Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of government intervention to maize efficiency at farmer’s level across time: a robust evidence in Northern Vietnam

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Vietnamese government has already legislated many agricultural policies to improve farmers’ performance. In particular, the extension programme aims to enhance technical efficiencies of targeted farmers. Besides, negative environmental effects of chemical pesticides and climate change on agricultural production efficiency have been proved in many recent studies. Therefore, the northern mountainous areas of Vietnam have not exceptionally been omitted from all discussions. This article examines the impact of government intervention by applying difference-in-difference method to determine the change in maize farmers’ technical efficiency using farm survey data of 666 northern maize farmers in the period of 2010 and 2015. Firstly, cultivation land was found to have a fundamentally significant effect on both trained and non-trained farmers. The extension programme has resulted in an ambiguous outcome, but the spillover effects of extension knowledge successfully spread out among all trained farmers to simultaneously increase. Furthermore, overexploited pesticides of either trained or non-trained farmers were altered since the introduction of extension in survey areas. The determinants of maize technical efficiency were analysed following a robust truncated half-normal regression. DID estimator signifies that although trained farmers achieved 95.6% averagely, which is considerably higher than that of non-trained group (88.1%) after 5 years, the increment pace of non-trained farmers was slightly higher at 0.031%. The environmental factors, such as the rise of temperature and the reduction in precipitation, had a negative significant impact on farmers’ technical efficiency. Adaptive measures to climate change should be considered to simultaneously enhance the technical efficiency of maize farmers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Chieng Sung, Co Noi (Mai Son district, Son La province); Na Muong, Chieng Son, Chieng Hac (Moc Chau district, Son La province); Hien Luong, Cao Son, Hao Ly (Da Bac district, Hoa Binh province); Dong Tam, Thanh Nong, Phu Thanh (Lac Thuy district, Hoa Binh province).

  2. Data and the survey questionnaire are available from the authors upon request.

References

  • Abdulai, A., & Huffman, W. (2000). Structural adjustment and economic efficiency of rice farmers in northern Ghana. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48, 503–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdulai, S., Nkegbe, P. K., & Donkoh, S. A. (2013). Technical efficiency of maize production in Northern Ghana. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8, 5251–5259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdulai, S., Nkegbe, P. K., & Donkor, S. A. (2017). Assessing the economic efficiency of maize production in Northern Ghana. Ghana Journal of Development Studies, 14, 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adewuyi, S. A., Agbonlahor, M. U., & Oke, A. T. (2013). Technical efficiency analysis of cassava farmers in Ogun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, 4, 515–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, M. H., Chaudhry, G. M., Iqbal, M., & Khan, D. A. (2002). Wheat productivity, efficiency, and sustainability: A stochastic production frontier analysis. The Pakistan Development Review, 41, 643–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, M. H., & Melesse, K. A. (2018). Impact of off-farm activities on technical efficiency: Evidence from maize producers of eastern Ethiopia. Agricultural and Food Economics, 6, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam, M. J., Van Huylenbroeck, G., Buysse, J., Begum, I. A., & Rahman, S. (2011). Technical efficiency changes at the farm-level: A panel data analysis of rice farms in Bangladesh. African Journal of Business Management, 5, 5559–5566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anang, B. T., Bäckman, S., & Rezitis, A. (2017). Production technology and technical efficiency: Irrigated and rain-fed rice farms in northern Ghana. Eurasian Economic Review, 7, 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., & Feder, G. (2004). Agricultural extension: Good intentions and hard realities. The World Bank Research Observer, 19, 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, O. C., & Card, D. (1985). Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effect of training programs. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 648–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-differences models. Econometrica, 74, 431–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros, C. P. (2004). A stochastic cost frontier in the Portuguese hotel industry. Tourism Economics, 10, 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baten, M. A., Kamil, A. A., & Haque, M. A. (2009). Modeling technical inefficiencies effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4, 1374–1382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1992). Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E., Malik, S. J., & Gill, M. A. (1996). An investigation of technical inefficiencies of production of wheat farmers in four districts of Pakistan. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 47, 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binam, J. N., Tonye, J., Nyambi, G., & Akoa, M. (2004). Factors affecting the technical efficiency among smallholder farmers in the slash and burn agriculture zone of Cameroon. Food Policy, 29, 531–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozoğlu, M., & Ceyhan, V. (2007a). Measuring the technical efficiency and exploring the inefficiency determinants of vegetable farms in Samsun province, Turkey. Agricultural Systems, 94, 649–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozoğlu, M., & Ceyhan, V. (2007b). Measuring the technical efficiency and exploring the inefficiency determinants of vegetable farms in Samsun province, Turkey. Agricultural Systems, 94, 649–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-H., & Wen, F.-I. (2011). Off-farm work, technical efficiency, and rice production risk in Taiwan. Agricultural Economics, 42, 269–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T. J., & Battese, G. E. (1996). Identification of factors which influence the technical inefficiency of Indian farmers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 40, 103–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dastagiri, M., & Vajrala, A. S. (2018). The political economy of global agriculture: Effects on agriculture, farmers, consumers and economic growth. European Scientific Journal, 14, 193–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denning, G., Kabambe, P., Sanchez, P., Malik, A., Flor, R., Harawa, R., et al. (2009). Input subsidies to improve smallholder maize productivity in Malawi: Toward an African green revolution. PLoS Biology, 7, e23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinar, A., Karagiannis, G., & Tzouvelekas, V. (2007). Evaluating the impact of agricultural extension on farms performance in Crete: A nonneutral stochastic frontier approach. Agricultural Economics, 36, 133–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, S. G., & Lang, K. (2007). Inference with difference-in-differences and other panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebers, A., Nguyen, T. T., & Grote, U. (2017). Production efficiency of rice farms in Thailand and Cambodia: A comparative analysis of Ubon Ratchathani and Stung Treng provinces. Paddy and Water Environment, 15, 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Lovell, C. K. (1978). Measuring the technical efficiency of production. Journal of Economic theory, 19, 150–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, M. F., Imai, K. S., Sato, T., et al. (2013). Impacts of agricultural extension on crop productivity, poverty and vulnerability: Evidence from Uganda. Research Institute for Economics and Business Administration: Kobe University.

  • Hughes, N., Lawson, K., Davidson, A., Jackson, T., & Sheng, Y. (2011). Productivity pathways: Climate-adjusted production frontiers for the Australian broadacre cropping industry. Technical report.

  • Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 5–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indriani, N. P., Yuwariah, Y., Rochana, A., & Djuned, H. (2015). Effect of intercropping between corn (Zea mays) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AMF) on the yield and forage mineral content. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 14, 362–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jondrow, J., Lovell, C. K., Materov, I. S., & Schmidt, P. (1982). On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics, 19, 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimov, A., Thinh, N. T., Cadilhon, J. J., Tung, H. T., Hai, D. T., Van Doan, V., & Duan, B. Q. (2016). Value chain assessment report for maize, pig, plum and tea in Son La province of Northwest Vietnam. ILRI (aka ILCA and ILRAD).

  • Khan, A., Huda, F. A., & Alam, A. (2010). Farm household technical efficiency: A study on rice producers in selected areas of Jamalpur District in Bangladesh. European Journal of Social Sciences, 14, 262–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kompas, T., Che, T. N., Nguyen, H. T. M., & Nguyen, H. Q. (2012). Productivity, net returns, and efficiency: Land and market reform in Vietnamese rice production. Land Economics, 88, 478–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouser, S., & Qaim, M. (2015). Bt cotton, pesticide use and environmental efficiency in Pakistan. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66, 66–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamers, M., Anyusheva, M., La, N., Nguyen, V. V., & Streck, T. (2011). Pesticide pollution in surface-and groundwater by paddy rice cultivation: A case study from Northern Vietnam. Clean-Soil, Air, Water, 39, 356–361.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Latruffe, L., Balcombe, K., Davidova, S., & Zawalinska, K. (2004). Determinants of technical efficiency of crop and livestock farms in Poland. Applied Economics, 36, 1255–1263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linh, T. T., Nanseki, T., & Chomei, Y. (2015). Productive efficiency of crop farms in Viet Nam: A DEA with a smooth bootstrap application. Journal of Agricultural Science, 7, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckmann, J., Ihle, R., Grethe, H., & Kleinwechter, U. (2011). Can Vietnamese upland farmers profit from high world market prices? A price transmission analysis. Technical report.

  • Meeusen, W., & van Den Broeck, J. (1977). Estimation from Cobb–Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18, 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minviel, J. J., & Latruffe, L. (2017). Effect of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: A meta-analysis of empirical results. Applied Economics, 49, 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moise, E. E. (2017). Land reform in China and North Vietnam: Consolidating the revolution at the village level. New York: UNC Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morassaei, M. S., Zinatloo-Ajabshir, S., & Salavati-Niasari, M. (2016). Simple salt-assisted combustion synthesis of Nd\(_{2}\)Sn\(_{2}\)O\(_{7}\)–SnO\(_{2}\) nanocomposites with different amino acids as fuel: An efficient photocatalyst for the degradation of methyl orange dye. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 27, 11698–11706.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mortazavi-Derazkola, S., Zinatloo-Ajabshir, S., & Salavati-Niasari, M. (2015). Preparation and characterization of Nd\(_{2}\)O\(_{3}\) nanostructures via a new facile solvent-less route. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 26, 5658–5667.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moshtaghi, S., Zinatloo-Ajabshir, S., & Salavati-Niasari, M. (2016). Preparation and characterization of BaSnO\(_{3}\) nanostructures via a new simple surfactant-free route. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 27, 425–435.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nauges, C., O’Donnell, C. J., & Quiggin, J. (2011). Uncertainty and technical efficiency in Finnish agriculture: A state-contingent approach. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 38, 449–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. T. (2012). Land reform and farm production in the Northern Uplands of Vietnam. Asian Economic Journal, 26, 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. T., & Tuan, A. N. (2019). Efficiency and adoption of organic tea production: Evidence from Vi Xuyen district, Ha Giang province, Vietnam. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 3, 201–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen-Van, P., et al. (2016). Technical efficiency and agricultural policy: Evidence from the tea production in Vietnam. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, 97, 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyekale, A. S. (2012). Impact of climate change on cocoa agriculture and technical efficiency of cocoa farmers in South-West Nigeria. Journal of Human Ecology, 40, 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, A., Vu, D. Q., Bui, T. P. L., Mai, T. L. A., Jensen, L. S., de Neergaard, A., et al. (2014). Organic matter and water management strategies to reduce methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddies in Vietnam. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 196, 137–146.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paracchini, M. L., Pacini, C., Jones, M. L. M., & Pérez-Soba, M. (2011). An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options. Ecological Indicators, 11, 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham, C. H., Saggar, S., Vu, C. C., Tate, K. R., Tran, T. T., Luu, T. T., et al. (2017). Biogas production from steer manures in Vietnam: Effects of feed supplements and tannin contents. Waste Management, 69, 492–497.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., Acquay, H., Biltonen, M., Rice, P., Silva, M., Nelson, J., et al. (1992). Environmental and economic costs of pesticide use. Bioscience, 42, 750–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razi, F., Zinatloo-Ajabshir, S., & Salavati-Niasari, M. (2017). Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic properties of Ag\(_{2}\)ZnI\(_{4}\)/AgI nanocomposites via a new simple hydrothermal approach. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 225, 645–651.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salehi, Z., Zinatloo-Ajabshir, S., & Salavati-Niasari, M. (2016). New simple route to prepare Dy\(_{2}\)Ce\(_{2}\)O\(_{7}\) nanostructures: Structural and photocatalytic studies. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 222, 218–224.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136, 31–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skevas, T., & Lansink, A. O. (2014). Reducing pesticide use and pesticide impact by productivity growth: The case of Dutch arable farming. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65, 191–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skevas, T., Lansink, A. O., & Stefanou, S. E. (2012). Measuring technical efficiency in the presence of pesticide spillovers and production uncertainty: The case of Dutch arable farms. European Journal of Operational Research, 223, 550–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solís, D., Bravo-Ureta, B. E., & Quiroga, R. E. (2009). Technical efficiency among peasant farmers participating in natural resource management programmes in Central America. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60, 202–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srichana, D., Suttitham, W., Thongsunthiah, P., Panja, P., & Jariyapamornkoon, N. (2014). Nutrients and ruminal digestibility of baby corn by-product silages under different harvesting methods. Science and Technology Asia, 19, 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, Y., Nomura, H., Son, C. T., Kusudo, T., Yabe, M., et al. (2020). Manure management and pollution levels of contract and non-contract livestock farming in Vietnam. Science of the Total Environment, 710, 136200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuy, P. T., Van Geluwe, S., Nguyen, V.-A., & Van der Bruggen, B. (2012). Current pesticide practices and environmental issues in Vietnam: Management challenges for sustainable use of pesticides for tropical crops in (South-East) Asia to avoid environmental pollution. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 14, 379–387.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tingley, D., Pascoe, S., & Coglan, L. (2005). Factors affecting technical efficiency in fisheries: Stochastic production frontier versus data envelopment analysis approaches. Fisheries Research, 73, 363–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toan, V. D., Thao, V. D., Walder, J., Schmutz, H.-R., et al. (2007). Contamination by selected organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in surface soils in Hanoi, Vietnam. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 78, 195–200.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, V. D., Hilger, T., MacDonald, L., Clemens, G., Shiraishi, E., Vien, T. D., et al. (2014). Mitigation potential of soil conservation in maize cropping on steep slopes. Field Crops Research, 156, 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vu, Q. D., de Neergaard, A., Tran, T. D., Hoang, H. T. T., Vu, V. T. K., & Jensen, L. S. (2015). Greenhouse gas emissions from passive composting of manure and digestate with crop residues and biochar on small-scale livestock farms in Vietnam. Environmental Technology, 36, 2924–2935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wadud, A., & White, B. (2000). Farm household efficiency in Bangladesh: A comparison of stochastic frontier and DEA methods. Applied Economics, 32, 1665–1673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C., & Tisdell, C. (2001). Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costs. Ecological Economics, 39, 449–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wossink, A., & Denaux, Z. S. (2006). Environmental and cost efficiency of pesticide use in transgenic and conventional cotton production. Agricultural Systems, 90, 312–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinatloo-Ajabshir, S., & Salavati-Niasari, M. (2016). Zirconia nanostructures: Novel facile surfactant-free preparation and characterization. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, 13, 108–115.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledges the supports of the National Foundation for Science and Technology Development of Vietnam (NAFOSTED).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Nguyen To-The

  2. University of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Tuan Nguyen-Anh

Authors
  1. Nguyen To-The
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tuan Nguyen-Anh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tuan Nguyen-Anh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

To-The, N., Nguyen-Anh, T. Impact of government intervention to maize efficiency at farmer’s level across time: a robust evidence in Northern Vietnam. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 2038–2061 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00662-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00662-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation