Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Metro design and heritage sustainability: conflict analysis using attitude based on options in the graph model

  • Case Study
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The historical megacities act as a catalyst for sustainable economic development. But the rampant urbanization and demand for the development of mass-transit infrastructure have put pressure on natural environment and heritage scape. Collaborative urban planning is essential especially in culturally and archaeologically rich cities. Megaprojects such as mass-transit systems, especially in developing countries, normally are encouraged for political point scoring. But the choices of the mod of mass-transit systems, their route selection, design and vertical alignment may have a devastating impact on cultural and historical heritage leading to serious conflicts during execution of mass-transit plans. This study employs system engineering decision analysis techniques to resolve urban planning issues of heritage sustainability while analysing metro-heritage conflict in Lahore. Realizing the fact that the attitude(s) of the Decision Makers (DMs) play important role in the decision–decision making, the authors use the attitudes of the DMs based on options in Graph Model for Conflict Resolution (GMCR) to resolve the metro-heritage conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Notes

  1. Moreover, UNESCO’s World Heritage Community also expressed serious concerns at its 40th session in Istanbul about the development of the OLMT and requested the government of the Punjab to conduct a visual impact study before pursuing the works of the project (Dawn 2016).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the editors and anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions that have greatly improved this article. The authors appreciate financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71471087).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharafat Ali.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 12.

Table 12 Historical buildings and sites affected by the OLMT project

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, S., Xu, H., Ahmed, W. et al. Metro design and heritage sustainability: conflict analysis using attitude based on options in the graph model. Environ Dev Sustain 22, 3839–3860 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00365-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00365-w

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Sharafat Ali