Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 433–453 | Cite as

Relationship between carbon emissions and economic development: case study of six countries

Case Study

Abstract

There is much discussion within the sustainable development community regarding climate stabilization and particularly, finding environmentally equitable ways to address emission reductions. Knowing the current level of emission is only one variable in this complex picture. While the rate of emissions is clearly a problem, the overall increase in GHG concentration in the atmosphere is ultimately the main driver of anthropogenic warming. Therefore, it is also important to understand the cumulative emissions, those which have taken us to the current condition. This research presents a case study of six countries to compare the emissions per capita and cumulative emissions during the past 200 years. It is known that carbon emissions are closely related to economic activities, but here we show that some countries have reached per capita emissions plateaus at different levels while others are still rising. Specifically, one approach toward socioeconomic development, in terms of energy–economy, reaches a plateau at 10 Mt carbon per person, which the United Kingdom and South Korea have attained. The US occupies another emission regime at 20 Mt carbon per person. Developing economies such as India and China are considerably below these levels, and unless they follow other integrated economic/environmental solutions, they will continue to increase their per capita emissions during development.

Keywords

Climate change Carbon emissions Per capita emissions Cumulative emissions Development Economy 

References

  1. Anoruo, E., Ramchander, S., & Thiewes, H. (2003). Cross-border linkages among Asian closed-end funds. Journal of Economics and Finance, 27, 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastianoni, S. P., Federico, M. P., & Tiezzi, E. (2004). The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics, 49(3), 253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). (2010). The World Factbook. UK.Google Scholar
  4. Cole, H. L., & Ohanian, L. E. (2007). The great UK depression: A puzzle and a possible resolution. In T. J. Kehoe & E. C. Prescott (Eds.), Great depressions of the twentieth century (pp. 59–84). Minneapolis: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  5. Conte, C., & Karr, A. R. (2011). The US economy: A brief history. Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  6. Gapminder. (2010). www.gapminder.org.
  7. Heitzman, J., & Worden, R. L. (Eds.). (1995). India: A country study. Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  8. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate change 2007: Mitigation of climate change, contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In B. Metz, O. R. Davidson, P. R. Bosch, R. Dave, & L. A. Meyer (Eds.), Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2009). Emerging and developing economies list. World Economic Outlook Database.Google Scholar
  10. Kathuria, V. (2008). Public disclosures: Using information to reduce pollution in developing countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 11(5), 955–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lai, D. (2000). Temporal analysis of human development indicators: Principal component approach. Social Indicators Research, 51, 331–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lenzen, M., Murray, J., Sack, F., & Wiedmann, T. (2007). Shared producer and consumer responsibility theory and practice. Ecological Economics, 61, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. LePoer, B. L. (Ed.). (1987). Thailand: A country study. Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  14. Li, W., & Yeng, D. T. (2005). The great leap forward: Anatomy of a central planning disaster. Journal of Political Economy, 113, 840–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nath, P. K., & Behera, B. (2011). A critical review of impact of and adaptation to climate change in developed and developing economies. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 13, 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Savada, A. M., & Shaw, W. (Eds.). (1990). South Korea: A country study, the economy. Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  17. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC). (2010). Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on its fifth session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009. Geneva: United Nations Office at Geneva.Google Scholar
  18. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (UNFCC). (2010). UN climate change conference in Cancún delivers balanced package of decisions, restores faith in multilateral process. Press Releases. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
  19. United Nations, Information Services. (2000). Secretary-general Kofi Annan’s address to the Tenth United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (“UNCTAD X”). Bangkok.Google Scholar
  20. United Nations Statistics Division. (2010). Composition of macro geographical (continental) regions, geographical sub-regions, and selected economic and other groupings. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  21. Usher, A. P. (1920). Introduction to the industrial history of England (pp. 247–275). Cambridge: The Riverside Press.Google Scholar
  22. US State Dept. (2010). State Department Country Background Notes.Google Scholar
  23. Worden, R. L., et al. (Eds.). (1987). China: A country study. Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  24. World Bank. (2008). World development indicators online. Industry, Contribution to Economy.Google Scholar
  25. World Bank. (2008).World Development Indicators Online. Exports of goods and services.Google Scholar
  26. World Bank. (2008).World Development Indicators Online. Industry, value added.Google Scholar
  27. World Trade Organization. (2010). Press Releases. International Trade Statistics.Google Scholar
  28. Wu, Y. (2000). Is China’s economic growth sustainable? A productivity analysis. China Economic Review, 11, 278–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesTowson UniversityTowsonUSA
  2. 2.Advanced Systems Analysis Program, International Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisLaxenburgAustria
  3. 3.University of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations