Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 245–256 | Cite as

Regional socio-economic impacts of decentralised bioeconomy: a case of Suutela wooden village, Finland



The regional bioeconomy has a high importance for generating socio-economic impacts, especially in sparsely populated resource peripheries. The benefits include increased employment and income and improved security of supply. In this study, the modified regional input–output model is applied for analysing the socio-economic impacts of Suutela wooden village construction in North Karelia, Finland. The main objective of this article is to provide an illustrative example on the regional input–output modelling, applied to the investigation of the socio-economic impacts of a conventional, decentralised bioeconomy. Based on this Finnish case of a wooden village with bioenergy district heating, we demonstrate both the employment and income potentials of a decentralised bioeconomy. The results indicate good socio-economic potential of local wood construction, resulting in about 250 personnel working years and a total economic impact of 43.7 million euros on the regional economy. To maintain the sensitivity of the input–output modelling, it is considered more suitable for overall regional impact estimations, rather than pointing out differences between the subsystems. When modified for research purposes, the regional input–output model is well capable to efficiently describe the socio-economic impacts and providing information for local decision-makers to support new projects of a bioeconomy.


Socio-economic impacts Input–output modelling Bioeconomy 


  1. Alanen, T., Lehtinen, E., Ratia, P., & Tienhaara, P. (1998). Rakentamisen työllisyysvaikutukset. Research notes 1891. Espoo: Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus.Google Scholar
  2. Borsboom, N., Hektor, B., McCallum, B., & Remedio, E. (2002). Social implications of forest energy production. In J. Richardson, R. Björheden, P. Hakkila, A. Lowe, & C. Smith (Eds.), Bioenergy from sustainable forestry. Guiding principles and practice (pp. 265–297). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bylund, E. (1989). Regional policy and regional research in Sweden. In G. Gustafsson (Ed.), Development in marginal areas. University of Karlstad, Karlstad: Department of Geography.Google Scholar
  4. Domac, J., Richards, K., & Risovic, S. (2005). Socio-economic drivers in implementing bioenergy projects. Biomass and Bioenergy, 28(2), 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Domac, J., Segon, V., Przulj, I., & Rajic, K. (2011). Regional energy planning methodology, drivers and implementation—Karlovac County case study. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(11), 4504–4510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunford, M., & Perrons, D. (1994). Regional inequality, regimes of accumulation and economic development in contemporary Europe. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 19(2), 163–182.Google Scholar
  7. Faaij, A. (2006). Bioenergy in Europe: Changing technology choices. Energy Policy, 34(3), 322–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. FFRI (Finnish Forest Research Institute) Yearbook (2007). Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. Helsinki:Finnish Forest Research Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Gan, J., & Smith, C. T. (2007). Co-benefits of utilizing logging residues for bioenergy production: The case for East Texas, USA. Biomass and Bioenergy, 31(9), 623–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gløersen, E., Dubois, A., Copus, A., & Schürmann, C. (2005). Northern peripheral, sparsely populated regions in the European North. Nordregio report 2005, 4. Stockholm: Nordregio.Google Scholar
  11. Hyttinen, P., Niskanen, A., Ottitsch, A., Tykkyläinen, M., & Väyrynen, J. (2002). Forest Related perspectives for regional development in Europe. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  12. Johansson, A., Kisch, P., & Mirata, M. (2005). Distributed economies—A new engine for innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(10–11), 971–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kokkonen, E. (2010). Hajautettu biotalous—Väylä vihreään tulevaisuuteen. Yhteenveto Sitran hajautettua biotaloutta koskevasta round-table työpajasta. Sitran selvityksiä No 38. http://www.sitra.fi/julkaisut/Selvityksi%C3%A4-sarja/Selvityksi%C3%A4%2038.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2011.
  14. Laine, P. (2007). Social security benefits for households in North Karelia. Unpublished statistics.Google Scholar
  15. Lehtonen, O., & Tykkyläinen, M. (2008). The emerging shortage of labour in forestry in a remote coniferous region: A brake on the massive use of biofuels. In K. Andersson, E. Eklund, M. Lehtola, & P. Salmi (Eds.), Beyond the rural-urban divide (pp. 25–55). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  16. Lehtonen, O., & Tykkyläinen, M. (2011). Potential and employment impacts of advanced energy production from forest residues in sparsely populated areas. In S. Brunn (Ed.), Engineering earth (pp. 513–533). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lehtonen, O., & Tykkyläinen, M. (2012). Työpaikkakehityksen alueelliset kehitysprosessit Itä-Suomessa 1994–2003. [Spatial processes of job growth in Eastern Finland, 1994–2003]. Terra, 124(2), 85–105.Google Scholar
  18. Leontief, W. (1966). Input-output economics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Miller, R., & Blair, P. (1985). Input-output analysis. Foundations and extensions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Mirata, M., Nilsson, H., & Kuisma, J. (2005). Production systems aligned with distributed economies: Examples from energy and biomass sectors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(10–11), 981–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. OECD. (2006). The new rural paradigm. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Okkonen, L. (2008). From exogenous to endogenous development in Scottish forestry: The feasibility of small-scale wood energy enterprise. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(2), 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rimler, T., Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., & Koljonen, K. (2000). Economic impacts of alternative timber cutting scenarios in Finland: An input-output analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 1(3–4), 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schaffer, W., & Chu, K. (1969). Nonsurvey techniques for constructing regional interindustry models. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 23(1), 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Slee, B., & Wiersum, K. (2001). New opportunities for forest-related rural development in industrialized countries. Forest Policy and Economics, 3(1–2), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Statistics Finland. (2006). Regional input-output tables. Description of statistics. http://www.stat.fi/til/apt/index.html. Accessed April 6, 2010.
  27. Statistics Finland. (2007a). Annual national accounts. http://www.stat.fi/til/vtp/index_en.html. Accessed April 6, 2010.
  28. Statistics Finland. (2007b). Regional accounts of production and employment. http://www.stat.fi/til/atutyo/index_en.html. Accessed April 6, 2010.
  29. Statistics Finland. (2007c). Regional household accounts. http://www.stat.fi/til/akoti/index_en.html. Accessed April 6, 2010.
  30. Valtioneuvosto. (2010). Biotalous Suomessa—arvio kansallisen strategian tarpeesta. Biotaloustyöryhmän loppuraportti 30.9.2010. Valtioneuvoston kanslian julkaisuja 15/2010. http://www.vnk.fi/julkaisukansio/2010/j15-biotalous/PDF/fi.pdf. Accessed June 9, 2011.
  31. Vatanen, E. (2001). Puunkorjuun ja puunkuljetuksen paikallistaloudelliset vaikutukset Juvan, Keuruun ja Pielisen Karjalan seutukunnissa. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja, 825.Google Scholar
  32. Whitley, M., Zervos, A., Timmer, M., & Butera, F. (2004). Meeting the targets and putting renewables to work. Overview report for MITRE project. Corsham: Directorate General for Energy and Transport, Energy for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geographical and Historical StudiesUniversity of Eastern Finland, Joensuu CampusJoensuuFinland
  2. 2.Centre for Natural ResourcesNorth Karelia University of Applied SciencesJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations