The integrated landscape approach is re-emerging in the global agenda as an approach which can give a fair deal to landscape functions such as climate change response, biodiversity conservation, food security, poverty reduction and economic growth. However, transformational change might be required to enable landscapes respond to these different functions. This is due to the sensitive nature of landscapes to local, national and global economic, social and political drivers. Based on national policy instruments, this paper presents a situational analysis of the landscape concept in Cameroon, operationalized as Technical Operation Units (TOUs) and in the context of the present institutional, social, economic and political features, it examines the rationale for a landscape approach in Cameroon. We notice potential trade-offs, indicating that the landscape approach is an opportunity for TOUs in Cameroon. Firstly, TOUs are characterized by multiple resource regimes with overlapping claims each having a legal land allocation and management plan. Secondly, TOUs are characterized by different stakeholders, with different land-use interests and motives, each controlling key components in the landscapes. Thirdly, the interests and motives of stakeholders overlap spatially and are connected to different sectoral policies at the national level. This setting might threaten decision making and the sustainability potentials of landscapes. Nonetheless, we propose areas for in-depth studies to generate knowledge and information to orientate win–win policy construction for landscapes. This is relevant for the social, ecological and economic objectives that underpin the sustainable development goals proposed in the post-2015 development agenda.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Arnold, M., Powell, B., Shanley, P., & Sunderland, T. C. H. (2011). Editorial: Forests, biodiversity and food security. International Forestry Review, 13, 259–264.
Castella, J.-C., Douangsavanh, L., Messerli, P., & Weyerhaeuser, H. (2009). Global agendas versus local realities. Bonn: Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Changes Meeting.
CBFP. (2006). The forests of the Congo basin—State of the forest 2006, Congo Basin Forest partnership. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
CBFP. (2008). The forests of the Congo basin—State of the forest 2008, Congo Basin Forest partnership. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
De Blas, E., Ruiz-Pérez, M., & Vermeulen, C. (2011). Management conflicts in Cameroonian community forests. Ecology and Society, 1, 1–19.
Eba’a Atyi, R., Lescuyer, G., Ngouhouo, P. J., & Moulendè., F. T. (2013). Étude de l’importance économique et sociale du secteur forestier et faunique au Cameroun—Rapport final. CIFOR.
Endamana, D., Boedhihartono, A. K., Bokoto, B., Defo, L., Eyebe, A., Ndikumagenge, C., & Sayer, J. A. (2010). A framework for assessing conservation and development in a Congo Basin Forest landscape. Tropical Conservation Science, 3, 262–281.
Funoh, K. N. (2014). The impacts of artisanal gold mining on local livelihoods and the environment in the forested areas of Cameroon. CIFOR working paper no. 150. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
German, L. (2012). Governance and large-scale investments in forested landscapes. ETFRN news no. 53.
German, L., Schoneveld, G., & Mwangi, E. (2011a). Processes of large-scale land acquisition by investors: Case studies from sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 6–8). Brighton: International Conference on Global Land Grabbing, University of Sussex.
German, L., Schoneveld, G. C., & Pacheco, P. (2011b). Local social and environmental impacts of biofuels: Global comparative assessment and implications for governance. Ecology & Society, 16(4), 29. doi:10.5751/ES-04516-160429.
Gibson, L., Lee, T. M., Koh, L. P., Brook, B. W., Gardner, T. A., Barlow, J., et al. (2011). Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature, 478, 378–381.
Gignoux, J., Davies, I. D., Flint, S. R., & Zucker, J.-D. (2011). The ecosystem in practice: Interest and problems of an old definition for constructing ecological models. Ecosystems, 14, 1039–1054.
GoC. (1994). Law No. 94-01 of 20 January 1994 to lay down forestry, wildlife and fisheries regulations. Yaounde: Government of Cameroon.
GoC. (1995). Decree No. 95-531-PM of 23 August 1995 to determine the conditions for implementation of forestry regulations. Yaounde: Goverment of Cameroon.
GoC. (2005). Decree No. 2005/495 of 31 December 2005 amending and supplementing certain provisions of Decree No. 2005/099 of 6 April 2005. Yaounde, Cameroon: Government of Cameroon.
GoC. (2013). Cameroon Vision 2035. Working Paper. Ministry of the Economy, Planning and Regional Development. Yaounde: Government of Cameroon.
Görg, C. (2007). Landscape governance: The “politics of scale” and the “natural” conditions of places. Geoforum, 38, 954–966.
Haber, W. (2004). Landscape ecology as a bridge from ecosystems to human ecology. Ecological Research, 19, 99–106.
Hett, C., Castella, J.-C., Heinimann, A., Messerli, P., & Pfund, J.-L. (2012). A landscape mosaics approach for characterizing swidden systems from a REDD+ perspective. Applied Geography, 32, 608–618.
Hilson, G., & Murck, B. (2000). Sustainable development in the mining industry: Clarifying the corporate perspective. Resources Policy, 26, 227–238.
Holmgren, P. (2013). Landscapes: Solutions for Sustainable Development. CIFORs Director Generals Presentation. http://www.slideshare.net/ifpri/holmgren-ifpri-washington-24-june-2013. Accessed 25 Apr. 2014.
Jenkins, H. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and the mining industry: Conflicts and constructs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11, 23–34.
Kanowski, P. (2014). To set priorities for research, ask the right questions. http://blog.cifor.org/22157/to-set-priorities-for-research-ask-the-right-questions. Accessed 24 May 2014.
Kitula, A. (2006). The environmental and socio-economic impacts of mining on local livelihoods in Tanzania: A case study of Geita District. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 405–414.
Klooster, D., & Masera, O. (2000). Community forest management in Mexico: Carbon mitigation and biodiversity conservation through rural development. Global Environmental Change, 10, 259–272.
Locatelli, B., Kanninen, M., Brockhaus, M., Colfer, C. J. P., Murdiyarso, D., & Santoso, H. (2008). Facing an uncertain future: How forest and people can adapt to climate change. Indonesia, Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
Nasi, R., Taber, A., & Van Vliet, N. (2011). Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the congo and Amazon Basins. International Forestry Review, 13, 355–368.
Oyono, P. R. (2004). The social and organisational roots of ecological uncertainties in Cameroon’s forest management decentralisation model. European Journal of Development Research, 16, 174–191.
Oyono, P. R. (2005). Profiling local-level outcomes of environmental decentralizations: The case of Cameroon’s forests in the Congo Basin. Journal of Environment and Development, 14, 317–331.
Pacheco, P., Aguilar-Støen, M., Börner, J., Etter, A., Putzel, L., & Diaz, M. D. C. V. (2010). Landscape transformation in tropical Latin America: Assessing trends and policy implications for REDD+. Forests, 2, 1–29.
Pfund, J.-L. (2010). Landscape-scale research for conservation and development in the tropics: Fighting persisting challenges. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 117–126.
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 10, 2417–2431.
Reed, J., Deakin, L., & Sunderland, T. (2014). What are ‘Integrated Landscape Approaches’ and how effectively have they been implemented in the tropics: A systematic map protocol. Environmental Evidence. doi:10.1186/2047-2382-4-2
Rodrigues, A. S. L., Ewers, R. M., Parry, L., Souza, C, Jr, Verissimo, A., & Balmford, A. (2009). Boom-and-bust development patterns across the Amazon deforestation frontier. Science, 324, 1435–1437.
Sandker, M., Campbell, B. M., Nzooh, Z., Sunderland, T., Amougou, V., Defo, L., & Sayer, J. (2009). Exploring the effectiveness of integrated conservation and development interventions in a Central African forest landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18, 2875–2892.
Sayer, J. (2009). Reconciling conservation and development: Are landscapes the answer? Biotropica, 41, 649–652.
Sayer, J., & Campbell, B. M. (2004). The science of sustainable development: Local livelihoods and the global environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sayer, J., Margules, C., Boedhihartono, A. K., Dale, A., Sunderland, T., Supriatna, J., et al. (2014). Landscape approaches; What are the pre-conditions for success? Sustainability Science. doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0281-5
Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J.-L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., et al. (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 8349–8356.
Smith, R. J., Verissimo, D., Leader-Williams, N., Cowling, R. M., & Knight, A. T. (2009). Let the locals lead. Nature, 462, 280–281.
Somorin, O. A., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., Arts, B., Sonwa, D. J., & Tiani, A.-M. (2014). REDD+ policy strategy in Cameroon: Actors, institutions and governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 35, 87–97.
Sonwa, D. J., Somorin, O. A., Jum, C., Bele, M. Y., & Nkem, J. N. (2012). Vulnerability, forest-related sectors and climate change adaptation: The case of Cameroon. Forest Policy and Economics, 23, 1–9.
Spittlehouse, D. L., & Stewart, R. B. (2004). Adaptation to climate change in forest management. Journal of Ecosystems and Management, 4, 1–11.
Stewart, R. E., Desai, A., & Walters, L. C. (2011). Wicked environmental problems: Managing uncertainty and conflict. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Sunderland, T. C. H. (2011). Food security: Why is biodiversity important? International Forestry Review, 13, 265–274.
Sunderland, T. C. H., Powell, B., Ickowitz, A., Foli, S., Pinedo-Vasquez, M., Nasi, R., & Padoch, C. (2013). Food security and nutrition: The role of forests. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
Tsanga, R., Lescuyer, G., & Cerutti, P. (2014). What is the role for forest certification in improving relationships between logging companies and communities? Lessons from FSC in Cameroon. International Forestry Review, 16, 14–22.
The paper originates from the project proposal development process related to landscapes, within the framework of the Congo Basin Forest and Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation (COBAM) project, implemented by CIFOR and funded by the AfDB and CEEAC through the COMIFAC-PACEBCo program. The views expressed in this paper remain those of the authors and not of the donors or the affiliated organizations.
About this article
Cite this article
Chia, E.L., Sufo, R.K. A situational analysis of Cameroon’s Technical Operation Units (TOUs) in the context of the landscape approach: critical issues and perspectives. Environ Dev Sustain 18, 951–964 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9688-0
- Landscape functions
- Multiple sectors
- Multiple actors
- Landscape approach
- Technical Operation Units