Applying fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS technique in identifying the content strategy of sustainable manufacturing for food production



Food manufacturing is an important value-adding sector of both local economies and the global economy in terms of job creation, food security and participatory community development, among others. Along with highly relevant issues on energy consumption, unsustainable land-use patterns, waste generation associated with the industry, social issues in terms of health and safety of food products are part of the larger sustainability concerns. While maintaining economic stability at the firm level, there is a need to develop a sustainable manufacturing strategy that addresses competitiveness and sustainability. Emerging concerns for sustainable manufacturing are circulating, but focusing on a particular industry remains a gap. Thus, this paper attempts to formulate a sustainable manufacturing strategy and then to map this strategy to established best practices. The main departure of this work is: (1) identifying the content strategy of sustainable manufacturing strategy for food manufacturing firms, (2) determining the most relevant best practice that would largely address the content strategy and (3) providing guidelines for food manufacturing decision-makers and policy-makers in strategy formulation that aims to enhance the sustainability of their manufacturing firms. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process–technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (AHP–TOPSIS) approach is used to formulate the strategy and then rank the best practices. A case study is carried out in the Philippines, and results show the content strategy and total quality management is the best practice that supports the sustainability of food manufacturing firms followed by resource and material efficiency approaches.


Food manufacturing Strategy Fuzzy set theory Analytic hierarchy process Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution 


  1. Abdul Rashid, S. H., Evans, S., & Longhurst, P. (2008). A comparison of four sustainable manufacturing strategies. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1(3), 214–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balasubramanian, D., Kher, D., Dinesh, M., Madan, G., Shekharan, G., & Venkatesh, V. G. (2015). Factors influencing successful implementation of green manufacturing. AIMS International Journal of Management, 9(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  3. Baltazar, M. E., Jardim, J., Alves, P., Silva, J. (2014). Air transport performance and efficiency: MCDA vs. DEA approaches. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 111, 790–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barreto, L. V., Anderson, H. C., Anglin, A., & Tomovic, C. L. (2010). Product lifecycle management in support of green manufacturing: Addressing the challenges of global climate change. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 19(3/4), 294–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chase, R., & Aquilano, N. (1992). Production and operations management (6th ed.). Toronto: Irwin Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, C.-T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Systems, 114(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clelland, I. J., Dean, T. J., & Douglas, T. J. (2000). Stepping towards sustainable business: An evaluation of waste minimization practices in US manufacturing, 30(3), 107–124.Google Scholar
  9. Crosby, P. B. (1987). Quality process improvement principles and strategic goals. Washington, DC: Management College (course materials). Department of the Navy. San Jose, CA: Philip Crosby Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Department of Trade and Industry. (2017). Securing the future of Philippine industries. Accessed 21 March 2017.
  11. Ehrenfeld, D. (2005). Sustainability: Living with the imperfections. Conservation Biology, 19(1), 33–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win–win–win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ETBPP. (1996). Saving money through waste minimisation: Raw material use. Environmental Technology Best Practice Programme.Google Scholar
  14. Forster, A. (2011). Sustainability: Best practices in the food industry. UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research, 16, 1–9.Google Scholar
  15. Global Environmental Management Initiative (GEMI). (1994). Environmental reporting in a total quality management framework. Accessed 21 March 2017.
  16. Hallgren, M., & Olhager, J. (2006). Quantification in manufacturing strategy: A methodology and illustration. International Journal of Production Economics, 104(1), 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howarth, G., & Hadfield, M. (2006). A sustainable product design model. Materials and Design, 27(10), 1128–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang, K. S. (2003). Food manufacturing productivity and its economic implications. Electronic report from the Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Technical bulletin number 1905.Google Scholar
  19. Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Isaksson, R. (2006). Total quality management for sustainable development: Process based system models. Business Process Management Journal, 12(5), 632–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaufmann, A., & Gupta, M. M. (1985). Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: Theory and applications. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.Google Scholar
  22. Kleindorfer, P., Singhal, K., & Van Wassenhove, L. (2005). Sustainable operations management. Production and Operation Management, 14(4), 482–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klöpffer, W. (1997). Life cycle assessment: From the beginning to the current state. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 4(4), 223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kroyer, G. T. (1995). Impact of food processing on the environment—An overview. LWT Food Science and Technology, 28(6), 547–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Langemeyer, J., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Haase, D., Scheuer, S., Elmqvist, T. (2016). Bridging the gap between ecosystem service assessments and land-use planning through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Environmental Science & Policy, 62, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. León-Bravo, V., Caniato, F., Caridi, M., & Johnsen, T. (2017). Collaboration for sustainability in the food supply chain: A multi-stage study in Italy. Sustainability, 9, 1253. Scholar
  27. Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  28. Luthra, S., Mangla, S. K., Xu, L., & Diabat, A. (2016). Using AHP to evaluate barriers in adopting sustainable consumption and production initiatives in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 342–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mani, V., Agrawal, R., & Sharma, V. (2014). Supplier selection using social sustainability: AHP based approach in India. International Strategic Management Review, 2(2), 98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mastrocinque, E., Coronado Mondragon, A., & Hogg, P. (2016). Manufacturing technology selection in the supply chain context by means of fuzzy-AHP: A case study in the high performance textile industry. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(1), 240–246.Google Scholar
  31. Meyer, P., Olteanu, A.-L. (2013). Formalizing and solving the problem of clustering in MCDA. European Journal of Operational Research, 227(3), 494–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mikhailov, L., & Tsvetinov, P. (2004). Evaluation of services using a fuzzy hierarchy process. Applied Soft Computing, 5(1), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morteza, Z., Reza, F. M., Seddiq, M. M., Sharareh, P., & Jamal, G. (2016). Selection of the optimal tourism site using the ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS in the framework of integrated coastal zone management: A case of Qeshm Island. Ocean and Coastal Management, 130, 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Naudé, W., & Szirmai, A. (2012). The importance of manufacturing in economic development: Past, present and future perspectives. UNU-MERIT working papers, Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT) and Maastricht Graduate School of Governance (MGSoG) (pp. 1–65).Google Scholar
  35. Ocampo, L., & Clark, E. (2015a). A sustainable manufacturing strategy framework: The convergence of two fields. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 20(2), 29–57.Google Scholar
  36. Ocampo, L., & Clark, E. (2015b). A simulation-based fuzzy analytic network process approach in developing sustainable manufacturing strategy. Management and Production Engineering Review, 6(2), 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ocampo, L. A., & Clark, E. E. (2017). Integrating sustainability and manufacturing strategy into a unifying framework. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 8(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ocampo, L., Clark, E., & Promentilla, M. A. (2016). Computing sustainable manufacturing index with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 9(5), 305–314.Google Scholar
  39. Ocampo, L. A., Clark, E. E., Tanudtanud, K. V. G., Ocampo, C. O. V., Impas, C. G., Sr., Vergara, V. G., et al. (2015). An integrated sustainable manufacturing strategy framework using fuzzy analytic network process. Advances in Production Engineering and Management, 10(3), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ocampo, L., & Promentilla, M. A. (2016). Development of a sustainable manufacturing strategy using analytic network process (ANP). International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 10(2–4), 262–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ohno, T. (1978). Toyota production system—Beyond management of large-scale production. Tokyo: Diamond Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Paul, I. D., Bhole, G. P., & Chaudhari, J. R. (2014). A review on green manufacturing: It’s important, methodology and its application. Procedia Materials Science, 6, 1644–1649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Promentilla, M. A. B., Aviso, K. B., & Tan, R. R. (2014). A group fuzzy analytic network process to prioritize low carbon energy systems in the Philippines. Energy Procedia, 61, 808–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., & Karami, E. (2008). A multiple criteria evaluation of sustainable agricultural development models using AHP. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(4), 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ribeiro, F., Ferreira, P., Araújo, M. (2013). Evaluating future scenarios for the power generation sector using a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) tool: The Portuguese case. Energy, 52, 126–136.Google Scholar
  46. Rothenberg, S., Pil, F. K., & Maxwell, J. (2001). Lean, green, and the quest for superior environmental performance. Production and Operations Management, 10(3), 228–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  48. Schmidheiny, S. (1992). Changing course: A global business perspective on development and the environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Schmidt-Bleek, F. (1996). Factor 10 with its MIPS and ecological rucksacks as measurement tools.Google Scholar
  50. Seliger, G., Kim, H.-J., Kernbaum, S., & Zettl, M. (2008). Approaches to sustainable manufacturing. International Journal of Sustainable Manufacturing, 1(1–2), 58–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shingo, S. (1981). Study of ‘TOYOTA’ production system from industrial engineering viewpoint. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
  52. Singh, R. P., & Nachtnebel, H. P. (2016). Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) application for reinforcement of hydropower strategy in Nepal. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Singian, M. R. C. (2014). Booming Philippine food processing industry provides opportunities for U.S. ingredients. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Accessed 21 March 2017.
  54. Siva, V., Gremyr, I., Bergquist, B., Garvare, R., Zobel, T., & Isaksson, R. (2016). The support of quality management to sustainable development: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 138, 148–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Skinner, W. (1969). Manufacturing—Missing link in corporate strategy. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  56. Stroufe, R. (2003). Effects of environmental management systems on environmental management practices and operations. Production and Operations Management, 12(3), 416–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sundharam, V. N., Sharma, V., & Thangaiah, I. S. T. (2013). An integration of BSC and AHP for sustainable growth of manufacturing industries. International Journal of Business Excellence, 6(1), 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tan, X., Liu, D., & Li, C. (2008). A decision-making framework model of cutting tool selection for green manufacturing and its application. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, 7(2), 257–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tari, J. J., & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2010). Integration of quality management and environmental management systems: Similarities and the role of the EFQM model. The TQM Journal, 22(6), 687–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thokala, P., Devlin, N., Marsh, K., Baltussen, R., Boysen, M., Kalo, Z., et al. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making—an introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA emerging good practices task force. Value in Health, 19(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tsai, W.-H., & Chou, W.-C. (2009). Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1444–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tseng, M. L., Lin, Y. H., Chiu, A. S. F., & Liao, J. C. H. (2008). Using FANP approach on selection of competitive priorities based on cleaner production implementation: A case study in PCB manufacturer, Taiwan. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 10(1), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Veisi, H., Liaghati, H., & Alipour, A. (2016). Developing an ethics-based approach to indicators of sustainable agriculture using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Ecological Indicators, 60, 644–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Voss, C., & Clutterbuck, D. (1989). Just-in-time: A global status report. Bedford: IFS Publications.Google Scholar
  65. Worrell, E., Bernstein, L., Roy, J., Price, L., & Harnisch, J. (2009). Industrial energy efficiency and climate change mitigation. Energy Efficiency, 2, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yuce, B., & Mastrocinque, E. (2016). A hybrid approach using the bees algorithm and fuzzy-AHP for supplier selection. In P. Samui (Ed.), Handbook of research on advanced computational techniques for simulation-based engineering (pp. 171–194). Hersey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringCebu Technological UniversityCebu CityPhilippines

Personalised recommendations