Abstract
The rural livelihood system in Zambia is essentially agriculture, and agriculture is the main link between people and their environment. Through agricultural activities, people seek to husband the available soil, water and biological resources so as to ‘harvest’ a livelihood for themselves. The aim of this study is to examine Zambian farmers’ awareness and attitude toward the degradation of the environment and their relationships with a set of beliefs to evaluate their perceived capacity to take actions to improve the environment. Results of the study revealed that perception of the severity of environmental degradation had a positive influence on both awareness of and attitude toward land degradation (β = 0.47; p < .001). Perception of susceptibility and benefits significantly influence farmers’ attitude toward environmental degradation (β = 0.51; p < .001). Awareness of environmental degradation is a significant precursor of environmental self-efficacy and behavior (β = 0.38; p < .001). Increasing severity of environmental degradation tends to promote a positive attitude of Zambian farmers toward the environment (β = 0.27; p < .001). Greater awareness of environmental degradation enhances farmers’ capacity in making decisions to improve the situation. Greater environmental awareness leads to greater involvement in land management programs. Greater awareness of the degradation of the environment leads to a more positive environmental behavior. The more individuals are aware of the existence of the degradation of the environment and of its consequences, the more likely they are to do something about it in order to ameliorate the situation (β = 0.36; p < .001). Farmers’ environmental self-efficacy also plays a significant role in their decision to change their behavior. Greater perception of one’s capability to improve the environment is significantly associated with a more positive environmental behavior (β = .39; p < .001).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balmford, A. (2002). Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science, 27, 93–96.
Banzhaf, S. (2003). Accounting for the environment. Resources, 151, 6–10.
Binswanger, M. (2001). Technological progress and sustainable development: What about the re-bound effect? Ecological Economics, 36, 119–132.
Bressers, J. T. A. (2004). Implementing sustainable development: How to know what works, where, when and how. In W. M. Lafferty (Ed.), Governance for sustainable development: The challenge of adapting form to function (Vol. 76, pp. 284–318). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Callan, J. S., & Thomas, J. M. (2007). Environmental economics and management: Theory, policy and applications. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
Dietz, T. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–1912.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2001). SPSS for windows (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Gowdy, J. (2005). Sustainability and collapse: What economics bring to the debate? Global Environmental Change, 10, 117–129.
Hare, B. (2005). Relationship between increases in global mean temperature and impacts on ecosystems, food production, water and socio-economic systems, In Avoiding dangerous climate change. Exeter, U.K.
Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary N.C: SAS Institute.
Maloney, M. P., & Ward, P. (1973). Ecology: Lets hear from the people. American Psychologists, 28(7), 583–586.
Mweemba, L. (2004). The impact of small-scale farming on agricultural land resources in Magoye West settlement. Lusaka: Unza Press.
Mweemba, L. (2008). Environmental degradation and rural poverty in Zambia: A silent alliance. Journal of Applied Science, 3(5), 369–376.
Nath, B. (2007). A heuristic for setting effective standards to ensure global environmental sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability 4:1–15.
O’Brien, M. (2002). Making better environmental decisions: An alternative to risk assessment. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Palmer, J. A. (2003). Environmental education in the 21st century, theory, practice, progress and promise. New York: Routledge Ltd.
Redman, L. C. (1999). Human impact on ancient environments. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Reid, A., & Nikel, J. (2008). Participating and learning perspectives on education and the environment, health and sustainability. Italy: Zanichelli Ltd.
Rodgers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Royal Society. (2005). Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. London: The Royal Society.
Turner, B. L. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 100(14), 8074–8079.
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (1997). African development indicators. Washington D.C: New York.
Vezzoli, C., & Manzini, E. (2008). Design for environmental sustainability. Italy: Zanic Ltd.
Vollebergh, H. R. J., & Kemfert, C. (2005). The role of technological change for a sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 53, 133–147.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Readers should send their comments on this paper to BhaskarNath@aol.com within 3 months of publication of this issue.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, H., Mweemba, L. Environmental self-efficacy, attitude and behavior among small scale farmers in Zambia. Environ Dev Sustain 12, 727–744 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-009-9221-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-009-9221-4