Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysing factors affecting developers’ behaviour towards the adoption of prefabricated buildings in China

  • Review
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prefabricated buildings (PBs) help alleviate housing pressure, reduce building energy consumption and solve environmental problems. However, the adoption of PBs in China has not been widespread. Despite being major suppliers of PBs, developers are still reluctant to actively adopt PBs. Thus, understanding the attitude and behaviour of developers is imperative to effectively promote PBs. This study takes the behaviour of developers towards the adoption of PBs as the entry point to discuss the critical factors affecting developers in China. Two additional variables: ‘government regulation’ and ‘economic viability’, are included in the classic theory of planned behaviour model to construct the developers’ PBs adoption behaviour model. On the basis of 198 samples, an empirical analysis of developers’ PBs adoption behaviour was performed using structural equation modelling. Attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control were observed to exert significant positive effects on the behavioural intention of developers. A highly positive correlation was noted between developers' behavioural intention and adoption behaviour. Government regulation and economic viability also presented a significant positive promoting effect on adoption behaviour. The additional variable ‘EV’ had the most influential impact on developers’ behaviour. This study theoretically demonstrates the influencing mechanism of developers' PBs adoption behaviour and serves as an important reference for the adoption of PBs in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abidin, N. Z. (2010). Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction concept by Malaysian developers. Habitat International, 344, 421–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 502, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 324, 665–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arif, M., Bendi, D., Sawhney, A., & Iyer, K. C. (2012). State of offsite construction in India-Drivers and barriers.

  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior a meta analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 404, 471–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: A comment. Journal of Marketing Research, 183, 375–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banfi, S., Farsi, M., Filippini, M., & Jakob, M. (2008). Willingness to pay for energy-saving measures in residential buildings. Energy Economics, 302, 503–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, S., Gilg, A. W., & Ford, N. (2005). The household energy gap: Examining the divide between habitual- and purchase-related conservation behaviours. Energy Policy, 3311, 1425–1444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beerepoot, M. (2007). Public energy performance policy and the effect on diffusion of solar thermal systems in buildings: A Dutch experience. Renewable Energy, 3211, 1882–1897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BIM, B. N. (2019). Available https://www.uibim.com/. Retrieved Accessed 22 February 2019.

  • Bortoleto, A. P., Kurisu, K. H., & Hanaki, K. (2012). Model development for household waste prevention behaviour. Waste Management, 3212, 2195–2207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, N., Khalfan, M. M. A., & Maqsood, T. (2013). Off-site construction of apartment buildings. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 191, 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., Li, X., Zhu, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2015). A comparative study of environmental performance between prefabricated and traditional residential buildings in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., Lu, X., & Wang, Y. (2018). Quality management of component production of prefabricated building based on BIM-RFID technology. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 35, 102–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congreve, A. (2012). Housing developers and sustainability. International Encyclopedia of Housing & Home, 408–414.

  • Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 161, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. D., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. (2002). Beyond the intention-behaviour mythology: An integrated model of recycling. Marketing Theory, 21, 29–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Mis Quarterly, 133, 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Development, B. M. C. o. H. a. U.-R. Available http://zjw.beijing.gov.cn/. Retrieved Accessed 27 May 2018.

  • Fielding, K. S., Mcdonald, R., & Louis, W. R. (2008). Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 284, 318–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego-Álvarez, I., & Prado-Lorenzo, J. M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and innovation: A resource-based theory. Management Decision, 4910, 1709–1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan, X., Chang, R., & Wen, T. (2018). Overcoming barriers to off-site construction through engaging stakeholders: A two-mode social network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 735–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A., & Isack, F. (2010). Re-engineering through pre-assembly: Client expectations and drivers. Building Research & Information, 312, 146–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodier, C., & Gibb, A. (2007). Future opportunities for offsite in the UK. Construction Management & Economics, 256, 585–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J., Shen, G. Q., Mao, C., Li, Z., & Li, K. (2016). Life-cycle energy analysis of prefabricated building components: An input–output-based hybrid model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2198–2207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 376, 838–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaillon, L., & Poon, C. S. (2008). Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: A Hong Kong case study. Construction Management & Economics, 269, 953–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaillon, L., & Poon, C. S. (2009). The evolution of prefabricated residential building systems in Hong Kong: A review of the public and the private sector. Automation in Construction, 183, 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, R., Mao, C., Hou, L., Wu, C., & Tan, J. (2018). A SWOT analysis for promoting off-site construction under the backdrop of China’s new urbanisation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G. (2006). A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: Norms and anticipated feelings of regret in conservationism. Personality & Individual Differences, 411, 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G., & Gutscher, H. (2010). The proposition of a general version of the theory of planned behavior: predicting ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 333, 586–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H., Hahn, M., Fortin, D. R., Yong, J. H., & Eom, Y. (2010). Effects of perceived behavioral control on the consumer usage intention of e-coupons. Psychology & Marketing, 2310, 841–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, Z., Zhijian, C., & Guozhu, H. (2015). Analysis of Low-carbon consumption behavior intention of rural residents—Based on the theory of planned behavior. Economy and Management.

  • Li, C. Z., Zhong, R. Y., Fan, X., Xu, G., Ke, C., Huang, G. G., & Shen, G. Q. (2017). Integrating RFID and BIM technologies for mitigating risks and improving schedule performance of prefabricated house construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 1048–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Zuo, J., Cai, H., & Zillante, G. (2018). Construction waste reduction behavior of contractor employees: An extended theory of planned behavior model approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1399–1408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Shen, G. Q., & Alshawi, M. (2014). Measuring the impact of prefabrication on construction waste reduction: An empirical study in China. Resources Conservation & Recycling, 915, 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., & Li, D. (2019a). Research on the influencing factors and promotion policieses of assembly building development intention. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 491, 88–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X. J., & Li, D. D. (2019b). Research on the influencing factors and mechanism of development intention of prefabricated building. Construction Economy, 40, 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, H., & Smith, S. J. (2010). Agencement in housing markets: The case of the UK construction industry. Geoforum, 413, 457–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, W., Huang, G. Q., & Li, H. (2011). Scenarios for applying RFID technology in construction project management. Automation in Construction, 202, 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems of innovation: Concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 729, 1153–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, C., Shen, Q., Pan, W., & Ye, K. (2015). Major barriers to off-site construction: The developer’sperspective in China. Journal of Management in Engineering, 313, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, C., Shirong, L. I., & Jing, X. (2016). Critical impetus and paths for off-site construction in China. Journal of Chongqing University.

  • Mao, C., Xie, F., & Liu, G. (2017). Research on the development and evolution of off-site construction ecosystem: Based on LV model. Construction Economy.

  • Miao, W., He, D., & Zhou, C. (2019). Innovation heterogeneity and the effect of government technological innovation expenditure. Economic Research Journal, 541, 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, R. O. (1997). Structural equation modeling: Back to basics. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 44, 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtagh, F., & Heck, A. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Technometrics, 1910, 549–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noguchi, M. (2003). The effect of the quality-oriented production approach on the delivery of prefabricated homes in Japan. Journal of Housing & The Built Environment, 184, 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W., Gibb, A. G. F., & Dainty, A. R. J. (2007). Perspectives of UK housebuilders on the use of offsite modern methods of construction. Construction Management & Economics, 252, 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, M., Ingawale-Verma, Y., Kim, W., & Ham, Y. (2011). Construction policymaking: With an example of singaporean government’s policy to diffuse prefabrication to private sector. Ksce Journal of Civil Engineering, 155, 771–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimian, F. P., Goulding, J., Akintoye, A., & Kolo, S. (2017). Review of motivations, success factors, and barriers to the adoption of offsite manufacturing in Nigeria. Procedia Engineering, 196, 512–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rui, J., Wu, C., Chao, M., & Shrestha, A. (2016). Ecosystem visualization and analysis of Chinese prefabricated housing industry. Procedia Engineering, 145, 436–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambasivan, M., & Soon, Y. W. (2007). Causes and effects of delays in Malaysian construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 255, 517–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sha, K. (2003). Cost and value: Thinking on economics of green building. China Environmental Management.

  • Son, H., Kim, C., Chong, W. K., & Chou, J. S. (2011). Implementing sustainable development in the construction industry: Constructors’ perspectives in the US and Korea. Sustainable Development, 195, 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, V. W. Y., Tam, C. M., Zeng, S. X., & Ng, W. C. Y. (2007). Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction. Building & Environment, 4210, 3642–3654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 122, 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonglet, M., Phillips, P. S., & Read, A. D. (2004). Using the theory of planned behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: A case study from Brixworth, UK. Resources Conservation & Recycling, 413, 191–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 462, 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G., & Liu, M. (2017). Empirical analysis and research of comprehensive benefits of prefabricated concrete buildings. Building Structure.

  • Wang, J. H., & Qin, X. (2013). Evolutionary analysis on green buildings' development behavior of real estate developer groups. Building Science.

  • Wang, Z. Q., Zhang, Q. M., & You, W. B. (2019). An evolutionary game and simulation study on government incentive strategy of prefabricated buildings—From the perspective of government subsidy. Systems Engineering, 37, 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 303, 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., Yu, A. T. W., & Shen, L. (2017). Investigating the determinants of contractor’s construction and demolition waste management behavior in Mainland China. Waste Management, 60, 290–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Z., Sun, C., & Wang, Y. (2018). Design for manufacture and assembly-oriented parametric design of prefabricated buildings. Automation in Construction, 88, 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., & Skitmore, M. (2012). Industrialized housing in China: A coin with two sides. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 162, 143–157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Skitmore, M., & Yi, P. (2014). Exploring the challenges to industrialized residential building in China. Habitat International, 4141, 176–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, H., Hong, J., Shen, G. Q., Mao, C., Zhang, H., & Li, Z. (2018). The exploration of the life-cycle energy saving potential for using prefabrication in residential buildings in China. Energy & Buildings, 166, S0378778817305534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The paper was conducted by Yanjie Wang, Fucheng Wang, Peidong Sang, and Huanbin Song. Yanjie Wang contributed to design the study and write the paper. Peidong Sang contributed to conceive the study. Fucheng Wang and Huanbin Song contributed to data collection and analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zhongnan Group—Zhongnan Hitech, Huijin Financial Center, Huaiyin District, Jinan City, Shandong Province, China

    Yanjie Wang & Fucheng Wang

  2. School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, 1000 Fengming Road, Licheng District, Jinan, 250101, China

    Peidong Sang

  3. University College London, Bloomsbury Gower Street, Central London, England, UK

    Huanbin Song

Authors
  1. Yanjie Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fucheng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peidong Sang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huanbin Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanjie Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Wang, F., Sang, P. et al. Analysing factors affecting developers’ behaviour towards the adoption of prefabricated buildings in China. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 14245–14263 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01265-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01265-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation