Constructing a policy and institutional framework for an ecosystem-based approach to managing the Lower Amazon floodplain

  • David G. McGrath
  • Alcilene Cardoso
  • Oriana T. Almeida
  • Juarez Pezzuti


A regional experiment in co-management is underway in the Lower Amazon that is developing the basic policy and institutional elements for an ecosystem-based approach to floodplain management. This initiative grew out of the grassroots movement of floodplain communities who, concerned with excessive commercial fishing pressure on local fisheries, took control of local lakes and implemented collective agreements regulating fishing activity. This paper describes the main elements of the evolving regional management system. This process has focused on four main dimensions of floodplain settlement and resource use: development of sustainable management systems for floodplain resources, policies and institutions for fisheries co-management, collective agreements for grazing cattle on floodplain grasslands, and a land tenure policy consistent with the objectives of the evolving co-management system. Over the last year INCRA, the National Institute for Colonization and Agrarian Reform, has begun implementation of a comprehensive new land tenure policy that could resolve structural deficiencies in the existing co-management system and provide the basis for the ecosystem-based management of the Lower Amazon floodplain.


Amazon Co-management Ecosystem management Fisheries Floodplain Varzea 



Instituto Brasileiro de Meio-Ambiente e Recursos Renováveis


Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária


Projeto de Assentamento Agro-Extrativista


Termo de Ajuste de Conduta


  1. Almeida, O. T. (2004). Fisheries management in the Brazilian Amazon. Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College London.Google Scholar
  2. Andrade, P. (Ed.). (2005). Projeto Pé de Pincha: Parceria do Futuro para Conservar Quelônios na várzea Amazônica. Manaus: IBAMA, Provárzea, UFAm.Google Scholar
  3. Benatti, J. H. (Ed.). (2005). A Questão Fundiária E O Manejo Dos Recursos Naturais Da Várzea: Análise Para Elaboração De Novos Modelos Jurídicos. Manaus: Provarzea, IBAMA, MMA.Google Scholar
  4. Brazaitis, P., Rebêlo, G. H., Yamashita, C., Odierna, E. A., & Watanabe, M. E. (1996). Threats to Brazilian crocodilian populations. Oryx, 30, 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castello, L. (2004). A method to count pirarucu Arapaimas gigas: Fishers’ assessment and management. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 24, 378–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cortner, H., & Moote, M. (1999). The politics of ecosystem management. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  7. Crossa, M. (2003). Annual Report Varzea Project. Santarém: Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia–IPAM.Google Scholar
  8. da Silveira, R., & Thorbjarnarson, J. B. (1999). Conservation implications of commercial hunting of black and spectacled caiman in the Mamirauá sustainable development reserve, Brazil. Biological Conservation, 88, 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Castro, F. (2002). From myths to rules: The evolution of local management in the Amazonian Floodplain. Environment and History, 8, 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidson, E., & Artaxo, P. (2004). Globally significant changes in biological processes of the Amazon Basin: Results of the large-scale biosphere-atmosphere experiment. Global Change Biology, 10, 519–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grumbine, R. E. (1994). What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology, 8, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grumbine, R. E. (1997). Reflections on “What is ecosystem management?” Conservation Biology, 11, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goulding, M. (1980). The fishes and the forest: Explorations in Amazonian natural history. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Goulding, M., Smith, N. J. H., & Mahar, D. J. (1996). Floods of fortune; ecology and economy along the Amazon. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hall, A. (1997). Sustaining Amazonia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hecht, S., & Cockburn, A. (1989). The fate of the forest. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  17. INCRA. (1996). Conceito e Metodologia para Implantação dos Projetos de Assentamento Agro-Extrativistas (PAES). Brasília: Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária.Google Scholar
  18. INCRA. (1997). Plano de Utilização do Projeto de Assentamento Agroextrativista Remanso. Diretoria de Assentamento. Rio Branco: Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária.Google Scholar
  19. Isaac, V. J., Ruffino, M. L., & McGrath, D. (1998). In search of a new approach to fisheries management in the middle Amazon. In F. Funk, J. Heifetz, J. Ianelli, J. Power, T. Quinn, J. Schweigert, P. Sullivan, & C. I. Zhang (Eds.), Fishery stock assessment models for the 21st century (pp. 889–902). Fairbanks: Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska.Google Scholar
  20. Junk, W., Bayley, P., & Sparks, R. (1989). The pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. In D. P. Dodge (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium (LARS) Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 106 (pp. 110–127). Ottawa: Editora.Google Scholar
  21. Keough, H. L., & Blahna, D. J. (2006). Achieving collaborative, integrative ecosystem management. Conservation Biology, 20, 1373–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Magnusson, W. E., & Mourão, G. (1997). Manejo extensivo de Jacarés no Brasil. In C. Valladares-Padua, R. E. Bodmer & L. Cullen (Eds.), Manejo e Conservação de Vida Silvestre no Brasil (pp. 214–221). Belém: Sociedade Civil Mamirauá.Google Scholar
  23. McGoodwin, J. R. (1990). Crisis in the world’s fisheries. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. McGrath, D. (1997). Biosfera ou biodiversidade: Uma avaliação crítica do paradigma da biodiversidade. Páginas 34–69 in T. Ximenes (Org.) Perspectivas do Desenvolvimento Sustentável: Uma Contribuição para a Amazônia 21. Ufpa: Belém. 33–70.Google Scholar
  25. McGrath, D. G., Cardoso, A., & Sá, E. P. (2004). Community fisheries and co-management on the lower Amazon floodplain. In R. Welcome & T. Petr (Eds.). Proceedings of the second international symposium on the management of large rivers for fisheries (Vol. II. pp. 207–222). FAO and Mekong River Commission.Google Scholar
  26. McGrath, D. G., Castro, F., Futemma, C. R., Amaral, B. D., & Araujo, J. C. (1993a). Fisheries and the evolution of resource management on the lower Amazonian floodplain. Human Ecology, 22, 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McGrath, D., Castro, F., & Futemma, C. R. (1993b). Reservas de lago e manejo comunitário da pesca no Baixo Amazonas: Uma avaliação preliminar. In M. A. D’Incao, & I. M. Silveira (Eds.), A Amazônia e a Crise da Modernização (pp. 389–402). Belém: Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi.Google Scholar
  28. McGrath, D., Castro, F., Camara, E., & Futemma, C. R. T. (1999). Community management of floodplain lakes and the sustainable development of Amazonian fisheries. In C. Padoch, M. Ayres, M. Pinedo-Vasques, & A. Henderson (Eds.), Varzea: Diversity, development, and conservation of Amazonia’s whitewater floodplains. Advances in economic botany, Vol. 13 (pp. 59–82). New York: The New York Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
  29. McGrath, D., & Crossa, M. (1998). Restoration of floodplain lake habitat: A PLEC demonstration project. PLEC News and Views, 11, 10–17.Google Scholar
  30. Meffe, G., Nielsen, L., Knight, R., & Schoenborn, D. (2002). Ecosystem management. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  31. Nepstad, D., Stickler, C., & Almeida, O. T. (2006). Globalization of the Amazon beef and soy industries: Opportunities for conservation. Conservation Biology, 20, 1595–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Odum, E. (1969). The strategy of ecosystem development. Science, 164, 262–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Piñedo-Vasquez, M., Zarin, D., & Jipp, P. (1992). Community forest and lake reserves in the Peruvian Amazon: A local alternative for sustainable use of tropical forests. In D. Nepstad & S. Schwartzman (Eds.), Non-timber products from tropical forests. Advances in economic botany, Vol. 9, pp. 79–86.Google Scholar
  34. Rebêlo, G. H., & Pezzuti, J. C. B. (2001). Percepções sobre o consumo de quelônios na Amazônia: Considerações para o manejo atual. Ambiente e Sociedade, 6/7, 85–104.Google Scholar
  35. Rodrigues, G. S., Buschinelli, C. C., Medeiros, C., Izilda Aparecida Rodrigues, I. A., Silva, M. R., Mello, R., Mattos, L., & Brienza, S. (2007). Avaliação de serviços ambientais em Unidades de Produção Familiar do Pólo Transamazônica (PA) do Programa Proambiente. Manuscript, 4 pp.Google Scholar
  36. Salafsky, N., Margolius, R., & Redford, K. (2001). Adaptive management: A tool for conservation practitioners. Washington, DC: Biodiversity Support Program.Google Scholar
  37. Sen, S., & Nielsen, J. R. (1996). Fisheries co-management: A comparative analysis. Marine Policy, 20, 405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sheikh, P. A. (2002) The impacts of cattle and water buffalo ranching on the Lower Amazon floodplain: An ecological and socioeconomic comparison. Ph.D. Thesis. Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  39. Sheikh, P. A., Merry, F. D., & McGrath, D. G. (2006). Water buffalo and cattle production on the Lower Amazon: Comparisons and conflicts. Agricultural Systems, 87, 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, N. (1974). Destructive exploitation of the South American River Turtle. Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers, 36, 85–120.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, N. (1999). The Amazon River forest. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Sparks, R. E. (1995). Need for ecosystem management of large rivers and their floodplains. Bioscience, 45, 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilson, E. O. (1992). The diversity of life. Belknap: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. WinklerPrins, A. (2006). Jute cultivation in the Lower Amazon, 1940–1990: An ethnographic account from Santarém, Pará, Brazil. Journal of Historical Geography, 32, 818–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. WinklerPrins, A., & McGrath, D. (2000). Smallholder agriculture along the Lower Amazon floodplain, Brazil. PLEC News and Views Australia, 16, 34–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • David G. McGrath
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Alcilene Cardoso
    • 3
  • Oriana T. Almeida
    • 1
    • 3
  • Juarez Pezzuti
    • 1
  1. 1.Nucleo de Altos Estudos Amazonicos (NAEA)Federal University of ParaBelemBrazil
  2. 2.The Woods Hole Research CenterFalmouthUSA
  3. 3.Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazonia (IPAM)SantaremBrazil

Personalised recommendations