Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 233–253 | Cite as

Behavioral intentions toward genetically modified crops in Southwest Iran: a multi-stakeholder analysis

Article

Abstract

This study examined the influencing factors of the self-reported behavioral intentions toward genetically modified (GM) crops using a multi-stakeholder approach in the Khuzestan Province in Southwest Iran. The study focused on three different groups, including: “agricultural students,” “agricultural private firms’ managers” and “rich-resource farmers.” Data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire and was analyzed by SPSS (V20) and AMOS (V20). Results indicated that the respondents perceive more benefits than risks for GM crops and that the perception of benefits and risks, respectively, had positive and negative impacts on the self-reported behavioral intention of the respondents. The knowledge of the respondents regarding these crops had positive impacts on perception of benefits. The results showed that both managers and students worried about the food safety and impact of GM crops on human health while farmers worried about the environmental risks of GM crops. The results also revealed that those who are the most conscious about GM crops are more trusted. The findings also showed that the majority of the respondents hold a positive view of the potential of GM crops.

Keywords

Food security Biotechnology Perception Adoption Agricultural development Behavioral intention 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Ms. Bethany Gardner from the Department of Linguistics, Binghamton University for her kind help in improving the English of this text.

References

  1. Aerni, P. (2002). Public attitudes towards agricultural biotechnology in South Africa. Final report, a joint research project of the Center of International Development (CID) (pp. 1–30). Harvard University, USA, and the Southern African Labour and Development Research Unit (SALDRU), University of Cape Town, South Africa.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amin, L., Azad, M. A. K., Gausmian, M. H., & Zulkifli, F. (2014). Determinants of public attitudes to genetically modified salmon. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e86174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amin, L., Md Jahi, J., & Md Nor, A. R. (2013). Stakeholders’ attitude to genetically modified foods and medicine. The Scientific World Journal, 2013, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amin, L., Noor, A. A. A., Jamil, A., Hasrizul, H., Abdul, L. S., & Mohamad, S. H. (2011). Ethical perception of synthetic biology. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(58), 12469–12480.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, J. C., Wachenheim, C. J., & Lesch, W. C. (2007). Perceptions of genetically modified and organic foods and processes. AgBioForum, 9(3), 180–194.Google Scholar
  7. Angulo, A. M., & Gil, J. M. (2007). Spanish consumers’ attitudes and acceptability towards GM food products. Agricultural Economics Review, 8(1), 50.Google Scholar
  8. Azadi, H., Ghanian, M., Ghoochani, O. M., Khachak, P. R., Taning, C. N., & Hajivand, R. Y., et al. (2015). Genetically modified crops: Towards agricultural growth, agricultural development or agricultural sustainability? Food Reviews International, 31(3), 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Azadi, H., & Ho, P. (2010). Genetically modified and organic crops in developing countries: A review of options for food security. Biotechnology Advances, 28(1), 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Azzam, Z. A. (2013). Managers’ perspective towards perceived risks associated with technology based self services a case of-Jordan Banks. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(11), 46–64.Google Scholar
  11. Bazuin, S., Azadi, H., & Witlox, F. (2011). Application of GM crops in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons learned from green revolution. Biotechnology Advances, 29(6), 908–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brankov, T. P., Sibalija, T., Lovre, K., Cvijanovic, D., & Subic, J. (2013). The impact of biotechnology knowledge on the acceptance of genetically modified food in Serbia. Romanian Biotechnological Letters, 18(3), 8295–8306.Google Scholar
  13. Bredahl, L. (2001). Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods—Results of a cross-national survey. Consumer Policy, 24(1), 23–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bredahl, L., Grunert, K. G., & Frewer, L. J. (1998). Consumer attitudes and decision-making with regard to genetically engineered food products—A review of the literature and a presentation of models for future research. Journal of Consumer Policy, 21(3), 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buah, J. (2011). Public perception of genetically modified food in Ghana JN Buah. American Journal of Food Technology, 6(7), 541–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen, M.-F. (2008). An integrated research framework to understand consumer attitudes and purchase intentions toward genetically modified foods. British Food Journal, 110(6), 559–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, M.-F., & Li, H.-L. (2007). The consumer’s attitude toward genetically modified foods in Taiwan. Food Quality and Preference, 18(4), 662–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chuang, S.-C., Kao, D. T., Cheng, Y.-H., & Chou, C.-A. (2012). The effect of incomplete information on the compromise effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(2), 196.Google Scholar
  19. Costa-Font, M., & Gil, J. M. (2009). Structural equation modelling of consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food in the Mediterranean Europe: A cross country study. Food Quality and Preference, 20(6), 399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Costa-Font, M., Gil, J. M., & Traill, W. B. (2008). Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy. Food Policy, 33(2), 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Dominicis, S., Fornara, F., Cancellieri, U. G., Twigger-Ross, C., & Bonaiuto, M. (2015). We are at risk, and so what? Place attachment, environmental risk perceptions and preventive coping behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2009). Agricultural growth and poverty reduction: Additional evidence. The World Bank Research Observer, 25, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Delwaide, A.-C., Nalley, L. L., Dixon, B. L., Danforth, D. M., Nayga, R. M., Jr., Van Loo, E. J., et al. (2015). Revisiting GMOs: Are there differences in European consumers’ acceptance and valuation for cisgenically versus transgenically bred rice? PLoS ONE, 10(5), e0126060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Devos, Y., Demont, M., Dillen, K., Reheul, D., Kaiser, M., & Sanvido, O. (2009). Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29(1), 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dona, A., & Arvanitoyannis, I. S. (2009). Health risks of genetically modified foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 49(2), 164–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Earle, T., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2001). The influence of trust and confidence on perceived risks and cooperation (EMC Zurich Symposium ed.). Electromagnetic Compatibility Supplement, Zurich: ETH–IKT (pp. 183–184).Google Scholar
  27. Frewer, L., Lassen, J., Kettlitz, B., Scholderer, J., Beekman, V., & Berdal, K. G. (2004). Societal aspects of genetically modified foods. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 42(7), 1181–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ghanian, M., Ghoochani, O. M., Kitterlin, M., Jahangiry, S., Zarafshani, K., & Van Passel, S. (2015). Attitudes of agricultural experts toward genetically modified crops: A case study in Southwest Iran. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(2), 509–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ghanian, M., Ghoochani, O. M., Kitterlin, M., Jahangiry, S., Zarafshani, K., Van Passel, S., et al. (2016). Attitudes of agricultural experts toward genetically modified crops: A case study in Southwest Iran. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(2), 509–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ghasemi, S., Karami, E., & Azadi, H. (2013). Knowledge, attitudes and behavioral intentions of agricultural professionals toward genetically modified (GM) foods: A case study in Southwest Iran. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 1201–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ghoochani, O., Ghanian, M., Baradaran, M., & Azadi, H. (2016a). Factors influencing Stakeholders™ behavioral intention toward Bt rice in Iran. GMO Biosafety Research, 6, 1–7.Google Scholar
  32. Ghoochani, O. M., Ghanian, M., Baradaran, M., & Azadi, H. (2016b). Multi Stakeholders’ attitudes toward Bt rice in Southwest, Iran: Application of TPB and multi attribute models. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1–23.Google Scholar
  33. Giger, E., Prem, R., Leen, M. (2009). Increase of agricultural production based on genetically modified food to meet population growth demands. School of Doctoral Studies (European Union) Journal, 1, 98–124.Google Scholar
  34. Gilbert, N. (2013). A hard look at GM crops. Nature, 497(7447), 24–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  36. Hall, C. (2008). Identifying farmer attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) crops in Scotland: Are they pro-or anti-GM? Geoforum, 39(1), 204–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hall, C., Toma, L., & Moran, D. (2009). Investigation of the factors influencing adoption of GM crops at country level. In 2009 Conference, August 16–22, 2009, Beijing, China (No. 50366). International Association of Agricultural Economists.Google Scholar
  38. Han, J. H. (2006). The effects of perceptions on consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) foods (Doctoral dissertation, Chonnam National University).Google Scholar
  39. Henry, J. W., & Stone, R. W. (1994). A structural equation model of end-user satisfaction with a computer-based medical information system. IRMJ, 7(3), 21–33.Google Scholar
  40. Hosseini, S. J. F., Ehsani, V., & Lashgarara, F. (2011). Exploiting the application of genetically modified crops by farmers in Iran. American Journal of Scientific Research, 7, 138–144.Google Scholar
  41. House, L., Lusk, J., Jaeger, S., Traill, W. B., Moore, M., Valli, C., Morrow, B., & Yee, W. M. S. (2004). Objective and subjective knowledge: Impacts on consumer demand for genetically modified foods in the United States and the European Union. AgBioForum, 7(3), 113–123.Google Scholar
  42. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Huang, J., Qiu, H., Bai, J., & Pray, C. (2006). Awareness, acceptance of and willingness to buy genetically modified foods in Urban China. Appetite, 46(2), 144–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kim, R. B. (2012). Consumer attitude of risk and benefits toward genetically modified (GM) foods in South Korea: Implications for food policy. Engineering Economics, 23(2), 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Koenig-Lewis, N., Palmer, A., Dermody, J., & Urbye, A. (2014). Consumers’ evaluations of ecological packaging—Rational and emotional approaches. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lucht, J. M. (2015). Public acceptance of plant biotechnology and GM crops. Viruses, 7(8), 4254–4281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martinez-Poveda, A., Molla-Bauza, M. B., del Campo Gomis, F. J., & Martinez, L. M.-C. (2009). Consumer-perceived risk model for the introduction of genetically modified food in Spain. Food Policy, 34(6), 519–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  50. Morrow, B. H. (2009). Risk behavior and risk communication: Synthesis and expert interviews. Final Report for the NOAA Coastal Services Center (p. 53).Google Scholar
  51. Nganje, W., Wachenhiem, C., & Lesch, W. (2009). A comparison between perception of risk and willingness to serve genetically modified foods. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 40(2), 57–71.Google Scholar
  52. Pino, G., Amatulli, C., De Angelis, M., & Peluso, A. M. (2016). The influence of corporate social responsibility on consumers’ attitudes and intentions toward genetically modified foods: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2861–2869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Prati, G., Pietrantoni, L., & Zani, B. (2012). The prediction of intention to consume genetically modified food: Test of an integrated psychosocial model. Food Quality and Preference, 25(2), 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Qaim, M., & De Janvry, A. (2003). Genetically modified crops, corporate pricing strategies, and farmers’ adoption: The case of Bt cotton in Argentina. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(4), 814–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ravallion, M. (2013). How long will it take to lift one billion people out of poverty? The World Bank Research Observer, 28(2), 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rogers, E. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). London: The free press, A Division of Macmillan publishing co. Inc.Google Scholar
  57. Rudi, L.-M., Azadi, H., & Witlox, F. (2012). Reconcilability of socio-economic development and environmental conservation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Global and Planetary Change, 86, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schnettler, B., Miranda, H., Sepúlveda, J., & Denegri, M. (2012). Consumer preferences of genetically modified foods of vegetal and animal origin in Chile. Food Science and Technology (Campinas), 32(1), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Senarath, S. N., & Karunagoda, R. P. (2012). Consumer attitude towards labeling of genetically modified foods in Sri Lanka. Tropical Agricultural Research, 23(3), 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sharma, R. (2012). Ensuring the success of feed the future: Analysis and recommendations on gender integration. Global Agricultural Development Initiative Issue Briefs are published by The Chicago Council on Global Affairs. http://www.thechicagocouncil.org/UserFiles/File/GlobalAgDevelopment/Issue_Briefs/GADI%20Issue%20Brief%20-%20FtF%20and%20Gender%20Integration%20-%20FINAL.pdf.
  62. Shew, A. M., Nalley, L. L., Danforth, D. M., Dixon, B. L., Nayga, R. M., Delwaide, A. C., et al. (2016). Are all GMOs the same? Consumer acceptance of cisgenic rice in India. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 14(1), 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Siegrist, M., Cousin, M.-E., Kastenholz, H., & Wiek, A. (2007). Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust. Appetite, 49(2), 459–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Siegrist, M., & Cvetkovich, G. (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 20(5), 713–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Soregaroli, C., Boccaletti, S., & Moro, D. (2003). Consumer’s attitude towards labeled and unlabeled GM food products in Italy. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 6(2), 111–127.Google Scholar
  66. Tegegne, F., Aziz, A. N., Bhavsar, H., & Wiemers, R. (2013). Awareness of and attitudes towards biotechnology by Tennessee State University students with different backgrounds and majors. Journal of Biotech Research, 5, 16–23.Google Scholar
  67. Traill, W. B., Jaeger, S. R., Yee, W. M. S., Valli, C., House, L. O., Lusk, J. L., et al. (2004). Categories of GM risk-benefit perceptions and their antecedents. AgBioForum, 7(4), 176–186.Google Scholar
  68. Tsourgiannis, L., Karasavvoglou, A., & Florou, G. (2011). Consumers’ attitudes towards GM free products in a European region. The case of the prefecture of Drama–Kavala–Xanthi in Greece. Appetite, 57(2), 448–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. van Lieshout, E., & Dawson, V. (2016). Knowledge of, and attitudes towards health-related biotechnology applications amongst Australian year 10 high school students. Journal of Biological Education, 50(3), 1–16.Google Scholar
  70. Verdurme, A., & Viaene, F. (2003). Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified food. Qualitative Market Research, 6(2), 11–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Verma, C., Nanda, S., Singh, R. K., Singh, R. B., & Mishra, S. (2011). A review on impacts of genetically modified food on human health. The Open Nutraceuticals Journal, 4(1), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wang, N., Houston, J. E., Colson, G., & Liu, Z. (2015). Consumer attitudes toward the use of gene technology in breakfast products: Comparison between college students from the US and China. Journal of Food Research, 4(6), 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wunderlich, S., & Gatto, K. A. (2015). Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information. Advances in Nutrition: An International Review Journal, 6(6), 842–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhang, M., & Liu, G. L. (2015). The effects of consumer’s subjective and objective knowledge on perceptions and attitude towards genetically modified foods: Objective knowledge as a determinant. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 50(5), 1198–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural Extension and EducationRamin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of KhuzestanAhvazIran
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural Extension and EducationTehran UniversityTehranIran
  3. 3.Centre for Environmental SciencesHasselt UniversityHasseltBelgium
  4. 4.Economics and Rural DevelopmentGembloux Agro-Bio Tech (ULg)GemblouxBelgium
  5. 5.Department of GeographyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations