Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Flood hazards adaptation strategies: a gender-based disaggregated analysis of farm-dependent Bait community in Punjab, Pakistan

Environment, Development and Sustainability volume 23, pages 865–886 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

Climate change has increased the frequency of natural hazards significantly in the consecutive occurrence of floods and drought in the current era. These hazards adversely affected specifically the livelihood of the farming community. This study tried to identify the factors affecting adaptation strategies of floods used by male and female household farmers in the Bait area of Punjab, Pakistan, by using primary data for empirical analysis. Focus group discussion, in-depth interviews and key information of respondents were used for the collection of primary data. Data comprised a total sample size of 293 respondents including 139 males and 154 females. Findings of the study indicated schooling years, training, age, agricultural labor, farming experience and access of agricultural land significantly affect adaptation strategies of farmers. In the empirical analysis, both regressions illustrated the goodness of fit of the model. Female model with values of higher adjusted R2 exposed that factors integrated with the female model are more critical for flood adaptation strategies rather than the male model. Schooling years, access to agricultural land and agricultural labor were more significant factors in both groups according to estimates of regression. Agricultural land access and schooling years were highly significant factors for female as compared to male for adopting the adaptation strategies regarding floods. The government needs to form fair and equitable regulations specifically for female regarding schooling access, land ownership, land access, land use, promoting off-farm income opportunities, more remunerative adaptation strategies and less labor-intensive farming practices for these flood hazards areas for minimizing hazards losses and enhancing farming efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Abbas, A., Amjath-Babu, T. S., Kächele, H., & Müller, K. (2015). Non-structural flood risk mitigation under developing country conditions: An analysis on the determinants of willingness to pay for flood insurance in rural Pakistan. Natural Hazards, 75(3), 2119–2135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abid, M., Schneider, U. A., & Scheffran, J. (2016). Adaptation to climate change and its impacts on food productivity and crop income: Perspectives of farmers in rural Pakistan. Journal of Rural Studies, 47, 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. (2008). The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. World Bank. https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/28274.

  • Ajibade, I., McBean, G., & Bezner-Kerr, R. (2013). Urban flooding in Lagos, Nigeria: Patterns of vulnerability and resilience among women. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1714–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, K., & Rahman, M. H. (2014). Women in natural disasters: A case study from southern coastal region of Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 8, 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alwang, J., Siegel, P. B., & Jorgensen, S. L. (2001). Vulnerability: A view from different disciplines . Social protection discussion paper series (Vol. 115, p. 60).

  • Anderson, E. (2000). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. WW Norton & Company.

  • Arkin, H., & Colton, R. R. (1963). Tables for statisticians (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora-Jonsson, S. (2011). Virtue and vulnerability: Discourses on women, gender and climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 744–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashfaq, M., Hassan, S., Naseer, M. Z., Baig, I. A., & Asma, J. (2008). Factors affecting farm diversification in rice–wheat. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture Science, 45(3), 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atta-ur-Rahman, K. A. N. (2013). Analysis of 2010-flood causes, nature and magnitude in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Natural Hazards, 66, 887–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55369-4_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babugura, A. A. (2008). Vulnerability of children and youth in drought disasters: A case study of Botswana. Children Youth and Environments, 18(1), 126–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I. I., & Wisner, B. (1994). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters.

  • Bradshaw, A. D. (2002). Introduction and philosophy. Handbook of Ecological Restoration, 1, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, S. (2004). Socio-economic impacts of natural disasters: A gender analysis (Vol. 32). New York: United Nations Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, A., Demetriades, J., & Esplen, E. (2008). Gender and climate change: Mapping the linkages-A scoping study on knowledge and gaps‖, report prepared for the UK‘s Department for International Development (DFID) and Institute of Development Studies (IDS). Brighton: University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, N., Adger, W. N., & Kelly, P. M. (2005). The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohle, H. G., Downing, T. E., & Watts, M. J. (1994). Climate change and social vulnerability: toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity. Global Environmental Change, 4(1), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L. (2003). The vulnerability of science and the science of vulnerability. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., & Emrich, C. (2005). Are natural hazards and disaster losses in the US increasing? EOS, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 86(41), 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadzie, S. K. N., & Acquah, H. D. G. (2012). Attitudes toward risk and coping responses: The case of food crop farmers at Agona Duakwa in Agona East District of Ghana. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 2(2), 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dankelman, I. (2002). Climate change: Learning from gender analysis and women’s experiences of organising for sustainable development. Gender & Development, 10(2), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, A. P. (1998). Women and the household economy: The case of the Punjab, Pakistan. Culture & Agriculture, 20(1), 30–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deere, C. D., & Doss, C. R. (2006). The gender asset gap: What do we know and why does it matter? Feminist Economics, 12(1–2), 1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton, F. (2001). Climate change, gender and poverty–academic babble or realpolitik? Point de vue, 14, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, F. (2002). Climate change vulnerability, impacts, and adaptation: Why does gender matter? Gender & Development, 10(2), 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deressa, T. T., Hassan, R. M., Ringler, C., Alemu, T., & Yesuf, M. (2009). Determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods to climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Global Environmental Change, 19(2), 248–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deressa, T. T., Ringler, C., & Hassan, R. M. (2010). Factors affecting the choices of coping strategies for climate extremes. The case of farmers in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia IFPRI Discussion Paper, 1032.

  • Doocy, S., Daniels, A., Packer, C., Dick, A., & Kirsch, T. D. (2013). The human impact of earthquakes: A historical review of events 1980–2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS Currents, 5, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enarson, E. (1998). Through women’s eyes: A gendered research agenda for disaster social science. Disasters, 22(2), 157–173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enarson, E. (2006). Women and girls last? Averting the second post-Katrina disaster. Social Science Research Council, 1–18. http://www.cwhn.ca/en/node/43615.

  • Enarson, E., & Fordham, M. (2001). From women’s needs to women’s rights in disasters. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 3(3), 133–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enarson, E., & Morrow, B. H. (1998). The gendered terrain of disaster. Westport, CT.

  • Enarson, E., & Meyreles, L. (2004). International perspectives on gender and disaster: Differences and possibilities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 24(10/11), 49–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fakhruddin, S. H. M., & Rahman, J. (2015). Coping with coastal risk and vulnerabilities in Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 12, 112–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2018) Regional conference on strengthening resilient food and agriculture systems – implementing the sendai framework for disaster risk reduction in the agriculture sector in asia and the Pacific. World food Organization.

  • Fordham, M. (1999). Balancing resilience and vulnerability. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 17(1), 15–36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fothergill, A. (1996). Gender, risk, and disaster. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 14(1), 33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulu, E. (2007). Gender, vulnerability, and the experts: Responding to the Maldives tsunami. Development and Change, 38(5), 843–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOP (2017). 6th Population and Housing Census-2017, Economic Survey of Pakistan, Economic Advisor’s Wing, Finance Division, Islamabad, Pakistan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habtezion, S. (2013). Overview of linkages between gender and climate change. Policy Brief. United Nations Development Programme, New York.

  • Hair, J. F. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). NY: Prentice Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. P., & Halvorson, S. J. (2007). The 2005 Kashmir earthquake. Mountain Research and Development, 27(4), 296–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda, K. (1995). Gender differences in human loss and vulnerability in natural disasters: a case study from Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 2(2), 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (1996) Climate change: Impact, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: Scientific-technical analyses, contribution of working group II to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.

  • Islam, M. N. (2012). Flood risks for the char community on the Ganges-Padma floodplain in Bangladesh. International Journal of Environment, 2(2), 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouamé, E. B. H. (2010). Risk, risk aversion and choice of risk management. Strategies by cocoa farmers in western Côte d’Ivoire. In CSAE conference.

  • Mainuddin, K., Rahman, A., Islam, N., & Quasem, S. (2011). Planning and costing agriculture’s adaptation to climate change in the salinity-prone cropping system of Bangladesh. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, S. (2010). ‘Gender and climate change’: From impacts to discourses. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 6(2), 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mak, K. (2005). Engendering property rights: Women’s insecure land tenure and its implications for development policy in Kenya and Uganda. Journal of Public and International Affairs, 16, 145–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, J. N., & Kellert, S. R. (1998). Local attitudes toward community-based conservation policy and programmes in Nepal: A case study in the Makalu-Barun Conservation Area. Environmental Conservation, 25(4), 320–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesfin, W., Fufa, B., & Haji, J. (2011). Pattern, trend and determinants of crop diversification: Empirical evidence from smallholders in eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 2(8), 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naz, F., Doneys, P., & Saqib, S. E. (2018a). Adaptation strategies to floods: A gender-based analysis of the farming-dependent char community in the Padma floodplain, Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 28, 519–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naz, M. S. G., Kariman, N., Ebadi, A., Ozgoli, G., Ghasemi, V., & Fakari, F. R. (2018b). Educational interventions for cervical cancer screening behavior of women: A systematic review. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention: APJCP, 19(4), 875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E., & Plümper, T. (2007). The gendered nature of natural disasters: The impact of catastrophic events on the gender gap in life expectancy, 1981–2002. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(3), 551–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. H., Perilla, J. L., Ibañez, G. E., & Murphy, A. D. (2001). Sex differences in symptoms of posttraumatic stress: Does culture play a role? Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14(1), 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyanga, P. H., Johnsen, F. H., & Aune, J. B. (2011). Smallholder farmers’ perceptions of climate change and conservation agriculture: Evidence from Zambia. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Nyanga+et+al+2011&btnG=.

  • Oliver-Smith, A. (1996). Anthropological research on hazards and disasters. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25(1), 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Othniel Yila, J., & Resurreccion, B. P. (2013). Determinants of smallholder farmers’ adaptation strategies to climate change in the semi arid Nguru Local Government Area, Northeastern Nigeria. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 24(3), 341–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Othniel Yila, J., & Resurreccion, B. P. (2014). Gender perspectives on agricultural adaptation to climate change in drought-prone Nguru Local Government Area in the semiarid zone of northeastern Nigeria. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 6(3), 250–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S. K. (2010). Livelihood security of cyclone-prone coastal communities in Bangladesh: A comparative study. In Regional and Rural Development Planning, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Thailand Asian Institute of Technology.

  • Peek, L., & Fothergill, A. (2008). Displacement, gender, and the challenges of parenting after Hurricane Katrina. NWSA Journal, 20(3), 69–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielke, R. A., Jr. (1998). Rethinking the role of adaptation in climate. Global Environmental Change, 8(2), 1597170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pincha, C. H. A. M. A. N. (2010). Shifting spaces of women in Tamil Nadu. Women’s Encounter with Disaster, 204.

  • Provincial Disaster Management Authority Punjab. (2014). Punjab Disaster Response Plan, Government of Punjab, Pakistan. http://pdma.gop.pk/system/files/2.pdf.

  • Rafiq, L., & Blaschke, T. (2012). Disaster risk and vulnerability in Pakistan at a district level. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 3(4), 324–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehima, M., Belay, K., Dawit, A., & Rashid, S. (2013). Factors affecting farmers’ crops diversification: Evidence from SNNPR. Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(6), 558–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saqib, S. E., Ahmad, M. M., & Panezai, S. (2016a). Landholding size and farmers’ access to credit and its utilisation in Pakistan. Development in Practice, 26(8), 1060–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saqib, S. E., Ahmad, M. M., Panezai, S., & Rana, I. A. (2016b). An empirical assessment of farmers’ risk attitudes in flood-prone areas of Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 18, 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scalise, E. (2009). Women’s inheritance rights to land and property in South Asia: A study of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Rural Development Institute.

  • Seager, J. (2006). Noticing gender (or not) in disasters. Geoforum, 37(1), 2–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. K., Rallen, O., & Padung, E. (2013). Elderly Adi Women of Arunachal Pradesh: “Living encyclopedias” and cultural refugia in biodiversity conservation of the Eastern Himalaya, India. Environmental Management, 52(3), 712–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. K., Zander, K. K., Kumar, S., Singh, A., Sheoran, P., Kumar, A., et al. (2017). Perceptions of climate variability and livelihood adaptations relating to gender and wealth among the Adi community of the Eastern Indian Himalayas. Applied Geography, 86, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sultana, A. (2010). Patriarchy and women’s subordination: A theoretical analysis. Arts Faculty Journal, 1–18.

  • Terry, G. (2009). Climate change and gender justice. Oxford: Oxfam GB.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tschakert, P., & Machado, M. (2012). Gender justice and rights in climate change adaptation: Opportunities and pitfalls. Ethics and Social Welfare, 6(3), 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah, R., Jourdain, D., Shivakoti, G. P., & Dhakal, S. (2015). Managing catastrophic risks in agriculture: Simultaneous adoption of diversification and precautionary savings. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 12, 268–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2011). Pakistan floods: One year on 2011. A report by the United Nations–Pakistan, Islamabad. Retrieved 7 August 2013 http://unportal.un.org.pk/sites/unpakistan/pages/default.aspx.

  • UNDP. (2018). The Vulnerability of Pakistan’s Water Sector to the Impacts of Climate Change: Identifications of gaps and recommendations for action, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Report. https://www.undp.org/content/dam/pakistan/docs/Environment%20&%20Climate%20Change/Report.pdf.

  • Velandia, M., Rejesus, R. M., Knight, T. O., & Sherrick, B. J. (2009). Factors affecting farmers’ utilization of agricultural risk management tools: The case of crop insurance, forward contracting, and spreading sales. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 41(1), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, M. M. (2006). Social research methods. Oxford, Melbourne, Victoria, pp. 390. ISBN 9780195555301.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiese, R. J., Willis, K., & Hutchins, M. (1994). Is genetic and demographic management conservation? Zoo Biology, 13(4), 297–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yila, J. O. (2013). Gendered based analysis of adaptability and vulnerability to climate change among smallholder farmers: A case of semi-arid NGURU local government area, northeastern Nigeria, in School of Environment. Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand: Resources and Development.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Dilshad Ahmad

  2. Department of Economics, Preston University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Muhammad Afzal

  3. Department of Economics, Abbottabad University of Science and Technology, Havelian, Pakistan

    Abdur Rauf

Authors
  1. Dilshad Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Afzal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdur Rauf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilshad Ahmad.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmad, D., Afzal, M. & Rauf, A. Flood hazards adaptation strategies: a gender-based disaggregated analysis of farm-dependent Bait community in Punjab, Pakistan. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 865–886 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00612-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00612-5

Keywords

  • Drought
  • Flood
  • Gender
  • Mitigation
  • Pakistan

Search

Navigation