Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Consideration of strength and service life in cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of self-compacting concrete in a maritime area: a study in the Brazilian context

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One solution for reducing the environmental impact of the civil construction industry is to incorporate by-products and waste from other industries into materials such as concrete, which is the most commonly used construction material. Therefore, this study presents a comparison of the production of self-compacting concrete containing mineral admixtures in a Brazilian context. To compare mixtures fairly, it is necessary to use indicators that incorporate all the relevant aspects; therefore, two environmental impact indicators were used, considering mechanical strength and service life (SL) as parameters. The concrete mixtures studied contained ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS) and fly ash at replacement levels of 20, 30, and 40%. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) is a method that can be used to quantify the environmental impact of a product throughout its life cycle. SimaPro software was used as a tool to perform the LCA. To assess the durability of concrete, the SL of each mixture was estimated using Life-365 software. The difference in the clinker transportation of different cement suppliers was an important parameter in the analysis. Based on all of the indicators analyzed, it was concluded that utilization of the highest GGBFS content in the cement was the environmentally preferable solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1 ton of oil equivalent (toe) = 41.87 GJ.

References

  • ABNT (Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas). (1991). NBR 5732-Cimento Portland comum. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT.

    Google Scholar 

  • ABNT (Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas). (2014). NBR 6118: Projeto de estruturas de concreto – Procedimento. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M., Bertron, A., & de Belie, N. (2012). In Performance of cement-based materials in aggressive aqueous environments: State-of-the-Art. RILEM TC 211-PAE.

  • Andrade, C., Prieto, M., Tanner, P., Tavares, F., & d’Andrea, R. (2013). Testing and modelling chloride penetration into concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 39, 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM C150. (2012). Standard C150/C150M-12. Standard specification for Portland cement 04.01. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankendaal, T., Schuur, P., & Voordijk, H. (2014). Reducing the environmental impact of concrete and asphalt: A scenario approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, J. (2002). Análise de Ciclo de Vida ambiental aplicada a construção civil - Estudo de caso: Comparação entre cimentos Portland com adição de resíduos. Dissertation, Escola Politécnica (USP), São Paulo, Bazil.

  • Carvalho, J. O. (2009). A Indústria do cimento e a Infraestrutura no Brasil. Comissão de serviços de infraestrutura. Senado Federal. Sindicato Nacional da Indústria do Cimento. SNIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, A. L., Silva, F. B., Arduin, R. H., Oliveira, L. A., & Becere, O. H. (2015). Análise da viabilidade técnica da adaptação de dados internacionais de inventário de ciclo de vida para o contexto brasileiro: um estudo de caso do concreto para paredes moldadas no local. In Anais do 57º Congresso Brasileiro do Concreto—CBC2015. Bonito, MS. 16p.

  • Celik, K., Meral, C., Gursel, A. P., Mehta, P. K., Horvath, A., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2015). Mechanical properties, durability, and life-cycle assessment of self-consolidating concrete mixtures made with blended Portland cements containing fly ash and limestone powder. Cement and Concrete Composites, 56, 59–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Habert, G., Bouzidi, Y., Jullien, A., & Ventura, A. (2010). LCA allocation procedure used as an incitative method for waste recycling: An application to mineral additions in concrete. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(12), 1231–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaia, B., Fantilli, A. P., Guerini, A., Volpatti, G., & Zampini, D. (2014). Eco-mechanical index for structural concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 67(Part C), 386–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CONAMA. (2011). Resolução Nº 436, de 22 de dezembro de 2011. Published in the DOU Nº 247, 26 December 2011.

  • Damineli, B. L., Kemeid, F. M., Aguiar, P. S., & John, V. M. (2010). Measuring the eco-efficiency of cement use. Cement and Concrete Composites, 32(8), 555–562.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Medeiros-Junior, R. A., de Lima, M. G., & de Medeiros, M. H. F. (2015). Service life of concrete structures considering the effects of temperature and relative humidity on chloride transport. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17(5), 1103–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodoo, A., Gustavsson, L., & Sathre, R. (2009). Carbon implications of end-of-life management of building materials. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53, 276–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Y. H., Ng, S. T., Kwan, A. H. K., & Wu, S. K. (2015). Substituting local data for overseas life cycle inventories—A case study of concrete products in Hong Kong. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 414–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelen, A., & Ingwersen, W. (2016). Guidance on data quality assessment for life cycle inventory data. V.1. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). EPA/600/R-16/096. June 2016.

  • EFCA (European Federation of Concrete Admixture Associations). (2002). Environmental declaration superplasticizing admixtures. http://www.admixtures.org.uk/downloads/xIS%20Environmental%20Declaration%20Superplasticizer.PDF. Accessed May 13, 2015.

  • Ehlen, M. A. (2014). Life-365™ service life prediction model™, v, p 2.2.1, users manual.

  • EPE (Empresa de Pesquisa Energética). (2016). Balanço Energético Nacional 2016: Ano base 2015. Rio de Janeiro: EPE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galan, I., Andrade, C., Mora, P., & Sanjuan, M. A. (2010). Sequestration of CO2 by concrete carbonation. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(8), 3181–3186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García-Segura, T., Yepes, V., & Alcalá, J. (2014). Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of blended cement concrete including carbonation and durability. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19, 3–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., De Schryver, A., Struijs, J. & Van Zelm, R. (2013). ReCiPe 2008: A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. Report I: Characterisation. 1st edition (version 1.08). Updated May 2013.

  • Gursel, A. P., Maryman, H., & Ostertag, C. (2016). A life-cycle approach to environmental, mechanical, and durability properties of “green” concrete mixes with rice husk ash. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(Part 1), 823–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gursel, A. P., Masanet, E., Horvath, A., & Stadel, A. (2014). Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: A critical review. Cement and Concrete Composites, 51, 38–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Habert, G. (2013). A method for allocation according to the economic behaviour in the EU-ETS for by-products used in cement industry. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(1), 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingrao, C., Giudice, A. L., Tricase, C., Mbohwa, C., & Rana, R. (2014). The use of basalt aggregates in the production of concrete for the prefabrication industry: Environmental impact assessment, interpretation and improvement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 75, 195–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (International Organization for Standardization). (2006a). Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. ISO 14040.

  • ISO (International Organization for Standardization). (2006b). Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044.

  • ISO (International Organization for Standardization). (2012). Environmental management for concrete and concrete structures: Part 1: General principles. ISO 13315-1.

  • ISO (International Organization for Standardization). (2014). Environmental management for concrete and concrete structures: Part 2: System boundary and inventory data. ISO 13315-2.

  • John, V. M. (2007). Materiais de construção e o Meio Ambiente. In G. C. Isaia (Ed.), Materiais de construção civil e princípios de ciência e engenharia de materiais (Chapter 4). São Paulo: IBRACON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellenberger, D., Althaus, H.-J., Jungbluth N., Künniger T., Lehmann M., & Thalmann P. (2007). Life cycle inventories of building products. Final report ecoinvent data v2.0 No.7 EMPA Dübendorf, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, CH. www.ecoinvent.org.

  • Life-365. (2016). Versão 2.2.1, Service life prediction model. http://www.life-365.org. Accessed November 10, 2015.

  • Marceau, M., & Vangeem, M. G. (2003). Sustainability and slag cement. Slag cement association. http://www.slagcement.org/sustainability/sustainability.html. Accessed May 19, 2015.

  • Marinković, S., Radonjanin, V., Malešev, M., & Ignjatović, I. (2010). Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete. Waste Management, 30(11), 2255–2264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MCTIC (Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações). (2016). Estimativas anuais de emissões de gases de efeito estufa no Brasil (3rd ed.). Brasília: MCTIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2013). Concrete microstructure, properties, and materials (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijers, S. J. H. (2003). Computational modelling of chloride ingress in concrete. PhD Thesis, Delft University, Delft, Netherlands.

  • Miller, S. A., Horvath, A., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2016). Readily implementable techniques can cut annual CO2 emissions from the production of concrete by over 20%. Environmental Research Letters, 11(7), 074029.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MME (Ministério de Minas e Energia). (2009). Relatório Técnico 34 - Perfil da Gipsita. Secretaria de Geologia, mineração e transformação mineral –SGM.

  • O’Brien, K. R., Menache, J., & O’Moore, L. M. (2009). Impact of fly ash content and fly ash transportation distance on embodied greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption in concrete. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 14(7), 621–629.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ožbolt, J., Oršanić, F., & Balabanić, G. (2016). Modelling processes related to corrosion of reinforcement in concrete: Coupled 3D finite element model. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(1), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J.-I., Lee, K.-M., Kwon, S.-O., Bae, S.-H., Jung, S.-H., & Yoo, S.-W. (2016). Diffusion decay coefficient for chloride ions of concrete containing mineral admixtures. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2016, 2042918. doi:10.1155/2016/2042918.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Proske, T., Hainer, S., Rezvani, M., & Graubner, C.-A. (2013). Eco-friendly concretes with reduced water and cement contents—Mix design principles and laboratory tests. Cement and Concrete Research, 51, 38–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg, T., et al. (2004). Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environment International, 30(5), 701–720.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seto, K. E., Panesar, D. K., & Churchill, C. J. (2016). Criteria for the evaluation of life cycle assessment software packages and life cycle inventory data with application to concrete. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1060-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, M. G., Saade, M., & Gomes, V. (2013). Influence of service life, strength and cement type on life cycle environmental performance of concrete. The IBRACON Structures and Materials, 6, 844–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • SimaPro. (2016). Faculty Version 8.2.0.0. PRé Consultants.

  • Struble, L., & Godfrey, J. H. (2004). How sustainable is concrete? In Proceedings of the international workshop on sustainable development and concrete, Beijing. Center for Transportation Research and Education.

  • Tait, M. W., & Cheung, W. M. (2016). A comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of three concrete mix designs. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(6), 847–860.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, S. W., Yao, Y., Andrade, C., & Li, Z. J. (2015). Recent durability studies on concrete structure. Cement and Concrete Research, 78, 143–154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, F. B. (2013). Coupled model of initiation and propagation of corrosion in reinforced concrete. Doctoral Thesis, E.T.S.I. Caminos, Canales y Puertos (UPM), Madrid, Spain.

  • Valipour, M., Yekkalar, M., Shekarchi, M., & Panahi, S. (2014). Environmental assessment of green concrete containing natural zeolite on the global warming index in marine environments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 418–423.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Heede, P., & de Belie, N. (2012). Environmental impact and life cycle assessment (LCA) of traditional and ‘green’ concretes: Literature review and theoretical calculations. Cement and Concrete Composites, 34(4), 431–442.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, D. R., Calmon, J. L., & Coelho, F. Z. F. (2016). Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the manufacturing of common and ecological concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 124, 656–666.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Sun, W., Wu, X., & Gao, B. (2015). The properties of the self-compacting concrete with fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag mineral admixtures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 95, 66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of FAPES (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do ES–Brazil).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Chair in Management of Aeronautical Projects, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivières, 3351, Boul. Des Forges, C.P. 500, Trois-Rivières, QC, G9A 5H7, Canada

    Darli Rodrigues Vieira

  2. Building Information Modeling Laboratory (LABESBIM), Civil Engineering Department, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Avenida Fernando Ferrari, 845, Goiabeiras, Vitória, ES, CEP 29075-053, Brazil

    João Luiz Calmon, Robson Zulcão & Felipe Zanellato Coelho

Authors
  1. Darli Rodrigues Vieira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. João Luiz Calmon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robson Zulcão
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Felipe Zanellato Coelho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darli Rodrigues Vieira.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vieira, D.R., Calmon, J.L., Zulcão, R. et al. Consideration of strength and service life in cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of self-compacting concrete in a maritime area: a study in the Brazilian context. Environ Dev Sustain 20, 1849–1871 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9970-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9970-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation