Skip to main content
Log in

Potential of replacing clay soil by rice husk ash (RHA) in enhancing the properties of compressed earth blocks (CEBs)

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study was planned to assess the potentiality of replacing clay soil with rice husk ash (RHA), in manufacturing of compressed earth blocks (CEBs) while maintaining the required mechanical properties of CEBs. CEBs having the size of 300 mm × 150 mm × 100 mm (length, width and height) were manufactured by hydraulic compaction at 1.37 × 109 N/m2 using ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and clay soil at 1:15 ratio and a commercially available resin adhesive (20 mL/kg cement). Six different types of CEBs were manufactured by replacing 0% (control and B1), 5% (B2), 7.5% (B3), 10% (B4), 15% (B5) and 20% (B6) of clay soil with RHA. Dry and bulk densities, water absorption, compressive strength, erosion and acid resistance were tested. Each test was quadruplicated. The highest compressive strength, the lowest water absorption and acceptable erosion resistance were recorded from B3. Results further revealed that 25.7% improvement in the compressive strength of B3 was achieved compared to B1. Although all types of CEBs recorded compressive strength greater than 2.75 N/mm2, indicating that the blocks were suitable for load bearing walls for one and two story houses and story houses divided into flat and non-load bearing walls (both external and internal), the results of acid tolerance revealed that they were more suitable for internal walls. As such, the present study recommends to replace the maximum of 7.5% clay soil with RHA in manufacturing of CEBs for load bearing and non-load bearing internal walls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials as well as software application support their published claims and comply with field standards. Data can be made available on request by interested parties.

References

  • Adegun, O. B., & Adedeji, Y. M. B. (2017). Review of economic and environmental benefits of earthen materials for housing inAfrica. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 6, 519–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Belie, N., Debruyckere, M., Van Nieuwenburg, D., & De Blaere, B. (1997). Attack of concrete floors in pig houses by feed acids: Influence of fly ash addition and cement-bound. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 68(2), 101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, P. R. (2017). Experimental investigation of the effect of fired clay brick on partial replacement of rice husk ash (RHA) with brick clay. Advances in Recycling and Waste Management, 2, 120. https://doi.org/10.4172/2475-7675.1000120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givi, A. N., Rashid, S. A., Aziz, F. N. A., & Salleh, M. A. M. (2010). Contribution of rice husk ash to the properties of mortar and concrete: A review. Journal of American Science, 6(3), 157–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guettala, A., Abibsi, A., & Houari, H. (2006). Durability study of stabilized earth concrete under both laboratory and climatic conditions exposure. Construction and Building Materials, 20(3), 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habeeb, G. A., & Mahmud, H. B. (2010). Study on properties of rice husk ash and its use as cement replacement material. Materials Research, 13(2), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392010000200011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashem, F. S., Amin, M. S., & El-Gamal, S. M. A. (2013). Improvement of acid resistance of Portland cement pastes using rice husk ash and cement kiln dust as additives. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 111(2), 1391–1398.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote, K. A. (1995). Durability of earth wall buildings. Construction and Building Materials, 9(3), 185–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, R., Jabbar, A., Ahmaed, I., Khan, W., Khan, A. N., & Mizra, J. (2012). Reduction in environmental problems using rice-husk ash in concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 30, 360–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerali, A. G. (2001) Durability of compressed and cement-stabilized building blocks, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9e86/27d90788d7c28fc2a42358c53b6af4a55949.pdf?_ga=2.264341199.1765880189.1580365750-933831213.1575060357, Accessed March 07, 2018.

  • Mayooran, S., Ragavan, S., & Sathiparan, N. (2017). Comparative study on open air burnt low-and high-carbon rice husk ash as partial cement replacement in cement block production. Journal of Building Engineering, 13, 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa, M., & Uddin, N. (2016). Experimental analysis of compressed earth block (CEB) with banana fibers resisting flexural and compression forces. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 5, 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pushpakumara, B. H. J., & De Silva, G. H. M. J. (2012). Characteristics of masonry blocks manufactured with rice husk ash (RHA) and lime. Engineer - Journal of the Institution of Engineers, Sri Lanka, 45(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.4038/engineer.v45i3.6928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riza, F. V., Rahman, I. A., & Zaidi, A. M. A. (2011). Preliminary study of compressed stabilized earth brick (CSEB). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(9), 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. (2014). Soil stabilization using rice husk ash and cement. International Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 5(1), 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddika, A., Al Mamun, M. A., & Ali, M. H. (2018). Study on concrete with rice husk ash. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 3, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-018-0127-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SLS 1382: 2009. Specification on compressed stabilized earth blocks (Part 1 and Part 2). Sri Lanka Standards Institution.

  • Walker, R., & Pavia, S. (2011). Physical properties and reactivity of pozzolans, and their influence on the properties of lime-pozzolan pastes. Materials and Structures, 44(6), 1139–1150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zargar, M., Gholami, H., Norouzi, H., Soltani, M., Singh, V. P., Ghane, M., et al. (2019). Features of pozzolans in the robustness and productivity of the concrete constructions. International Journal of Constructive Research in Civil Engineering (IJCRCE), 5(2), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-8693.0502005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Smart Eco-concept (Pvt.) Ltd. in Sri Lanka for providing facilities for manufacturing of CEBs and the National Engineering Research and Development Center and the Department of Zoology & Environmental Management of University of Kelaniya in Sri Lanka for providing field and laboratory facilities, respectively.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Mangala Yatawara and Sachini Athukorala. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Mangala Yatawara, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mangala Yatawara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yatawara, M., Athukorala, S. Potential of replacing clay soil by rice husk ash (RHA) in enhancing the properties of compressed earth blocks (CEBs). Environ Dev Sustain 23, 3474–3486 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00727-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00727-9

Keywords

Navigation