Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 225–243 | Cite as

Reframing social sustainability reporting: towards an engaged approach

  • Liam Magee
  • Andy Scerri
  • Paul James
  • James A. Thom
  • Lin Padgham
  • Sarah Hickmott
  • Hepu Deng
  • Felicity Cahill
Article

Abstract

Existing approaches to sustainability assessment are typically characterized as being either “top–down” or “bottom–up.” While top–down approaches are commonly adopted by businesses, bottom–up approaches are more often adopted by civil society organizations and communities. Top–down approaches clearly favor standardization and commensurability between other sustainability assessment efforts, to the potential exclusion of issues that really matter on the ground. Conversely, bottom–up approaches enable sustainability initiatives to speak directly to the concerns and issues of communities, but lack a basis for comparability. While there are clearly contexts in which one approach can be favored over another, it is equally desirable to develop mechanisms that mediate between both. In this paper, we outline a methodology for framing sustainability assessment and developing indicator sets that aim to bridge these two approaches. The methodology incorporates common components of bottom–up assessment: constituency-based engagement processes and opportunity to identify critical issues and indicators. At the same time, it uses the idea of a “knowledge base,” to help with the selection of standardized, top–down indicators. We briefly describe two projects where the aspects of the methodology have been trialed with urban governments and communities, and then present the methodology in full, with an accompanying description of a supporting software system.

Keywords

Indicators Social sustainability Sustainability reporting Community engagement Urban development 

References

  1. Adomßent, M., & Godemann, J. (2011). Sustainability communication: An integrative approach. In J. Godemann & G. Michelsen (Eds.), Sustainability communication: Interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundations (pp. 27–37). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Agger, A. (2010). Involving citizens in sustainable development: Evidence of new forms of participation in the Danish Agenda 21 schemes. Local Environment, 15(6), 541–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, G. (2000). Measuring corporate sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(2), 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry, J. (1996). Sustainability, political judgement and citizenship. In B. Doherty & M. de Geus (Eds.), Democracy and green political thought: sustainability (pp. 115–131). Routledge, London: Rights and Citizenship.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2004). Experiences with sustainability indicators and stakeholder participation: A case study relating to a “Blue Plan” project in Malta. Sustainable Development, 12(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bohringer, C., & Jochem, P. (2007). Measuring the immeasurable —a survey of sustainability indices. Ecological Economics, 63(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradbury, H., & Clair, J. A. (2012). Promoting sustainable organizations with Sweden’s Natural Step. The Academy of Management Executive, 13(4), 63–74.Google Scholar
  8. Coelho, P., Mascarenhas, A., Vaz, P., Dores, A., & Ramos, T. B. (2010). A framework for regional sustainability assessment: developing indicators for a Portuguese region. Sustainable Development, 18(4), 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business, capstone.Google Scholar
  10. Fahy, F., & Cinnéide, M. Ó. (2009). Re-constructing the urban landscape through community mapping: an attractive prospect for sustainability? Area, 41(2), 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer, T. B. (2003). Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23(2), 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fraser, E. D. G., Dougill, A. J., Mabee, W. E., Reed, M., & McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(2), 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Global Reporting Initiative (2006). Sustainability reporting guidelines, version 3.0. Boston, M.A. Retrieved from http://www.globalreporting.org/ReportingFramework/ReportingFrameworkDownloads/.
  15. Grosskurth, J., & Rotmans, J. (2007). Qualitative system sustainability index: A new type of sustainability indicator. In T. Hák, B. Moldan, & A. L. Dahl (Eds.), Sustainability indicators: A scientific assessment (pp. 177–188). Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hickmott, S., Magee, L., Thom, J., & Padgham, L. (2012). An Adaptive system for proactively supporting sustainability goals. International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, June 2012.Google Scholar
  17. Holden, M. (2006). Urban indicators and the integrative ideals of cities. Cities, 23(3), 170–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hugé, J., Le Trinh, H., Hai, P. H., Kuilman, J., & Hens, L. (2009). Sustainability indicators for clean development mechanism projects in Vietnam. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 12(4), 561–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hussey, D. M., Kirsop, P. L., & Meissen, R. E. (2001). Global reporting initiative guidelines: An evaluation of sustainable development metrics for industry. Environmental Quality Management, 11(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. James, P., Nadarajah, Y., Haive, K., & Stead, V. (2012). Sustainable communities, sustainable development: Other paths for papua new guinea. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jha-Thakur, U., Gazzola, P., Peel, D., Fischer, T. B., & Kidd, S. (2009). Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment the significance of learning. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27(2), 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelman, I. (2010). Hearing local voices from small island developing states for climate change. Local Environment, 15(7), 605–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krank, S., Wallbaum, H., & Grêt-Regamey, A. (2010). Constraints to implementation of sustainability indicator systems in five Asian cities. Local Environment, 15(8), 731–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levett-Therivel Sustainability Consultancy. (2004). Sustainable Urban Environments—Metrics, Models and Toolkits: Analysis of sustainability/social tools, Reports to the Sustainable Urban Environments-Metrics, Models, Tools Consortium. Oxford: SUE-MoT Consortium.Google Scholar
  25. McCool, S. F., & Stankey, G. H. (2004). Indicators of sustainability: Challenges and opportunities at the interface of science and policy. Environmental Management, 33(3), 294–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meadows, D. (1998). Indicators and information systems for sustainable development. Hartland Four Corners, VT: The Sustainability Institute.Google Scholar
  27. Ness, B., Urbelpiirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., & Olsson, L. (2007). Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 60(3), 498–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Parris, T. M., & Kates, R. W. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28(1), 559–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pintér, L., Hardi, P., Martinuzzi, A., & Hall, J. (2012). Bellagio STAMP: Principles for sustainability assessment and measurement. Ecological Indicators, 17(June), 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pope, J., Annandale, D., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2004). Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(6), 595–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reed, M. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reed, M. S., Evely, A. C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., Laing, A., Newig, J., Parrish, B., Prell, C., Raymond, C., & Stringer, L.C. (2010). What is Social Learning? Ecology and Society. 15(4).Google Scholar
  33. Reed, M., Fraser, E., & Dougill, A. (2006). An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecological Economics, 59(4), 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48(4), 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rydin, Y. (2007). Indicators as a governmental technology? The lessons of community-based sustainability indicator projects. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(4), 610–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saroar, M., & Routray, J. K. (2010). Adaptation in situ or retreat? A multivariate approach to explore the factors that guide the peoples preference against the impacts of sea level rise in coastal Bangladesh. Local Environment, 15(7), 663–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scerri, A., & James, P. (2010a). Accounting for sustainability: combining qualitative and quantitative research in developing “indicators” of sustainability. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(1), 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scerri, A., & James, P. (2010b). Communities of citizens and “indicators” of sustainability. Community Development Journal, 45(2), 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schilperoord, M., Rotmans, Jan, & Bergman, N. (2008). Modelling societal transitions with agent transformation. Computational and Mathematical Organisation Theory, 14(4), 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Singh, R., Murty, H., Gupta, S., & Dikshit, A. (2009). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9(2), 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turnhout, E., Hisschemoller, M., & Eijsackers, H. (2007). Ecological indicators: Between the two fires of science and policy. Ecological Indicators, 7(2), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: Creating knowledge for science and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Veleva, V. (2001). Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(6), 519–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Veleva, V., Hart, M., Greiner, T., & Crumbley, C. (2001). Indicators of sustainable production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(5), 447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Walsh, M., & Burch, S. (2012). Communities at the crossroads: Using metro quest to help communities create consensus around a vision of the future. In L. Bazzanella, et al. (Eds.), The Future of cities and regions (pp. 45–64). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Williams, R. (1976). Keywords. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  47. Willis, A. (2003). The role of the global reporting initiative’s sustainability reporting guidelines in the social screening of investments. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wills-Johnson, N. (2010). Lessons for sustainability from the world’s most sustainable culture. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 12(6), 909–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson, J., Tyedmers, P., & Pelot, R. (2007). Contrasting and comparing sustainable development indicator metrics. Ecological Indicators, 7(2), 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common future, report of the world commission on environment and DEvelopment. Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  51. Xing, Y., Horner, M., El-Haram, M., & Bebbington, J. (2007). A framework model for assessing sustainability impacts of a built environment. Accounting Forum, 33(3), 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liam Magee
    • 1
  • Andy Scerri
    • 1
  • Paul James
    • 1
  • James A. Thom
    • 2
  • Lin Padgham
    • 2
  • Sarah Hickmott
    • 2
  • Hepu Deng
    • 3
  • Felicity Cahill
    • 4
  1. 1.Global Cities InstituteRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Computer Science and Information TechnologyRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.School of BusinessRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.School of Global Studies, Social Science and PlanningRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations