Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigating the use of environmental tableware based on the theory of planned behavior

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the statistics of the Environmental Protection Administration in Taiwan, the average usage amount of disposable tableware is about 59,000 tons year. Disposable tableware waste always causes serious pollution to the environment. The aim of this study is to explore the problem of disposable tableware garbage pollution with respect to different impact factors, and increase the usage of eco-friendly tableware. The subjects of this study are the undergraduates and graduates of the colleges in Taiwan. This research adopted the theory of planned behavior to investigate the relationship between user's behavior and cognition and designed questionnaires through expert interviews to advocate reducing the usage of disposable tableware. 550 college students were invited as the subjects to answer the narrative questionnaires and calculate the score of each questionnaire based on Likert scale. A series of data analysis methods, including reliability analysis, Pearson’s correlation analysis, and regression analysis etc., were adopted and programmed in Statistical Product and Service Solutions. The research results show that the usage of eco-friendly tableware has a positive impact on behavioral intentions, attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. This study also learns that governments, industries, environmental protection, and community groups are closely related and interact with each other; their eco-friendly policy can influence users to undergo behavioral changes as well as encourage them to reject the use of disposable tableware. The conclusions would be helpful for policy makers to take effective actions to guide public behaviors and promote public participation in using eco-friendly tableware.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior, action-control: from cognition to behavior. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2002). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes (pp. 1–33).

  • Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology. Worcester: Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arezu, S., & Hamideh, M. (2020). Pro-environmental behavior of university students: Application of protection motivation theory. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, e00908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker-Eveleth, L., & Stone, R. W. (2008). Expectancy theory and behavioral intentions to use computer applications. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 3, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A.-E. (1977). Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ben, J. M., Ben, Y. S., & Ozturk, I. (2020). Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecological Indicators, 60, 824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhead-Fern, D., White, K. M., et al. (2006). The role of self-efficacy in predicting rule-following behaviors in shelters for homeless youth: a test of the theory of planned behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P.-Y., & Chu, M.-C. (2014). Behavioral factors affecting students’ intentions to enroll in business ethics courses: A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and social cognitive theory using self-identity as a moderator. Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: implications for educational interventions. Journal of environmental psychology, 42, 128–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Administration (2006). Environmental protection administration reports. https://www.epa.gov.tw/ENG/.

  • Foster, & Kaerstein. (1985). Buildings and projects (Vol 3). Watermark Publications (UK) Ltd.

  • Liao, C., Zhao, D., & Zhang, S. (2018). Psychological and conditional factors influencing staff’s takeaway waste separation intention: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Sustainable Cities and Society, 41, 186–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B. J., & Chiou, W. B. (2010). Undergraduates’ intentions to take a second language proficiency test: A comparison of predictions from the theory of planned behavior and social cognitive theory. Psychological Reports, 106, 798–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendonça, A. K. S., Barni, G. D. A. C., et al. (2020). Hierarchical modeling of the 50 largest economies to verify the impact of GDP, population and renewable energy generation in CO2 emissions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 22, 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad, I., Robert, S., et al. (2020). Does CSR influence firm performance? A longitudinal study of SME sectors of Pakistan. Journal of Global Responsibility, 11(1), 27–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad, I., Zhou, P., et al. (2019). Do environmental management systems help improve corporate sustainable development? Evidence from manufacturing companies in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 628–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Health Research Institutes of Taiwan (2015). Environmental Protection Reports. https://www.nhri.edu.tw/eng/.

  • Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanek, V. (1971). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. Academy Chicago.

  • Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. (2001). The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviors: broadening and deepening the theory of planned behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2003). Interaction design—beyond human computer interaction. USA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, C., Kavussanu, M., et al. (2018). The role of self-regulatory efficacy, moral disengagement and guilt on doping likelihood: A social cognitive theory perspective. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36, 578–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, L. G., et al. (2004). Consumer behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seto, K. C., & Ramankutty, N. (2016). Hidden linkages between urbanization and food systems. Science, 352(6288), 943–945.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, D. J., & O’Leary, J. E. (1995). The theory of planned behavior: The effects of perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapa, B. (1999). Environmentalism: the relation of environmental attitudes and environmentally responsible behaviors among undergraduate Students. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 19, 426–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente-Molina, M. A., Fernández-Sainz, A., & Izagirre-Olaizola, J. (2018). Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., & Ann, R. (2011). Factors influencing private and public environmental protection behaviors: Results from a survey of residents in Shaanxi, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 429–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14, 361–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z., Li, J., Shan, J., & Zhang, W. (2020). Extending the theory of planned behavior to understand residents’ coping behaviors for reducing the health risks posed by haze pollution. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00666-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, T. Y., et al. (2017). Understanding Taiwanese undergraduate students’ pro-environmental behavioral intention towards green products in the fight against climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 390–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Yin Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 409 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tu, JC., Chen, YY., Lee, YL. et al. Investigating the use of environmental tableware based on the theory of planned behavior. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 10013–10037 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01044-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01044-x

Keywords