/R3610VV2K.
Mccool, S. F., & Martin, S. R. (1994). Community attachment and attitudes toward tourism development. Journal of Travel Research, 32(3), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759403200305
McGehee, N. G., & Andereck, K. L. (2004). Factors predicting rural residents’ support of tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 43(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287504268234
McLeod, S. (2008). Likert scale likert scale examples how can you analyze data from a likert scale? Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/likert-scale.html.
Nunkoo, R., & Ramkissoon, H. (2011). Developing a community support model for tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 964–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.01.017
Ogunjinmi, A., Aiyeloja, A. A., Osunsina, I., & Ogunjinmi, K. (2014). Understanding perceptions of protected area management in developing countries: The case of Nigeria National Parks. Global Environment: A Journal of History and Natural and Social Sciences, 7, 610–628. https://doi.org/10.3197/ge.2014.070213
Ross, G. F. (1992). Resident perceptions of the impact of tourism on an Australian city. Journal of Travel Research, 30(3), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759203000302
Sharpley, R. (2014). Host perceptions of tourism: A review of the research. Tourism Management, 42, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.10.007
Spiteri, A., & Nepal, S. K. (2006). Incentive-based conservation programs in developing countries: A review of some key issues and suggestions for improvements. Environmental Management, 37, 1–14.
Strickland-Munro, J. K., Moore, S. A., & Freitag-Ronaldson, S. (2010). The impacts of tourism on two communities adjacent to the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 27(5), 664–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2010.522829
Grant Thornton, Western Management Consultants, E. R. L. (2016). Banff, Jasper and Canmore Tourism Economic Impact Study. https://banff.ca/DocumentCenter/View/5550/Banff-Jasper-Canmore-EIA_Final-Report_June-2016?bidId=
Tovar, C., & Lockwood, M. (2008). Social impacts of tourism: An Australian regional case study. International Journal of Tourism Research, 10, 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.667
Wouters, M. (2011). Socio-economic effects of concession-based tourism in New Zealand’s national parks. New Zealand Department of Conservation, 5–91. https://www.engineeringvillage.com/share/document.url?mid=geo_2808b31340faaaf3bM78a32061377553&database=geo
Acknowledgements
This research was partially supported by APFNet (2017SP2-UBC) and a scholarship from the China Scholarship Council (Grant No. CSC201806300014). We are also immensely grateful to Mr. Harvey Locke (Founder) from the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative, Mr. Peter Poole (Town Councillor) from the Town of Banff, Mr. Louie Liu (Secretary-General) from the Green Idea Exchanging Association, and Ms. Leslie Bruce (President and CEO) from Banff and Lake Louise Tourism, who provided insight and expertise that greatly assisted this research.
Funding
This research was partially supported by APFNet (2017SP2-UBC) and a scholarship from the China Scholarship Council (Grant No. CSC201806300014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
Not applicable.
Ethics approval
The questionnaire was reviewed and approved by the Behavioural Research Ethics Office of the University of British Columbia before distribution. The questionnaire was of minimum risk. The distributors have received certification from the University of British Columbia tutorial “CORE” (Course in Research Ethics).
Consent to participate
The questionnaire indicated that participation was voluntary.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, F., Wang, Z., Sheng, G. et al. Impacts of national park tourism sites: a perceptual analysis from residents of three spatial levels of local communities in Banff national park. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 3126–3145 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01562-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01562-2