Efficiency of common-pool resource institutions: focusing on water users associations in South Africa

Article
  • 122 Downloads

Abstract

Despite of the promulgation of new water laws post-apartheid by the South African government, some parts of the country are still faced with inequitable, inefficient and inadequate water supply. Water institutions in South Africa and other developing countries are faced with various and multi-faceted challenges that consequently lead to their failure to provide water resources effectively. The evident responsibility of governing water resources in developing countries is commonly played by local and national institutions, using the water sector’s fundamental regulations, policies as well as statutory enactments. This paper draws lessons from the international examples to analyse the motivation for WUAs and the challenges they are faced with. The method for data generation used in this article is document analysis. A narrative approach using the literature and document analysis provided an insight into the economic and institutional history of WUAs. The analytical framework to study path dependency and power relations in connection with WUAs in South Africa was drawn from a literature review of transition studies and NIE. This study established that the current and future decisions made by the WUAs in South Africa are not entirely independent of those made in the past under irrigation boards. The study argues that establishing WUAs cannot automatically substitute for the domains of relations which existed within irrigation boards.

Keywords

Water users associations Common-pool resources Water resources management Path dependency 

References

  1. Adhikari, B. (2002). Property rights and natural resource: Socio-economics, heterogeneity and distributional implications of common property resource and management. In EEE Working Paper 3. Environmental Department, University of York, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A. (1999). Greener pastures: Politics, markets, and community among a migrant pastoral people. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Agrawal, B. (2001). Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development, 29(10), 1623–1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aoki, M. (2001). Toward a comparative institutional analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bakker, K. (2007). The “Commons” versus the “Commodity”: Alter-globalization, antiprivatization and the human right to water in the global south. Antipode, 39(3), 430–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baland, J. M., & Platteau, J. P. (1996). Halting degradation of natural resources: Is there a role for rural communities? Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bandaragoda, D. J. (2000). A framework for institutional analysis for water resources management in a river basin context. Colombo: International Water Management Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyd, L., & Tompkins, R. (2012). A new mindset for integrated water quality management for South Africa. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 27(1), 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brajer, V., Church, A. L., Cummings, R., & Farah, P. (1989). The strengths and weaknesses of water markets as they affect water scarcity and sovereignty interests in the west. Natural Resources Journal, 29, 489–509.Google Scholar
  11. Bromley, D. W. (1992). The commons, common property and environmental policy. Environment and Resource Economics, 2, 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brookshire, H., Burness, H. S., Chermak, J. M., & Krause, K. (2002). Urban water demand. Natural Resources Journal, 42, 873–898.Google Scholar
  13. Brousseau, E. (2008). Contracts: from bilateral sets of incentives to the multi-level governance of relations. In E. Brousseau & J. Glachant (Eds.), New institutional economics: A guidebook (pp. 37–66). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brousseau, E., & Glachant, J. (2008). New institutional economics: A guidebook. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, J. (2013). Can participation change the geography of water? Lessons from South Africa. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 271–279. http://0-www.tandfonline.com.wam.seals.ac.za/doi/pdf/10.1080/00045608.2013.754685. Accessed 22/06/2013.
  16. Clifford-Holmes, J. K., De Wet, C., Slinger, J., & Palmer, C. G. (2013). Governance gaps and operational opportunities: Water users association and the challenges of municipal bulk water supply. In The Third Southern African Young Water Professional’s Conference, 1518 July. Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
  17. Debaere, P., Richter, B., Davis, K., Duvall, M., Gephart, J., O’Bannon, C., et al. (2014). Water markets as a response to scarcity. Water Policy, 16, 625–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Coning, C., & Sherwill, T. (2004). An assessment of the water policy process in South Africa (1994 to 2003). Johannesburg: Water Research Commission.Google Scholar
  19. Dinar, A., & Saleth, R. M. (2005). Water institutions reforms: Theory and practice. Water Policy, 7, 1–19.Google Scholar
  20. Duncan, R. (2003). Agricultural and resource economics and economic development in Aboriginal communities. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47(3), 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DWAF. (2003). Guidelines for drafting business and annual plans and annual reports for Water Users Associations. Cradock: The Provincial Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.Google Scholar
  22. Faysse, N. (2004). Challenges for fruitful participation of smallholders in large-scale water resource management organisations: Selected case studies in South Africa. Agrekon, 43(1), 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gandhi, P., & Crase, L. (2009). New institutional economics, governance and the performance of water institutions in India. International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference. Beijing: China. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/51415/2/Contributed-Paper-626-Gandhi-Crase-Iaae2009.pdf. Accessed: 02/07/2013.
  24. Grafton, R. Q., Libecap, G., McGlennon, S., Landry, C., & O’Brien, B. (2011). An integrated assessment of water markets: A cross-country comparison. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5(2), 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hackett, S. C. (2011). Environmental and natural resources economics: Theory, policy, and the sustainable society. New York: M.E Sharpe Inc.Google Scholar
  26. Haigh, E. H., Fox, H. E., & Davies-Coleman, H. D. (2010). Framework for local government to implement integrated water resource management linked to water service delivery. Water SA, 36(4), 475–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heinmiller, B. T. (2009). Path dependency and collective action in common pool governance. International Journal of the Commons, 3(1), 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hickey, S., & Mohan, G. (2004). Participation: From tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  29. IWMI. (2011). Water user’s associations in the context of small holder agriculture. http://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/water_cooperation_2013/pdf/wuas_and_small_holder_agriculture.pdf. Accessed 6/07/2014.
  30. Kapfudzaruwa, F., & Sowman, M. (2009). Is there a role for traditional governance systems in South Africa’s new water management regime? Water SA 35(5), 683–692. http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/wsa/v35n5/a18v35n5.pdf. Accessed 23/03/2013.
  31. Kemerink, J. S., Mendez, L. E., Ahlers, R., Wester, P., & van der Zaag, P. (2013). The question of inclusion and representation in rural South Africa: Challenging the concept of water user associations as a vehicle for transformation. Water Policy, 15, 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Khosa, M. M. (2003). Towards effective delivery: Closing the gap between policy and implementation in South Africa. Johannesburg: The Centre for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  33. Kirsten, J. F., Dorward, A. R., Poulton, C., & Vink, N. (2009). Institutional economics perspectives on African agricultural development. Springer Science and Business Media. http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/oc61abr_0.pdf. Accessed 4/04/2014.
  34. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews (pp. 1–33). Keele: Keele University. http://www.inf.ufsc.br/~aldo.vw/kitchenham.pdf. Accessed 14/1/2016.
  35. Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering—a systematic literature review. Information and SoftwareTechnology, 51(1), 7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009.Google Scholar
  36. Libecap, G. D. (2006). Transaction costs, property rights, and the tools of the new institutional economics: Water rights and water markets. Tucson: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  37. Lieberherr, E. (2009). Policy relevance of new institutional economics? Assessing efficiency, legitimacy and effectiveness. In Discussion paper series on the Coherence between institutions and technologies in infrastructures. http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/151644/files/Lieberherr_NIE.working.paper_11.09.pdf. Accessed 28/01/2013.
  38. LSR-WUA. (2004). Constitution. Sunland: Lower Sundays River Water Users Association.Google Scholar
  39. Meinzen-Dick, R. (2007). Beyond panaceas in water institutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15200–15205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meinzen-Dick, R., Raju, R., & Gulati, A. (2000). What affects organizations and collective action for managing resources? Evidence from canal irrigation systems in India. Washington, DC: IFPRI.Google Scholar
  41. Menard, C., & Saleth, R. M. (2011). The effectiveness of alternative Water Governance Arrangements. In M. Young (Ed.), Towards a green economy (pp. 1–29). Nairobi: United Nations Environment Program.Google Scholar
  42. Mihaiu, D. M., Opreana, A., & Cristescu, M. P. (2010). Efficiency, effectiveness and performance of the public sector. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 4, 122–147.Google Scholar
  43. Miyajima, H., Matsumoto, T., Rhee, Y.-H., & Chang, J. (1992). Studies in modern Korean irrigation. Tokyo: Nihon Hyoron-sha.Google Scholar
  44. Mokgope, K., Pollard, S., & Butterworth, J. (2001). Water resources and water supply for rural communities in the Sand River Catchment, South Africa. In 27th WEDC conference: People and systems for water, sanitation and health, 2024 August. Lusaka, Zambia.Google Scholar
  45. Mukherji, A., Fuleki, B., Shah, T., Suhardiman, D., Giordano, M., & Weligamage, P. (2009). Irrigation reform in Asia: A review of 108 cases of irrigation management transfer. Colombo: International Water Management Institute.Google Scholar
  46. Narain, V. (2004). Brackets and black boxes: Research on water users’ associations. Water Policy, 6, 185–196.Google Scholar
  47. Nash, F. (2012). Participation and passive revolution: The reproduction of neoliberal water governance mechanisms in Durban, South Africa. Antipode, 45(1), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. North, D. (1997). Prologue. In J. K. Drobak & J. V. C. Nye (Eds.), The frontiers of the new institutional economics. California: Academic.Google Scholar
  49. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Orne-Gliemann, M. (2008). Water user associations in South Africa: Balancing flexibility and clarity. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.Google Scholar
  51. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ostrom, E. (2009). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 21–64). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  53. Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. The Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ostrom, E., & Gardner, R. (1993). Coping with asymmetries in the commons: Self-governing irrigation systems can work. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(4), 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Institutional analysis and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  56. Pegram, G., & Mazibuko, G. (2003). Evaluation of the role of water user associations in water management in South Africa. Gezina: Water Research Commission.Google Scholar
  57. Roy, W. (1981). The vesting of interests and the determinants of political power: Size, network structure, and mobilization of American Industries, 1886–1905. American Journal of Sociology, 86(6), 1287–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. RSA. (1997). Water Services Act. (Act No. 108 of 1997). Government Gazette: Pretoria.Google Scholar
  59. RSA (1998). National water act. Pretoria, South Africa: Government Gazette, 19182. Act 38, 26 August 1998.Google Scholar
  60. Saleth, R. M., & Dinar, A. (2004). A cross-country analysis of institutions and performance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sehring, J. (2009). Path dependencies and institutional bricolage in post-Soviet Water governance. Water Alternatives, 2(1), 61–81.Google Scholar
  62. Sethi, R., & Somanathan, E. (1996). The evolution of social norms in common property resource use. The American Economic Review, 86(4), 766–787.Google Scholar
  63. Shah, T., van Koppen, B., Merrey, D., de Lange, M., & Samad, M. (2000). Institutional alternatives in African smallholder irrigation lessons from international experience with irrigation management transfer. Colombo: International Water Management Institute.Google Scholar
  64. Stein, R. (2005). Water law in a democratic South Africa: A country case study examining the introduction of a public rights system. Texax Law Review, 83(7), 2169–2196.Google Scholar
  65. Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity. Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Subramanian, A., Jagannathan, N., & Meinsen-Dick, R. (1997). User organizations for sustainable water services. Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Swyngedouw, E. (2006). Power, water and money: Exploring the Nexus. New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
  68. Thompson, H., Stimie, C. M., Richters, E., & Perret, S. (2001). Policies, legislation and organizations related to water in South Africa, with special reference to the Olifants river basin. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute. Working Paper 18 (South Africa Working Paper No. 7).Google Scholar
  69. Tropp, H. (2007). Water governance: Trends and needs for new capacity development. Water Policy, 9(Supplement 2), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Van der Zaag, P., & Savenije, H. H. G. (2006). Water as an economic good: The value of pricing and the failure of markets. Research Report Series No. 19: UNESCO-IH Institute of Water Education.Google Scholar
  71. Van Steenbergen, F. (2013). On Water User Associations (WUAs). The Water Channel. http://www.thewaterchannel.tv/thewaterblog/147-on-water. Accessed 13/01/2014.
  72. Williamson, O. E. (1998). The institutions of governance. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 75–79.Google Scholar
  73. Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economist: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wilson, A., & Perret, S. (2010). Participation in water resources and services governance in South Africa: Caught in the act. In K. A. Berry (Ed.), Social participation in water governance and management: Critical and global perspectives (pp. 183–200). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  75. Yang, H., Reichert, P., Abbaspour, K., & Zehnder, A. (2003). A water resources threshold and its implications for food security. Environmental Science and Technology, 37, 3048–3053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Okavango Research InstituteUniversity of BotswanaMaunBotswana

Personalised recommendations