Movement towards a low carbon emitted environment: a test of some factors in Malaysia

  • Abubakar Hamid Danlami
  • Shri-Dewi Applanaidu
  • Rabiul Islam
Article

Abstract

There exists a high global concern in different nations on environmental sustainability especially at the focal stage of increased economic growth and development process due to high level of environmental degradation and pollution. The major aim of this study was to empirically examine how to minimise carbon emissions (CO2) in Malaysia which are mainly caused by energy production, fossil fuel consumption, population density and economic growth. The study adopted the method of autoregressive distributed lag bound testing approach to analyse the data for the period 1971–2011. The study found that economic growth in Malaysia has a direct relationship with CO2 emissions in both the short run and the long run. Similarly, there is a positive relationship between fossil fuel consumption and CO2 emissions over the same period. Population density was found to have positive impacts on CO2 emissions. Contrarily, the relationship between the activities of energy production and pollution is negative in the long run. The study recommends that a targeted GDP growth rate should be set with the consideration to avoid more environmental pollution. In addition, the positive impact of fossil fuel consumption on the environmental pollution implies that there is a need to make and implement policies that will encourage the use of public transportation system more than private transportations. That is, the unnecessary use of private vehicles should be discouraged in order to reduce the extent of fossil fuel consumption.

Keywords

CO2 emissions Economic growth Fossil fuel consumption 

References

  1. Akbostanci, E., Turut-Asik, S., & Tungi, S. (2009). The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: Is there an environmental Kuznet curve? Energy Policy, 37, 861–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akpan, G. E., & Akpan, U. F. (2012). Electricity consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in Nigeria. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 4, 292–306.Google Scholar
  3. Alshehry, A. S., & Belloumi, M. (2015). Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: The case of Saudi Arabia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azam, M., Othman, J., Begum, R. A., Abdullah, S. M. S., & Nor, N. G. M. (2015). Energy consumption and emission projection for the road transport sector in Malaysia: An application of the LEAP model. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18, 1027–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Begum, R. A., Sohag, K., Abdullah, S. M., & Jaafar, M. (2015). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic and population growth in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 594–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benhelal, E., Zahedi, G., Shamsaei, E., & Bahadori, A. (2013). Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 51, 142–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dahalan, J., & Jayaraman, T. K. (2006). Monetary and fiscal policies: A test of effectiveness. Pacific Economic Bulletin, 21, 94–102.Google Scholar
  8. EIA. (2014). Country overview: Malaysia energy analysis. https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/analysis.cfm?iso=MYS.
  9. Heidari, H., Turan, S. K., & Saeidpour, L. (2015). Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and energy consumption in the five ASEAN countries. Electric Power and Energy Systems, 64, 785–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hui, T. S., Abdurrahman, S., & Labadin, J. (2012). Statistical modelling of CO2 emissions in Malaysia and Thailand. International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering Information Technology, 5, 10–15.Google Scholar
  11. Jalil, A., & Mahmud, S. F. (2009). Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy, 37, 5167–5172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lean, H., & Smyth, R. (2013). Disaggregated energy demand by fuel type and economic growth in Malaysia. Discussion paper 43/13 series, Department of economics Monash University.Google Scholar
  13. Lise, W. (2006). Decomposition of CO2 emissions over 1980–2003 in Turkey. Energy Policy, 34, 1841–1852.Google Scholar
  14. MEC. (2011). National energy balance: A publication of energy commission, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  15. MEC. (2012). National energy balance: A publication of Energy commission, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  16. Menyah, K., & Rufael, Y. W. (2010). Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth in South Africa. Energy Economics, 32, 1374–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meratizaman, M., Monadizadeh, S., Pourali, O., & Amidpour, A. (2015). High efficient-low emissions power production from low BTU gas extracted from heavy fuel oil gasification, introduction of IGCC-SOFC process. Journal of Natural Gas and Science Engineering, 23, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Narayan, P. K. (2005). The savings and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 98, 178–191.Google Scholar
  19. Nejat, P., Jomehzadeh, F., Taheri, M., Gohari, M., Abd, M., & Majid, M. Z. (2015). A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 843–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nnaji, C. E., Chukwu, J. O., & Moses, N. (2013). Electricity supply, fossil fuel consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth: Implications and policy options for sustainable development in Nigeria. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 3, 262–271.Google Scholar
  21. Ong, H. C., Mahlia, T. M., & Masjuki, H. H. (2012). A review on energy pattern and policy for transportation sector in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 532–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pesaran, M. H., & Pesaran, B. (1997). Working with Microfit 4.0: Interactive econometric analysis. Oxford: Oxford University press.Google Scholar
  23. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (1996). Testing for the existence of a long run relationship. DAE working paper 9622; University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bound testing approach to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Razak, M. I., Ahmad, I., Bujang, I., Talib, A. H., & Ibrahim, Z. (2013). IPAT—fuzzy model in measuring air pollution: Evidence from Malaysia. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 6, 62–69.Google Scholar
  26. Rui, Z., & Shuang, L. (2011). A study on the development of low-carbon economy in Shandong province-based on empirical analysis on the influence factor of carbon emissions. Energy Procedia, 5, 2152–2159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Salahuddin, M., & Gow, J. (2015). Economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Gulf cooperation council countries. Energy, 73, 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shaari, M. S., Hussaim, N. E., & Isma’i, M. S. (2013). Relationship between energy consumption and economic growth: Empirical evidence for Malaysia. Business Systems Review, 2, 17–28.Google Scholar
  29. Shahbaz, M., Muhammad, Q., Hye, A., Tiwari, A. K., & Leitão, N. C. (2013). Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sohag, K., Begum, R. A., & Abdullah, S. M. S. (2015). Dynamic impact of household consumption on its CO2 emissions in Malaysia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17(5), 1031–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Song, T., Zheng, T., & Tong, I. (2008). An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China. A panel cointegration approach. China Economic Review, 19, 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tan, S. T., Hashim, H., Lim, J. S., Ho, W. S., Lee, C. T., & Yan, J. (2014). Energy and emissions benefits of renewable energy derived from municipal solid waste: Analysis of a low carbon scenario in Malaysia. Applied Energy, 136, 797–804.Google Scholar
  33. Tang, C. F., & Tan, B. W. (2015). The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy, 79, 447–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tiwar, A. K. (2011). Energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth: Evidence from India. Journal of International Business and economy, 12, 85–122.Google Scholar
  35. Umar, M., Dahalan, J., & Aziz, M. I. (2014). The relationship between inflation and exchange rate volatility in Nigeria (1970–2012): Further evidence. ICESS, 219–232.Google Scholar
  36. Wahid, I. N., Aziz, A. A., & Mustapha, N. H. (2013). Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in selected ASEAN countries. Prosiding Perkem, 2, 758–765.Google Scholar
  37. Wang, S. S., Zho, D. Q., Zhou, P., & Wang, Q. W. (2011). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China: A panel data analysis. Energy Policy, 39, 4870–4875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. WDI. (2015). World development indicators databank. www.worldbank.org.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abubakar Hamid Danlami
    • 1
  • Shri-Dewi Applanaidu
    • 1
  • Rabiul Islam
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Economics, Finance and Banking (SEFB), College of Business (COB)Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM)SintokMalaysia
  2. 2.School of International Studies (SOIS), College of Law, Government and International Studies (COLGIS)Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM)SintokMalaysia

Personalised recommendations