Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of remittances and decentralization of forest management in the sustainability of a municipal-communal pine forest in eastern Guatemala

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At the national scale, forest cover in Guatemala declined at an annual rate of 1.2% during the past quarter century because of settlement that removed primary forests in the northern region of the country; however, the majority of the population of Guatemala still resides in the densely populated central highlands and has extracted timber and fuelwood from adjacent forests for centuries. Using baseline data recorded in 1987 and 1996, this article reexamined the sustainability of a municipal-communal pine forest in San José La Arada, a municipality in eastern Guatemala. The pine forest declined from the period 1987 to 1996 because of overextraction of timber and fuelwood. Forest structure and forest use were reexamined from the period 1996 to 2007 to test the hypothesis that the forest continued to decline. Forest characteristics such as stand density, basal area, tree height, and evidence of forest use were measured to replicate the procedures from previous work at the study area. To understand changes in forest structure and forest use in the context of the rise in remittances and the introduction of decentralized forest governance that emerged since 1996, a household survey was conducted in two adjacent villages. Forest structure improved from 1996 to 2007. From 1996 to 2007, forest characteristics such as stand density, basal area, tree height, and forest regeneration improved and evidence of forest use decreased in the municipal-communal pine forest. The influence of large amounts of remittances from the United States and other regions of Guatemala to households in the adjacent villages and the decentralization of forest governance largely explains the shift toward forest sustainability in San José La Arada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta, P., Calderón, C., Fajnzylber, P., & Lopez, H. (2008). What is the impact of international remittances on poverty and inequality in Latin America? World Development, 36, 89–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. H. (2006). Remittances, poverty, and investment in Guatemala. In C. Ozden & M. Schiff (Eds.), International migration, remittances & the brain drain (pp. 53–80). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. H., & Cuecuecha, A. (2010). Remittances, household expenditure and investment in Guatemala. World Development, 38, 1626–1641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A., Chhatre, A., & Hardin, R. (2008). Changing governance of the world’s forests. Science, 320, 1460–1462.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, K., Awe, Y., Barnes, D. F., Cropper, M. L., & Kojima, M. (2005). Environmental health and traditional fuel use in Guatemala. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, K. P. (2004). Who talks with whom? The role of repeated interactions in decentralized forest governance. World Development, 32, 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, K. P., Gibson, C. C., & Lehoucq, F. (2006). Municipal politics and forest governance: Comparative analysis of decentralization in Bolivia and Guatemala. World Development, 34, 576–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banco de Guatemala (2011) Ingreso de Divisas por Remesas Familiares. http://www.banguat.gob.gt/inc/main.asp?aud=1&id=33190&lang=1. Accessed 25 April 2011.

  • Bass, J. O. (2010). Learning landscape change in Honduras: Repeat photography and discovery. In R. H. Webb, D. E. Boyer, & R. M. Turner (Eds.), Repeat photography: Methods and applications in the natural sciences (pp. 275–288). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendixon, S., & St. Onge, E. (2005). Remittances from the United States and Japan to Latin America: An in-depth look using public opinion research. In D. F. Terry & S. R. Wilson (Eds.), Beyond small change: Making migrant remittances count (pp. 41–67). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birner, R., & Wittmer, H. (2006). Better public sector governance through partnership with the private sector and civil society: The case of Guatemala’s forest administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72, 459–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S. (2009). Revisiting a Honduran landscape described by Robert West: An experiment in repeat geography. Journal of Latin American Geography, 8, 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., & Lugo, A. E. (1990). Tropical secondary forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 6, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CALAS. (2004). Legislación Ambiental Guatemalteca. Tomo I. Guatemala City: Centro de Acción Legal Ambiental y Social de Guatemala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J. (2011). Bringing the green back. Conservation Magazine, 11, 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carletto, C., Covarrubias, K., & Maluccio, J. A. (2011). Migration and child growth in rural Guatemala. Food Policy, 36, 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. L. (2004). Proximate population factors and deforestation in tropical agricultural frontiers. Population and Environment, 25, 585–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. L. (2005). Forest clearing among farm households in the Maya Biosphere Reserve. The Professional Geographer, 57, 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheikhrouhou, H., Jarque, R., Hernandez-Coss, R., & El-Swaify, R. (2006). The U.S.-Guatemala Remittance Corridor: Understanding better the drivers of remittances intermediation. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (2002). Migration and “stay at homes” in rural Oaxaca, Mexico: Local expressions of global outcomes. Urban Anthropology, 31, 231–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colchester, M. (1995). Guatemala: The clamour for land and the fate of the forests. In M. Colchester & L. Lohmann (Eds.), The struggle for land and the fate of the forests (pp. 99–138). Penang: World Rainforest Movement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, D., & Cohen, J. (1998). Consequences of migration and remittances for Mexican transnational communities. Economic Geography, 74, 26–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, D., & Cohen, J. (2003). Local dynamics in multi-local transnational spaces of rural Mexico: Oaxacan experiences. International Journal of Population Geography, 9, 1401–1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corlett, R. T. (1995). Tropical secondary forests. Progress in Physical Geography, 19, 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropper, M., Puri, J., & Griffiths, C. (2001). Predicting the location of deforestation: The role of roads and protected areas in north Thailand. Land Economics, 77, 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Garza, R. O., & Lowell, B. L. (2002). Sending money home: Hispanic remittances and community development. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Garza, R. O., & Orozco, M. (2002). Binational impact of Latino remittances. In R. O. de la Garza & B. L. Lowell (Eds.), Sending money home: Hispanic remittances and community development (pp. 29–51). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–1912.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Direccion General de Estadistica. (1950). Sexto Censo General de Poblacion. Guatemala: Republica de Guatemala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Direccion General de Estadistica. (1982). Censos Nacionales IX de Poblacion. Guatemala: Ministerio de Economia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, H. Y., & Langpap, C. (2005). Startup costs and the decision to switch from firewood to gas fuel. Land Economics, 81, 570–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, S., & Wittman, H. (2005). State, forest and community: Decentralization of forest administration in Guatemala. In C. J. Pierce Colfer & D. Capistrano (Eds.), The politics of decentralization: Forests, people and power (pp. 282–295). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2006). Global forest resources assessment 2005: Progress towards sustainable forest management. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organizaion of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farjon, A., & Styles, B. T. (1997). Pinus (Pinaceae). Flora Neotropica Monograph 75. New York: New York Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, M. C. (2006). Seeking refuge: Central American migration to Mexico, The United States, and Canada. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garni, A. (2010). Mechanisms of migration: Poverty and social instability in the postwar expansion of Central American migration to the United States. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 8, 316–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist, H. J., & Lambin, E. F. (2001). What drives tropical deforestation?: A meta-analysis of proximate and underlying causes of deforestation based on subnational case study evidence. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: LUCC International Project Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. C. (2001). Forest resources: Institutions for local governance in Guatemala. In J. Burger, E. Ostrom, R. B. Norgaard, D. Policansky, & B. D. Goldstein (Eds.), Protecting the commons: A framework for resource management in the Americas (pp. 71–89). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. C., & Lehoucq, F. E. (2003). The local politics of decentralized environmental policy in Guatemala. Journal of Environment & Development, 12, 28–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greaves, A. (1982). Pinus oocarpa. Forestry Abstracts, 43, 503–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregersen, H. M., Contreras-Hermosilla, A., White, A., & Phillips, L. (2005). Forest governance in federal systems: An overview of experiences and implications for decentralization. In C. J. Pierce Colfer & D. Capistrano (Eds.), The politics of decentralization: Forests, people and power (pp. 13–31). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haack, R. A., & Paiz-Schwartz, G. (1997). Bark beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) outbreak in pine forests of the Sierra de las Minas Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Entomology News, 108, 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, S. (2010). The new rurality: Globalization, peasants and the paradoxes of landscapes. Land Use Policy, 27, 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, S. B., Kandel, S., Gomes, I., Cuellar, N., & Rosa, H. (2006). Globalization, forest resurgence, and environmental politics in El Salvador. World Development, 34, 308–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, S. B., & Saatchi, S. S. (2007). Globalization and forest resurgence: Changes in forest cover in El Salvador. BioScience, 57(8), 663–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heltberg, R. (2005). Factors determining household fuel choice in Guatemala. Environment and Development Economics, 10, 337–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Coss, R. (2005). The U.S.-Mexico remittance corridor: Lessons on shifting from informal to formal transfer systems. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holder, C. D. (2004). Changes in structure and cover of a common property pine forest in Guatemala, 1954–1996. Environmental Conservation, 31, 22–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holder, C. D. (2006). The hydrological significance of cloud forests in the Sierra de las Minas Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Geoforum, 37, 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (1994). X Censo Nacional de Poblacion y V de Habitacion, Departamento de Chiquimula. Guatemala: Instituto Nacional de Estadística.

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2002). XI Censo Nacional de Poblacion y VI de Habitacion 2002. Guatemala: Instituto Nacional de Estadística.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isakson, S. R. (2009). No hay ganancia en la milpa: The agrarian question, food sovereignty, and the on-farm conservation of agrobiodiversity in the Guatemalan highlands. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36, 725–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islebe, G. (1993). Will Guatemala’s Juniperus-Pinus forests survive? Environmental Conservation, 20, 167–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kull, C. A., Ibrahim, C. K., & Meredith, T. C. (2007). Tropical forest transitions and globalization: Neo-liberalism, migration, tourism, and international conservation agendas. Society and Natural Resources, 20, 723–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. M. (2008). Indigenous peoples, representation and citizenship in Guatemalan forestry. Conservation and Society, 6, 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. M., Pacheco, P., Toni, F., & Vallejo, M. (2007). The effects of forestry decentralization on access to livelihood assets. The Journal of Environment and Development, 16, 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra, K., & Kant, S. (2005). Tropical deforestation: A multinomial logistic model and some country-specific policy prescriptions. Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makdissi, P., & Wodon, Q. (2006). Fuel poverty and access to electricity: Comparing households when they differ in needs. Applied Economics, 38, 1071–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Parrado, E. A. (1994). Migradollars: The remittances and savings of Mexican migrants to the United States. Population Research and Policy Review, 13, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayne, J. C. (1999). Neotropical forests: Status and prediction. In L. U. Hatch & M. E. Swisher (Eds.), Managed ecosystems: The Mesoamerican experience (pp. 78–87). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville, T., & Melville, M. (1971). Guatemala: The politics of land ownership. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, E., & Dirzo, R. (1999). Deforestation in Lacandonia (southeast Mexico): Evidence for the declaration of the northernmost tropical hot-spot. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, 1621–1641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monterroso-Rivas, O. (2009). Institutions and public policies for rural development in Guatemala. Cepal Review, 97, 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran-Taylor, M. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2010). Land and leña: Linking transnational migration, natural resources, and the environment in Guatemala. Population and Environment, 32, 198–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndarishikanye, B. (2005). Remittances from Canada to Central America and the Caribbean. In S. Maimbo & D. Ratha (Eds.), Remittances: Development impact and future prospects, (pp. 143–155). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

  • Nygren, A. (2005). Community-based forest management within the context of institutional decentralization in Honduras. World Development, 33, 639–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orellana, C. (2006). Controversial Guatemala forestry scheme underway. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4, 287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orozco, M. (2005a). Migration, money, and markets: The new realities for Central America. In D. F. Terry & S. R. Wilson (Eds.), Beyond small change: Making migrant remittances count (pp. 193–217). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orozco, M. (2005b). Transnationalism and development: Trends and opportunities in Latin America. In S. Maimbo & D. Ratha (Eds.), Remittances: Development impact and future prospects (pp. 307–329). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2001). Reformulating the commons. In J. Burger, E. Ostrom, R. B. Norgaard, D. Policansky, & B. D. Goldstein (Eds.), Protecting the commons: A framework for resource management in the Americas (pp. 17–41). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., & Schlager, E. (1996). The formation of property rights. In S. Hanna, C. Folke, & K. G. Mäler (Eds.), Rights to nature: Ecological, economic, cultural, and political principles of institutions for the environment (pp. 127–156). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perz, S. G., Overdevest, C., Caldas, M. M., Walker, R. T., & Arima, E. Y. (2007). Unofficial road building in the Brazilian Amazon: Dilemmas and models for road governance. Environmental Conservation, 34, 112–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pira, J. P., Marcos, C., & Garzona, E. (1999). Patrones de Uso del Bosque Espinoso Seco, en el Norte del Valle del Motagua. Guatemala: Asociacion de Investigacion y Estudios Sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. (2003). Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 302, 1912–1914.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, S. P. (2002). Communal forests, political spaces: Territorial competition between common property institutions and the state in Guatemala. Space & Polity, 6, 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redo, D., Bass, J. O., & Millington, A. C. (2009). Forest dynamics and the importance of place in western Honduras. Applied Geography, 29, 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, E. V. (1998). Poder Local y Bosques Communales en Totonicapan: Estudio de un Caso. Guatemala: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudel, T. K., Bates, D., & Machinguiashi, R. (2002). A tropical forest transition? Agricultural change, out-migration, and secondary forests in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92, 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sader, S. A., Sever, T., Smoot, J. C., & Richards, M. (1994). Forest change estimates for the northern Petén region of Guatemala–1986–1990. Human Ecology, 22, 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, N. B. (1990). Forest society: A social history of Peten, Guatemala. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shriar, A. (2006). Regional integration or disintegration? Recent road improvements in Peten, Guatemala: A review of preliminary economic, agricultural, and environmental impacts. Geoforum, 37, 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. A., & Gretzinger, S. P. (1996). Timber management of forest patches in Guatemala. In J. Schelhas & R. Greenberg (Eds.), Forest patches in tropical landscapes (pp. 343–365). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, D. (2010). From wage migration to debt migration? Easy credit, failure in El Norte, and foreclosure in a bubble economy of the Western Guatemalan Highlands. Latin American Perspectives, 170, 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tacconi, L. (2007). Decentralization, forests and livelihoods: Theory and narrative. Global Environmental Change, 17, 338–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. J., Moran-Taylor, M. J., & Ruiz, D. R. (2006). Land, ethnic, and gender change: Transnational migration and its effects on Guatemalan lives and landscapes. Geoforum, 37, 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, D. F., & Wilson, S. R. (2005). Beyond small change: Making migrant remittances count. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thillet, B. (2003). Tierras Municipales en Guatemala: Un Desafio para el Desarrollo Local Sostenible. Guatemala: FLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. M. (2008). Changing Forests: Collective Action, Common Property, and Coffee in Honduras. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. M., Randolph, J. C., & Castellanos, E. J. (2007). Institutions, biophysical factors and history: An integrative analysis of private and common property forests in Guatemala and Honduras. Human Ecology, 35, 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urrea, O. S. (1995). Economic and institutional analysis of agroforestry projects in Guatemala. In D. Current, E. Lutz, & S. Scherr (Eds.), Costs, benefits, and farmer adoption of agroforestry: Project experience in Central America and the Caribbean (pp. 96–113). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utting, P. (1993). Trees, people and power: Social dimensions of deforestation and forest protection in Central America. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kempen, L., Muradian, R., Sandóval, C., & Castañeda, J.-P. (2009). Too poor to be green consumers? A field experiment on revealed preferences for firewood in rural Guatemala. Ecological Economics, 68, 2160–2167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wey, L. K., Tucker, C. M., & McConnell, E. D. (2005). Community organization, migration, and remittances in Oaxaca. Latin American Research Review, 40, 83–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vásquez, W. F., & Bohara, A. K. (2010). Household shocks, child labor, and child schooling evidence from Guatemala. Latin American Research Review, 45, 165–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. T. (1976). The urgent need for forest conservation in highland Guatemala. Biological Conservation, 9, 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. T. (1978). Forest preservation in the Western Highlands of Guatemala. The Geographical Review, 68, 417–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villafuerte, H. R. (1987). Estudio de Crecimiento y Rendimiento de Pinus oocarpa Schiede, en San José Las Arada, Chiquimula. M.Sc. Thesis, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala.

  • Willis, K. J., Gillson, L., & Brncic, T. M. (2004). How “virgin” is virgin rainforest? Science, 304, 402–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, H., & Geisler, C. (2005). Negotiating locality: Decentralization and communal forest management in the Guatemalan Highlands. Human Organization, 64, 62–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2004). Poverty in Guatemala. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank José Luis Cerón Sagastume and Valerie Brodar for assistance in the field and logistical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Curtis D. Holder.

Additional information

Readers should send their comments on this paper to BhaskarNath@aol.com within 3 months of publication of this issue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holder, C.D., Chase, G. The role of remittances and decentralization of forest management in the sustainability of a municipal-communal pine forest in eastern Guatemala. Environ Dev Sustain 14, 25–43 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-011-9307-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-011-9307-7

Keywords

Navigation