Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 987–1002 | Cite as

Sustainability in environmental education: new strategic thinking

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Recently environmental education (EE) literature has been supportive of pluralistic rather than goal-oriented learning. Researchers argue that sustainability is not fixed but socially constructed and that sustainability issues should not be represented as indisputable targets. Countering this trend in environmental education research, this article argues that unsustainability should be treated as a concrete challenge that requires concrete solutions. The author will argue that there is a need for clear articulation of (1) what (un)sustainability is; (2) what are the key challenges of (un)sustainability; and (3) how the sustainability challenges can be meaningfully addressed. This article will outline a number of helpful frameworks that address obstacles to sustainability, ranging from population growth to unsustainable production and consumption practices. Solutions include investment in family planning to counter the effects of overpopulation, and alternative production frameworks, such as Cradle to Cradle that differs from the conventional frameworks. This article will conclude with the broader reflection that without goal-oriented critical learning explicitly providing sound models of sustainability, open learning may never permit transcendence from unsustainability. This article will develop a number of comprehensive frameworks targeted at solutions to sustainability issues both from ethical and practical perspectives.

Keywords

Circular economy Cradle to Cradle Education for sustainable development (ESD) Environmental education Sustainable consumption 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Ayres, R. U., & Kneese, A. V. (1969). Production, consumption, and externalities. The American Economic Review, 59, 282–297.Google Scholar
  2. Benyus, J. M. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Biesta, G. (2006). Beyond learning. Democratic education for a human future. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  4. Blowfield, M. (2013). Business and sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bonnett, M. (2004). Retrieving nature. Education for a post-humanist age. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Bonnett, M. (2012). Environmental concern, moral education, and our place in nature. Journal of Moral Education. Special Issue: Moral Education and Environmental Concern, 41(3), 285–300.Google Scholar
  7. Breiting, S. (2009). Issues for environmental education and ESD research development: Looking ahead from WEEC 2007 in Durban. Environmental Education Research, 15(2), 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cafaro, P., & Primrack, R. (2014). Species extinction is a great moral wrong. Biological Conservation, 170, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cherniak, B. (2012). Critiquing the Role of Deliberative Democracy in EE and ESD: The Case for Effective Participation and Pragmatic Deliberation. Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences Master Thesis, Geotryckeriet.Google Scholar
  10. Commoner, B. (1971). The closing circle: Confronting the environmental crisis. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  11. Crist, E. (2012). Abundant Earth and Population. In P. Cafaro & E. Crist (Eds.), Life on the brink: Environmentalists confront overpopulation (pp. 141–153). Georgia: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  12. Daly, H. E. (1991). Steady-state economics (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press. 17.Google Scholar
  13. Daly, H.E. (1994). Sustainable Growth: An Impossibility Theorem. Clearinghouse Bulletin, April 1994, Carrying Capacity Network, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  14. Eisenstein, C. (2014). Let’s be honest: real sustainability may not make business sense. The Guardian. January 8. http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/blog/sustainability-business-sense-profit-purpose.
  15. Engelman, R. (2012). Nine population strategies to stop short of 9 billion. In L. Starke (Ed.), State of the world 2012: Moving toward sustainable prosperity. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  16. Frosch, R. A., & Gallopoulos, N. E. (1989). Strategies for manufacturing. Scientific American, 261, 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glasser, H. (2004). Learning our way to a sustainable and desirable world: Ideas inspired by Arne Naess and deep ecology. In P. B. Corcoran & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), Higher education and the challenge of sustainability: Problematics, promise, and practice (pp. 131–148). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Gorski, P. C. (2009). Critical Ties: The Animal Rights Awakening of a Social Justice Educator. Available on-line http://www.edchange.org/publications/animal-rights-social-justice.pdf.
  19. Graedel, T. E. (1996). On the concept of industrial ecology. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 21, 69–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hawken, P. (1993). The Ecology of Commerce: A declaration of sustainability. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Why is biodiversity in crisis? http://www.iucn.org/iyb/about/biodiversity_crisis/.
  22. IPCC. (2014). Fifth assessment Report http://www.ipcc.ch/.
  23. Isenmann, R. (2003). Industrial ecology: shedding more light on its perspective of understanding nature as model. Sustainable Development, 11, 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jickling, B. (2005). Education and advocacy: A troubling relationship. In E. A. Johnson & M. Mappin (Eds.), Education and advocacy: Changing perspectives of ecology and education (pp. 91–113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Jickling, B. and Wals, A. E. J. (2013). Probing Normative Research in Environmental Education: Ideas About Education and Ethics. In Robert B. Stevenson, Michael Brody, Justin Dillon, Arjen E.J. Wals (eds), International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education (pp. 74-87).Google Scholar
  26. Kaplan, S. (2000). Human nature and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kirby, K. (2014). “New conservation” as a moral imperative. Conservation Biology,. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12294.Google Scholar
  28. Kopnina, H. (2011). Consumption in environmental education: developing curriculum that addresses Cradle to Cradle principles. Factis Pax, 5(3), 374–388.Google Scholar
  29. Kopnina, H. (2013). The grand old theory of human nature and environmental problems. Journal of Ecological Anthropology, 16(1), 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kopnina, H., & Blewitt, J. (2014). Sustainable business: Key issues. New York: Routledge Earthscan.Google Scholar
  31. LaChapelle, D. (1991). Educating for deep ecology. Journal of Experiential Education, 14, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laurence, W. F., Sayer, J., & Cassman, K. G. (2014). Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lowe, I. (2002). The Need for Environment Literacy, http://www.staff.vu.edu.au/alnarc/onlineforum/AL_pap_lowe.htm.
  34. Lyle, J. T. (1996). Regenerative design for sustainable development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Madden, R. (1995). Eco-Fascism: Ecocentric Environmentalism Pushes Radical Agendas to Achieve Its Goals http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/eco-fascism.
  36. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  37. McIntire-Strasburg, J. (2008). Robbing the Cradle to Cradle? William McDonough a Saint… and a Sinner. Blog post. http://sustainablog.org/2008/11/robbing-the-cradle-to-cradle-william-mcdonough-a-saint-and-a-sinner/.
  38. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). Limits to growth: A report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York City: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  39. MEA Millennium Ecosystem Assessment http://www.maweb.org/en/index.aspx.
  40. Miller, B., Soulé, M. E., & Terborgh, J. (2014). New conservation’ or surrender to development? Animal Conservation. doi: 10.1111/acv.12129.Google Scholar
  41. Morley, L., Marginson, S., & Blackmore, J. (2014). Education and neoliberal globalization. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(3), 457–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep: Long-range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry, 16, 95–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pauli, G. (2010). The blue economy—10 years, 100 innovations and 100 million jobs a report to the club of Rome. Taos: Paradigm Publications.Google Scholar
  44. Pauli, G. (2011). From Deep Ecology to The Blue Economy: A review of the main concepts related to environmental, social and ethical business that contributed to the creation of The Blue Economy. ZERI.Google Scholar
  45. Pinske, J., & Kolk, A. (2009). International business and global climate change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Rees, W. (2009). The ecological crisis and self-delusion: implications for the building sector. Building Research and Information, 37(3), 300–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rees, W. (2010). What’s blocking sustainability? Human nature, cognition, and denial. Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, 6(2), 13–25.Google Scholar
  48. Regan, T. (1986). A case for animal rights. In M. W. Fox & L. D. Mickley (Eds.), Advances in animal welfare science (pp. 179–189). Washington, DC: The Humane Society of the United States.Google Scholar
  49. Root-Bernstein, M., Root-Bernstein, M., & Root-Bernstein, R. (2014). Tools for thinking applied to nature provide an inclusive pedagogical framework for environmental education. Fauna & Flora International, Oryx, 3, 1–9.Google Scholar
  50. Schultz, W. (2011). Conservation means behavior. Conservation Biology, 25(6), 1080–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stahel, W. R. (1984). The Product-Life Factor. In S. G. Orr (Ed.), An inquiry into the nature of sustainable societies, the role of the private sector. Texas: HARC Houston.Google Scholar
  52. Stahel, W. R., & Reday-Mulvey, G. (1981). Jobs for tomorrow: the potential for substituting manpower for energy. New York: Vantage Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tennant, M., & Brennan, G. (2015). Business and production solutions: Closing the loop. In H. Kopnina & E. Shoreman-Ouimet (Eds.), Sustainability: Key issues. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. The Belgrade Charter (1975). UNESCO-UNEP International Environmental Workshop, October 13–22, 1975.Google Scholar
  55. The Economist. (2012). Climate Change: Theatre of the Absurd. December 1, P. 62.Google Scholar
  57. Van Poeck, K., & Vandenabeele, J. (2012). Learning from sustainable development: education in the light of public issues. Environmental Education Research, 18(4), 541–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wals, A. E. J. (2009). Review of contexts and structures for education for sustainable development. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  59. Wals, A. E. J. (2010). Between knowing what is right and knowing that it is wrong to tell others what is right: On relativism, uncertainty and democracy in environmental and sustainability education. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wals, A. E. J., & Jickling, B. (2002). ‘Sustainability’ in higher education: from doublethink and newspeak to critical thinking and meaningful learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3(3), 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Washington, H. G. (2013). Human dependence on nature. New York: Routledge, Earthscan.Google Scholar
  62. Webster, K. (2007). Hidden Sources: Understanding Natural Systems is the Key to an Evolving and Aspirational ESD. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 1(1), 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Researcher/Lecturer and Sustainable Business Program CoordinatorThe Hague University of Applied ScienceThe HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations