Abstract
The current trend in foreign aid is toward small-scale sustainable development projects in partnership with defined communities. However, these projects are subject to the influences of self-interested human behavior, poorly defined community structures and resources and organizational constraints that can prevent full realization of development models. Under these constraints, attempting participatory community development models to the exclusion of other techniques may not be the most effective way to achieve positive change. Instead, development agencies should consider adopting other proven elements of development in combination with the spirit of community development to achieve a positive impact within the community and organizational structures and ensure accountability for success. A small-scale attempted, sustainable development case study in Rwanda is reviewed, as well as a new concept for larger scale development integrating ‘carbon credits’. Additionally, a development accreditation organization is proposed to ensure additional accountability in this field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barton, T. G., Barton, T. et al. (1997). Our people, our resources: Supporting rural communities in participatory action research on population dynamics and the local environment, IUCN-The World Conservation Union.
Brown, L. D. (2009). Creating credibility: Legitimacy and accountability for transnational civil society. Sterling: Kumarian Press.
CSVBD. (2005). The village earth model for sustainable village-based development, consortium for sustainable village-based development. Consortium for Sustainable Village-Based Development.
Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking Adult.
Easterly, W. (2003). Can foreign aid buy growth? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 23–48. doi:10.1257/089533003769204344.
Easterly, W. (2006). The white man’s burden: Why the west’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much I’ll and so little good. New York: Penguin Press.
Ebrahim, A. (2005). NGOs and organizational change: Discourse, reporting, and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, C., Andersson, K., et al. (2005). The samaritan’s dilemma. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gold, M., Thomas, E., et al. (2007). Development and implementation of the bring your own water treatment system in dense, rural, and mountainous Rwandan communities. Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Development, 2(1), 10–28.
GoR. (2006). Mechanisms for participation and accountability at community and decentralized levels in Rwanda. Kigali: Government of Rwanda.
Hatch, H. (2007). “Workshop seeks mentors to guide Afghanistan’s reconstruction” from http://pubs.asce.org/magazines/ascenews/2007/Issue_08-07/news3.htm.
Hazeltine, B., & Bull, C. (2003). Field guide to appropriate technology. London: Academic Press.
Jordan, L., & van Tuijl, P. (2006). NGO accountability: Politics, principles and innovations. London: Earthscan.
Mayhew, C., & Simmon, R. (2000). “Earth at night” from http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap001127.html.
MWH. (2005). Water treatment principles and design. Hoboken: Wiley.
Smith, C., Feyerabend, B., et al. (1994). The wealth of communities. Sterling: Kumarian Press.
USAID. (2008). Distribution of point of use water treatment product through Mutual Health Organizations in Rwanda: Baseline survey results. Washington: USAID.
WASH (2004). Listening, water supply and sanitation collaborative council.
White, G. (2009). “Water partners international.” Retrieved March 16, 2009, from www.water.org.
White, G., Bradley, D., et al. (1972). Drawers of water: Domestic water use in East Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zaidi, S. (1999). NGO failure and the need to bring back the state. Journal of International Development, 11, 259–271. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199903/04)11:2<259::AID-JID573>3.0.CO;2-N.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank our colleagues at the University of Colorado at Boulder, Engineers without Borders-USA and the Manna Energy Foundation for their tireless efforts to improve the lives of people around the world and for their thoughtful reviews of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Readers should send their comments on this paper to: BhaskarNath@aol.com within 3 months of publication of this issue.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, E., Amadei, B. Accounting for human behavior, local conditions and organizational constraints in humanitarian development models. Environ Dev Sustain 12, 313–327 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-009-9196-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-009-9196-1