Abstract
According to the statistics of the Environmental Protection Administration in Taiwan, the average usage amount of disposable tableware is about 59,000 tons year. Disposable tableware waste always causes serious pollution to the environment. The aim of this study is to explore the problem of disposable tableware garbage pollution with respect to different impact factors, and increase the usage of eco-friendly tableware. The subjects of this study are the undergraduates and graduates of the colleges in Taiwan. This research adopted the theory of planned behavior to investigate the relationship between user's behavior and cognition and designed questionnaires through expert interviews to advocate reducing the usage of disposable tableware. 550 college students were invited as the subjects to answer the narrative questionnaires and calculate the score of each questionnaire based on Likert scale. A series of data analysis methods, including reliability analysis, Pearson’s correlation analysis, and regression analysis etc., were adopted and programmed in Statistical Product and Service Solutions. The research results show that the usage of eco-friendly tableware has a positive impact on behavioral intentions, attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. This study also learns that governments, industries, environmental protection, and community groups are closely related and interact with each other; their eco-friendly policy can influence users to undergo behavioral changes as well as encourage them to reject the use of disposable tableware. The conclusions would be helpful for policy makers to take effective actions to guide public behaviors and promote public participation in using eco-friendly tableware.



Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior, action-control: from cognition to behavior. Heidelberg: Springer.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2002). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes (pp. 1–33).
Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology. Worcester: Clark University Press.
Arezu, S., & Hamideh, M. (2020). Pro-environmental behavior of university students: Application of protection motivation theory. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, e00908.
Baker-Eveleth, L., & Stone, R. W. (2008). Expectancy theory and behavioral intentions to use computer applications. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 3, 135–146.
Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 175–187.
Bandura, A.-E. (1977). Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191.
Ben, J. M., Ben, Y. S., & Ozturk, I. (2020). Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecological Indicators, 60, 824.
Broadhead-Fern, D., White, K. M., et al. (2006). The role of self-efficacy in predicting rule-following behaviors in shelters for homeless youth: a test of the theory of planned behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 307–325.
Cheng, P.-Y., & Chu, M.-C. (2014). Behavioral factors affecting students’ intentions to enroll in business ethics courses: A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and social cognitive theory using self-identity as a moderator. Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 35–46.
De Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: implications for educational interventions. Journal of environmental psychology, 42, 128–138.
Environmental Protection Administration (2006). Environmental protection administration reports. https://www.epa.gov.tw/ENG/.
Foster, & Kaerstein. (1985). Buildings and projects (Vol 3). Watermark Publications (UK) Ltd.
Liao, C., Zhao, D., & Zhang, S. (2018). Psychological and conditional factors influencing staff’s takeaway waste separation intention: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Sustainable Cities and Society, 41, 186–194.
Lin, B. J., & Chiou, W. B. (2010). Undergraduates’ intentions to take a second language proficiency test: A comparison of predictions from the theory of planned behavior and social cognitive theory. Psychological Reports, 106, 798–810.
Mendonça, A. K. S., Barni, G. D. A. C., et al. (2020). Hierarchical modeling of the 50 largest economies to verify the impact of GDP, population and renewable energy generation in CO2 emissions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 22, 58–67.
Muhammad, I., Robert, S., et al. (2020). Does CSR influence firm performance? A longitudinal study of SME sectors of Pakistan. Journal of Global Responsibility, 11(1), 27–53.
Muhammad, I., Zhou, P., et al. (2019). Do environmental management systems help improve corporate sustainable development? Evidence from manufacturing companies in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 628–641.
National Health Research Institutes of Taiwan (2015). Environmental Protection Reports. https://www.nhri.edu.tw/eng/.
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54.
Papanek, V. (1971). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. Academy Chicago.
Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. (2001). The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviors: broadening and deepening the theory of planned behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 79.
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2003). Interaction design—beyond human computer interaction. USA: Wiley.
Ring, C., Kavussanu, M., et al. (2018). The role of self-regulatory efficacy, moral disengagement and guilt on doping likelihood: A social cognitive theory perspective. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36, 578–584.
Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Schiffman, L. G., et al. (2004). Consumer behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Seto, K. C., & Ramankutty, N. (2016). Hidden linkages between urbanization and food systems. Science, 352(6288), 943–945.
Terry, D. J., & O’Leary, J. E. (1995). The theory of planned behavior: The effects of perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 199–220.
Thapa, B. (1999). Environmentalism: the relation of environmental attitudes and environmentally responsible behaviors among undergraduate Students. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 19, 426–438.
Vicente-Molina, M. A., Fernández-Sainz, A., & Izagirre-Olaizola, J. (2018). Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 89–98.
Wang, F., & Ann, R. (2011). Factors influencing private and public environmental protection behaviors: Results from a survey of residents in Shaanxi, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 429–436.
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14, 361–384.
Xu, Z., Li, J., Shan, J., & Zhang, W. (2020). Extending the theory of planned behavior to understand residents’ coping behaviors for reducing the health risks posed by haze pollution. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00666-5
Yu, T. Y., et al. (2017). Understanding Taiwanese undergraduate students’ pro-environmental behavioral intention towards green products in the fight against climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 390–402.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tu, JC., Chen, YY., Lee, YL. et al. Investigating the use of environmental tableware based on the theory of planned behavior. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 10013–10037 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01044-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01044-x

