Abstract
Around the world, there are several ecosystems, some in their initial conditions, which are unique and need preservation. This heritage needs adjusted management plans and conservation attentions. It is important to preserve the natural heritage for the future generations, creating active legislation, more governance, empowerment for the related institutions, and bringing more dynamics for these frameworks. However, the literature shows that these issues may be explored deeper. In this context, using data from the Portuguese Institute for Conservation and Nature, this work discusses the heterogeneous distribution of Trees of Public Interest (TPI) in Portugal. These trees are relevant for several criteria such as size, age, or cultural value. Through the use of Poisson, negative binomial, zero-inflated Poisson, and zero-inflated negative binomial regressions, several conclusions have been reached. Among these conclusions, it is highlighted that areas characterized by higher levels of touristic dynamism tend to increase the number of TPI. Higher percentages of forestry area for intervention ensure at least one TPI. The age of the creation of the municipality also significantly influences the risk of having no TPI.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A Forestry Intervention Area (in Portuguese, ‘Zona de Intervenção Florestal’) is an officially recognized area that is a continuous and delimited territorial area, constituted mainly by forest areas. It is submitted to a Forest Management Plan (PGF) and complies with what is established in the Municipal Plans of Defense of the Forest against Fire; it is administered by a single entity, called the Entity Manager of ZIF.
References
Accati, E., & Gullino, P. (2009). Plants in gardens and parks of XVIII century in piedmont. Acta Horticulturae, 881, 939–944.
Alonso, M. (1999). Infrastructures and articulation of the district. Mimeo. Report available through https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295459349_Infrastructures_and_articulation_of_the_district. Accessed 12 May 2017.
Alves, L., & Carvalho, P. (2015). Biocaching: Leisure, tourism and heritage. Cadernos de Geografia, 34, 101–106.
Anira, W., Hassan, N., Hassan, K., & Nayan, N. (2016). The morphology of heritage trees in colonial town: Taiping Lake Garden, Perak, Malaysia. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 621–630.
ANMP (2016); Various Indicators. Available through http://www.anmp.pt.
Arnan, X., López, B., Martínez-Vilalta, J., Estorach, M., & Poyatos, R. (2012). The age of monumental olive trees (Olea europaea) in northeastern Spain. Dendrochronologia, 30(2012), 11–14.
Ataberka, E., & Baykalb, F. (2010). Utilization of natural and cultural resources of Dikili (Izmir) for tourism. In Proceedings of the 2nd international geography symposium GEOMED 2010. Antalya: GeoMed.
Bevilacqua, M., & Ochoa, J. (2001). Conservation of the lastfrontier forests of the Venezuelan Guayana: Guidelines proposal for the Caura River watershed. Interciencia, 26(10), 491-+.
Brito-Rozas, E., & Flores-Toro, L. (2014). Structure and dynamics in North Belloto forests (Beilschmiedia miersii) in Cordillera El Melon, Valparaiso Region, Chile. Bosque, 35(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002014000100002.
Canclini, N., & Liffman, P. (2000). From national capital to global capital: Urban change in Mexico City. Public Culture, 12(1), 207–213.
Capretz, R. L., & Rohn, R. (2013). Lower Permian stems as fluvial paleocurrent indicators of the Parnaiba Basin, northern Brazil. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 45, 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2012.12.007.
Carmo, J. (2013). Avaliação do estado atual das árvores classificadas de interesse público da cidade de lisboa e recomendações para a sua manutenção. Dissertação de Mestrado em Engenharia Florestal e dos Recursos Naturais, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.
Chalak, L., Haouane, H., Essalouh, L., Santoni, S., Besnard, G., & Khadari, B. (2015). Extent of the genetic diversity in Lebanese olive (Olea europaea L.) trees: A mixture of an ancient germplasm with recently introduced varieties. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 62(4), 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-014-0187-1.
Das, S. (2017). Forests of cedar and forests of Sal: Trees, affects and politics of recognition on the himalayan frontier. In Conference proceedings “dimensions of political ecology conference, at University of Kentucky”, Lexington.
Domina, G., Saporita, P., Margagliotta, V., Venturella, G., & Gargano, M. L. (2018). Naturalistic hotspots along the Itinerarium Rosaliae (CW Sicily, Italy). International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 25(8), 696–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1467980.
Dudkiewicz, M., Dabski, M., & Durlak, W. (2015). Dendroflora of Historic Park in Kijany. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum-Formatio Circumiectus, 14(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.15576/ASP.FC/2015.14.1.15.
Efe, R., Soykan, A., Curebal, I., & Sonmez, S. (2014). Kuyucak monumental cretan maple. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 120(2014), 547–556.
Gruber, J. (1999). Growth of the spruce number 48 of the “Dicke Tannen”/Hohegeiss. Allgemeine Forst Und Jagdzeitung, 170(10–11), 188–194.
Gulgun, B, Yazici, K., Dursun, S. (2015). Tokat and Amasya cities monumental trees as natural heritage. In Ecology, economics, education and legislation, Vol II; International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferenceSGEM.
Gullino, P., Larcher, F., & Devecchi, M. (2009). The importance of the chestnut cultivation and its evolution in the piedmont landscape (NorthWest Italy). Acta Horticulturae, 866, 37–42.
Gutiérrez, A. (2016). Monumental trees: A natural patrimony not yet recognized in Chile. Bosque, 37(2), 445–449.
Hew, H., Tong, D., & Goh, G. (2014). Revitalisation of the old township of Ipoh, Malaysia. Journal of Place Management and Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmd-05-2013-0015.
Hilbe, J. (2014). Modeling count data. Utah: Arizona State University.
Horak, J. (2017). Insect ecology and veteran trees. Journal of Insect Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-9953-7.
Hwang, (2014). Avifaunal biodiversity and conservation management plans for the Ansan Reed-Wetland Park in Korea. Korean Journal of Ornithology, 21(1), 1–15.
Hyeon, L. W. (2013). Studies on the investigation into original form of natural monument no. 404 Orijangnim in Jacheon-ri, Yeongcheon. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture, 31(3), 83–94.
ICNF. (2016). Various Indicators. Lisboa: Instituto de Conservação da Natureza e Florestas.
INE. (2016). Various indicators. http://www.ine.pt. Accessed 12 May 2017.
Jander, K. C. (2015). Indirect mutualism: Ants protect fig seeds and pollen dispersers from parasites. Ecological Entomology, 40(5), 500–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12215.
Joo-Hwan, S., & Oh, J. H. (2010). Measures to implements the landscape preservation and management on consideration of changing the actual condition and landscape visibility in the surround area of the Jongmyo. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture, 28(2), 118–126.
Kang, P. (2015). The recognition on trees and culture transformation in China and Korea—Focusing on Sophora and Zelkova Tree. Daegusahak, 118, 113–142. https://doi.org/10.17751/DHR.118.113.
Kang, H. M., Lee, S. H., Yang, B. W., Choi, S. I., Kim, H., Cho, Y. J., et al. (2007). Importance-performance analysis of forest works for sustainable forest management in Korea. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Kyushu University, 52(1), 255–263.
Kubus, M. (2009). The evaluation of using resistograph when specifying the health condition of a monumental tree. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 37(1), 157–164.
Lambert, D. (1992). Zero-inflated poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics, 34, 114.
Lee, Y. J., Bhuiyan, M. S. A., Chung, H. J., Jung, W. Y., Choi, K. D., Jang, B. G., et al. (2007). Mitochondrial DNA diversity of Korean Ogol chicken. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 20(4), 477–481. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.477.
Lee, J., Han, G., Fulp, W., & Giuliano, A. (2012). Analysis of overdispersed count data: Application to the Human Papillomavirus Infection in Men (HIM) Study. Epidemiology and Infection, 140(6), 1087–1094.
Lee, S.-G., Kim, C., Choi, I.-J., Kuprin, A., & Lim, J. (2019). A review of host plants of Callipogon (Eoxenus) relictus Semenov (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Prioninae), a Korea natural monument, with a new host, Quercus aliena Blume. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 22(1), 353–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2019.01.016.
Lopes, R. P., Reis, C. S., & Trincao, P. R. (2019). Portugal’s Trees of Public Interest: Their role in botany awareness. Finisterra-Revista Portuguesa De Geografia, 54(110), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.18055/Finis14564.
Lourenço, D. (2015). Árvores de Interesse Público da cidade do Porto—do inventário ao itinerário. Porto: Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto.
Massavanhane, A. (2010). Avaliação do Estado Actual de Desenvolvimento e da Situação Fitossanitária dos Arvoredos, Bosquetes e Maciços Classificados de Interesse Público, do Concelho de Lisboa. Dissertação de Mestrado em Engenharia Florestal e dos Recursos Naturais, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.
Mohamad, R., Bteich, M., Cardone, G., & Marchini, A. (2013). Economic analysis in organic olive farms: The case of the ancient olive trees in the rural parkland in Apulia. New Medit, 12(4), 55–61.
Mourao, P. (2017). Discussing the spatial dependence and the determinants of the municipal expenses of Portuguese forest sappers’ teams. Journal of Forest Economics, 27, 38–49.
Mullahy, J. (1986). Specification and testing of some modified count data models. Journal of Econometrics., 33, 341–365.
Oner, N., Ozden, S., & Birben, U. (2010). Relationship between a natural monumental stand in Turkey and local beliefs. Journal of Environmental Biology, 31(1–2), 149–155.
Ostrowska-Tryzno, A., & Pawlikowska-Piechotka, A. (2016). Mobility and sustainable cultural tourism (case study: Cracow and warsaw old towns accessibility). Journal of Tourism & Hospitality, 5, 195. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0269.1000195.
Pietrzak-Zawadka, J. (2015). Dimensional criteria for recognition of trees as monuments of nature. Sylwan, 159, 227–235.
PORDATA. (2016). Various indicators. http://www.pordata.pt/. Accessed 12 May 2017.
Preisser, J., Das, K., Long, L., & Divarisd, K. (2016). Marginalized zero-inflated negative binomial regression with application to dental caries. Statistics in Medicine, 35(10), 1722–1735.
Salimontia, A., Simeoneb, V., Cesaric, G., Lamajb, F., Cattivellid, L., Perria, E., et al. (2013). A first molecular investigation of monumental olive trees in Apulia region. Scientia Horticulturae, 162(23), 204–212.
Scopus. (2020). Scopus (Article title, Abstract, Keywords). https://www.scopus.com/search/form.uri?display=basic. Accessed 25 Mar 2020.
Singh, R. (2017). The world heritage villages of Shirakawa-Gō and Gokayama, Japan: Continuing culture and meeting modernity. In Russo, A., Singh, R. P. B., & Kim, S.-K. (Eds.), Vladivostok proceedings of international summer school—“Cultural landscape & sustainable urban regeneration”.
Sun, Y., Mwangi, E., & Meinzen-Dick, R. (2011). Gender, institutions and sustainability in the context of forest decentralization reforms in latin America and East Africa. In Agricultural and applied economics association proceedings, 2011, Pittsburgh.
Temel, F., & Ozalp, M. (2009). Monumental Castanea sativa Mill. Individuals on the Slopes of Genya Mountain, Artvin, Turkey. Acta Horticulturae, 815, 171–178.
Vandekerkhove, K., Baeté, H., Verstraeten, A, et al. (2003). Conservation and management of ancient trees in Southern England, 2003 (edited excursion report). IBW Bb C&Z 2003.011 (bijgewerkt). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318351405_Conservation_and_management_of_ancient_trees_in_Southern_England_2003_edited_excursion_report. Accessed 12 May 2017.
Vykouk, M., Smid, P., & Pecharova, E. (2014). Determination of the age of lime in Maskovice (Czech Republic). In GeoConference on ecology, economics, education and legislation, international multidisciplinary scientific GeoConferencem SGEM
Web of Science. (2020). Web of science (all databases). https://apps.webofknowledge.com/UA_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=UA&SID=C6jywh4WttS2tW8L1yI&search_mode=GeneralSearch. Accessed 25 Mar 2020.
Wilkins, E. (2016). Tourism in Maine: Visitation and economic impacts of weather. Dissertation, Utah State University, Utah.
Yaman, B., & Saribas, M. (2007). Elemen black pine, a new monumental tree in Dirgine forests. EKOLOJI, 16, 62–68.
Zapponi, L., Mazza, G., Farina, A., Fedrigoli, L., Mazzocchi, F., Roversi, P. F., et al. (2017). The role of monumental trees for the preservation of saproxylic biodiversity: Re-thinking their management in cultural landscapes. Nature Conservation-Bulgaria, 19, 231–243. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.19.12464.
Laws
Decree-Law 28468 (of 15th February of 1938).
Decree Law 135/2012.
Law 53/2012.
Order 124/2014.
Acknowledgements
This work is funded by National Funds through the FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., within the scope of the project Refa UIDB/00681/2020. Furthermore we would like to thank the CERNAS Research Centre and the Polytechnic Institute of Viseu for their support. This paper is also financed by National Funds of the FCT – Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology within the project «UIDB/03182/2020". Authors also acknowledge the contributions from anonymous reviewers on a previous version of this text as well as they acknowledge the contributions from various discussants at GECAMB 2018 (Setubal, Portugal) in which a previous version of this research has been discussed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mourao, P.R., Martinho, V.D. Choosing the best socioeconomic nutrients for the best trees: a discussion about the distribution of Portuguese Trees of Public Interest. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 5985–6001 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00858-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00858-z