Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An integrated multi-objective optimization modelling for sustainable development goals of India

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modelling for long-term goals involving multiple factors and criteria often require incorporating decision-makers preferences to realize optimum satisfaction. Goal programming (GP) is an operational research technique that is relevant to analysing decision-making problems with multiple competing and conflicting objectives. Multi-objective goal programming approach takes advantage of striking the trade-off between the overachievement and underachievement of the decision-makers future aspirations. The concept of GP with a satisfaction function integrates the preference of the decision-makers explicitly. In this paper, we proposed a multi-objective optimization model integrating economic growth, electricity consumption, greenhouse gas emission and the number of employees across the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors of Indian economy using the concept of GP with a satisfaction function. The model validated with data from the three economic sectors, and the results provided a quantitative justification for achieving economic growth, electricity consumption, with optimal employment strength across the sectors, for the sustainable development goals of India vision 2030. Also, a strong suggestion for improvement and encouragement in the use of renewable energies such as wind and solar and reduction in fossil fuels utilization to arrest the high emission tendencies shortly was evidence by the solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MOSPI) http://mospi.nic.in/sites/default/files/press_release/Press Note PE 2018-19-31.5.2019-Final.pdf [accessed 13 July 2019]

Fig. 2

Source: https://data.worldbank.org/country/india [accessed 13 July 2019]

Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Source: https://data.worldbank.org/country/india [accessed 13 July 2019]

Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelaziz, F. B. (2012). Solution approaches for the multiobjective stochastic programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 216(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allouche, M. A., Aouni, B., Martel, J. M., Loukil, T., & Rebaï, A. (2009). Solving multi-criteria scheduling flow shop problem through compromise programming and satisfaction functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(2), 460–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aouni, B., Abdelaziz, F. B., & Martel, J. M. (2005). Decision-maker’s preferences modeling in the stochastic goal programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 162(3), 610–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aouni, B., Ben Abdelaziz, F., & La Torre, D. (2012). The stochastic goal programming model: Theory and applications. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 19(5–6), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aouni, B., & La Torre, D. (2010). A generalized stochastic goal programming model. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 215(12), 4347–4357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, M., & Gonzalez, I. (2009). Applying stochastic goal programming: A case study on water use planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), 1123–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. (1962). Chance constraints and normal deviates. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(297), 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1959). Chance-constrained programming. Management Science, 6(1), 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Ferguson, R. O. (1955). Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Management Science, 1(2), 138–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Mellon, B. (1952). Blending aviation gasolines—A study in programming interdependent activities in an integrated oil company. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 20, 135–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colapinto, C., Jayaraman, R., & La Torre, D. (2020). Goal programming models for managerial strategic decision making. In Applied mathematical analysis: theory, methods, and applications (pp. 487–507). Cham: Springer.

  • Contini, B. (1968). A stochastic approach to goal programming. Operations Research, 16(3), 576–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebrezgabher, S., Taron, A., & Amewu, S. (2019). Investment climate indicators for waste reuse enterprises in developing countries: Application of analytical hierarchy process and goal programming model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 144, 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., Fügenschuh, A., & Ali, I. (2018). A multi-criteria goal programming model to analyze the sustainable goals of India. Sustainability, 10(3), 778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • India’s, I. N. D. C. (2019). India’s intended nationally determined contribution: Working towards climate justice. Retrieved on July 29, 2019 from https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/India/1/INDIA%20INDC%20TO%20UNFCCC.pdf.

  • Jayaraman, R., Colapinto, C., Liuzzi, D., & La Torre, D. (2017). Planning sustainable development through a scenario-based stochastic goal programming model. Operational Research, 17(3), 789–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman, R., Liuzzi, D., Colapinto, C., & La Torre, D. (2015, December). A goal programming model with satisfaction function for long-run sustainability in the United Arab Emirates. In 2015 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IEEM) (pp. 249–253). IEEE.

  • Li, P., Arellano-Garcia, H., & Wozny, G. (2008). Chance constrained programming approach to process optimization under uncertainty. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 32(1–2), 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingo System Inc. (2016). Lingo-user’s guide. Published by Lindo System Inc.: Chicago, IL, USA.

  • Liu, B., & Iwamura, K. (1998). Chance constrained programming with fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 94(2), 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., Chu, Y., Oza, S., Hogan, D., Perin, J., Bassani, D. G., et al. (2019). National, regional, and state-level all-cause and cause-specific under-5 mortality in India in 2000–15: A systematic analysis with implications for the sustainable development goals. The Lancet Global Health, 7(6), e721–e734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansour, N., Cherif, M. S., & Abdelfattah, W. (2019). Multi-objective imprecise programming for financial portfolio selection with fuzzy returns. Expert Systems With Applications, 138(2019), 112810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.07.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martel, J. M., & Aouni, B. (1990). Incorporating the decision-maker’s preferences in the goal-programming model. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(12), 1121–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modibbo, U. M., Heman, E. D., & Hafisu, R. (2019). Multi-criteria decision analysis for malaria control strategies using analytic hierarchy process: A case of Yola North Local Government Area, Adamawa State Nigeria. Amity Journal of Computational Sciences, 3(2), 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasiri, M. M., Shakouhi, F., & Jolai, F. (2019). A fuzzy robust stochastic mathematical programming approach for multi-objective scheduling of the surgical cases. OPSEARCH, 56(3), 890–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nechi, S., Aouni, B., & Mrabet, Z. (2019). Managing sustainable development through goal programming model and satisfaction functions. Annals of Operations Research,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03139-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nomani, M. A., Ali, I., Fügenschuh, A., & Ahmed, A. (2017). A fuzzy goal programming approach to analyse sustainable development goals of India. Applied Economics Letters, 24(7), 443–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Retzlaff-Roberts, D. L., & Morey, R. C. (1993). A goal-programming method of stochastic allocative data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 71(3), 379–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, P. R., Mittal, S., Liu, J. Y., Fujimori, S., Dai, H., & Zhang, R. (2017). India INDC assessment: Emission gap between pledged target and 2 C target. In Post-2020 climate action (pp. 113–124). Singapore: Springer.

  • Siriginidi, S. R. (2009). Achieving millennium development goals: Role of ICTS innovations in India. Telematics and Informatics, 26(2), 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srikanth, R. (2018). India’s sustainable development goals—Glide path for India’s power sector. Energy policy, 123, 325–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, L., & Rehman, I. H. (2006). Energy for sustainable development in India: Linkages and strategic direction. Energy Policy, 34(5), 643–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC. (2015a). India intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs). Retrieved July 29, 2019 from https://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/INDC.

  • UNFCCC, V. (2015b). Adoption of the Paris agreement. I: Proposal by the president (Draft Decision), United Nations Office, Geneva (Switzerland), (s 32).

  • Vellinga, N. (2006). Eight-sector social accounting matrix of the UAE economy. Working paper, Economic Policy Research Unit. Zayed University.

  • Venkatanarayana, I. (2016). Startups in India: Sustainable development. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 2(3), 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vié, A., Colapinto, C., La Torre, D. and Liuzzi, D. (2019).The long-run sustainability of the European Union countries: Assessing the Europe 2020 strategy through a fuzzy goal programming model. Management Decision, 57(2), 523–542. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2018-0518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the editor and anonymous referees who helped in improving the quality of the presentation with their numerous comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IA and UMM designed and conceived the models, analysed the data, interpreted the result and wrote the paper. JC and MM supplied, summarized and analyzed the data, and edited and supported the writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irfan Ali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest by all the authors regarding the publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, I., Modibbo, U.M., Chauhan, J. et al. An integrated multi-objective optimization modelling for sustainable development goals of India. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 3811–3831 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00745-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00745-7

Keywords

Navigation