Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Introducing education for sustainable development into Egyptian schools

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unsustainable development in Egypt has increased water, air and soil pollution, which caused health problems and endangered natural and human resources. The effort to increase the economic well-being has caused enormous damages to the society and the environment. Only sustainable development will enable Egyptians to attain a better quality of life and meet their current needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. EduCamp is a European–Egyptian project entitled ‘EduCamp: education for sustainable development beyond the campus’ which aims to introduce key sustainable development principles into teaching and learning in the Egyptian public schools. EduCamp followed four main principles to introduce ESD into Egyptian schools. These include (a) a partnership approach between different stakeholders, (b) changing pedagogical practices, (c) teacher development through training the trainers, and (d) developing public understanding and awareness of sustainability. The main achievements of EduCamp are (a) Developing ESD resource kits for schools to provide activities for teachers and students which link the existing school curriculum to the local community. The kits include activities related to biodiversity, agriculture, energy, and water. (b) A school teachers’ training programme has been developed and applied to enable teachers to implement ESD and use the kits in their teaching activities. (c) Seven ESD Centres of Excellence have been established to promote and support the introduction of ESD into the education system and provide teachers’ training programmes. It is premature to draw a quantitative conclusion about the impact nationwide because change takes time and the implementation of ESD presents a long-lasting process, which will take many years to achieve. The indicators of direct impact on teachers’ and students’ performance are promising. This discussion paper presents and examines EduCamp. The paper is divided into three main sections. Firstly, the authors set the context for the project, explore the issue of education for sustainable development (ESD) and examine current issues facing education in Egypt. Secondly, the authors discuss the project in relation to relevant literature, often curriculum change literature, in order to explore the merits and challenges of the project and the extent to which curriculum change is actually feasible as a result of the project. Finally, the paper concludes by reflecting on the challenges ahead.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. The needs analysis has been carried out by the team of EduCamp.

  2. The consortium of this project includes seven Egyptian universities, two NGOs, one SME, Egyptian Schools, two miniseries and three European universities. The EduCamp team includes experienced teachers, professors, members from the civil society and government officials.

  3. The progress still at a pilot scale.

References

  • Baggott la Velle, L., Wishart, J., McFarlene, A., & Brawn, E. (2007). Teaching and learning with ICT within the subject culture of secondary school science. Research in Science and Technology Education, 25(3), 339–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baneviciute, B. (2010). Dance teachers education: Program analysis and students’ perception. Journal of Disclosure and Communication for Sustainable Development, 1(2), 64–73.

  • Byford, J., Lennon, S., & Russell, W. (2009). Teaching Controversial issues in the social studies: A research study of high school teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 82(4), 165–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (2010). Teachers in the news: A critical analysis of one US newspaper’s discourse on education, 2006–2007. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 231(1), 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, B. (1999). Islamic versus western conceptions of education: Reflections on Egypt. International Review of Education, 45(3), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornbleth, C. (1990). Curriculum in context. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornbleth, C. (2007). Echo effects and curriculum change. Teachers College Records, 110(10), 2148–2171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corney, G., & Reid, A. (2007). Student teaches’ learning about subject matter and pedagogy in education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 13(1), 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, D. (2006). Teaching Controversial environment issues: Neutrality and balance in the reality of the classroom. Educational Research, 48(2), 223–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, D., Warren, M., Maiboroda, O., & Bailey, I. (2007). Sustainable development, higher education and pedagogy: A study of lecturers’ beliefs and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 13(5), 579–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtner-Smith, M. (1999). The more things change the more they stay the same: Factors influencing teachers’ interpretations and delivery of national curriculum physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 4(1), 75–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. The Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneulin, S., & Shahani, L. (2009). An introduction to the human development and capability approach. London, UK: Earthscan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • EduCamp Knowledge Sharing System. (2014). EduCamp education for sustainable development kits—Levels 1–3. http://www.kss.educamp.eu. Accessed 19 Aug 2014.

  • Eisner, E. (1992). Educational reform and the ecology of schooling. Teachers College Record, 13(4), 610–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eschig, G. (2005). Dekade “Bildung für Nachhaltige Entwicklung“. In W. Linder (Ed.), Bildung für Nachhaltige Entwicklung – Ansichten und Einsichten. Vienna, Austria: Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Arts and Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1991). The New meaning of educational change. London: Cassell.

  • Fullan, M. (2013). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, J. (2010). Curriculum in context: partnership, power and praxis in Ireland. Oxford: Peter Lang.

  • Global Integrity. (2014). Global integrity—Country details Egypt 2010 and 2006. https://www.globalintegrity.org. Accessed 21 May 2014.

  • Goodson, I. (2001). Social histories of educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D., & Bryce, T. (2006). Socio-science issues in science education: Implications for the professional development of teachers. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(2), 171–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, M. (2001). Institutional theory and educational change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 637–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargraves, E. (1997). The diploma disease in Egypt: Learning, teaching and the monster of the secondary leaving certificate. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 4(1), 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargraves, E. (2001). Assessment in Egypt. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 8(2), 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (1989). Curriculum and assessment reform. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (1998). What’s worth fighting for in education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hord, S. (1987). Evaluating educational innovations. Kent: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO (International Labour Organization). (2010). Cataloguing in Publication Data Skills for green jobs in Egypt. Geneva: Unedited background country study/International Labour Office, Skills and Employability Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, T. (1986). Discussing controversial issues: Four perspectives on the teacher’s role. Theory and Research in Social Education, 14(2), 113–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, D., Ramzy, O., & Mostafa, R. (2013). Perception towards sustainable development concept: Egyptian students’ perspective. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 4(3), 307–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. (2005). National policies that connect ICT-based education reform to economic and social development. An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, 1(2), 117–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Velle, L., Reynolds, D., & Nichol, J. (2013). An unusually effective school/university programme: The Plymouth and Peninsula Model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 39(4), 400–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leat, D., & Higgins, S. (2002). The role of powerful pedagogical strategies in curriculum development. The Curriculum Journal, 13(1), 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C., & Chan, B. (2007). MicroLessons in teacher education: Examining pre-service teachers pedagogical beliefs. Computers & Education, 48, 474–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mader, M., Mader, C., Zimmermann, F. M., Görsdorf-Lechevin, E., & Diethart, M. (2013). Monitoring networking between higher education institutions and regional actors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 49, 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayock, P., Kitching, K., & Morgan, M. (2007). RSE in the context of SPHE: An assessment of the challenges to full implementation of the programme in post-primary school. Dublin: Crisis Pregnancy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, O., & Gleeson, J. (2012). Curriculum, culture, ideology and ownership: The case of the exploring masculinities programme. Irish Educational Studies, 31(4), 397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, O., & O’Flaherty, J. (2010). Pre-service teacher’s views and attitudes towards integrating development education active learning methodologies into their teaching. Teacher and Teacher Education, 26(6), 1332–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMorrow, U. (2006). Changing practices for a global society: Voices of students, teachers, principals and university teacher educators on active learning. Irish Educational Studies, 25(3), 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moomaw, W., Griffin, T., Kurczak, K., & Lomax, J. (2012). The critical role of global food consumption patterns in achieving sustainable food systems and food for all, a UNEP Discussion Paper. Paris, France: United Nations Environment Programme, Division of Technology, Industry and Economics.

  • Murphy, P., & Torrance, H. (1988). The changing face of educational assessment. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Child Left Behind. (2002). No child left behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, § 115. Stat, 1425.

  • Oulton, C., Day, V., Dillion, J., & Grace, M. (2004). Controversial issues—teachers’ attitudes and practices in the context of citizenship education. Oxford Review of Education, 30(4), 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, C. (2002). The impact of assessment on student learning: How can the research literature practically help to inform the development of departmental assessment strategies and learner-centred assessment practices? Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(2), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. (1990). The predictable failure of curriculum reform. New York: Jossey-Bass Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schifter, D., Russell, S. J., & Bastable, V. (1999). Teaching to the big ideas. In M. Z. Solomon (Ed.), The diagnostic teacher: Constructing new approaches to professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1973). Beyond the stable state. Public and private learning in a changing society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewilam, H., McCormack, O., Osório-Peters, S., & Mader, M. (2013). Education for sustainable development. In I. Serageldin, M. Yahia, M. El-Faham, & M. El-Wakil (Eds.), New life sciences: Linking science to society (pp. 197–206). BioVision Alexandria 2012.

  • Sheehy, G. (1981). Path finders: How to achieve happiness by conquering life's crisis. London: Sidgwick & Jackson

  • Sparkes, A. (1991). The culture of teaching, critical reflection and change: Possibilities and problems. Educational Management and Administration, 19(1), 4–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1983). Authority, education and emancipation. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugrue, C. (1997). Complexities of teaching: Child-centred perspectives. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, M., Childs, A., & Corney, G. (2005). Education for sustainable development in initial teacher training: Issues for interdisciplinary collaboration. Environmental Education Research, 11(5), 623–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain, J., Monk, M., & Johnson, S. (2010). A comparative study of attitudes to the aims of practical work in science education in Egypt, Korea and the UK. International Journal of Science Education, 21(12), 1311–1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabulawa, R. (1998). Teachers’ perspectives on classroom practice in Botswana: Implications for pedagogical change. Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(2), 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tormey, R. (2003). Teaching social justice intercultural and development education perspectives on educations context, content and methods. Dublin: Centre for Educational Disadvantage Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trant, A. (1998). ‘Giving the curriculum back to teachers: Curriculum development and the teachers role’, the future of the curriculum. Dublin: Curriculum Development Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2002). World Summit on Sustainable Development, A/CONF.199/20.

  • UNDP. (2012). Assessment of development results: Egypt. UNDP Egypt.

  • UNECE. (2005). Strategy for education for sustainable development. www.unece.org/env/documents/2005/cep/ac.13/cep.ac.13.2005.3.rev.1.e.pdf, Accessed 12 May 2009.

  • UNECE. (2011). Learning for the future: Competences in education for sustainable development. ECE/CEP/AC.13/2011/6.http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/esd/6thMeetSC/Learning%20for%20the%20Future_%20Competences%20for%20Educators%20in%20ESD/ECE_CEP_AC13_2011_6%20COMPETENCES%20EN.pdf. Accessed 2 April 2014.

  • UNESC. (2010). Education for sustainable development lens: A policy and practice review tool. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2005). United Nations decade of education for sustainable development (2005–2014): International implementation scheme. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFPA. (2014). Egypt—Population and development. http://egypt.unfpa.org/english/Staticpage/89ee0417-6c84-4410-8317-f41518c07273/Population_and_Development.aspx. Accessed 21 May 2014.

  • UNSD (United Nations Statistics Division). (2008). Millennium Development Goals Indicators. http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/SeriesDetail.aspx?srid=751. Accessed 4 April 2014.

  • Vargas, C. (2000). Sustainable development education: Averting or mitigating cultural collision. International Journal of Educational Development, 20, 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors like to thank all project partners, trainers, teachers and students who contributed to the success of the EduCamp project. The EduCamp project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This paper reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hani Sewilam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sewilam, H., McCormack, O., Mader, M. et al. Introducing education for sustainable development into Egyptian schools. Environ Dev Sustain 17, 221–238 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9597-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9597-7

Keywords

Navigation