Advertisement

Synergy between traditional knowledge of use and tree population structure for sustainability of Cola nitida (Vent.) Schott. & Endl in Benin (West Africa)

  • Merveille Koissi Savi
  • Raoul Noumonvi
  • Flora Josiane Chadaré
  • Kasso Daïnou
  • Valère Kolawolé Salako
  • Rodrigue Idohou
  • Achille Ephrem Assogbadjo
  • Romain Glèlè Kakaï
Article
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

Cola nitida is a West African tree, commonly used for pharmaceutical purposes. In Benin, the species is used for many purposes ranging from traditional rituals to domestic consumption. Nowadays, the species, as well as its offspring, are hardly encountered. So far, research on the species focused on a single domain such as ethnobotany and phytochemistry. The current paper used a holistic approach to explain the species scarcity in the natural habitats using (1) the rural knowledge pattern on C. nitida and (2) the tree population structure. Semi-structured interviews (n = 170 respondents) were conducted and combined with ecological inventory (n = 38 plots) in the phyto-geographical districts of Coast and Pobè in southern Benin. The indices of diversity, equitability, and consensus quantified the range, the evenness, and the relative reliability of rural communities’ knowledge. Moreover, the plant part index gave the most used part of the tree. The knowledge on the species was unevenly distributed according to the gender, while the cofactor age did not have a statistically significant effect (P = 0.902) on the pattern. In addition, seeds represented the most used plant part (PPI = 0.59). C. nitida tree demographic structure showed a low density of seedling and sapling (1.05 ± 0.47 trees ha-1). Diameter size fitted with a two-parameter Weibull distribution indicated a threat of species extinction. The multiple uses of C. nitida seeds do not allow natural regeneration of the species. The domestication of C. nitida tree and the establishment of Cola garden/orchard in the surveyed districts are suggested for sustainable use of the species.

Keywords

Benin Cola nitida Quantitative ethnobotany Tree demographic structure Wild edible plant 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Rufford Small Grant foundation through the research Grant 16785-1 provided to M. K. Savi supported for this study. Authors would like to thank the rural communities and their chiefs for their collaboration and help during this study. We thank colleagues and reviewers for their comments.

References

  1. Adomou, A.C. (2005). Vegetation patterns and environmental gradients in Benin: implications for biogeography and conservation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wageningen, Netherlands, p. 136.Google Scholar
  2. Akoègninou, A., Van Der Burg, W. J., & Van Der Maesen, L. J. G. (Eds.). (2006). Flore analytique de Bénin (p. 1034). Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2009). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161(2): 105-121. Retrieved Feb. 18, 2016, from http://www.enotes.com/topic/APG_III_system.
  4. Asogwa, E. U., Adedeji, A. R., Oyedokun, A. V., Otuonye, A. H., Mokwunye, F. C., & Agbongiarhuoyi, A. E. (2012a). Strategies for improving production and storage of kolanuts in Nigeria. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 12(1), 37–43.Google Scholar
  5. Asogwa, E. U., Agbongiarhuoyi, A. E., Mokwunye, F. C., Ndagi, I., Adebiyi, S., & Ndubuaku, T. C. N. (2012b). The challenges of kola nuts processing, trade and export from Nigeria and other sub-saharan African countries. International Journal of Science and Nature, 3(1), 06–11.Google Scholar
  6. Assogbadjo, A. E., Kakaï, R. G., Chadare, F. J., Thomson, L., Kyndt, T., Sinsin, B., et al. (2008). Folk classification, perception, and preferences of baobab products in West Africa: Consequences for species conservation and improvement. Economic Botany, 62(1), 74–84.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-007-9003-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bailey, R. L., & Dell, T. R. (1973). Quantifying diameter distributions with the Weibull function. Forest Science, 19, 97–104.Google Scholar
  8. Beavo, J., Rogers, N., Crofford, O., Hardman, J., Sutherland, E., & Newman, E. (1970). Effects of Xanthine derivatives on lipolysis and on adenesine 3, 5 -monophosphate, phosphodiesterase activity. Molecular Pharmacology, 6, 597–603.Google Scholar
  9. Becker, C. D., & Ghimire, K. (2003). Synergy between traditional ecological knowledge and conservation science supports forest preservation in Ecuador. Conservation Ecology, 8(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belcher, B., Ruiz-Pérez, M., & Achdiawan, R. (2005). Global pattern and trends in the use and management of commercial NTFPs: Implications for livelihood and conservation. World Development, 33, 1435–1452.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benz, B. F., Cevallos, E., Santana, M., Rosales, A., & Graf, M. (2000). Losing knowledge about plant use in the sierra de manantlan biosphere reserve, Mexico. Economic Botany, 54(2), 183–191.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Byg, A., & Baslev, H. (2001). Diversity and use of palms in Zahamena, eastern Madagascar. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10, 951–970.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016640713643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dagnelie, P. (1998). Statistiques théoriques et appliquées. Brussels: De Boeck et Larcier.Google Scholar
  14. Dah-Nouvlessounon, D., Adjanohoun, A., Sina, H., Noumavo, P. A., Diarrasouba, N., Parkouda, C., et al. (2015a). Nutritional and anti-nutrient composition of three kola nuts (Cola nitida, Cola acuminata and Garcinia kola) produced in Benin. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 6(15), 1395–1407.  https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2015.615145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dah-Nouvlessounon, D., Adoukonou-Sagbadja, H., Diarrassouba, N., Adjanohoun, A., Baba-Moussa, F., Sezan, A., et al. (2015b). Indigenous knowledge and socioeconomic values of three kola species (Cola nitida, Cola acuminata and Garcinia kola) used in southern Benin. European Scientific Journal, 11(36), 206–227.Google Scholar
  16. Dah-Nouvlessounon, D., Adoukonou-Sagbadja, H., Diarrassouba, N., Adjanohoun, A., Noumavo, P. A., Sina, H., et al. (2016). Morpho-agronomic variability of three kola trees accessions [Cola nitida (Vent.) Schott et Endl., Cola acuminata (P. Beauv.) Schott et Endl., and Garcinia kola Heckel] from Southern Benin. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 63(3), 561–579.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0362-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dah-Nouvlessounon, D., Adoukonou-Sagbadja, H., Diarrassouba, N., Sina, H., Adjanohoun, A., Inoussa, M., et al. (2015c). Phytochemical Analysis and Biological Activities of Cola nitida Bark. Biochemistry Research International.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/493879.Google Scholar
  18. Esimone, C., Adikwu, M., Nworu, C., Okoye, F., & Odimegwu, D. (2007). Adaptogenic potentials of Camellia sinensis leaves, Garcinia kola and Kola nitida seeds. Scientific Research and Essays, 2(7), 232–237.Google Scholar
  19. Fandohan, A.B., Assogbadjo, A.E., & Sinsin, B. (2009). Endogenous knowledge on tamarind (Tamarindus indica l.) in northern Benin. Traditional Forest-Related Knowledge and Sustainable Forest Management in Africa IUFRO World Serives 23: 57–62. ISSN 1016-3263; ISBN 978-3-901347-81-8.Google Scholar
  20. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2011). Situation des forêts du monde. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  21. Fentahun, M., & Hager, H. (2010). Integration of indigenous wild woody perennial edible fruit bearing species in the agricultural landscapes of Amhara region, Ethiopia. Agroforestry Systems, 78, 79–95.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9239-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuchs, E. J., Lobo, J. A., & Quesada, M. (2003). Effects of forest fragmentation and flowering phenology on the reproductive success and mating patterns on the tropical dry forest tree, Pachira quinata (Bombacaceae). Conservation Biology, 17, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gomez-Beloz, A. (2002). Plant use knowledge of the Winikina Warao: The case for questionnaires in ethnobotany. Economic Botany, 56(3), 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Houéhanou, T. D., Kindomihou, V., & Sinsin, B. (2011). Effectiveness of conservation areas in protecting Shea trees against hemiparasitic plants (Loranthaceae) in Benin, West Africa. Plant Ecology and Evolution, 144(8), 267–274.  https://doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.2011.485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Husch, B., Beers, T. W., & Kershaw, J. A., Jr. (2003). Forest mensuration (4th ed.). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Igwe, S., Akunyili, D., & Ikonne, E. (2007). Ocular effects of acute ingestion of Cola nitida (Linn) on healthy adult volunteers. The South African Optometrist, 66(1), 19–23.  https://doi.org/10.4102/aveh.v66i1.201.Google Scholar
  27. Ingram, V., Ndoye, O., Iponga, D., Tieguhong, J., Nasi, R., CIFOR, FAO, IRET. (2010). Les produits Forestiers non Ligneux: Contribution aux économies Nationales et stratégies pour une gestion durable. Résultats d’atelier sous régional du projet FORENET sur l’harmonisation des revues nationales, sur le thème des « Produits Forestiers Non Ligneux (PFNL) en Afrique Centrale » . 137-154, Douala, Cameroun.Google Scholar
  28. INSAE (Institut National de la Statistique et de l’Analyse Economique). (2003). Troisième Recensement Général de la Population et de l’Habitation Février 2002 Synthèse des Analyses. Institut National de la Statistique et de l’Analyse Economique, Cotonou, Bénin.Google Scholar
  29. Leakey, R. R. B. (2001). Win: Win land use strategies for Africa: 1. Building on experience with agroforests in Asia and Latin America. International Forest Review, 3, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2005.9684741.Google Scholar
  30. Leakey, R. R. B., & Simons, A. J. (1997). The domestication and commercialization of indigenous trees in agroforestry for the alleviation of poverty. Agroforestry System, 38, 165–176.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005912729225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, E. R., Kang, G. H., & Cho, S. G. (2007). Effect of flavonoids on human health: old subjects but new challenges. Recent Patent on Biotechnology, 1(2), 139–150.  https://doi.org/10.2174/187220807780809445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (1968). The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Science, 159(3810), 71–72.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Monteiro, J. M., Albuquerque, U. P., Lins-Neto, E. M. F., Araújo, E. L., & Amorim, E. L. C. (2006). Use patterns and knowledge of medicinal species among two rural communities in Brazil’s semi-arid northeastern region. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 105, 173–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.10.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Niemenak, N., Onomo, P. E., Fotso, Lieberei, R., & Ndoumou, D. O. (2008). Purine alkaloids and phenolic compounds in three Cola species and Garcinia kola grown in Cameroon. South African Journal of Botany, 74, 629–638.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2008.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Opeke, L. K. (1992). Tropical tree crops. Ibadan, Nigeria: Spectrum Books Limited.Google Scholar
  36. Phounvisouk, L., Ting, Z., & Kiat, N. C. (2013). Non-timber forest products marketing: Trading Network of trader and market chain in Luang Namtha Province, Lao PDR. IOSR. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 18(4), 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Quiroz, D., & van Andel, T. (2015). Evidence of a link between taboos and sacrifices and resource scarcity of ritual plants. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 11(5), 11p.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-11-5.Google Scholar
  38. R core team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. & URL http://www.R-project.org/.
  39. Sogbohossou, O. E. D., Achigan-Dako, E. G., Assogba-Komlan, F., & Ahanchede, A. (2015). Diversity and differential utilization of Amaranthus spp. along the urban-rural continuum of southern Benin. Economic Botany, 69(1), 9–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-014-9294-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tarrason, D., Urrutia, J. T., Ravera, F., Herrera, E., Andres, P., & Espelta, J. M. (2010). Conservation status of tropical dry forest remnants in Nicaragua: Do ecological indicators and social perception tally? Biodiversity Conservation, 19, 813–827.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9736-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Andel, T. (2006). Non-timber Forest Products: The Value of Wild Plants. Agromisa Foundation and CTA: Wageningen.Google Scholar
  42. Vandebroek, I., Calewaert, J. B., De Jonckheere, S., Sanca, S., Semo, L., Van Damme, P., et al. (2004). Use of medicinal plants and pharmaceuticals by indigenous communities in the Bolivian Andes and Amazon. Bulletin of World Health Organization, 82(4), 243–250.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0042-96862004000400005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Merveille Koissi Savi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Raoul Noumonvi
    • 2
  • Flora Josiane Chadaré
    • 3
  • Kasso Daïnou
    • 4
    • 5
  • Valère Kolawolé Salako
    • 1
  • Rodrigue Idohou
    • 1
  • Achille Ephrem Assogbadjo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Romain Glèlè Kakaï
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Biomathématiques et d’Estimations Forestières, Faculty of Agronomic SciencesUniversity of Abomey-CalaviCotonouBenin
  2. 2.Laboratory of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Agronomic SciencesUniversity of Abomey-CalaviCotonouBenin
  3. 3.School of Sciences and Techniques for Preservation and Processing of Agricultural ProductsUniversity of Agriculture of KétouSakétéBenin
  4. 4.Nature Plus asbl, Foresterie tropicale, TERRAGembloux Agro-Bio Tech, ULgGemblouxBelgium
  5. 5.Ecole de foresterie et d’ingénierie du boisUniversité d’Agriculture de KétouKétouBenin

Personalised recommendations