Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Community attitudes toward forest conservation programs through collaborative protected area management in Bangladesh

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The formulation of conservation policies with options for creating protected areas is significantly influenced by the social factors of the surrounding communities. Therefore, indigenous knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of the local communities need to be explored during the planning and implementation stages of conservation projects. A government-initiated experiment in co-management was conducted in the Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh. This paper analyzes the attitudes toward conservation by members of local communities living in and around the wildlife sanctuary. Training incentives on alternative income-generating (AIG) activities and allotment of agricultural lands were distributed among the Forest User Groups. It is of interest to policy makers and resource managers whether this technique leads to improved attitudes on the part of local people. Although there were different attitudes toward protected areas and conservation, overall, a favorable attitude of the respondents was observed. The opinions of respondents also varied based on factors such as village position, village dependency level on forest resources, ethnicity and gender. Increase in annual income resulting from the augmented skills by trainings on AIG activities and getting agricultural lands leased from the Forest Department contributed significantly to the variation in respondents’ conservation attitudes. It is suggested that eliminating inequity and inequality in incentive distribution, discovering and launching training on more need-based livelihood activities, and liberalizing the restriction of resource extraction from the protected area by fixing the harvesting limit would encourage the community to be more cordially and actively involved in the conservation efforts of the sanctuary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005), the four categories of ecosystem services are: provisioning (e.g., food, water, wood & fiber, fuel), regulating (e.g., climate regulation, flood regulation, disease regulation, water purification), cultural (e.g., esthetic, spiritual, educational, recreational), and supporting (nutrient cycling, soil formation, primary production).

  2. The local unit of landholdings; 1 decimal = 40.46 sq m.

  3. Bangladeshi currency unit Taka. US$1 = Tk. 78.00 as of September 2013.

References

  • Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akama, J. S., Lant, C. L., & Burnett, G. W. (1995). Conflicting attitudes toward state wildlife conservation programs in Kenya. Society and Natural Resources, 8, 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf, T., Swe, K. K., Oo, T., Htut, Y., Aung, M., Aung, M., et al. (2006). Community attitudes toward three protected areas in Upper Myanmar (Burma). Environmental Conservation, 33(4), 344–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, B. (2007). The dual nature of parks: Attitudes of neighboring communities towards Kruger National Park, South Africa. Environmental Conservation, 34(4), 236–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasinorwala, T., Kothari, A., & Jaireth, H. (2008). Protected area governance in south Asia: How far has it progressed? Parks, 17, 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandara, R., & Tisdell, C. (2003). Comparison of rural and urban attitudes to the conservation of Asian elephant in Sri Lanka: Empirical evidence. Biological Conservation, 110, 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baral, N., & Heinen, J. T. (2007). Resource use, conservation attitudes, management intervention and park-people relations in the Western Terai landscape of Nepal. Environmental Conservation, 34(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BCAS. (2008). Bangladesh state of the environment report 2001. Dhaka: Bangladesh Center for Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1692–1702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BFD. (2013). Protected areas of Bangladesh. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka: Bangladesh Forest Department.

  • Chape, S., Spalding, M., & Jenkins, M. D. (2008). The world’s protected areas. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnley, S., Fischer, A. P., & Jones, E. T. (2007). Integrating traditional and local ecological knowledge into forest conservation in the Pacific Northwest. Forest Ecology and Management, 246, 14–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, M. S. H., & Koike, M. (2010a). An overview of the protected area system for forest conservation in Bangladesh. Journal of Forestry Research, 21, 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, M. S. H., & Koike, M. (2010b). Therapeutic use of plants by local communities in and around Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary: Implications for protected area management in Bangladesh. Agroforestry Systems, 80, 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, M. S. H., Koike, M., Akther, S., & Miah, M. D. (2011). Biomass fuel use, burning techniques and reasons for the denial of improved cooking stoves by Forest User Groups of Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 18(1), 88–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, M. S. H., Koike, M., & Muhammed, N. (2009). Embracing collaborative protected area management for conservation: An analysis of the development of the forest policy of Bangladesh. International Forestry Review, 11(3), 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, M. S. H., Koike, M., Rana, M. P., & Muhammed, N. (2013). Community development through collaborative management of protected areas: Evidence from Bangladesh with a case of Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 20(1), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCosse, P. J. (2006). The role of Alternative Income Generation (AIG) activities in Nishorgo’s strategy for conservation of protected areas (PAs). Dhaka: Ministry of Environment and Forest.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKoninck, V. (2005). Joint management of Banteng (Bos javanicus) in a contested cultural landscape: Observations and implications. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 10(2), 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrakopoulos, P. G., Jones, N., Iosifides, T., Florokapi, I., Lasda, O., Paliouras, F., et al. (2010). Local attitudes on protected areas: Evidence from three Natura 2000 wetland sites in Greece. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1847–1854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolisca, F., McDaniel, J. M., & Teeter, L. D. (2007). Farmers’ perceptions towards forests: A case study from Haiti. Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 704–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiallo, E. A., & Jacobson, S. K. (1995). Local communities and protected areas: Attitudes of rural residents towards conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. Environmental Conservation, 22(3), 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan, T., & Renard, Y. (2002). Beyond community involvement: Lessons from the insular Caribbean. Parks, 12, 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, S., & Lee, P. C. (1999). The impact of wildlife related benefits on the conservation attitudes of local people around the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Environmental Conservation, 26(3), 218–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa, M. (2012). Central African forests as hunter-gatherers’ living environment: An approach to historical ecology. African Study Monographs, 43, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRG. (2004). Site-level field appraisal for protected area co-management: Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary. Dhaka: International Resources Group and Bangladesh Forest Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. (2000). Red list of threatened animals of Bangladesh. Dhaka: IUCN Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jim, C. Y., Steve, S. W., & Xu, C. (2002). Stifled stakeholders and subdued participation: Interpreting local responses toward Shimentai Nature Reserve in South China. Environmental Management, 30(3), 327–341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Junge, X., Jacot, K. A., Bosshard, A., & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2009). Swiss people’s attitudes towards field margins for biodiversity conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation, 17, 150–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. M. H. (2008). Protected areas of Bangladesh: A guide to wildlife. Nishorgo Program. Dhaka: Bangladesh Forest Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. S., & Bhagwat, S. A. (2010). Protected areas: A resource or constraint for local people? A study at Chitral Gol National Park, North-West Frontier Province, Pakistan. Mountain Research and Development, 30(1), 14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, A., Singh, N., & Saloni, S. (1996). People and protected areas: Towards participatory conservation in India. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahanty, S., Stacey, N., Holland, A., & Menzies, S. (2007). Learning to learn: Designing monitoring plans in the Pacific Islands International Waters Project. Ocean and Coastal Management, 50(5–6), 392–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matta, J. R., & Alavalapati, J. R. R. (2006). Perceptions of collective action and its success in community-based natural resource management: An empirical analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 274–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J. A. (1990). The future of national parks. Environment, 32(1), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEA. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

  • Mehta, J. N., & Heinen, J. T. (2001). Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal. Environmental Management, 28, 165–177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, J. N., & Kellert, S. R. (1998). Local attitudes toward community-based conservation policy and programs in Nepal: A case study of the Makalu-Barun Conservation Area. Environmental Conservation, 25(5), 320–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukul, S. A., & Quazi, S.A. (2009). Communities in conservation: Changing paradigm of protected area management and enhanced conservation in the northeastern hill region of Bangladesh. In R. N. Leslie (Ed.) Proceedings of the international conference: ‘The Future of Forests in Asia and the Pacific: Outlook for 2020’ held in October 1618 2007 (pp. 143–159). Chiang Mai, Thailand.

  • Mulder, M. B., Schacht, R., Caro, T., Schacht, J., & Caro, B. (2009). Knowledge and attitudes of children of the Rupununi: Implications for conservation in Guyana. Biological Conservation, 142, 879–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NACOM. (2003). Secondary data collection for pilot protected areas: Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary. Dhaka: Nature Conservation & Management and Ministry of Environment and Forest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark, W. D., Leonard, N. L., Sariko, H. I., & Gamassa, D. M. (1993). Conservation attitudes of local people living adjacent to five protected areas in Tanzania. Biological Conservation, 63, 177–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, L., & Thapa, B. (2010). Visitor perspectives on sustainable tourism development in the Pitons Management Area World Heritage Site, St. Lucia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 12(5), 839–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSP. (2009). Nishorgo: Bangladesh’s protected area management program. Dhaka: Nishorgo Support Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oil, K. P. (1999). Collaborative management of protected areas in the Asian region. Nepal: IUCN-Kathmandu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (2002). Management guidelines for IUCN category V protected areas protected landscapes/seascapes. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 9. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.

  • Pipinos, G., & Fokiali, P. (2009). An assessment of the attitude of the inhabitants of Northern Karpathos, Greece: Towards a framework for ecotourism development in environmentally sensitive areas. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 11(3), 655–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purnomo, H., & Mendoza, G. (2011). A system dynamics model for evaluating collaborative forest management: A case study in Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 18(2), 164–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana, M. A., Noguchi, T., & Muhammed, N. (2007). Impact of participatory forest management (PFM) on socio-economic development in Bangladesh: A case study in the Madhupur Sal Forest. Journal of Forest Economics, 53, 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K. S., Maikhuri, R. K., & Saxena, K. G. (2003). Local people’s knowledge, aptitude and perceptions of planning and management issues in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. Environmental Management, 31(2), 168–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A. Z. M. M., Craig, D., Mukul, S. A., & Khan, N. A. (2013). A journey towards shared governance: Status and prospects for collaborative management in the protected areas of Bangladesh. Journal of Forestry Research, 24(3), 599–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodela, R., & Udovc, A. (2008). Participation in nature protection: Does it benefit the local community? A Triglav National Park case study. International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management, 4, 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, M. K., & DeCosse, P. (2006). Managing demand for protected areas in Bangladesh: Poverty alleviation, illegal commercial use and nature recreation. Policy Matters, 94–102.

  • Sah, J. P., & Heinen, J. T. (2001). Wetland resource use and conservation attitudes among indigenous and migrant peoples in Ghodaghodi Lake area, Nepal. Environmental Conservation, 28(4), 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schusler, T. M., Decker, D. J., & Pfeffer, M. J. (2003). Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 15, 309–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. R. D. (1973). Broadening the approach to evaluation in resource management decision-making. Journal of Environmental Management, 1, 33–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suckall, N., Fraser, E. D. G., Cooper, T., & Quinn, C. (2009). Visitor perceptions of rural landscapes: A case study in the Peak District National Park, England. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1195–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trakolis, D. (2001). Local people’s perceptions of planning and management issues in Prespes Lakes National Park, Greece. Journal of Environmental Management, 61(3), 227–241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uddin, M. Z., & Roy, S. (2007). Collection and management of selected medicinal plants in Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary. In J. Fox, B. R. Bushley, S. Dutt, & S. A. Quazi (Eds.), Making conservation work: Linking rural livelihoods and protected area management in Bangladesh (pp. 66–83). Dhaka: Nishorgo Support Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vodouhe, F. G., Coulibaly, O., Adegbidi, A., & Sinsin, B. (2010). Community perception of biodiversity conservation within protected areas in Benin. Forest Policy and Economics, 12, 505–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, P., & Packard, J. M. (1997). Acceptance of scientific management by natural resource dependent communities. Conservation Biology, 11(1), 236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weladji, R., Moe, S., & Vedeld, P. (2003). Stakeholder attitudes wildlife policy and Benoue Wildlife Conservation Area, North Cameroon. Environmental Conservation, 30, 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, G. F. (1966). Formation and role of public attitudes. In H. Jarrett (Ed.), Environmental quality in a growing economy (pp. 1–105). Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Chen, L., Lu, Y., & Fu, B. (2006). Local people’s perceptions as decision support for protected area management in Wolong Biosphere Reserve, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 78, 362–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziadat, A. H. (2010). Major factors contributing to environmental awareness among people in a third world country/Jordan. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 12, 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Shaheed Hossain Chowdhury.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 156 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chowdhury, M.S.H., Gudmundsson, C., Izumiyama, S. et al. Community attitudes toward forest conservation programs through collaborative protected area management in Bangladesh. Environ Dev Sustain 16, 1235–1252 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9524-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9524-y

Keywords

Navigation