Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

To preserve, or not to preserve, that is the question: urban and rural student attitudes towards wild vertebrates

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historically, human interactions with other animals have been marked by an attitudinal affinity–aversion polarization, depending on the animal involved and its local utilitarian value, as well as whether it is related to conflict situations or not. In this sense, the present study aimed to analyse the attitudes (affinity–aversion) of urban and rural students in relation to wild vertebrates and the factors that influence them. Data were obtained from three public schools, one urban and two rural, in the city of Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil. Questionnaires were given to 990 students (528 urban and 462 rural), distributed among all levels of basic education (students 6–17 years of age). We used the technique of “content analysis” to categorize the descriptive data and tests of significance and correlation for statistical analyses. No differences were observed in attitudes of affinity (preservation) and/or aversion (elimination) about vertebrates between urban and rural students. However, there was variation in preferences regarding animals as a function of these contexts. There was a common tendency between genders for aversion for snakes, followed by amphibians, mammals, turtles and birds, with slight differences in the specificities of the animals considered. Significant positive correlations (p < 0.05) between affinity (preservation) and curricular development, age and family income were observed. Attitudinal antagonism (affinity–aversion), expressed by the variation in preferences for certain animals and repulsion by others, has consequential implications for the conservation of wild fauna, thus demonstrating the relevance of incorporating this reality into the context of educational strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use the term “preservation” as synonymous with safeguarding; protect, save; the sense used in the questionnaire for acquiring field data.

References

  • Albuquerque, U. P., Araújo, E. D. L., El-Deir, A. C. A., Lima, A. L. A. D., Souto, A., Bezerra, B. M., et al. (2012). Caatinga revisited: Ecology and conservation of an important seasonal dry forest. Scientific World Journal, 2012(205182), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/205182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves, R. R. N. (2012). Relationships between fauna and people and the role of ethnozoology in animal conservation. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 1(2), 1–69. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2012-8-1.2-1-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves, R. R. N., Feijó, A., Barboza, R. R. D., Souto, W. M. S., Fernandes-Ferreira, H., Cordeiro-Estrela, P., et al. (2016a). Game mammals of the Caatinga biome. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 5(5), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2016-7-5.5-1-51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves, M. M., Lopes, S. F., & Alves, R. R. N. (2016b). Wild vertebrates kept as pets in the semiarid region of Brazil. Tropical Conservation Science, 9(1), 354–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves, R. R. N., Pereira-Filho, G. A., Vieira, K. S., Santana, G. G., Vieira, W. L. S., & Almeida, W. O. (2010). Répteis e as populações humanas no Brasil: uma abordagem etnoherpetológica. In R. R. N. Alves & W. M. S. Souto (Eds.), A Etnozoologia no Brasil: Importância, Status Atual e Perspectivas Futuras (pp. 121–146). Recife: NUPEEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alves, R. R. N., Pereira-Filho, G. A., Vieira, K. S., Souto, W. M. S., Mendonça, L. E. T., Montenegro, P. F. G. P., et al. (2012a). A zoological catalogue of hunted reptiles in the semiarid region of Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 8(27), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-8-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves, R. R. N., Silva, V. N., Trovão, D. M. B. M., Oliveira, J. V., Mourão, J. S., Dias, T. L. P., et al. (2014). Students’ attitudes toward and knowledge about snakes in the semiarid region of Northeastern Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 10(30), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-10-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves, R. R. N., & Souto, W. M. S. (2015). Ethnozoology: A brief introduction. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 4, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alves, R. R. N., Vieira, K. S., Santana, G. G., Vieira, W. L. S., Almeida, W. O., Souto, W. M. S., et al. (2012b). A review on human attitudes towards reptiles in Brazil. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184(11), 6877–6901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2465-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. J., Gorley, R. N., & Clarke, K. R. (2008). PERMANOVA + for PRIMER: Guide to software and statistical methods. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballouard, J. M., Ajtic, R., Balint, H., Brito, J. C., Crnobrnja-Isailovic, J., Desmonts, D., et al. (2013). Schoolchildren and one of the most unpopular animals: Are they ready to protect snakes? Anthrozoös, 26(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303713x13534238631560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballouard, J. M., Provost, G., Barré, D., & Bonnet, X. (2012). Influence of a field trip on the attitude of schoolchildren toward unpopular organisms: An experience with snakes. Journal of Herpetology, 46(3), 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1670/11-118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baquero, R. (2005). Vygotsky e a aprendizagem escolar. São Paulo: Artes Médicas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barboza, R. R. D., Lopes, S. F., Souto, W. M. S., Fernandes-Ferreira, H., & Alves, R. R. N. (2016). The role of game mammals as bushmeat In the Caatinga, northeast Brazil. Ecology and Society, 21(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08358-210202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardin, L. (1977). Análise de Conteúdo. São Paulo: Ediçoes 70 - Brasil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de Conteúdo. São Paulo: Ediçoes 70 - Brasil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrens, M. A. (2010). O Paradigma Emergente e a Prática Pedagógica. Petrópolis: Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benavides, P. (2013). Animal symbolism in folk narratives and human attitudes towards predators: An analysis of their mutual influences. The Folklore Society, 124(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015587X.2013.767484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesdorf, R. K. (2011). O papel da educação formal e informal: Educação na escola e na sociedade. Itinerarius Reflections, 1(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5216/rir.v1i10.1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerke, T., Kaltenborn, B. P., & Ødegårdstuen, T. S. (2001). Animal-related activities and appreciation of animals among children and adolescents. Anthrozoös, 14(2), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279301786999535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerke, T., & Østdahl, T. (2015). Animal-related attitudes and activities in an urban population. Anthrozoös, 17(2), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279304786991783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, C. J. A., Giam, X., & Sodhi, N. S. (2010). Evaluating the relative environmental impact of countries. PLoS ONE, 5(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G., Murphy, J. B., Chiszar, D., & Hutchins, M. (2009). Combating ophiophobia: Origins, treatment, education and conservation tools. In S. Mullin & R. Seigel (Eds.), Snakes: Ecology and conservation (pp. 262–280). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, C. M., Greco, S., Ciarlante, J. J., Balangione, M., Bender, J. B., Nates, J., et al. (2012). Students’ familiarity and initial contact with species in the Monte desert (Mendoza, Argentina). Journal of Arid Environments, 82, 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.02.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceríaco, L. M. P. (2012). Human attitudes towards herpetofauna: The influence of folklore and negative values on the conservation of amphibians and reptiles in Portugal. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 8(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-8-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demo, P. (2007). Educar pela Pesquisa. São Paulo: Autores Associado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickman, A. J. (2010). Complexities of conflict: The importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation, 13(5), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00368.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes-Ferreira, H., Mendonça, S. V., Albano, C., Ferreira, F. S., & Alves, R. R. N. (2012). Hunting, use and conservation of birds in Northeast Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(1), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0179-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2001). Educação e mudança. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2002). Pedagogia da Autonomia: Saberes necessários à prática educativa. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadotti, M. (2005). A questão da educação formal/não-formal. In Droit à l'éducation: solution à tous les problèmes ou problème sans solution? (Conference) (pp. 1–11). Sion: Institut International des Droits de L’enfant (IDE).

  • Gramza, A., & Temple, S. (2010). Effect of education programs on the knowledge and attitudes about snakes in San Isidro de Upala, Costa Rica. Journal of Kansas Herpetology, 33, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnthorsdottir, A. (2001). Physical attractiveness of an animal species as a decision factor for its preservation. Anthrozoös, 14(4), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279301786999355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). Past: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, H. A., & Burghardt, G. M. (1988). Attitudes toward animals: Origins and diversity. Anthrozoös, 1(8), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279388787058317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J. P. (2004). Social and environmental influences on endangered species: A cross-national study. Sociological Perspectives, 47(1), 79–107. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2004.47.1.79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, T. G., Peterson, G. D., & Gonzalez, A. (2009). Cross-national analysis of how economic inequality predicts biodiversity loss. Cnservation Biology, 23(5), 1304–1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01207.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBGE. (2010). Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. http://cidades.ibge.gov.br/xtras/perfil.php?codmun=250400. Accessed February 20, 2016.

  • Kellert, S. R. (2010). Attitudes toward animals: Age-related development among children. The Journal of Environmental Education, 16(3), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. R., & Berry, J. K. (1987). Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 15(3), 363–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiven, J., Bjerke, T., & Kaltenborn, B. P. (2004). Factors influencing the social acceptability of large carnivore behaviours. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13(9), 1647–1658. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000029328.81255.38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, A. J. (2008). Bats, snakes and spiders, Oh my! How aesthetic and negativistic attitudes, and other concepts predict support for species protection. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasilchik, M. (1987). O Professor e o Currículo das Ciências. São Paulo: EPU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasilchik, M. (2004). Prática de Ensino de Biologia. São Paulo: EdUSP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583–621. https://doi.org/10.2307/2280779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2005). ‘Loveable’ mammals and ‘lifeless’ plants: How children’s interest in common local organisms can be enhanced through observation of nature. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 655–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500038116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendonça, L. E. T., Souto, C. M., Andrelino, L. L., Souto, W. M. S., Vieira, W. L. S., & Alves, R. R. N. (2011). Conflitos entre pessoas e animais silvestres no semiárido paraibano e suas implicações para conservação. Sitientibus, 11(2), 186–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesquita, G. P., & Barreto, G. P. (2015). Evaluation of mammals hunting in indigenous and rural localities in Eastern Brazilian Amazon. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 4, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizukami, M. G. N. (2007). Ensino: As Abordagens do Processo. Temas Básicos de Educação e Ensino. São Paulo: EPU.

    Google Scholar 

  • OCEM/Brasil. (2006). Orientações Curriculares Para O Ensino Médio/BRASIL Ciências da Natureza. Matemática e suas Tecnologias. Brasília: MEC/SEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, R. I. R., & Gastal, M. L. A. (2009). Educação formal fora da sala de aula—olhares sobre o ensino de ciências utilizando espaços não formais. In Encontro Nacional de Pesquisadores em Educação em Ciências (Conference) (Vol. 7, pp. 1–11). Florianópolis: ABRAPEC.

  • Páramo, P., & Galvis, C. J. (2010). Conceptualizaciones acerca de los animales en niños de la sociedad mayoritaria y de La comunidad indígena Uitoto en Colombia. Fólios, 32, 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • PCNs/BRASIL. (1998). Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais. Terceiro e quarto ciclos do ensino fundamental: introdução aos parâmetros curriculares nacionais. Brasília: MEC/SEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, L. T., Rodrigues, J. F. M., & Borges-Nojosa, D. M. (2016). Formal education, previous interaction and perception influence the attitudes of people toward the conservation of snakes in a large urban center of northeastern Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 12(25), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0096-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinho, J. R., Grilo, C., Boone, R. B., Galvin, K. A., & Snodgrass, J. G. (2014). Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in kenyan agropastoralist communities. PLoS ONE, 9(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088842.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polaina, E., González-Suárez, M., & Revilla, E. (2015). Socioeconomic correlates of global mammalian conservation status. Ecosphere, 6(9), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00505.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pough, F. H., Heiser, J. B., & Janis, C. M. (2008). A Vida dos Vertebrados. São Paulo: Ateneu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, P., & Fančovičová, J. (2012). Tolerance of amphibians in slovakian people: A comparison of pond owners and non-owners. Anthrozoös, 25(3), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303712X13403555186136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, P., & Fančovičová, J. (2013). Does colour matter? The influence of animal warning coloration on human emotions and willingness to protect them. Animal Conservation, 16(4), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, P., & Fančovičová, J. (2017a). Animals in dangerous postures enhance learning, but decrease willingness to protect animals. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(9), 6069–6077. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01000a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, P., & Fančovičová, J. (2017b). The effect of hands-on activities on children’s knowledge and disgust for animals. Journal of Biological Education, 51(3), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1217910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, P., Fančovičová, J., & Kubiatko, M. (2009a). Vampires are still alive: Slovakian students’ attitudes toward bats. Anthrozoös, 22(1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, P., Medina-Jerez, W., Coleman, J., Fančovičová, J., Özel, M., & Fedor, P. (2016). Tolerance of frogs among high school students: Influences of disgust and culture. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6), 1499–1505. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.1241a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, P., Özel, M., & Uşak, M. (2009b). Cross-cultural comparison of student attitudes toward snakes. Society and Animals, 17, 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853009X445398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2010). Effects of having pets at home on children’s attitudes toward popular and unpopular animals. Anthrozoös, 23(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303710X12627079939107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, P., Usak, M., & Erdogan, M. (2011). Good predators in bad stories: Cross-cultural comparison of children’s attitudes towards wolves. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 10(4), 229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randler, C., Hummel, E., & Prokop, P. (2012). Practical work at school reduces disgust and fear of unpopular animals. Society & Animals, 20(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853012X614369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randler, C., Hummel, E., & Wüst-Ackermann, P. (2013). The influence of perceived disgust on students’ motivation and achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17), 2839–2856. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.654518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randler, C., Ilg, A., & Kern, J. (2005). Cognitive and emotional evaluation of an amphibian conservation program for elementary school students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 37(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.37.1.43-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renoux, F., & de Thoisy, B. (2016). Hunting management: the need to adjust predictive models to field observations. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 5, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabino, J., & Prado, P. I. (2003). Avaliação do Estado. Brasília: COBIO/MMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, J., & Rupf, R. (2010). Attitudes towards potential animal flagship species in nature conservation: A survey among students of different educational institutions. Journal for Nature Conservation, 18(4), 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2009.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrant, J., Kruger, D., & Preez, L. H. (2016). Do public attitudes affect conservation effort? Using a questionnaire-based survey to assess perceptions, beliefs and superstitions associated with frogs in South Africa. African Zoology, 51(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15627020.2015.1122554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, D. F., Oliveira, E. S., & Alves, R. R. N. (2018). Understanding Human-Wildlife Conflicts and Their Implications. In R. R. N. Alves & U. P. Albuquerque (Eds.), Ethnozoology: animals in our lives (pp. 421–445). London: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trombulak, S. C., Omland, K. S., Robinson, J. A., Lusk, J. J., Fleischner, T. L., Brown, G., et al. (2004). Principles of conservation biology: Recommended guidelines for conservation literacy from the education committee of the society for conservation biology. Conservation Biology, 18(5), 1180–1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.01851.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Vliet, N., Schulte-Herbruggen, B., Vanegas, L., Cuesta, E. Y., Sandrin, F., & Nasi, R. (2018). What role do wild animals (fish and wildmeat) play in the food security of urban teenagers living in poverty and conflict-the case of Quibdó, Colombia. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 7, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorek, N. (2009). The only good snake is a dead snake: Secondary school students’ attitudes toward snakes. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 23(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2009.10818358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., Goodale, E., & Chen, J. (2014). How contact with nature affects children’s biophilia, biophobia and conservation attitude in China. Biological Conservation, 177, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to give a special thanks to all interviewers, who kindly shared their knowledge with us and all school directors that allowed the carrying out of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Av. das Baraúnas, 351/Campus Universitário, Bodocongó, Campina Grande, PB, 58109-753, Brazil

    José Valberto de Oliveira, Sérgio de Faria Lopes, Raynner Rilke Duarte Barboza & Rômulo Romeu da Nóbrega Alves

Authors
  1. José Valberto de Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sérgio de Faria Lopes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raynner Rilke Duarte Barboza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rômulo Romeu da Nóbrega Alves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Valberto de Oliveira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Oliveira, J.V., Lopes, S.F., Barboza, R.R.D. et al. To preserve, or not to preserve, that is the question: urban and rural student attitudes towards wild vertebrates. Environ Dev Sustain 21, 1271–1289 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0083-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0083-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation