Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Thermal performance of three improved biomass-fired cookstoves using fuel wood, wood pellets and coconut shell

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

India produces 500 million metric tones of renewable agricultural biomass every year, primarily used as a cooking fuel. Inefficient combustion of biomass is one of the major hindrances for the effective utilization of this vast reserve of energy. Inefficient combustion may occur due to several factors such as lack of proper air circulation, improper packing of fuel and excess moisture content in the fuel. This paper describes the performance evaluation of three improved stoves; natural draft TLUD stove and forced draft Purti and Mpurti stove using three kinds of biomass fuel as wood chips, wood pellets and coconut shell. It was found that the thermal efficiency of the natural draft TLUD stove was 26–27%, electric fan operated Purti stove was 44–45%, and solar fan operated Mpurti stove was 46–48%. This performance was assessed by the standard laboratory-based water boiling test method (WBT) to get thermal efficiency, burning rate, boiling point, specific fuel consumption and firepower. The economic analysis study was carried out to get an idea about the approximate cost that would be incurred per month on the fuel. All these desirable parameters are maximized for the efficient combustion of fuel. The gaseous components like CO and CO2 obtained over the fuel bed are analyzed using gas chromatography. Particulate matter (PM2.5) was measured by the fine particulate sampler. PM2.5 concentration for traditional cookstoves was much higher than studied forced draft Mpurti (510 ± 45 μg/m3) and Purti stove (677 ± 40 μg/m3). The reduction in the indoor concentration of PM2.5 for Mpurti is about 60–63% as compared to traditional stove. Mean CO emissions on a volumetric basis during the cold start and hot start phase were lowest for Mpurti forced draft stove (2.41%). The study reveals that clean cooking can be achieved using the forced draft Mpurti stove.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

h c :

Thermal efficiency of the stove (%)

Pjci :

Mass of container of water before test (g)

Pj:

Weight of empty container (g)

Tj:

Temperature of water before test (°C)

Tjci :

Water temperature at start of test (°C)

W cv :

Quantity of water evaporated (g)

f cd :

Equivalent mass of fuel consumed (g)

LHV:

Lower heating value

SC c :

Specific fuel consumption (g of fuel/g of water)

Pjcf :

Mass of container of water after test (g)

T b :

Local boiling point of water (°C)

t s :

Time to boil (min)

WP:

Wood pellets

WC:

Wood chips

CS:

Coconut shells

FPs :

Fire power (Watt)

BR:

Burning rate (g/min)

WPBD:

Wood pellets bone dry

CSBD:

Coconut shells bone dry

WCBD:

Wood chips bone dry

References

  • Annual Book of ASTM Standard. (1983). American society for testing of materials (p. 19103). Philadelphia.

  • Arora, P., & Jain, S. (2016). A review of chronological development in cookstove assessment methods: Challenges and way forward. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailis, R., Berrueta, V., Chengappa, C., Dutta, K., Edwards, R., Masera, O., et al. (2007). Performance testing for monitoring improved biomass stove interventions: Experiences of the household energy and health project. Energy Sustainable Development, 11(2), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S. C., Albina, D. O., & Khaing, A. M. (2002). Effects of selected parameters on performance and emission of biomass fired cookstoves. Biomass and Bioenergy, 23, 387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocci, E. A., Sisinni, M. B., Moneti, M. C., Vecchione, L. C., Di Carlo, A. B., & Villarini, M. C. (2014). State of art of small scale biomass gasification power systems: A review of the different typologies. Energy Procedia, 45, 247–256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, E. R., Muvandimwe, D., Hagar, Y., Wiedinmyer, C., Kanyomse, E., Piedrahita, R., et al. (2017). New emission factors and efficiencies from in-field measurements of traditional and improved cookstoves and their potential implications. Environmental Science and Technology, 51, 12508–12517.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jetter, J., Zhao, Y., Smith, K. R., Khan, B., Yelverton, T., & DeCarlo, P. (2012). Pollutant emissions and energy efficiency under controlled conditions for household biomass cook stoves and implications for metrics useful in setting international test standards. Environmental Science and Technology, 46, 10827.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M., Edwards, R., Frenk, C., & Masera, O. (2008). In-field greenhouse gas emissions from cookstoves in rural Mexican households. Atmospheric Environment, 42, 1206–1222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Just, B., Rogak, S., & Kandlikar, M. (2013). Characterization of ultrafine particulate matter from traditional and improved biomass cookstoves. Environmental Science and Technology, 47, 3506–3512.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. (1994). Generalized equation for airflow resistance of bulk grains with variable density, moisture content and fines. Drying Technology, 12(3), 649–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, D. J. (2001). The forest plantation thematic papers report plantations and wood energy (pp 5). http://www.fao.org/tempref/docrep/fao/006/ac125e/ac125e00.pdf.

  • Mukhopadhyay, R., Sambandam, S., Pillarisetti, A., Jack, D., Mukhopadhyay, K., & Balakrishnan, K. (2012). Cooking practices, air quality, and the acceptability of advanced cookstoves in Haryana, India: An exploratory study to inform large scale interventions. Global Health Action, 5, 19016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukunda, H. S., Dasappa, S., Paul, P. J., Rajan, N. K. S., Yagnaraman, M., & Ravikumar, D. (2010). Gasifier stoves science, technology and field outreach. Current Science, 98, 627.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, K. K., Sangen, E., & Visser, P. (1985). Wood burning cookstoves. Advanced Heat Transfer, 17, 159–317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, T. B., & Larson, R. A. (1996). Wood gas stove for developing countries. In: A. V. Bridgwater (Ed.) Developments in thermo-chemical biomass conversion conference Banff, Canada (pp. 20–24). Blackie Academic Press.

  • Roden, A., Bond, T., Conway, S., Osorto Pinel, A., MacCarty, N., & Still, D. (2009). Laboratory and field investigations of particulate and carbon monoxide emissions from traditional and improved cookstoves. Atmospheric Environment, 43, 1170–1181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, M., Granstrom, K., Berghel, J., & Renstrom, R. (2004). Process for biomass drying and their effects on the quality properties of wood pellets. Biomass and Bioenergy, 27, 621–628.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Still, D., MacCarty, N., Ogle, D., Bond, T., & Bryden, M. (2011). Test results of cookstove performance. Cottage Grove, OR: Aprovecho Research Center; London: Shell Foundation; Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

  • Suresh, R., Singh, V. K., Malik, J. K., Datta, A., & Pal, R. C. (2016). Evaluation of the performance of improved biomass cooking stoves with different solid biomass fuel types. Biomass and Bioenergy, 95, 27–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tryner, J., Marchese, A. J., & Willson, B. D. (2013). The effects of fuel type and geometry on emissions and efficiency of natural draft semi-gasifier biomass cookstoves. In 8th U. S. National Combustion Meeting, the University of Utah (pp 3–4).

  • Varunkumar, S., Rajan, N. K. S., & Mukunda, H. S. (2011a). Single particle and packed bed combustion in modern gasifier stoves—density effects. Combustion Science and Technology, 183(11), 1147–1163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varunkumar, S., Rajan, N. K. S., & Mukunda, H. S. (2011b). Experimental and computational studies on a gasifier based stove. Energy Conversion and Management, 53, 135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, C., Habib, G., Eiguren-Fernandez, A., Miguel, A., & Friedlander, S. (2005). Residential biofuels in south Asia: carbonaceous aerosol emissions and climate impacts. Science, 307, 1454–1456.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wendelbo, P. (2012). The Peko Pe biomass household energy program. Available at: http://wendelborecho.wordpress.com/2012/05/10/downloads. Accessed November 29, 2012.

  • Witt, M. J. (2005). An improved wood cookstove: Harnessing fan driven forced draft for cleaner combustion. Hartford CT: Trinity College; Cottage Grove, OR: Aprovecho Research Center.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, India, for providing experimental and other necessary facilities to carry out this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashish S. Chaurasia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sonarkar, P.R., Chaurasia, A.S. Thermal performance of three improved biomass-fired cookstoves using fuel wood, wood pellets and coconut shell. Environ Dev Sustain 21, 1429–1449 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0096-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0096-0

Keywords

Navigation