Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding inter-community performance assessments in community-based resource management at Avu Lagoon, Ghana

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Community-based natural resources governance (CBNRG) is becoming increasingly important as a means to achieve both conservation and sustainable livelihood goals. Assessing the performance of such approaches is an important step in improving their performance and facilitating their expansion. However, CBNRG initiatives are often not restricted to one community, and significant differences may exist among communities that can be obscured using performance assessments that do not attend to those differences. This paper first assesses the performance of the Avu Lagoon Community Resource Management Area (CREMA) in Ghana through a survey of 232 households and an 18 participant workshop that compares desired outcomes with those outcomes that were perceived to have been achieved (i.e. performance). This paper next examines the differences among four communities within the Avu Lagoon CREMA and provides some insight as to why these differences occur. Results indicate that overall, achieved outcomes fall short of desired outcomes. This is particularly the case for socio-economic outcomes and less so for conservation outcomes. We also find that communities are more homogenous in their desired outcomes than they are in their assessment of performance outcomes. There are important differences among the four communities in terms of the importance attached to outcomes and the achievement of those outcomes. Influential variables include how and who introduced the CBNRG concept to the local communities, existing socio-economic and cultural context, the development status and challenges of the community, effective leadership, and institutional capabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This research was conducted as part of a larger research programme entitled ‘Protected Areas and Poverty Reduction: A Canada-Africa Research and Learning Alliance (PAPR)’. Funding for PAPR comes from Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the International Development Research Centre under the International Community-University Research Alliance Program.

  2. Ramsar sites are designated wetlands of international importance.

  3. In Ghana, communities and villages are so-called or described depending on the population of the settlement. Villages tend to be settlements (clustered or dispersed) that have smaller populations. On the other hand, communities are settlements with much higher populations and a higher mix of persons who are not necessarily related in terms of family, clan, religion, or any other characteristic.

  4. The population of the four communities was estimated by the writer using 2000 population figures by the Ghana Statistical Service for the locality and the district. Projection was made with 2010 district figures and the 2000 figures to arrive at this estimate.

  5. A community that is transitioning from rural to urban setting.

  6. To avoid bias, the research assistant team was constituted mostly by local people that were not directly involved with the CREMA process. In addition, those who were members of CREMA communities did not survey their own communities.

  7. Community Resource Management Committee is the governance unit at the individual CREMA community level.

References

  • Abalo, J., Varela, J., & Manzano, V. (2007). Importance values for importance-performance analysis: A formula for spreading out values derived from preference rankings. Journal of Business Research, 60(2), 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, W. M., Aveling, R., Brockington, D., Dickson, B., Elliott, J., Hutton, J., & Wolmer, W. (2004). Biodiversity conservation and eradication of poverty. Science Magazine, 306(5699), 1146–1149.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, W. M., & Hutton, J. (2007). People, parks and poverty: Political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conservation and Society, 5, 147–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D. (2005). Adaptive capacity and community-based natural resource management. Environmental Management, 35(6), 703–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, C., & Hussein, K. (2000). Developing methodologies for livelihood impact assessment: Experience of the African Wildlife Foundation in East Africa. Overseas Development Institute.

  • Baird, I., & Dearden, P. (2003). Biodiversity conservation and resource tenure regimes: A case study from NE Cambodia. Environmental Management, 32, 541–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C., Brandon, K., Gibson, C., & Gjertsen, H. (2011). Conserving tropical biodiversity amid weak institutions (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1847716). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1847716.

  • Boudreaux, K. C. (2010). Community conservation in Namibia: Devolution as a tool for legal empowerment of the poor: Working paper No 10–64 Mercatus Centre George Mason University.

  • Boudreaux, K., & Nelson, F. (2011). Community conservation in Namibia: Empowering the poor with property rights. Oxford: Institute of Economic Affairs, Blackwell Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockelman, W. Y., & Dearden, P. (1990). The role of nature trekking in conservation: A case study in Thailand. Environmental Conservation, 17(2), 141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosius, J. P., Tsing, A. L., & Zerner, C. (1998). Representing communities: Histories and politics of community-based natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 11(2), 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buizer, M., Arts, B., Kok, K. (2011). Governance, Scale and the Environment: The Importance of Recognising Knowledge Claims in Trans-Disciplinary Arenas. Resilience Alliance.

  • Christie, P. (2004). Marine protected areas as biological successes and social failures in Southeast Asia. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 42, 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee, R., & Song, A. M. (2012). Institutional thinking in fisheries governance: Broadening perspectives. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(3), 309–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearden, P. (1995). Biocultural diversity and development in Northern Thailand. Applied Geography, 15, 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearden, P. (1996). Development, the environment and social differentiation in Northern Thailand. In J. Rigg (Ed.), Counting the costs: Environmental growth and economic change (pp. 111–130). Singapore: ISEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearden, P., & Harron, S. (1994). Alternative tourism and adaptive change. Annals of Tourism Research, 21(1), 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, W. (2007). Using a revised importance-performance analysis approach: The case of taiwanese hot springs tourism. Tourism Management, 28(5), 1274–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, P. J., Hanauer, M. M., & Sims, K. R. E. (2011). Conditions associated with protected area success in conservation and poverty reduction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(34), 13913–13918.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. C., & Koontz, T. (1998). When “Community” is not enough: Institutions and values in community-based forest management in Southern Indiana. Human Ecology, 26(4)

  • Hauzer, M., Dearden, P., & Murray, G. (2013). The effectiveness of community-based governance of small-scale fisheries, Ngazidja Island, Comoros. Marine Policy, 38, 346–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornback, K. E., & Eagles, P. F. J. (1999). Guidelines for public use measurement and reporting at parks and protected areas. IUCN.

  • https://community.iucn.org/rba1/Pages/conservation.aspx#Question1. (n.d.).

  • Hutton, J., Adams, W. M., & Murombedzi, J. C. (2005). Back to the barriers? Changing narratives in biodiversity conservation. Forum for Development Studies, 32(2), 341–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igoe, J. (2006). Measuring the costs and benefits of conservation to local communities. Journal of Ecological Anthropology, 10(1), 72–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. T. (2004).CBNRM, poverty reduction and sustainable livelihoods: Developing criteria for evaluating the contribution of CBNRM to Poverty Reduction and Alleviation in Southern Africa (No. 7) (pp. 1–41). Zimbabwe: Centre for Allied Social Sciences University of Zimbabwe.

  • Jones, B. T., & Murphree, M. W. (2004). Community-based natural resource management as a conservation mechanism: Lessons and directions. In Biodiversity, rural development and the bottom line (Vol. 1, pp. 63–103). London: Earthscan.

  • Jones, B., & Weaver, L. C. (2009). Community-based natural resource management in Namibia: Growth, trends, lessons and constraints. In H. Suich, B. Child, & A. Spenceley (Eds.), Evolution and innovation in wildlife conservation: Parks and game ranches to transfrontier conservation areas. UK: Earthscan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, M. (2005). Integration of natural area values: conceptual foundations and methodological approaches. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 12 (Supplementary Issue), 8.

  • Marks, S. A. (2001). Back to the future: Some unintended consequences of Zambia’s community-based wildlife program (ADMADE). Africa Today, 48(1), 120–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. I., & Boucher, T. M. (2011). Global development and the future of the protected area strategy. Biological Conservation, 144(1), 383–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muruvi, W. (2011). Assessing community conditions that facilitate implementation of participatory poverty reduction strategies (Thesis). Ontario: Guelph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton-Treves, L., Holland, M. B., & Brandon, K. (2005). The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 219–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCRC. (2008). Socio-cultural study of the Avu lagoon communities in volta region, Ghana.

  • Noss, R. F., Dobson, A. P., Baldwin, R., Beier, P., Davis, C. R., Dellasala, D. A., & Tabor, G. (2012). Bolder thinking for conservation. Conservation Biology, 26(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oates, J. F. (1999). Myth and reality in the rainforest: How conservation strategies are failing in Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, R., FitzGibbon, J. (2006). People matter: The importance of social capital in the co-management of natural resources. In Natural Resources Forum (Vol. 30, pp. 51–62).

  • Randall, C., & Rollins, R. B. (2009). Visitor perceptions of the role of tour guides in natural areas. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(3), 357–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L. W., Bennett, N., King, L. A., & Murray, G. (2012). We want our children to grow up to see these animals: Values and protected areas governance in Canada. Ghana and Tanzania. Human Ecology, 40(4), 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, D., & Elliott, J. (2004). Poverty reduction and biodiversity conservation: Rebuilding the bridges. Oryx, 38(2).

  • Sheppard, D. J., & Bowen, H. (2006). Avu Lagoon Sitatunga conservation initiative-work summary. Accra: Nature Conservation Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, T. C. H., Ehringhaus, C., & Campbell, B. M. (2007). Conservation and development in tropical forest landscapes: A time to face the trade-offs? Environmental Conservation, 34(04), 276–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J. (1999). Requiem for nature. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonge, J., & Moore, S. A. (2007). Importance-satisfaction analysis for marine-park hinterlands: a western Australian case study. Science Direct, 28, 768–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tungittiplakorn, W., & Dearden, P. (2002). Biodiversity conservation and cash crop development in Northern Thailand. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11(11), 2007–2025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaske, J. J., Kiriakos, R., Cottrell, S. P., & Khuong, M. N. (2009). Importance-performance and segmentation: An application at a biosphere reserve in vietnam. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 26, 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, D. J., & Eagles, P. F. (2003). The use of importance-performance analysis and market segmentation for tourism management in parks and protected areas: An application to Tanzania’s National Parks. Journal of Ecotourism, 2(3), 196–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, D. S., Morelli, G., Demmer, J., Starkey, M., Telfer, P., & Steil, M. (2006). Parks and people: Assessing the human welfare effects of establishing protected areas for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 20(1), 247–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittayapak, C., & Dearden, P. (1999). Decision-making arrangements in community-based watershed management in Northern Thailand. Society and Natural Resources, 12, 673–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J., Dearden, P., & Rollins, R. (2011). But are tourists satisfied? Importance-performance analysis of the whale shark tourism industry on Isla Holbox, Mexico. Tourism Management, 33(3), 692–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Kyei Agyare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agyare, A.K., Murray, G., Dearden, P. et al. Understanding inter-community performance assessments in community-based resource management at Avu Lagoon, Ghana. Environ Dev Sustain 17, 1493–1508 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9617-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9617-7

Keywords

Navigation