Abstract
The main aim of this article is to identify how the pressures from the external environment, in relation to the adoption of practices for sustainability in the environmental dimension, interfere with the organizational routines of companies involved in the plastic transformation chain. This research used a qualitative method because we sought to understand the meaning of managerial decisions regarding the routines that make up an organizational structure. For this purpose, secondary sources of evidence were used, which provided information on the history, infrastructure and products of 107 companies associated with the Brazilian Association of the Plastic Industry (Abiplast). In addition, six individuals directly linked to the plastics industry were also interviewed in order to obtain more evidence about the changes in the routines of this industry. For the analysis of the data, the constant comparison method was used based on the coding technique to identify patterns of behavior. The qualitative data were analyzed using the Atlas.ti version 7 software. The results demonstrate that the routines can be categorized as isomorphic or evolutionary, which is the main contribution of this research. In addition, the type of routine adopted may be associated with the company being reactive or proactive in relation to the pressures from the external environment. Furthermore, we can also say that the activities involved in the creation of new routines for environment sustainability are linked to three actions: building an infrastructure for sustainability, managing a circular flow of resources and innovation for sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Source: elaborated by authors based on data from search, 2017
Source: elaborated by authors based on data from search, 2017
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abatecola, G. (2014). Untangling self-reinforcing processes in managerial decision making. Co-evolving heuristics? Management, 52(5), 934–949. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2013-0543.
Abiplast (2015) Perfil 2015. http://file.abiplast.org.br/download/2016/perfil_2015_ok.pdf. Retrieved 11 Dec 2016.
Almeida, C. M. V. B., Rodrigues, A. J. M., Agostinho, F., & Giannetti, B. F. (2017). Material selection for environmental responsibility: The case of soft drinks packaging in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.130.
Ari, E., & Yılmaz, V. (2017). Consumer attitudes on the use of plastic and cloth bags. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19(4), 1219–1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9791-x.
Beck, U. (2010). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage.
Beck, U. (2010). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage.
Becker, M. C. (2001). Empirical research on routines: The state of the art and its integration into the routines debate. Nelson and Winter Conference, Aalborg. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.515.4754. Retrieved 11 Dec 2016
Becker, M. C. (2004). Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643–678. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth026.
Begossi, A. (2014). Ecological, cultural, and economic approaches to managing artisanal fisheries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 16(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9471-z.
Bergaglio, M. (2017). The contemporary illusion: Population growth and sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19(5), 2023–2038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9842-3.
Bismarck, A., Baltazar-Y-Jimenez, A., & Sarikakis, K. (2006). Green composites as panacea? Socio-economic aspects of green materials. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 8(3), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-8506-5.
Brown, S., Squire, B., & Blackmon, K. (2007). The contribution of manufacturing strategy involvement and alignment to world-class manufacturing performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(3), 282–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570710725554.
Bruntland, G. H. (1987). Our common future: The world commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buclet, N., & Lazarevic, D. (2015). Principles for sustainability: The need to shift to a sustainable conventional regime. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9539-4.
Carroll, G. R. (1993). A sociological view on why firms differ. Strategic Management Journal, 14(4), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140402.
Cecere, G., Corrocher, N., Gossart, C., & Ozman, M. (2014). Lock-in and path dependence: An evolutionary approach to eco-innovations. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24(5), 1037–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-014-0381-5.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405.
Cohen, M. D., & Bacdayan, P. (1994). Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organization Science, 5(4), 554–568.
Commons, J. R. (1934). Institutional economics: Its place in political economy (Vol. 2). New York: Macmillan.
Cressey, D. (2016). Bottles, bags, ropes and toothbrushes: The struggle to track ocean plastics. Nature, 536, 263–265. https://doi.org/10.1038/536263a.
De Oliveira, M. C. B. R. (2012). Gestão de Resíduos Plásticos Pós-Consumo: Perspectivas para a Reciclagem no Brasil/Maria Clara Brandt Ribeiro de Oliveira. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ/COPPE.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2006). A disciplina e a prática da pesquisa qualitativa. O planejamento da pesquisa qualitativa: teorias e abordagens. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
do Amaral, G., et al. (2011). Guia ambiental da indústria de transformação e reciclagem de materiais plásticos. São Paulo: CETESB-SINDIPLAST.
Dobusch, L., & Kapeller, J. (2009). Why is economics not an evolutionary science? New answers to Veblen’s old question. Journal of Economic Issues, 43(4), 867–898.
Dolfsma, W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). The citation field of evolutionary economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20(5), 645–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-010-0172-6.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385.
Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the triple bottom line. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.), The triple bottom line: Does it all add up (Vol. 11(12), pp. 1–16). Adington: Routledge.
Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.6.611.12529.
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620.
Finkbeiner, M., Schau, E. M., Lehmann, A., & Traverso, M. (2010). Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability, 2(10), 3309–3322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2103309.
Friese, S. (2014). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti. Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164.
Hassan, M. F., Saman, M. Z. M., Sharif, S., & Omar, B. (2016). Sustainability evaluation of alternative part configurations in product design: Weighted decision matrix and artificial neural network approach. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 18(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0990-1.
Heine, K., & Rindfleisch, H. (2013). Organizational decline: A synthesis of insights from organizational ecology, path dependence and the resource-based view. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(1), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811311307888.
Hodgson, G. M. (1994). The return of institutional economics. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hodgson, G. M. (2007). Evolutionary and institutional economics as the new mainstream? Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 4(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.4.7.
Hodgson, G. M. (2013). Understanding organizational evolution: Toward a research agenda using generalized Darwinism. Organization Studies, 34(7), 973–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613485855.
Hodgson, G. M., & Knudsen, T. (2012). Agreeing on generalised Darwinism: A response to Pavel Pelikan. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 22(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-011-0249-x.
Iles, A., & Martin, A. N. (2013). Expanding bioplastics production: Sustainable business innovation in the chemical industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.008.
International Energy Agency. (2016). Decoupling of global emissions and economic growth confirmed. https://www.iea.org/newsroom/news/2016/march/decoupling-of-globalemissions-and-economic-growth-confirmed.html. Retrieved 11 Dec 2016.
Jeffrey, P. (1996). Evolutionary analogies and sustainability: Putting a human face on survival. Futures, 28(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(95)00088-7.
Ji, P., Ma, X., & Li, G. (2015). Developing green purchasing relationships for the manufacturing industry: An evolutionary game theory perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.009.
Keiner, M. (2005). Re-emphasizing sustainable development—The concept of ‘evolutionability’. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 6(4), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-5737-4.
Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986) Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Kitchel, D. (2016). A real and monetary analysis of capitalism. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 26(2), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-015-0440-6.
Kopnina, H. (2017). Sustainability: New strategic thinking for business. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9723-1.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
MacArthur, E. (2012). Towards the circular economy. v. 1, 2012. http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/towards-the-circular-economy-vol-1-an-economic-and-business-rationale-for-an-accelerated-transition. Retrieved 11 Dec 2016.
Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507–548. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th Edn). Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2009). Strategy Safari/Safári da estratégia. São Paulo: Bookman Editora.
Mitchell, W. C. (1937). Backward art of spending money, and other essays. New York: McGraw-Hill.
MMA-Brazil. (2016). Ministério do Meio Ambie nte Brasileiro - Indicadores Ambientais / Environmental Indicators. http://www.mma.gov.br/informacoes-ambientais/indicadores-ambientais. Retrieved 11 Dec 2016.
Mulder, P., & Van Den Bergh, J. C. (2001). Evolutionary economic theories of sustainable development. Growth and Change, 32(1), 110–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/0017-4815.00152.
Murakami, F., Sulzbach, A., Pereira, G. M., Borchardt, M., & Sellitto, M. A. (2015). How the Brazilian government can use public policies to induce recycling and still save money? Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.083.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Evolutionary theorizing in economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2), 23–46.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (2005). Uma teoria evolucionária da mudança econômica/An evolutionary theory of economic change. Campinas: Editora Unicamp.
North, D. C. (1993). The new institutional economics and development. St. Louis: Washington Univesity.
Onat, N. C., Kucukvar, M., Tatari, O., & Zheng, Q. P. (2016). Combined application of multi-criteria optimization and life-cycle sustainability assessment for optimal distribution of alternative passenger cars in US. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.021.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. California: Sage Publications.
Pelikan, P. (2012). Agreeing on generalized Darwinism: A response to Geoffrey Hodgson and Thorbjørn Knudsen. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 22(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-011-0260-2.
Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2005). Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and corporate change, 14(5), 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth070.
Pentland, B. T., Feldman, M. S., Becker, M. C., & Liu, P. (2012). Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1484–1508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01064.x..
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International journal of nursing studies, 47(11), 1451–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004.
Rich, M., & Ginsburg, K. R. (1999). The reason and rhyme of qualitative research: Why, when, and how to use qualitative methods in the study of adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent health, 25(6), 371–378.
Ridley, M. (2009). Evolução/Evolution. São Paulo: Artmed Editora.
Safarzyńska, K., Frenken, K., & van den Bergh, J. C. (2012). Evolutionary theorizing and modeling of sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41(6), 1011–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.014.
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage.
Sant’Anna, J. P. (2016). PET: Técnica de transformação evolui e reduz o consumo de resina por unidade, Plástico, 2016. http://www.plastico.com.br/pet-tecnica-de-transformacao-evolui-e-reduz-consumo-de-resina-por-unidade/3/. Retrieved 11 Dec 2016.
Sauerbronn, J. F. R., & Ayrosa, E. A. T. (2010). Concerning convergence and the methodological practice of interpretive interactionism in academic marketing research. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 14(5), 854. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552010000500006.
Silva, A. B., Godoy, C. K., & Bandeira-de-Mello, R. (2010). Pesquisa qualitativa em estudos organizacionais: paradigmas, estratégias e métodos. São Paulo: Saraiva.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles (Vol. 1, pp. 161–174). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Seiffert, M. E. B. (2009). Carbon Market and Kioto Protocol/Mercado de Carbono e Protocolo de Quioto. São Paulo: Atlas.
Silvestre, B. S. (2015). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Environmental turbulence, institutional voids and sustainability trajectories. International Journal of Production Economics, 167, 156–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.025.
Stark, O., Jakubek, M., & Kobus, M. (2015). A bitter choice turned sweet: How acknowledging individuals’ concern at having a low relative income serves to align utilitarianism and egalitarianism. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 25(3), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-015-0396-6.
Taylor, M. L., Gwinnett, C., Robinson, L. F., & Woodall, L. C. (2016). Plastic microfibre ingestion by deep-sea organisms. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33997.
Torres, F. G., & Cornejo, H. (2016). The need for technical improvement in the plastics recycling industry in middle-income countries: The peruvian case. Progress in Rubber, Plastics and Recycling Technology, 32(4), 201–212.
Veblen, T. (1898). Why is economics not an evolutionary science? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12(4), 373–397.
Waring, T. M. (2010). New evolutionary foundations: Theoretical requirements for a science of sustainability. Ecological Economics, 69(4), 718–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.017.
Westerman, M. A. (2011). Conversation analysis and interpretive quantitative research on psychotherapy process and problematic interpersonal behavior. Theory & Psychology, 21(2), 155–178.
Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613.
Witt, U. (2008). What is specific about evolutionary economics? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18(5), 547–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-008-0107-7.
Wool, R., & Sun, X. S. (2011). Bio-based polymers and composites. Cambridge: Academic Press.
World Bank. (2016). Banco Mundial: serão necessários 3 planetas para manter atual estilo de vida da humanidade. Retrieved December 11, 2016 from https://nacoesunidas.org/banco-mundial-serao-necessarios-3-planetas-para-manter-atual-estilo-de-vida-da-humanidade/.
Yepsen, R. (2009). Sustainability of compostable products. Biocycle, 50(9), 16–23.
Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research, design and methods (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Zen, I. S., Ahamad, R., & Omar, W. (2013). No plastic bag campaign day in Malaysia and the policy implication. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15(5), 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9437-1.
Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., & Lai, K. (2010). Circular economy practices among Chinese manufacturers varying in environmental-oriented supply chain cooperation and the performance implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(6), 1324–1331.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
da Silva, L.F., de Hoyos Guevara, A.J., Santibanez Gonzalez, E.D.R. et al. Evolution toward environment sustainable behavior: search for survival in the plastic industry in Brazil. Environ Dev Sustain 21, 1291–1320 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0085-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0085-3