Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comprehensive benefit evaluation of eco-industrial parks by employing the best-worst method based on circular economy and sustainability

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At the aim of solving the increasing conflicts among the economic growth, resource shortage, and environmental aggravation, the eco-industrial park becomes a significant research issue to achieve sustainable development and circular economy. Therefore, evaluating the comprehensive benefit of eco-industrial parks and providing references and policy formulation in supporting the improvement of construction and management level for eco-industrial parks are of great significance. In this paper, a hybrid framework was proposed to assess the comprehensive benefit of eco-industrial parks in terms of circular economy and sustainability. Firstly, the evaluation index system was constructed by using grey-Delphi method, which included economic benefit criteria, social benefit criteria, and environmental benefit criteria with nine quantitative sub-criteria and four qualitative sub-criteria. Then, a new comparison-based method, namely the best-worst method, was employed to determine the weights of all sub-criteria and the performance values of all selected eco-industrial parks with respect to the qualitative sub-criteria. Finally, five selected representative eco-industrial parks in China were ranked in terms of comprehensive benefit, and the optimal eco-industrial park was selected. According to the results of comprehensive benefit evaluation for eco-industrial parks, the strengths and weaknesses of each eco-industrial park were obvious. At the end, the recommendations for the effective and rapid development of eco-industrial parks were formulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baas, L. W., & Boons, F. A. (2004). An industrial ecology project in practice: Exploring the boundaries of decision-making levels in regional industrial systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(8), 1073–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, A. S. F., & Yong, G. (2004). On the industrial ecology potential in Asian developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(8), 1037–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côté, R. P., & Cohen-Rosenthal, E. (1998). Designing eco-industrial parks: A synthesis of some experiences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 6(3), 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Y., Cote, R. P., & Qin, R. (2007). Industrial sustainability in China: Practice and prospects for eco-industrial development. Journal of Environmental Management, 83(3), 315–328.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, Y., Fu, J., Sarkis, J., et al. (2012). Towards a national circular economy indicator system in China: An evaluation and critical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 23, 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, Y., Liu, Z., Xue, B., et al. (2014). Emergy-based assessment on industrial symbiosis: A case of Shenyang Economic and Technological Development Zone. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(23), 13572–13587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, D., & Deutz, P. (2005). Implementing industrial ecology? Planning for eco-industrial parks in the USA. Geoforum, 36(4), 452–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, D., & Deutz, P. (2007). Reflections on implementing industrial ecology through eco-industrial park development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(17), 1683–1695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H., Zhang, H., Cai, W., et al. (2005). The assessment of the eco-industrial park based on the grey clustering method. Journal-Zhejiang University of Technology, 33, 379–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, Z. (2011). Study on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy integrated evaluation method of eco-industrial parks. Energy Procedia, 5, 1944–1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julong, Deng. (2005). The primary methods of grey system theory. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, S., Dodbiba, G., Chae, S. H., et al. (2013). A novel approach for evaluating the performance of eco-industrial park pilot projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 50–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, A. J. D., & Boons, F. A. (2002). Eco-industrial parks: Stimulating sustainable development in mixed industrial parks. Technovation, 22(8), 471–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, M. (2010). A study on comprehensive evaluation of eco-industrial parks. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., Tang, J., & Zhong, S. (2006). Construction of the evaluation index sign system of the eco-industrial parks. Science-Technology and Management, 4, 67–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., Geng, Y., Ulgiati, S., et al. (2016). Uncovering key factors influencing one industrial park’s sustainability: A combined evaluation method of energy analysis and index decomposition analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q., Jiang, P., Zhao, J., et al. (2011). Life cycle assessment of an industrial symbiosis based on energy recovery from dried sludge and used oil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(15), 1700–1708.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z., Shao, C., Ma, S., et al. (2011). Constructing road safety performance indicators using fuzzy delphi method and grey delphi method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 1509–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, H., Zhang, X., Wu, J., et al. (2016). Sustainability evaluation of a steel production system in China based on emergy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1498–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. S., & Behera, S. K. (2014). Methodological aspects of applying eco-efficiency indicators to industrial symbiosis networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 478–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. S., Rene, E. R., Choi, S. M., et al. (2008). Strategies for sustainable development of industrial park in Ulsan, South Korea—From spontaneous evolution to systematic expansion of industrial symbiosis. Journal of Environmental Management, 87(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, J. (2015a). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, J. (2015b). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. H. (2004). The application of industrial ecology principles and planning guidelines for the development of eco-industrial parks: An Australian case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(8), 997–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, H., Tian, J., & Chen, L. (2012a). China’s quest for eco-industrial parks, Part I. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(1), 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, H., Tian, J., & Chen, L. (2012b). China’s quest for eco-industrial parks, Part II. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(3), 290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, S., & Kapur, A. (2002). Industrial estate planning and management in India—An integrated approach towards industrial ecology. Journal of Environmental Management, 66(1), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, J., Guo, Q., Chen, Y., et al. (2012a). Study on industrial metabolism of carbon in a Chinese fine chemical industrial park. Environmental Science and Technology, 47, 1048–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, J., Liu, W., Lai, B., et al. (2014). Study of the performance of eco-industrial park development in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 486–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, J., Shi, H., Chen, Y., et al. (2012b). Assessment of industrial metabolisms of sulfur in a Chinese fine chemical industrial park. Journal of Cleaner Production, 32, 262–272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, J., Shi, H., Li, X., et al. (2012c). Measures and potentials of energy-saving in a Chinese fine chemical industrial park. Energy, 46, 459–470.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiejun, D. (2010). Two quantitative indices for the planning and evaluation of eco-industrial parks. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, 442–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, L., Liu, X., Liu, X., et al. (2013). Life cycle assessment of water reuse systems in an industrial park. Journal of Environmental Management, 129, 471–478.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor, T., Adam, E., & Bates, M. (2007). Drivers and limitations for the successful development and functioning of EIPs (eco-industrial parks): A literature review. Ecological Economics, 61(2), 199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela-Venegas, G., Salgado, J. C., & Díaz-Alvarado, F. A. (2016). Sustainability indicators for the assessment of eco-industrial parks: Classification and criteria for selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Berkel, R., Fujita, T., Hashimoto, S., et al. (2009). Industrial and urban symbiosis in Japan: Analysis of the Eco-Town program 1997–2006. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(3), 1544–1556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. J. (2014). The evaluation of financial performance for Taiwan container shipping companies by fuzzy TOPSIS. Applied Soft Computing, 22, 28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Ni, W., & Li, Z. (2006). Emergy evaluation of combined heat and power plant eco-industrial park (CHP plant EIP). Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 48, 56–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Xi, C., Zhang, S., et al. (2014). A combination of extended fuzzy AHP and fuzzy GRA for government E-tendering in hybrid fuzzy environment. The Scientific World Journal. doi:10.1155/2014/123675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, G. (2011). Grey relational analysis model for dynamic hybrid multiple attribute decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24, 672–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenbo, L. (2011). Comprehensive evaluation research on circular economic performance of eco-industrial parks. Energy Procedia, 5, 1682–1688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiaomei, Sun, Zhaojie, Cui, Li, Zhu, et al. (2010). Establishment of indicator set for evaluating operating efficiency of eco-industrial parks. China Population, Resources and Environment, 01, 124–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xuebin, Xie, & Changliang, Pan. (2007). Rockburst prediction method based on grey whitenization weight. Journal of Hunan University: Natural Sciences, 34, 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, M. R., & Chien, K. M. (2013). Evaluating the economic performance of high-technology industry and energy efficiency: A case study of science parks in Taiwan. Energies, 6(2), 973–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, F., & Li, Y. (2014). An extended TOPSIS model based on the possibility theory under fuzzy environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 67, 263–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, J. L. (2003). Study on assessment indicator system of eco-industrial park. Environmental Conservation, 3, 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Z., Zhang, L., & Bi, J. (2010). Which is more cost-effective? A comparison of two wastewater treatment models in China–Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1270–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Yuan, Z., Bi, J., et al. (2010). Eco-industrial parks: National pilot practices in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(5), 504–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Zhao, H., & Guo, S. (2016). Evaluating the comprehensive benefit of eco-industrial parks by employing multi-criteria decision making approach for circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, L., Zhou, J., Cui, Z., et al. (2010). A method for controlling enterprises access to an eco-industrial park. Science of the Total Environment, 408(20), 4817–4825.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 71373076).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, #2 Beinong Road, Changping District, Beijing, 102206, China

    Haoran Zhao, Sen Guo & Huiru Zhao

Authors
  1. Haoran Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sen Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Huiru Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sen Guo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, H., Guo, S. & Zhao, H. Comprehensive benefit evaluation of eco-industrial parks by employing the best-worst method based on circular economy and sustainability. Environ Dev Sustain 20, 1229–1253 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9936-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9936-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation