Skip to main content

How much is enough? How multi-season exposure to demonstrations affects the use of conservation farming practices in Mozambique

Abstract

Scaling new agricultural practices and technologies requires deliberate investments in the education and training of farmers. This can be done through field demonstrations, farmer field days and exchange visits. However, the effectiveness of these extension approaches has not been adequately documented, especially in quantitative terms. Based on data collected from 875 smallholder farmers in central and northern Mozambique, this paper uses a continuous treatment model within the framework of a generalized propensity score matching to empirically assess the effectiveness of community-based extension activities in fostering the adoption of a set of conservation tillage practices. The results show that controlling for socio-demographic factors such as gender of decision maker, land size and access to government services, the area under conservation tillage doubled when respondents had been exposed to targeted extension activities for at least six seasons, from a baseline exposure of two seasons. Subject to further program and investment analysis, the results suggest that farmer-centered learning activities should be implemented for about four to six seasons as a likely optimal lifespan of such programs. Our study offers an important first step in making an empirical case for multi-year investments in extension activities. For rural development programming in Mozambique and similar areas, these results suggest the need for sustained funding and personnel allocation in agricultural extension activities in local farming communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Notes

  1. In what follows, the subscript i is suppressed to simplify the notation.

  2. Conditional on the covariates.

  3. Note that the coefficients from the outcome model have little interpretational significance. The more farmers were exposed to the project extension activities, the higher was their propensity to adopt the technologies as shown by the increasing acreage under various CA practices. Broadly, the MLD component of the first three technology combinations (MLD, MLD + MULCH and MLD + MULCH + Herb) is common in many smallholder farming systems in Mozambique and across the region commonly referred to as conventional agriculture, while the last combination is under total conservation agriculture.

References

  • Abdoulaye, T., Abass, A., Maziya-Dixon, B., Tarawali, G., Okechukwu, R., Rusike, J., Alene, A., Manyong, V., & Ayedun, B. (2014). Awareness and adoption of improved cassava varieties and processing technologies in Nigeria. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 6(4), 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, J. A., & D’Souza, S. (2014). From adoption claims to understand farmers and contexts: A literature review of conservation agriculture (CA) adoption among smallholder farmers in southern Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 187, 116–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araya, T., Nyssen, J., Govaerts, B., Baudron, F., Carpentier, L., Bauer, H., et al. (2015). Restoring cropland productivity and profitability in Northern Ethiopia drylands after nine years of resource-conserving agriculture. Experimental Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001447971400060X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, A., McCarthy, N., Lipper, L., Asfaw, S., & Cattaneo, A. (2014). Adoption and intensity of adoption of conservation farming practices in Zambia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 187, 72–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata Journal, 2, 358–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. W., Haque, E., Jahiruddin, M., Rahman, M., Begum, M., Miah, M. A. M., et al. (2019). Conservation agriculture for rice-based intensive cropping by smallholders in the Eastern Gangetic Plain. Agriculture, 2009(9), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9010005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benyishay, A. & Mobarak, A. M. (2013). Communicating with farmers through social networks). Yale University Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper No. 1030; Yale Economics Department Working Paper No. 121. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2315229

  • Bia, M., & Mattei, A. (2008). A Stata package for the estimation of the dose-response function through adjustment for the generalized propensity score. The Stata Journal, 8(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0800800303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouder, S. M., & Gomez-Macpherson, H. (2014). The impact of conservation agriculture on smallholder agricultural yields: a scoping review of the evidence. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment., 187, 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chankrajang, T., & Muttarak, R. (2017). Green returns to education: Does schooling contribute to pro-environmental behaviours? Evidence from Thailand. Ecological Economics, 131, 434–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIMMYT. (2019). Adoption and impacts of SIMLESA program: Pathways to sustainable intensification report 2019.

  • Cunguara, B., & Moder, K. (2011). Is agricultural extension helping the poor? Evidence from rural Mozambique. Journal of African Economies, 20(4), 562–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. E., Ekboir, J., & Spielman, D. J. (2008). Strengthening agricultural education and training in sub-Saharan Africa from an innovation systems perspective: A case study of Mozambique. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 14(1), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Roo, N., Andersson, J., & Krupnik, T. (2019). On-farm trials for development impact? The organization of research and the scaling of agricultural technologies. Experimental Agriculture, 55(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479717000382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dercon, S., Gilligan, D., Hoddinott, J., & Woldehanna, T. (2009). The impact of agricultural extension and roads on poverty and consumption growth in fifteen Ethiopian villages. American Journal of Agricultural Economics., 91(14), 1007–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias, D., Mulima, E.P., & Nhantumbo, S. (2018). Enhancing agricultural resilience and sustainability in Mozambique: Investing in scaling modalities, laying the foundations for sustainable agricultural intensification in Mozambique. https://simlesa.cimmyt.org/wp-content/uploads/SCALING-C.pdf

  • Duo, S., & Bruening, T. (2007). Assessment of the Sasakawa Africa fund for extension education in Ghana. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 14(1), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzeco, C., Amilai C., & Cristovao, A. (2010). Farm field schools and farmer’s empowerment in Mozambique: A pilot study. In 9th European IFSA Symposium, 4–7 July 2010, Vienna, Austria.

  • FAO. (2009). How to feed the world 2050: The special challenge for sub-Saharan Africa. High Level Expert Forum.

  • FAO. (2015). Conservation agriculture. Available online at: http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/index.html

  • Fichera, E., & Emsley, R. (2016). Is treatment “intensity” associated with healthier lifestyle choices? An application of the dose response function. Economics and Human Biology, 23(2016), 149–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M., Holden, S. T., Thierfelder, C., & Katengeza, S. P. (2018). Awareness and adoption of conservation agriculture in Malawi: What difference can farmer to-farmer extension make? International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 16(3), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2018.1472411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, A. D., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (2010). Microeconomics of technology adoption. Annual Review of Economics, 2(1), 395–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R., & Rockstrom, J. (2001). Conservation tillage for sustainable agriculture: An agrarian revolution gathers momentum in Africa. Soil & Tillage Research., 61, 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, P., Walker, F., Haggblade, S., Maria, R., & Neal E. (2013). Conservation agriculture in Mozambique: Literature review and research gaps

  • Hirano, K., & Imbens, G. W. (2004). The propensity score with continuous treatments. In A. Gelman & X.-L. Meng (Eds.), Applied Bayesian modeling and causal inference from incomplete-data perspectives (pp. 73–84). West Sussex, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 8, 945–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai, K., & Van Dyk, D. A. (2004). Causal inference with general treatment regimes: Generalizing the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214504000001187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaweesa, S., Mkomwa, S., & Loiskandl, W. (2018). Adoption of conservation agriculture in Uganda: A case study of the Lango subregion. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A., Pervaiz, U., Khan, N. M., Ahmad, S., & Nigar, S. (2009). Effectiveness of demonstration plots as extension method adopted by AKRSP for agricultural technology dissemination in District Chitral. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 25(2), 313–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiptot, E., Karuhanga, M., Franzel, S., & Nzigamasabo, P. B. (2016). Volunteer farmer-trainer motivations in East Africa: Practical implications for enhancing farmer-to-farmer extension. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 14(3), 339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondylis, F., & Mueller, V. (2012). Seeing is believing? Evidence from a demonstration plot experiment in Mozambique (p. 19). Washington D.C.: IFPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristen, H. (2012). Practical sampling for impact evaluations, Living Standards Measurement Study. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTDEVIMPEVAINI/Resources/3998199-1285617002143/7430173-1367431734968/3-Sampling_for_IE.pdf

  • Mahale, M. M., Patil, S., & Chavan, A. P. (2014). Impact of front-line demonstrations on yield, adoption and horizontal spread of oilseed crops. Farming Systems Research & Development, 20(1), 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matuschke, I., & Qaim, M. (2009). The impact of social networks on hybrid seed adoption in India. Agricultural Economics, 40(5), 493–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, P. E. (2014). A review of sustainable financing of extension services in developing countries. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

  • Misiko, M., & Ramisch, J. (2007). Integrated soil fertility management technologies: Review for scaling up. In A. Bationo, B. Waswa, J. Kihara, & J. Kimetu (Eds.), Advances in integrated soil fertility management in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and opportunities. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mlenga, D., & Sakhile, M. (2015). Factors influencing adoption of conservation agriculture: A case for increasing resilience to climate change and variability in Swaziland. Journal of Earth and Environmental Science., 5, 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muilerman, S., & Vellema, S. (2017). Scaling service delivery in a failed state: Cocoa smallholders, Farmer Field Schools, persistent bureaucrats and institutional work in Côte d’Ivoire. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 15(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2016.1246274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muilerman, S., Wigboldus, S., & Leeuwis, C. (2018). Scaling and institutionalization within agricultural innovation systems: the case of cocoa farmer field schools in Cameroon. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 16(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2018.1440469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muoni, T., Thierfelder, C., Rusinamhodzi, L., et al. (2013). Weed control in conservation agriculture systems of Zimbabwe: Identifying economical best strategies. Crop Protection., 53, 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzangwa, L., Mnkeni, P. N. S., & Chiduza, C. (2017). Assessment of conservation agriculture practices by smallholder farmers in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Agronomy, 2017(7), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy7030046.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NEPAD. (2002). Working for household food security and economic prosperity in Africa. National Department of Agriculture (South Africa) on behalf of NEPAD Secretariat. [First NEPAD provisional agriculture strategy paper: Presented at 22nd FAO Regional Conference for Africa, Cairo, February 3–8, 2002 and later updated].

  • Ngoma, H., Mulenga, B. P., & Jayne, T. S. (2014). What explains minimal use of minimum tillage in Zambia: Evidence from district representative data? IAPRI Working Paper #82. Lusaka, Zambia: Indaba Agricultural Research Institute.

  • Ngwira, A., Thierfelder, C., & Lambert, D. (2013). Conservation agriculture systems for Malawian smallholder farmers: Long-term effects on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 28(4), 350–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyanga, P. H. (2012). Factors influencing adoption and area under conservation agriculture: A mixed methods approach. Sustainable Agriculture Research, 1(2), 2012. https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v1n2p27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, T., Hoddinott, J., & Kinsey, B. (2003). The impact of agricultural extension on farm production in resettlement areas of Zimbabwe. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 51(2), 337–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sietz, D., & Van Dijk, H. (2015). Land-based adaptation to global change: What drives soil and water conservation in western Africa? Global Environmental Change, 33, 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soule, M. J., Tegene, A., & Wiebe, K. D. (2000). Land tenure and the adoption of conservation practices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(4), 993–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, J. R., & Vlek, P. (2018). Assessing the adoption and diffusion of natural resource management practices synthesis of a new set of empirical studies. Rome: Independent Science and Partnership Council (ISPC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, B. E., & Rajalahti, R. (2010). Strengthening agricultural extension and advisory systems: Procedures for assessing, transforming, and evaluating extension systems. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 45, The World Bank.

  • Taapopi, M., Kamwi, J. M., & Siyambango, N. (2018). Perception of farmers on conservation agriculture for climate change adaptation in Namibia. Environment and Natural Resources Research, 8, 3. https://doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v8n3p33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taffa, T. (2002). Soil and water conservation for sustainable agriculture.

  • Teshome, A., de Graaff, J., & Kassie, M. (2016). Household-level determinants of soil and water conservation adoption phases: Evidence from north-western Ethiopian highlands. Environmental Management, 57, 620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0635-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traore, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (1998). On-farm adoption of conservation practices: The role of farm and farmer characteristics, perceptions, and health hazards. Land Economics, 74(1), 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, P. C. (2007). Tailoring conservation agriculture to the needs of small farmers in developing countries: An analysis of issues. Journal of Crop Improvement, 19(1/2), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, P. C., Thierfelder, C., Ngwira, A., Govaerts, B., Nyagumbo, I., & Baudron, F. (2013). Conservation agriculture in Eastern and Southern Africa. In R. A. Jat, K. L. Sahrawat, & A. H. Kassam (Eds.), Conservation agriculture: Global prospects and challenges. Wallingford, Oxfordshire: CABI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolka, K., Mulder, J., & Biazin, B. (2018). Effects of soil and water conservation techniques on crop yield, runoff and soil loss in sub-Saharan Africa: A review. Agricultural Water Management., 207, 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wossen, T., Berger, T., Mequaninte, T., & Alamirew, B. (2013). Social network effects on the adoption of sustainable natural resource management practices in Ethiopia. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 20, 477–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paswel P. Marenya.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 5 and 6.

Table 5 Outcome model results
Table 6 Average number of visits/attendance in Project extension activities per season in central Mozambique

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khainga, D.N., Marenya, P.P. & da Luz Quinhentos, M. How much is enough? How multi-season exposure to demonstrations affects the use of conservation farming practices in Mozambique. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 11067–11089 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01106-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01106-0

Keywords

  • Conservation agriculture
  • Agricultural extension
  • Scaling
  • Generalized propensity score
  • Dose response